Agency could intervene to cull estate's red deer
The Scottish government has used a legal power for the first time to force the owners of a Highland estate to cull red deer on their land.
The compulsory deer management control scheme could see Scotland's nature agency, NatureScot, step in to reduce numbers of the animals on Loch Choire Estate in Sutherland.
There are concerns grazing by deer is damaging mossy peatland called blanket bog at four sites of special scientific interest (SSSI).
NatureScot said the action was approved by Agriculture Minister Jim Fairlie and taken after a voluntary agreement on a cull could not be reached.
The estate's Shropshire-based owners have 28 days to lodge an appeal against the control scheme.
Gamekeepers 'spared torment' of pregnant deer cull
Why are large numbers of red deer being killed?
NatureScot had 160 deer culled on the estate in 2023 because it said the owners failed to manage their numbers.
The deer were processed for venison.
NatureScot said further action was needed and the estate could now be targeted with the first compulsory deer management control scheme under the Deer (Scotland) Act 1996.
The Scottish government wants the deer density on Loch Choire Estate reduced from 14 deer per square km to 7.5 within five years.
Failure to do so could see NatureScot carry out a cull and recover the costs from the estate.
The estate's owners could also be guilty of an offence under the rules of the scheme.
Robbie Kernahan, NatureScot's director of green economy, said high numbers of deer could have negative impacts on woodlands, peatlands and other habitats.
"We will always favour a voluntary and collaborative approach to deer management, working in cooperation with partners towards this shared goal," he said.
"However, we will use our intervention powers as a last resort in cases such as this, where despite significant efforts we have been unable to secure the required commitment and action through voluntary means."
More stories from the Highlands and Islands
News from the Highlands and Islands on BBC Sounds
NatureScot said habitats on four SSSIs on or around Loch Choire Estate were at risk.
One of the sites, Ben Kilbreck, near Altnaharra, has rocks that originated as muddy and sandy sediments in an ancient sea about one billion years ago.
Mallart SSSI is dominated by blanket bog, which provides habitat to otters and birds including golden eagles and black-throated divers.
Truderscaig is listed as a nationally important site for birds called greenshank, while Skinsdale Peatlands SSSI has extensive "carpets" of bog moss.
Deer culls credited with green loch wood recovery
Culling deer 'protects' mountain habitats
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'The Camilla Massacre continues' … divided citizens confront Camilla leadership days after mayor's arrest
CAMILLA – Just three days after his release from the Mitchell County Jail, Camilla Mayor Kelvin Owens addressed a crowded city hall during a called council meeting, Monday. The meeting's intent, Owens said, was to keep the public informed on the ongoing legal situation involving himself, City Clerk Cheryl Ford and Election Superintendent Rhunette Williford. The three were arrested on election interference and other charges on May 28 then released on bond last Friday. At Monday's meeting, an Atlanta-based transactional attorney spoke over Zoom and shared her legal opinion that under a Camilla ordinance, the city is obligated to pay for the trio's legal fees. The mayor confirmed that a written request for this payment was submitted to the city attorney. 'The basis of it (the ordinance) is that if you are a city official, or an employee, an elected official, and you're operating within your job and your title, then there should be some degree of support if you're doing that particular job,' Owens said during the press conference. 'No employee or elected official should feel threatened in operating within the scope of their job. Dozens showed up in support of the mayor and to speak out against what they believe is systemic racism plaguing the city. A smaller minority showed up and rebutted racist accusations. They expressed concerns over corruption, citing November's canceled – and then resumed – special election among other matters. Despite the mayor's attempt at transparency to Camilla citizens, the meeting ended with a clear divide – one that Camilla's black residents say is ingrained in the city's history. Camilla's City Hall was so packed Monday, that people brought foldable camping chairs to sit outside the council room, leaning toward the door to listen to what was happening inside. Charlie Will Dixon, an 80-year-old lifelong Mitchell County resident, made sure to have a front row seat in the room. When public comment began, he rose slowly, using a walker to make his way to the podium. 'The reason we are here today is because the Camilla massacre continues in Mitchell County,' Dixon said. 'It started in 1868, and it hasn't ceased yet. It's carrying on because of racist white people in this community.' Charlie Will Dixon talks about systemic racism in Mitchell County during a special called meeting Monday. Staff Photo: Lucille LanniganThe so-called 'Camilla Massacre' took place on Sept. 19, 1968. It was a violent episode of Reconstruction in Georgia. Hundreds of black people and a few white people marched from Albany to Camilla to attend a Republican political rally. As the marchers entered the courthouse square, white people opened fire on the group, shooting and killing about a dozen and wounding nearly 30. White people reportedly continued to assault the group as they marched back to Albany. This violence intimidated many black people who remained home on Election Day, and white leaders reportedly misplaced black votes through fraud at the polls, therefore sweeping the election. This history wasn't directly addressed by the city until 1998. 'My great-great grandparents were shot and ran off the street in Mitchell County,' Dixon said. 'During that week … white people in Mitchell paraded through the black community to make sure they didn't come to vote. … It's the same thing being carried on today. They don't want blacks in political positions. They don't want us to vote.' Camilla's council consists of a black mayor, three black councilmen, two white councilmen and a white councilwoman. Owens said when he took office, along with three black councilmen, in 2022 that they formed the 'first progressive, black voting block' in a city where 68% of its roughly 5,000 residents are black. Owens told The Albany Herald in November that not everyone was happy about this voting power of four black men. Tensions followed as lawsuits challenging residency of two black councilmen, demands that a black Councilman's name be removed from a November 2024 special election ballot because of these residency issues, and a canceled – then resumed – special election that led to election interference arrests. Several Camilla residents showed up at Monday's meeting to deny racist intentions from community members. 'It's not about race,' Camilla resident Joe Marsh said. 'It's about what's right and what's wrong. If you know you're going to break the law, then you suffer the consequences.' On a Facebook page called 'Camilla for Transparency,' anonymous residents break down concerns about inappropriate spending and misused city funds. In January, the group posted against the Cobblestone Hotel project. At a January meeting, the council discussed the prospect of issuing a $13 million bond for constructing the hotel. Commenters on the Facebook page were adamant that it would be a misuse of taxpayer money. Charlette Wimberly, a 50-year-old Camilla resident, said she believes the mayor and three council members are doing what's best for the city but are constantly being challenged by a divided council and city. 'The city has progressed more in the last six years than it ever has,' Wimberly told The Albany Herald. 'We've been moving forward … vs. where we were this time 10 years ago. There were no amenities for the citizens … council members voted against them. Wimberly said she's been most impressed by the new Community Resource Center, which houses the Boys & Girls Club. The project was estimated to cost about $2.5 million in 2022, fully funded by the city. Charlette Wimberly urges the city to put aside 'black and white' and work together as a city. Staff Photo: Lucille Lannigan'That was a dilapidated gym that kids had been playing in for years and years,' Wimberly said. 'They tore that gym down, and now the kids have a modern facility to do things in.' She said she also feels current city leadership is finally supporting its senior residents. On Friday, the first Senior Citizen Sneaker Gala was held. Mayor Owens attended the event on the same day he was released from jail. 'We'd been planning this for months, and I thought it was important for me to be there,' he said. 'Even though I was tired, and there was a lot happening in my life at the time, I had to remind myself that it's not about me. I recognized that showing up for this Sneaker Ball would be important for our seniors.' Owens said showing up for Camilla's citizens is what he plans to continue doing, 'until something changes.' He maintains that the indictment is just an accusation. Owens told The Albany Herald in November that he used emergency powers to cancel the November special election after the elections superintendent resigned the night before. Williford and Ford cited 'mental duress, stress and coercion experienced by recent court decisions' regarding their role in elections and a 'requirement to violate our oath of office' as reasons for resignation in a November letter. Two council members challenged the city's obligation to pay legal fees. 'In my opinion, the allowance of paying city attorneys and fines and penalties and so forth to individuals that are voting for this to enrich themselves is totally and absolutely against the law,' Councilman W.D. Palmer said. Councilwoman Azalee Vereen said her priority is what's in the best interest of the city, and court costs approaching $123,000 would create a financial burden. 'I love this city. I've been living here for 34 years, and it makes me sad that we are here today,' Vereen said. 'But this is not racial in the eyes of the district attorney, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the Mitchell County grand jury. This is a criminal prosecution.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Reform win Scotland's Hamilton by-election? Our experts make their predictions
The major problem for Unionist parties in Scottish by-elections is that the SNP invariably hoovers up something like 30 per cent of the popular vote. Infuriatingly for their opponents this tends to be the case no matter how poor its record in government has been. And remember the SNP has been the Scottish Government since 2007 since when it has become better known for its foul-ups – especially on issues like the NHS and education – than for successes. With normally such a head start for the Nats, Labour, Tories, Lib Dems – and this time Reform UK – are left to share out the remainder amongst themselves, meaning that all too often the SNP gets the prize. And last time it helped them to comfortably win this seat, Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall, with nearly 50 per cent of the vote. This time the contest has been unique in that policies, per se, have played little part in it. Nigel Farage and Reform have basically confined themselves to insisting that they're not Labour, Tory, Lib Dem or SNP but that they will provide 'Change'. And that's it. For their part all the others have concentrated on attacking Nigel Farage for being, well, Nigel Farage, even if he's not his party's candidate here. They've sought to conjure up an image of Reform's leader as an extreme Right-wing, racist bogey man – a character assassination that he constantly denies but which he shrugs off while accepting that it gets him talked about. But as Labour showed in last year's general election 'Change' works and now seems to be helping Reform. However, there are two wars being fought in this by-election – a ground war, on the doorsteps with continuous canvassing as well as an air war in the mass media. In spite of numerous defections from other parties, as the new boys on the block, Reform doesn't have anything like the foot soldiers required to fight an effective ground war. But Mr Farage's stardom – or notoriety if you prefer – means Reform is getting masses of broadcast, online and newspaper coverage in the air war. But while the SNP, Labour and Tories know who their traditional supporters are it is pretty much a shot in the dark for Reform. They think they're doing well but can't be sure. The SNP is a formidable election-fighting machine and is defending a huge majority won last time by a popular minister whose death caused this by-election, even if its present candidate lost in her last two contests. Meanwhile Labour reckon their strength on the doorsteps has been helped by having a popular local candidate, even if he's been shielded from too much media attention. The result may well be very close but it looks and smells like an SNP victory. Labour is desperate to be second and is praying that it gets its vote out. But failing to be runners-up, almost certainly behind Reform, will count as a major humiliation for Sir Keir Starmer and Scottish leader Anas Sarwar. A Labour Party friend forwarded me an email from his party today, which appealed for help in the last 24 hours of campaigning in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse Scottish parliamentary by-election. The only problem with the message is that it features a photo of a large billboard being used by Labour in the final days of the campaign. The first word on that billboard? Reform. 'REFORM CAN'T WIN', it reads. 'THE SNP DON'T DESERVE TO'. For an invitation to voters to cast a positive vote for Labour, you need to wait for the third sentence in the lower half of the advert. In advance of the actual result, we can be sure of only two things: that Labour has thrown every resource it possibly can at this campaign. And also that it isn't going to win. In fact it is more likely to come third, behind the SNP and Reform. This should not be the case: Labour's publicity is right. Having governed Scotland for 18 years, and having governed badly, the SNP certainly doesn't deserve a victory. Nevertheless, having skilfully led his party out of the choppy waters made more hazardous by his two predecessors, first minister John Swinney could reap the benefits of being a distinct improvement on both Humza Yousaf and Nicola Sturgeon. The bar is set dreadfully low in Scottish politics. But will his party win in a seat that has been SNP since 2011? Bookies and commentators reckon this is the most likely outcome, narrowly ahead of Reform, which has become an unlikely challenger. In the 1990s, polling organisations blamed 'shy Tory voters' for the inaccuracy of polls that skewed in Labour's favour. Given the public hostility to all things Tory, at least some voters chose to deny the party in public while quietly voting for them in the privacy of the polling booth. It would not be unreasonable to suggest that the same phenomenon might work in Reform's favour. In Left-wing, right-on, progressive Scotland, no one would dare admit publicly to supporting Nigel Farage's party. But they might vote for them anyway, once they've been issued with their ballot paper and the thin curtain has safely closed behind them. That's what Farage is counting on, in the hope that Reform's disadvantage over the other two parties in terms of organisational experience will be outweighed by disgruntled Scots wishing a plague on both Labour's and the SNP's houses. In private, of course. And it could conceivably happen. In British politics Hamilton will always be remembered for the 1967 by-election when Winnie Ewing won the Westminster seat. Scotland's Labour-Tory duopoly was torn asunder giving the SNP elected representatives at Westminster and Holyrood ever since. Although Labour won the Commons constituency in July 2024 the Scottish Parliament seat was held by the SNP's Christina McKelvie until her untimely death in March this year. A year ago Labour could have been expected to win a by-election, but their candidate, Davy Russell, has been heavily chaperoned by his minders, nervous about him defending Keir Starmer's highly unpopular policies. Declining to take part in Monday's televised debate, only the SNP and Reform candidates appeared live. The SNP's Katy Loudon has already been branded a serial loser of two previous elections, while Reform UK's Ross Lambie was a Tory councillor until March. Voters are said to be 'scunnered' with the mainstream parties, causing expectations of Lambie coming second. That would send a shockwave through the Holyrood establishment. Yet such has been the welcoming response for Reform on the door steps a victory cannot be ruled out. Nigel Farage said he was hopeful of coming second but winning was 'improbable' – a perfect example of expectation management. The Tories will be pleased to save their deposit. In 1967 Scots singer Lulu was top of the charts with To Sir with love. If the punters of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse send Farage's man to Holyrood it could be the beginning of a Scottish love affair causing Farage to dance a Highland jig. Brian Monteith is a former member of the Scottish and European parliaments Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ten jewels of English nature at risk from development and Labour's planning bill
More than 5,000 of the rarest and most precious natural habitats in England are at risk of being destroyed under Labour's new planning bill, according to legal analysis of the legislation. Here are just 10 irreplaceable wild places currently or recently imperilled by development that are likely to face renewed threats if the current wildlife protections are torn up by the government's bill. The best site in Britain for the endangered nightingale, Lodge Hill was made a site of special scientific interest (SSSI) in 2013. But the following year it was earmarked for 5,000 new homes – the biggest attempt to build on an SSSI in England since the wildlife laws of 1981 came into force. After widespread protests from ecologists and nature charities, Homes England withdrew its plans and said it would develop just 500 houses on the former MoD land, outside the SSSI. The scrubby, song-filled paradise of dense woodland and grassland is renowned for its bat roosts, exceptional reptile population, rare butterflies, flowers and three species of owl. But in an area under huge housing pressure, the site that was once used for bomb disposal training and is classified as 'brownfield' is likely to be targeted for development once more. The mudflats and coastal meadows of Tipner West are an internationally important place for waders such as black-tailed godwit and dunlin, as well as a wealth of intertidal marine life. As part of Portsmouth harbour and the wider Solent, it is home to 30% of Britain's overwintering population of brent geese. The area is protected not only as a SSSI but also a special protection area (SPA) and Ramsar site – the highest tier of protection. However, in 2019, Portsmouth city council proposed a 'super peninsula' on the site – a large-scale land reclamation project for housing that would have destroyed vast swathes of habitat. After 24,000 people objected, the council withdrew that plan but has continued to push for land reclamation and housebuilding that jeopardises vital intertidal habitats. Under current laws, SPAs and Ramsar sites can be built on only if there are 'imperative reasons of overriding public interest' and no feasible alternatives. If building went ahead, the council would also have to create new mudflats and coastal meadows on a significantly greater scale than the area damaged. Such a high bar has never been hurdled by mere housing, and this spring the government rejected the council's request. The council is now exploring how it can continue its development plans. Sources say housing minister Matthew Pennycook is interested in Tipner West being one of the first developments to happen if the planning bill goes through, when the council will be able to pay into a nature restoration fund and no longer obliged to provide alternative habitats nearby. The Humber estuary has almost every conservation protection going – SPA, SAC, SSSI – while also being a major shipping channel. Remarkably, it's also responsible for 20% of all surface drainage in the UK. The habitats regulations have helped protect its natural functioning for decades, ensuring that docks expansions and sea defence projects don't destroy vital mudflats, sand flats and salt marsh for overwintering birds and declining breeding species such as little terns. Spurn Point, Yorkshire's own Land's End, is a hugely popular national nature reserve whose visitors contribute to the local economy. Planning reforms could disrupt the partnership between port, business and housing interests that has enabled economic development alongside wildlife protection. Further south, the similarly important Wash estuary is threatened by a tidal barrage proposal which says it has funding to pursue a development consent order. Thetford, a rapidly growing town of 25,000 with a 5,000-home urban extension under way, is surrounded by SSSIs, special areas of conservation (SACs) and the Brecks SPA. This unique region of sandy heaths and dry grassland is home to 72 species found nowhere else in Britain. It is of European-wide importance for rare plants, invertebrates and birds including curlew, nightjar, woodlark and stone curlew. Rare and declining species here include turtle dove, goshawk, long-eared owl and lesser spotted woodpecker. Birds such as nightjar and woodlark occur at lower densities in areas surrounded by housing, while heaths close to urban areas suffer from increased fire risk, trampling, disturbance by dog walkers, water pollution from dog fouling, and air pollution from road traffic. At the moment, there are protection zones for the stone curlews with no development permitted within 1,500m of a nesting site. Thanks partly to this protection, populations have increased. Under the new planning bill, however, developers can disregard such protections if they pay into a new nature restoration fund. An ecological assessment of Thetford's local plan said 'the proximity of the Breckland European site's boundary to the edge of the town in most directions remains a fundamental issue to overcome' before further homes can be built. A vulnerable wetland SSSI, the Wolborough Fen nature reserve is home to emperor dragonfly, sphagnum moss and 30 species of bird. It sits beside a major development of 1,200 new homes on the edge of Newton Abbot, which is earmarked to take a huge chunk of new homes planned for the region. Devon Wildlife Trust has warned a new road could jeopardise the wetland. A tranche of the development, for 150 homes, was rejected by planners in December because of concerns about damage to the wetland. Police were called in April when residents accused developer Vistry Homes of breaching the restrictions on its planning approvals. Local people blocked the bulldozers digging close to the nature reserve and the council issued a stop notice to halt the work. Kate Van Dike of Wolborough Residents Association and campaign group Newton Says No said: 'There was no feeling of trespass, just a united sense of [people] having the courage of their convictions. 'The residents will continue to highlight unlawful acts by developers and call out any abdication of responsibility from the local planning authority who have a fundamental duty to protect an ancient and precious woodland, a hidden gem that is rare in the UK, with some species that can be found in only a few other sites in Europe.' Just 2.5% of Britain's ancient woodland – land continuously wooded since 1600 – survives. It represents an irreplaceable combination of veteran trees, undisturbed soils, fungal networks and rare flora. Two separate applications by Quinn Estates for 8,400 new homes, a hotel, rubbish tip, relief road and primary and secondary schools are subject to a planning hearing after Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, 'called in' proposals hours before they were set to be rejected by Swale borough council last November. According to Kent Wildlife Trust and the Woodland Trust, the plans entail the direct loss of ancient woodland, local wildlife sites and priority habitats including species-rich hedgerows and traditional Kentish orchards. The developments will also place indirect pressure – from pollution and people – on nearby Cromers Wood and Tonge Mill country park. Vulnerable species that would be directly affected include water vole, otter, yellowhammer, corn bunting, grey partridge and the critically endangered turtle dove. More than 700 local people have objected to the plans, which could sail through under the new legislation. Vast swathes of nature-rich heathland have been lost to housing over recent decades, because it is relatively cheap land and easy to build on. The surviving fragments of the Surrey Heaths – including Colony Bog and Bagshot Heath, Ash to Brookwood Heaths and Chobham Common – have historically been protected as SSSIs. They are part of the Thames Basin SPA, protected by the habitats regulations, which seeks to maintain internationally important bird populations of nightjar, woodlark and Dartford warbler. All of these species nest on or close to the ground and so are highly vulnerable to people-pressure, especially from dog – walkers. Under current planning laws, new homes close to vulnerable wildlife sites must provide suitable natural green space nearby so new residents don't disturb those sites. Under the new bill, developers will be able to pay to create such green spaces further away – potentially in other counties. Even if wildlife sites are not built on, this risks creating more disturbance leading to local extinctions of vulnerable species. Becky Pullinger, head of land use planning at the Wildlife Trusts, said: 'Places like the New Forest and the Surrey Heaths could be threatened by development that no longer has to avoid harm to those specific sites. On the Surrey Heaths, the clear impact the development can have is more people walking their dogs which can impact on birds in the area. Plans to hugely expand Southampton's container port and reclaim land on the New Forest side of Southampton Water were first rejected back in 2004. Doubling the capacity of the port would destroy grazing marshes and mudflats that provide nesting for lapwing and winter homes for 50,000 birds such as wigeon and pintail. The area is an SPA and contains several SSSIs, with Dibden Bay designated for its nationally important collection of invertebrates including 21 nationally rare species. The plans for a 1.85km-long deep quay would have destroyed 76 hectares (188 acres) of tidal foreshore designated as of international importance for birds. Associated roads would also threaten the New Forest national park. After being called in by the government, the then transport minister, Tony McNulty, accepted the planning inspector's recommendation to reject the proposals after a 13-month inquiry. In 2023, owners Associated British Ports refused to rule out another attempt to develop the 500-acre site but said any new planning application was 'many years away'. Under the new bill, mitigating for irreparable damage to protected sites caused by major infrastructure would become much simpler, making schemes such as Dibden Bay much more viable. A mosaic of woodlands that is home to a super-colony of rare barbastelle bats, the Wensum Woodlands has long been threatened by a 3.8-mile dual carriageway that would complete a third ring-road around Norwich. A series of connected colonies, including one of more than 105 barbastelles, live either on the route or close to the proposed road. The area is being considered for designation as a SSSI by Natural England, which has previously designated sites with just 20 or 30 colonies. In 2023, the government committed to paying for 80% of the road scheme, but cash-strapped Norfolk county council announced this year that Natural England's advice on the wildlife impacts meant it could not proceed with the £274m road, and withdrew its application. Landowners and developers have strongly pushed for the road, which they say will 'unlock' land for businesses and housing. The planning and infrastructure bill is likely to revive many such 'zombie' road projects. Earlier this year, Keir Starmer claimed that plans for 15,000 new homes in Ebbsfleet had been stymied by the discovery of the rare distinguished jumping spider, and blocked by Natural England. 'It's nonsense, and we'll stop it,' said the prime minister. In fact, the prime minister was talking nonsense: the vast majority of the 15,000 homes are being built, but 1,300 homes planned for Swanscombe Peninsula have been blocked. The peninsula – a portion of land on the fringe of the Ebbsfleet garden city project – was designated a SSSI by Natural England in 2021 because of its globally important collection of rare invertebrates. Nearly 2,000 species have been found at Swanscombe, making it one of the most biodiverse places in Britain. The existing planning regime has enabled a compromise, with thousands of new homes being built and the relatively modest SSSI protected. Under the planning bill, even SSSIs could be built upon in exchange for developers paying into the nature restoration fund, administered by Natural England which is both the executor and beneficiary of such schemes.
