Education Department slashes grants for training teachers on ‘divisive ideologies'
The Education Department said on Monday it is slashing grants for training teachers because the programs focused on 'divisive ideologies.'
The department cut $600 million to these programs it says focused on topics such as critical race theory, diversity, equity and inclusion, social justice, anti-racism, white privilege and white supremacy.
The agency gave examples from grant applications such as a program that required 'practitioners to take personal and institutional responsibility for systemic inequities (e.g., racism) and critically reassess their own practices.'
'Building historical and sociopolitical understandings of race and racism to interrupt racial marginalization and oppression of students in planning instruction relationship building discipline and assessment,' another program description read, according to the department.
The cuts build on the hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts the department has cut from the Institute of Education Sciences, which focuses on education research and administers tests such as the National Assessment of Education Progress.
'It's hard to overstate how radical these teacher trainings are — we are talking about forcing teachers to talk about their race at work, asking educators to 'take personal and institutional responsibility for systemic inequities,' promoting abolitionist teaching practices and defining equity as equal outcomes. And not for nothing but all we see are declining outcomes for the students that these trainings purport to help most,' said Erika Sanzi, director of outreach at Parents Defending Education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'What The F**k...': Watch Joe Rogan And Trump's FBI Director React To Musk's Post
Podcaster Joe Rogan — while recording an interview with conspiracy theorist and FBI Director Kash Patel on Thursday — was stunned as the two learned of billionaire Elon Musk's post linking Donald Trump to the Jeffrey Epstein files. 'What the fuck are they doing?' said Rogan, who's been credited for aiding Trump on his way to victory last year. Rogan read Musk's 'really big bomb' on the president word for word. 'Jesus Christ!' he remarked. Patel swiftly backed away from the topic. 'I'm not participating in any of that conversation between Elon and —,' said Patel, before cutting himself off. 'Someone should take his phone away,' Rogan said of Musk, before noting that Trump declared that he was 'disappointed' in the billionaire. He continued, 'Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?' Patel shrugged off the inquiry. 'I don't know how he would, but I'm just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing, that's way outside my lane,' he said. 'I know my lane and that ain't it.' Rogan has previously described Musk as 'the great and powerful' while promoting the billionaire's appearance on his podcast in early November. He declared at the time that Musk made 'the most compelling case' for Trump just before rolling out his endorsement of the president. On Friday, Trump seemingly acknowledged Musk's post tying him to Epstein by reposting a statement by Epstein's former attorney David Schoen, who wrote that he asked the disgraced financier if he had any information 'to hurt' the president, to no avail. Epstein hired Schoen just nine days before he died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump has previously denied being on Epstein's plane or island. The two were spotted together on a number of occasions back in the '80s and '90s. Trump And Musk's 'Public Meltdown' Sparks 1 Gravely Concerning Question, Expert Says Trump Administration Asks Supreme Court To Leave Mass Layoffs At Education Department In Place Seth Meyers Points Out The Strangest Part Of Elon Musk And Trump's Feud
Washington Post
7 hours ago
- Washington Post
Students applying for financial aid will face stricter ID verification
The Education Department on Friday announced new measures to verify the identities of people applying for financial aid — a move it says is needed because of rising fraud but is being met with mixed reactions from the higher education community. The department said that this summer, colleges and universities must ensure that people who are applying for aid for the first time are who they claim to be, which will require students to submit more documentation. Applicants must present — either in person or on a live video call — a valid, government-issued photo identification to the school. The department expects about 125,000 students to be affected by the new requirement. The changes will be in place until the department's Federal Student Aid office finalizes a permanent screening process in the fall for anyone applying for federal loans and grants through the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. The department said it is stepping up identity verification amid an increase in scammers accessing millions of dollars in federal aid. California's community colleges have reported being inundated with scammers posing as students and enrolling to steal aid, and lawmakers in the state are calling on the Education and Justice departments to investigate. An investigation by CalMatters found fraudsters are using artificial intelligence to pose as students and have stolen more than $10 million in federal financial aid over 12 months. For its part, the Education Department said last month that it uncovered more than $30 million in aid being disbursed to thousands of deceased people in the past three years. A separate review in February found that nearly $40 million in loan payments and $6 million in grant awards were sent to ineligible people, according to the department. 'When rampant fraud is taking aid away from eligible students, disrupting the operations of colleges, and ripping off taxpayers, we have a responsibility to act,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement Friday. The Trump administration is partly blaming the increase in financial aid fraud on the Biden administration, which it claims removed verification safeguards and diverted resources from fraud prevention toward student loan forgiveness. The Education Department said it restarted a fraud modeling system that was deprioritized under President Joe Biden and found 150,000 accounts believed to be fraudulent in the initial run. Biden administration officials relaxed some verification requirements during the coronavirus pandemic, requiring fewer college students from low-income households to provide additional proof that the information on their financial-aid applications was accurate. At the time, the department said it would focus on ferreting out identity theft and fraud. The decision was praised by financial aid and student advocacy groups, which said too many vulnerable students were caught up in the standard verification process, which yielded little evidence of fraud. They argued that focusing on identity theft, which requires a different form of verification, made more sense. Students can face three types of verification, based on suspected errors or fraud: a standard one that requires the submission of income and tax documents, a custom one that requires identity documentation, or an aggregate one that requires everything. In its latest report, from November, the department's office of inspector general said the agency had taken steps to address identity verification risks but could benefit from additional actions after investigators determined that roughly $27 million in federal student aid had gone to accounts suspected to be fraudulent. Advocacy groups say they want the department to root out fraud but caution against a return to the invasive, time-consuming audits of the past that routinely delayed students' financial aid. 'Protecting against fraud and abuse is important, but must be balanced against access,' said Elizabeth Morgan, chief external relations officer for the nonprofit National College Attainment Network. 'Barriers that delay students' ability to receive aid could harm their ability to attain a postsecondary degree.' The department said it does not expect any changes to the number of financial aid applicants selected for the standard verification while the number of applicants flagged for identity verification goes up. Financial aid groups are cautiously optimistic. Karen McCarthy, vice president of public policy and federal relations at the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, said some colleges have hoped that the department would take a stronger role in fraud prevention because they are ill-equipped to handle it on their own. But she worries that there are few details about the agency's long-term plans and that, while the department finalizes requirements, more work could fall on financial aid officers, especially at under-resourced schools. 'The lack of clarity and specific timing about Ed's plan is concerning,' McCarthy said. 'Recent history has shown that they make promises of delivery of things that will help institutions, and then there is lag, and institutions are kind of stuck doing that additional work for quite some time.' In her statement Friday, McMahon said the department is working to 'reduce the administrative burden on institutions.'
Los Angeles Times
9 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to leave mass layoffs at Education Department in place
WASHINGTON — President Trump's administration on Friday asked the Supreme Court to pause a court order to reinstate Education Department employees who were fired in mass layoffs as part of his plan to dismantle the agency. The Justice Department's emergency appeal to the high court said U.S. District Judge Myong Joun in Boston exceeded his authority last month when he issued a preliminary injunction reversing the layoffs of nearly 1,400 people and putting the broader plan on hold. Joun's order has blocked one of the Republican president's biggest campaign promises and effectively stalled the effort to wind down the department. A federal appeals court refused to put the order on hold while the administration appealed. The judge wrote that the layoffs 'will likely cripple the department.' But Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote Friday that Joun was substituting his policy preferences for those of the Trump administration. The layoffs help put in the place the 'policy of streamlining the department and eliminating discretionary functions that, in the administration's view, are better left to the states,' Sauer wrote. He also pointed out that the Supreme Court in April voted 5-4 to block Joun's earlier order seeking to keep in place Education Department teacher-training grants. The current case involves two consolidated lawsuits that said Trump's plan amounted to an illegal closure of the Education Department. One suit was filed by the Somerville and Easthampton school districts in Massachusetts along with the American Federation of Teachers and other education groups. The other suit was filed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general. The suits argued that layoffs left the department unable to carry out responsibilities required by Congress, including duties to support special education, distribute financial aid and enforce civil rights laws. Education Department employees who were targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff. Joun's order prevents the department from fully terminating them, but none have been allowed to return to work, according to the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. Without Joun's order, the workers were scheduled to be terminated Monday. Trump has made it a priority to shut down the Education Department, though he has acknowledged that only Congress has the authority to do that. In the meantime, Trump issued a March order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to wind it down 'to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law.' Trump later said the department's functions will be parceled to other agencies, suggesting that federal student loans should be managed by the Small Business Administration and programs involving students with disabilities would be absorbed by the Department of Health and Human Services. Those changes have not yet happened. The president argues that the Education Department has been overtaken by liberals and has failed to spur improvements to the nation's lagging academic scores. He has promised to 'return education to the states.' Opponents note that K-12 education is already mostly overseen by states and cities. Democrats have blasted the Trump administration's Education Department budget, which seeks a 15% budget cut including a $4.5 billion cut in K-12 funding as part of the agency's downsizing. Sherman writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Collin Binkley contributed to this report.
