How US-China-Russia rivalry is driving blockchain innovation
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
As the geopolitical fault line between the United States, China, and Russia deepens, it is no longer just a battle for dominance over trade routes, semiconductor supremacy, or artificial intelligence (AI). Beneath the surface of this strategic rivalry lies a quieter but equally disruptive contest. The race to dominate the architecture of tomorrow's digital economy. Blockchain, once a fringe innovation associated mostly with digital currency speculation, is quickly becoming a neutral ground and a battleground for systemic innovation, national resilience, and digital infrastructure autonomy.
The friction between these three superpowers is creating pressure and a necessity for critical innovation. As global systems splinter, supply chains decouple, digital payment networks bifurcate, and data ecosystems fracture, blockchain emerges as a tool of self-reliance, accountability, and trustless coordination.
For the U.S., blockchain offers a way to secure and verify essential systems in a world where traditional alliances and global flows of information can no longer be taken for granted. Whether in logistics, energy grids, defense contracting, or public record-keeping, decentralized ledgers can provide tamper-evident audit trails, transparent decision-making processes, and the kind of programmable control that rigid legacy databases lack. With increasing concern over cybersecurity threats and surveillance backdoors, especially from foreign-sourced hardware and software, blockchain's trust-minimization properties provide an alternative to simply hardening borders or banning adversarial technology.
China, on the other hand, is building blockchain-based systems not only as a means of economic modernization but also as instruments of control, efficiency, and global influence. The digital yuan, supported by its state-backed blockchain infrastructure, is already changing how transactions can be monitored and executed at the national level and across borders. By promoting its Blockchain Service Network (BSN) as a low-cost, interoperable platform, China is quietly exporting the foundations of an alternative Internet architecture that may appeal to other authoritarian regimes or even economically desperate countries seeking low-cost digital public goods.
Russia's strategy is distinct but equally calculated. Facing Western sanctions and an increasingly isolated economic position, Russia has turned to blockchain and digital assets as a means of bypassing traditional financial controls. Blockchain enables the Kremlin to conduct international transactions outside the purview of U.S.-dominated systems like SWIFT, providing an economic lifeline. At the same time, Russia is leveraging blockchain to enhance state control, with plans for a digital ruble that can be centrally managed and used in cross-border trade with allied nations outside the dollar's reach. This strategic divergence is driving all three nations to accelerate their blockchain agendas, albeit for different reasons. In the U.S., the private sector and decentralized communities lead the charge, seeking interoperability, openness, and resilience. In China, a centralized but fast-moving state mobilizes its institutions and companies toward efficiency and integration. In Russia, blockchain is a tool of survival and sovereignty, allowing it to sidestep economic isolation while maintaining domestic control.
But the shared outcome is the same. Faster adoption, more serious applications, and the rethinking of trust at the infrastructure level. As traditional institutions like SWIFT, Visa (NASDAQ: V), and national identity systems begin to encounter pressure from politically driven fragmentation, blockchain offers a neutral protocol layer that can survive above the fray. Supply chain management, identity verification, cross-border settlements, and data provenance are all domains under scrutiny for their geopolitical vulnerability. Blockchain transforms these systems from black boxes into transparent, programmable networks of records, where verification does not require trust in any single party.
Moreover, innovation is often born out of friction. With collaboration stalling between the East and West on technologies like AI regulation, semiconductor access, and cross-border data flows, developers, startups, and governments are increasingly turning to blockchain as a way to design systems that are more sovereign, interoperable, and accountable. Micropayments, decentralized cloud storage, secure voting, and tokenized assets are gaining momentum not as speculative experiments but as practical solutions in a multipolar, mistrustful world.
The very fracture that threatens global unity is catalyzing the rise of technologies that may help rebuild trust, but this time through math and code instead of treaties and diplomacy. The blockchain revolution is no longer just about replacing money. It is about replacing the fragile trust models that once held the globalized world together. The deeper the divide between Washington, Beijing, and Moscow, the more urgently the rest of the world will look for infrastructure that does not force a choice between them.
Blockchain could be that infrastructure—a neutral layer where neither the United States, China, or Russia can impose absolute control. It is a technological foundation that can rebuild trust in a world of suspicion and fragmentation. The rivalry between these superpowers may be destabilizing, but it is also an accelerant, driving humanity toward a new digital architecture. In this contest, blockchain may become not just a tool of economic strategy but a pillar of global stability.
Watch: The most successful organizations are ones with best culture
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Hidden invasion: Rwanda's covert war in the Congo
Open secret From the start, Rwanda has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal its intervention in the Kivu provinces in eastern Congo, which went from a couple of hundred soldiers in 2021 to an estimated 5,000 today. But there have been lapses in Rwanda's secrecy. In May 2022, Congolese forces announced they had captured two Rwandan soldiers who had entered the country. Rwanda denied this, claiming the soldiers were kidnapped across the border. NBC News obtained a Rwandan military report that admitted that these soldiers were captured while taking part in an M23 attack on barracks at Rumangabo military base. The internal report says members of the Rwanda Defence Force crossing the border were supposed to leave cellphones behind and strip identifying insignia from their uniforms. It recommends punishment for the soldiers' commander for failing to ensure the captured soldiers did so. In a bid to remove witnesses, Rwandan soldiers forced Congolese villagers to evacuate areas they occupied, according to a contractor hired to provide intelligence for the Congolese military. Operations like this drove hundreds of thousands from their homes. 'This is not business as usual in the DRC,' Antoine Sagot-Priez, DRC country director for the aid agency Concern Worldwide, said in March, commenting on the mass displacement. 'We need people to know what is happening here.' These villagers ended up living in 17 camps around the city of Goma, the capital of Congo's North Kivu province, that would eventually swell to hold 400,000 to 500,000 people. Reports drawn up by the same contractor state that Rwandan forces were moving their mortars in and out of Congo — sometimes each day — apparently to avoid detection. Rwandan soldiers also often don outfits usually worn by the M23 rebels. Much of the information used in this report was compiled by Western military experts, who included former French army officers, Romanians, Poles and Bulgarians, hired by Congo's President Felix Tshisekedi in 2022 when he realized his army was disastrously losing ground. They were assigned the task of protecting cities in the east and providing Congo's artillery with key information — thanks to a small fleet of Chinese drones. In March 2023, these new hires helped turn the tables on the Rwandans attacking the town of Sake, west of Goma, by hitting their mortar positions with Sukhoi fighter jets. The entire Rwandan force in Congo withdrew the following day. Military contractors believe this was the moment Rwanda — one of Africa's poorest states and heavily dependent on foreign aid — went on an international military shopping spree, placing orders in Poland and Turkey for sophisticated anti-missile systems, drones and signal-jamming equipment. Then in late 2023, Rwandan forces began returning to Congo. This time the numbers were 10 times higher than before — 3,000 to 5,000 men, according to the same military contractor. The Congolese army put its new drones to devastating use. Satellite imagery shows a sudden, dramatic increase in the number of graves at Kanombe Military Cemetery, Rwanda's main military burial ground in the capital, Kigali. It expanded by some 350 graves between mid-2023 and early 2024, according to a manual count carried out by NBC News. The images also show that from late 2021 to today, the cemetery has added 900 graves, even though the country says it is not engaged in any military conflict in Congo. Rwanda's government spokesperson declined to comment on the fresh graves, saying: 'Speculation about a military cemetery in Kigali has no basis in reality.' The DRC's air superiority did not last long. According to senior Congolese army officers, Rwanda used the opportunity presented by a U.S.-negotiated truce to install Chinese-made Yitian anti-missile systems in Congo. The addition in early 2024 of GPS-jamming equipment turned the war's tide, making it nearly impossible for the DRC's hired contractors to deploy their drone fleet. 'The new equipment changed everything,' said Gen. Sylvain Ekenge, a Congolese army spokesman. 'When we were asked by the Americans for a ceasefire to calm things down, the Rwandans used it as a chance to bring in these systems.'
Evening Standard
13 hours ago
- Evening Standard
Four dead in Kyiv after Russia hits Ukraine with missile and drone attacks in 'revenge' strike
In a signal that he believed the attack was supported by Kyiv's Western allies, he added it involved "provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession".
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
NATO allies agree huge spending boost as US demands they are 'ready' for Russia
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth demanded GDP members of NATO be 'combat-ready' or risk losing US support amid escalating security concerns over Russia's aggression NATO allies will increase defence spending to five per cent of GDP, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has said. The American also demanded that members of the organisation be 'combat-ready' or risk losing US support amid escalating security concerns over Russia 's aggression. Speaking ahead of a NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels yesterday, Hegseth emphasised that the alliance must move beyond symbolic gestures. He said: 'The commitment is there. Five per cent on defence spending. When you consider the threats that we face, the urgency in the world, it's critical. We don't need more flags. We need more fighting formations. We don't need more conferences. We need more capabilities. Hard power.' The call for a sharp increase from the current NATO guideline of two per cent has gained support across Europe and Canada, but places pressure on countries like the UK. The government currently spends around two per cent of GDP on defence but faces growing demands to raise that figure to at least three per cent, or even 3.5 per cent, to maintain good relations with Washington. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has promised to raise spending to three per cent when economic conditions allow, though no timeline has been set. Dutch Prime Minister and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte echoed Hegseth's urgency. 'The expectation is that on the European side of NATO and the Canadian side of NATO, if we think that we can keep ourselves safe sticking with the two per cent, forget it,' he said. 'Yes, the next three to five years, but then we are in great difficulty. And the US rightly expects us to spend much more to defend ourselves with their help, but also to equalise, which is only fair with what the US is spending on defence.' Rutte also highlighted the financial challenge. He added: 'All these investments have to be financed.' NATO ministers were set to approve 'capability targets' - detailed goals for each of the 32 member nations to purchase priority weapons and equipment, including air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, drones, and strategic enablers like air-to-air refuelling and heavy transport. Each nation's plan remains classified. The targets stem from a 2023 NATO blueprint aimed at countering threats from Russia or other major adversaries. NATO plans to maintain up to 300,000 troops ready to deploy to the alliance's eastern flank within 30 days, though experts doubt the allies can yet muster such forces effectively. The member countries are assigned defensive roles across three zones: the Arctic and North Atlantic, central Europe north of the Alps, and southern Europe. The timeline to meet these capability targets is within five to ten years - a timeframe NATO believes necessary given Russia's ongoing military build-up, which could accelerate if Western sanctions ease or a peace deal ends the war in Ukraine. 'We are going to gather here again and say 'okay, we failed a bit,' and then maybe we start learning Russian?' Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovilė Šakalienė warned, highlighting fears of a premature Russian strike on NATO territory. Swedish Defence Minister Pål Jonson stressed the importance of the current moment: 'We also know that after an armistice or a peace agreement, of course, Russia is going to allocate more forces closer to our vicinity. Therefore, it's extremely important that the alliance use these couple of years now when Russia is still limited by its force posture in and around Ukraine.' The Netherlands, for example, is planning to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said the country expects to purchase more tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and long-range missile systems such as the US-made Patriot missiles capable of targeting aircraft, cruise missiles, and short-range ballistic missiles. The UK currently spends 2.3 per cent of GDP on defence and has committed to raising this to 2.5 per cent by 2027. The government has set an ambition to then increase it to three per cent by 2034. The Office for Budget Responsibility has estimated that reaching three per cent of GDP by 2030 would cost the UK government an additional £17.3 billion. In the 2024/25 financial year, the UK spent £56.9 billion on defence, increasing to £59.8 billion in 2025/26 According to 2024 figures, Poland was the top military spender as a share of its economy for the second year running. It's forecast to spend 4.1 per cent of the gross domestic product (GDP) - the total value of goods and services produced. Estonia was in second place at 3.4 per cent with the US in third place at 3.4 per cent, which is about the same level as it has been spending for the last decade. The UK came ninth on the list with 2.3 per cent. The average for NATO members in Europe and Canada is estimated at 2.0 per cent. If the UK were to pay five per cent of its GDP to NATO, taxpayers would be hit with a £128 billion bill.
