logo
India Beats US & UK In Safety Index 2025. Here's Which Country Is Safest In Asia

India Beats US & UK In Safety Index 2025. Here's Which Country Is Safest In Asia

News1822-07-2025
Ranked 66th out of 147 nations with a score of 55.7, it edged past United Kingdom (87th, 51.7) and the US (89th, 50.8)—two countries often regarded as safe, developed democracies
In a world where safety often shapes both perception and policy, the latest global safety rankings have delivered a few surprises. According to the 2025 Numbeo Safety Index, China has emerged as the safest country in Asia, while India has outperformed several Western powers long seen as models of stability.
China secured the 15th spot globally with a safety score of 76.0, placing it well ahead of regional and international counterparts. The Numbeo index, which draws on user-submitted data from around the world, assesses countries based on crime rates, public perception of safety, and trust in law enforcement.
India, though much further down the list, delivered a noteworthy performance. Ranked 66th out of 147 nations with a score of 55.7, it edged past the United Kingdom (87th, 51.7) and the United States (89th, 50.8)—two countries often regarded as safe, developed democracies.
Among India's South Asian neighbours, Sri Lanka ranked 59th (score: 57.9), Pakistan was at 65th (score: 56.3), and Bangladesh was down below at 126th (score: 38.4).
Leading the global rankings this year is the tiny European nation of Andorra, crowned the 'world's safest country of 2025" with an impressive safety score of 84.7. Tucked away in the Pyrenees mountains between France and Spain, Andorra earned high marks for its exceptionally low crime rates and strong sense of public security.
Also making a strong showing were three Middle Eastern countries—United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Oman—all of which secured spots in the top five worldwide. Their high rankings were attributed to well-developed security infrastructures and consistently low levels of crime.
Let's take a look at the top 10 on the list:
1. Andorra – 84.7
2. United Arab Emirates (UAE) – 84.5
3. Qatar – 84.2
4. Taiwan – 82.9
5. Oman – 81.7
6. Isle of Man (a British Crown Dependency) – 79.0
7. Hong Kong (China) – 78.5
8. Armenia – 77.9
9. Singapore – 77.4
10. Japan – 77.1
At the other end of the rankings, Venezuela was named the least safe country, recording a concerning safety score of just 19.3. Other countries grappling with conflict, political turmoil, and high crime—such as Afghanistan, Syria, and Haiti—also ranked among the lowest, reflecting deep-rooted challenges to public safety and stability.
The Numbeo Safety Index offers a real-time, crowd-sourced snapshot of how secure people feel in their own countries. It factors in multiple indicators, including fear of crime, reported incidents, and overall perceptions of safety. In its 2025 edition, the index analysed data from 146 countries. The latest results reveal a growing divide between countries with strong security frameworks and those facing mounting public safety issues—even among long-established Western democracies.
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
China
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EU's anti-deforestation regulation a non-tariff barrier, raise this in WTO: Parliamentary panel to govt
EU's anti-deforestation regulation a non-tariff barrier, raise this in WTO: Parliamentary panel to govt

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

EU's anti-deforestation regulation a non-tariff barrier, raise this in WTO: Parliamentary panel to govt

The European Union's anti-deforestation regulation is a form of a non-tariff barrier and India should raise this in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and other trade forums, a parliamentary panel report said on Tuesday. It also said the regulation's compliance mechanism for the Indian growers is still under development by the Coffee Board, which needs to be fast-tracked so that India is fully equipped under the compliance framework and is able to meet the extended deadline of 2026. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program "Implementation of European Union's anti-Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is in fact a form of non-tariff barrier and government should flag this in the WTO and other trade forums," the report on performance evaluation and review of some commodity boards said. It added that the EUDR, which imposes strict regulatory requirements on rubber producers and exporters targeting European markets, is also a non-tariff barriers imposed by the EU. The report added that the effects of free trade agreements (FTAs) on the spice trade need to be reviewed. Live Events "FTAs should be designed to protect the interests of Indian spice farmers and exporters while also providing access to new markets," it said, adding that there are also concerns that pepper from ASEAN countries is being undervalued and cleared by customs based on these lower declared values. It recommended that the government formulate clear guidelines for monitoring imports under the Indo-Sri Lanka trade pact closely, and issue licences to importers through government authorities to prevent third countries from exploiting the pacts. Meanwhile another parliamentary panel report on leather industry said free trade agreements with major markets such as the EU, and the US, along with better use of existing pacts with countries like Japan, Australia, and the UAE, would help boost India's leather exports. It said a targeted export strategy is required to improve market access, explore alternate and new markets, strengthen the global presence of Brand India, and ensure that institutional support is aligned with the evolving needs of the industry. The committee suggests leveraging existing FTAs with countries like Japan, Australia, the UAE and ASEAN to increase export of leather and leather products while also prioritising new trade pacts with key markets such as the EU, it said. "It emphasises the need to negotiate FTAs with major markets such as the EU, and the US. Developing market linkages and global branding beyond traditional export destinations is essential," according to the report of department related parliamentary standing committee on commerce. It recommended that the department of commerce should conducts an assessment to identify funding gap particularly in MSME's and enhance financial support to ensure seamless functioning of sectors requiring significant capital. It also suggested providing capital and operational incentives to attract large-scale investments, promoting economies of scale across both component and end product sectors, while supporting both labour-intensive and high-tech manufacturing. "Further, the department should explore measures to simplify credit access, provide credit at low interest rates and extend priority sector lending benefits," it said. Further, to address the issue of heavy dependency on imports for machinery, equipment and spare parts, it suggested providing financial support for the development of large, integrated tanneries. The committee recommended exploring the option of importing completely knocked down units from countries like China to support local assembly and lower manufacturing costs.

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?
What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold?

Aug 12 - U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will discuss a possible deal to end the war in Ukraine when they meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit that is also likely to affect wider European security. What deal might emerge from Trump-Putin summit and could it hold? European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy plan to speak with Trump on Wednesday amid fears that Washington, hitherto Ukraine's leading arms supplier, may seek to dictate unfavourable peace terms to Kyiv. WHAT KIND OF DEAL COULD EMERGE FROM SUMMIT? Trump said last Friday that there would be "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both". This prompted consternation in Kyiv and European capitals that Russia could be rewarded for 11 years of efforts - the last three in full-blown war - to seize Ukrainian land. It occupies about 19% of Ukraine. Ukraine controls no Russian territory. "It's a reasonable concern to think that Trump will be bamboozled by Putin and cut a terrible deal at Ukraine's expense," said Daniel Fried, a former senior U.S. diplomat now with the Atlantic Council think-tank. But "better outcomes" for Ukraine were possible if Trump and his team "wake up to the fact that Putin is still playing them". One could entail agreeing an "armistice line" instead of a transfer of territory, with only de facto - not legal - recognition of Russia's current gains. Any sustainable peace deal would also have to tackle such issues as future security guarantees for Ukraine, its aspirations to join NATO, the restrictions demanded by Moscow on the size of its military, and the future of Western sanctions on Russia. Trump has not commented on those issues since announcing the summit with Putin, though his administration has said Ukraine cannot join NATO. Diplomats say there is an outside possibility that Trump might instead strike a unilateral deal with Putin, prioritising lucrative energy contracts and potential arms control accords. Trump himself has said he might conclude in Alaska that a Ukraine peace deal cannot be done. The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the possibility of Trump clinching a unilateral deal with Putin. WHAT IF UKRAINE OBJECTS TO ANY TRUMP-PUTIN DEAL? Trump would face strong resistance from Zelenskiy and his European allies if any deal expected Ukraine to cede territory. Zelenskiy says Ukraine's constitution prohibits such an outcome unless there is a referendum to change it. Trump could try to coerce Kyiv to accept such a deal by threatening to stop arms supplies and intelligence sharing. But analysts say there is more chance Ukraine might accept a freezing of battlelines and an unstable, legally non-binding partition. One European official told Reuters that, even if Trump did renege on recent promises to resume arms supplies to Ukraine, he was likely to continue allowing Europe to buy U.S. weapons on Ukraine's behalf. "The loss of U.S. intelligence capabilities would be the hardest element to replace. Europe can't even come close to providing that support," said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. HOW MIGHT A DEAL AFFECT TRUMP'S SUPPORT AT HOME? There would be big political risks in the U.S. for Trump in abandoning Ukraine, said John Herbst, a former U.S. ambassador to Kyiv, now with the Atlantic Council. This would portray him as "an accomplice in Putin's rape of Ukraine ... I don't think Trump wants to be seen that way, for sure", he said. Despite his strong political position at home, Trump would also come under fire even from parts of the American right if he were to be seen as caving in to Russia. "To reward Putin ... would be to send the exact opposite message that we must be sending to dictators, and would-be-dictators, across the globe," Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican lawmaker and former FBI agent, said on X last week. HOW MIGHT UKRAINE'S EUROPEAN ALLIES RESPOND? EU member states said on Tuesday that Ukraine must be free to decide its own future and that they were ready to contribute further to security guarantees for Kyiv. Oana Lungescu, a former NATO spokesperson now with the RUSI think-tank, said European states must move much faster to arm Ukraine, and start EU accession talks in September. Jana Kobzova, senior policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said that "... if an unacceptable deal emerges from Alaska, European capitals will go into yet another diplomatic and charm offensive vis-a-vis Trump". "European leaders are increasingly aware that the future of Ukraine's security is inseparable from that of the rest of Europe - and they can't let Putin alone decide its future shape and form." This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Andhra Pradesh shrimp farmers seek govt. support amid export tariff woes
Andhra Pradesh shrimp farmers seek govt. support amid export tariff woes

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Andhra Pradesh shrimp farmers seek govt. support amid export tariff woes

In a joint meeting held in Ongole on Tuesday, shrimp farmers' associations from Tirupati, Nellore, Prakasam, Bapatla, Guntur, and Krishna districts urged the Andhra Pradesh government to step in and address pressing challenges facing the aquaculture sector. Prakasam District Shrimp Farmers Association president Duggineni Gopinath highlighted that the sector has been hit hard since former U.S. President Donald Trump increased tariffs on Indian shrimp imports. 'Nearly 40% of our exports go to the U.S., and the increased tariff has severely hurt our earnings,' he said. Gopinath appealed to the State government to provide 50% subsidy on bank loans for setting up mini processing plants. He also suggested including shrimp in the food menus of social welfare hostels and anganwadi centres to boost domestic consumption. The farmer leaders demanded a minimum support price (MSP) of ₹470 per kg for 30-count tiger prawns and ₹400 per kg for 30-count Vannamei shrimp. They also sought uninterrupted power supply at ₹1.50 per unit without additional charges, and urged feed companies to lower prices by at least ₹15 per kg. Resolving to diversify their markets, the farmers said they will focus more on domestic sales and explore exports to South Korea and European countries, rather than depending solely on the U.S. and China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store