Cotswolds locals warn JD Vance he'll have 'nowhere to park' as US Vice President gets set for family holiday in star-studded market town
In recent weeks, Charlbury has seen many high profile guests, including Kamala Harris who visited during Steve Jobs' daughter Eve's wedding.
But despite being accustomed to star-studded visitors, the arrival of Donald Trump 's right-hand man has caused a stir among locals.
Many have even placed guesses on where he will stay, with guesses including Grade II listed estate Lee Place, built in 1640 with links to the historic Blenheim Palace.
Other believe he will holiday in a mansion owned by the billionaire Bamford family, while some predict he will need the security offered by the nearby Cornbury Park.
But choice of accommodation isn't the main worry Vance should have on his visit to the Costwolds town, locals say.
Many say his biggest problem will be navigating the narrow streets and finding suitable parking for his large motorcade and security team.
Neighbouring Clarkson's Farm, Charlbury is the 'checkpoint Charlie' of the sprawling Cotswolds, the town's vicar said.
Fergus Butler-Gallie, 33, the town's vicar who has lived in the area for 19 months, said: 'I'm just hoping they bring us Al Gore and Dick Cheney next, we've almost completed the set.
'We get all sorts of people here - we've got Mr Clarkson up the road. It's noticeably got busier in the time I've been here.'
'It's nice to be visited, and it's good the town can maintain two pubs and several shops. There are a lot of places like ours which wouldn't be able to keep that up.
'We can, and of course that's because of tourism.'
He says tourists often arrive having now idea where they are, assuming ' the Cotswolds is some sort of theme park rather than a large region'.
'But I suspect Mr Vance's people will be pretty thoroughly briefed,' he added.
Currently cars are parked on both sides of the narrow streets, with residents saying the market town becomes very easily congested.
And the parking chaos becomes worse during the summer season, when tourists come through the town to and from festivals and countryside retreats.
To add to traffic woes, the only way of moving around the town centre for the last decade has been one-way system, according to locals.
The town's vicar, Fergus Butler-Gallie (pictured left) described the town as the 'checkpoint Charlie' of the sprawling Cotswolds (Pictured right: Local resident Zena McGreavy)
A local business owner said the high profile American family's visit was the 'talk of the town'.
'They've locked our local website forum so people can't say any more about it,' they said. 'If they come into my shop, I won't bat an eyelid. I serve my customers.
'I'm just worried about the parking, all those secret service cars! Good luck to him - getting round these roads is no joke.
'They'll have some fun with these lanes, getting around in a big car.'
Elizabeth Sparks, a local secondary school cover teacher who has lived in the area for 16 years, said she too was mainly worried about the cars that came with the VP.
'The other day, the bus driver came into the pub and said, 'who drives the car with this particular number plate? You need to move it.' He couldn't drive past.
'The bus gets stuck, it gets very hard to park. The residential parking makes that even harder - good luck to him.'
The Vice-President's wife Usha discovered the country cottage they're expected to settle in after visiting London in mid-August, the Telegraph reported.
Many have even placed guesses on where he will stay, with guesses including Grade II listed estate Lee Place, built in 1640 with links to the historic Blenheim Palace
Mark Jones, a 67-year-old retired programme volunteer, said the town has a 'strong community' interest.
'You get mostly locals during the week and lots of tourists coming from everywhere at the weekends. And there are lots of festivals every summer.
'I hope his visit goes well,' he said. 'I haven't heard anything about protests - and I wouldn't join them, either.
'When Kamala Harris visited last week, it seemed to go very quietly. Hopefully the same will happen again.'
Zena McGreavey, a 57-year-old exhibition officer at a museum in Oxford, has lived in the area for 18 months.
She said: 'There does seem to be a lot happening around here nowadays. It's surprising they find us - Charlbury is such a hidden gem.
'People are talking about it in The Bull pub, it's caused a stir - but I don't think people mind him coming.
'There was a bit of confusion about where he's going to be staying, people want to know.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
a minute ago
- Leader Live
How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?
The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers under a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Here is a closer look at the plan and what the issue is. – What is the concern over the Channel crossings? Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys. On Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed the failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel is putting community cohesion at risk. Data on the crossings of migrants in 'small boats' like inflatable dinghies has been collected since 2018. In the first year of data, just 299 people were recorded to have arrived in the UK this way. Since 2018, 94% of migrants who arrived by small boat crossing have claimed asylum in the UK, or 145,834 out of 154,354 people. – What has the Labour Government's approach been to the issue? Since Labour came to power last July, the party has vowed to 'smash the gangs'. Ministers are seeking to ramp up enforcement action against smugglers with new legislation to hand counter terror-style powers to police, and new criminal offences aiming to crack down on the illegal trade. This is my message to the people smuggling gangs: we will end your vile trade. For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France. My government has led the way in taking our countries' co-operation to a new level. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 10, 2025 The Government is also seeking to reset the UK's relationship with Europe over the crossings, and France has agreed to change its rules to allow police to intervene when boats are in shallow water, rather than requiring them to still be on land. Meanwhile ministers are hoping to deter new arrivals promised jobs when they come to the UK by cracking down on illegal working and deportations of ineligible asylum seekers. – What is the new deal and how will it work? Last month, the Prime Minister and French president agreed a plan to send back small boats migrants, with an asylum seeker being sent to the UK in exchange in equal numbers. Under the pilot scheme, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time. The trial is set to run until June 11 2026, pending a longer-term agreement or cancellation by either the UK or France with one months' notice. Asylum seekers accepted to come to the UK under the deal would travel via a safe, legal route, 'subject to strict security checks'. Those in France could express an interest to apply for asylum to the UK through an online platform developed by the Home Office, and would then carry out the standard visa application process and checks. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs, and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. Borders are being breached by criminal gangs worldwide. Life-threatening Channel crossings have occurred for years – it is time to act. Border Security Command is how we fight back. — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) March 4, 2025 If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits. Their claim could still be rejected during their time in the UK, and they could then be removed from the country. It is not clear what the criteria will be for deciding which migrants who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, other than being aged over 18. New arrivals will be screened at Manston processing centre, in Kent, which is current procedure, before individuals determined to be suitable for the pilot and for detention, will be picked and held in an immigration removal centre. Their removal is expected to be made on the grounds of inadmissibility, that they have arrived from the UK from a safe country where their case can be heard instead, because an agreement is in place with France. The treaty confirms the migrants would be returned back to France by plane, and commits for a return to be completed within three months in all cases. It also agrees for a joint committee to be set up to monitor the agreement and arrange logistics. Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances. The Home Office said it had learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts. – How many people will be part of the pilot and much will it cost? No official number of migrants has been confirmed to take part in the pilot, but it is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors. The Home Secretary has said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount as she believes it could aid criminal gangs. It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year. There is no funding to France associated with this agreement, and operations around the returns and arrivals will be paid for from the existing Home Office budget. – What has the reaction been to the deal? Opposition politicians were scathing about the Prime Minister's deal with Mr Macron, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming the small percentage of arrivals to be removed would 'make no difference whatsoever'. On Tuesday, he added: 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also branded it a 'humiliation'. Meanwhile refugee charities have also criticised the plan and have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Reacting to the plan coming into force, Amnesty International UK's refugee rights director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy.'
The Guardian
2 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on asylum myths: when truth loses, scapegoating takes over Britain's migrant debate
In politics, numbers rarely speak for themselves. They must be framed and interpreted. They are often weaponised. In Britain's increasingly toxic debate over asylum and migration, the question isn't just how many asylum seekers arrive on small boats. It's what those numbers are made to represent – and why polls suggest a large proportion of the public now believes things that are simply untrue. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, has staked her political credibility on restoring a sense of grip over the asylum system: reducing the backlog by processing cases, accelerating returns of those with no legal claim to stay and launching an as yet small-scale 'one in, one out' returns deal with France. In balancing operational realism with symbolic reassurance, Ms Cooper walks a knife-edge between policy and perception. The small boats issue is no longer just about shortcomings. It is a cultural firestorm – and one increasingly fuelled not by facts, but by misinformation. According to new YouGov polling, nearly half of Britons wrongly believe that illegal migrants now outnumber those here legally. A staggering 72% of those who support mass deportations hold this belief – even though official estimates show legal migration outnumbers irregular migration by at least 10 to 1. That gap between belief and reality is not accidental. It is the outcome of years of distortion by populist media and politicians who conflate asylum, illegality and criminality. Figures like Nigel Farage and Robert Jenrick have led the charge, using cherrypicked statistics and lurid anecdote to foster the sense of a country under siege. Hotels housing asylum seekers have become flashpoints for far-right protest. Last summer's riots, frighteningly, appear to be no fluke. They look like a trial run. Ms Cooper's strategy to confront this with better data and a functioning system is, on paper, entirely rational. She wants to reassert the difference between political theatre and policy. But data alone cannot win a cultural war. Publishing the nationality or immigration status of offenders, even in the name of transparency, may serve only to reinforce the belief that 'foreignness' explains criminality – particularly when the dominant public narrative is already so skewed. Amnesty's warning that disclosing suspects' ethnicity risks becoming a 'lightning rod' for racist sentiment is well grounded. Moderate former Tory ministers have rightly urged caution, calling for accurate data and cooler heads. The former counter-terrorism chief Neil Basu is right to compare Faragism to Trumpism: both rely on lies about migrants that outpace the truth to win votes. The real problem isn't the number of small boats, but the growing number of Britons who see all migration as a threat to identity and safety. YouGov finds that a significant proportion of the public now supports not just border control, but mass removals of migrants who have already settled here. That is a policy with no precedent in mainstream politics since 1971. Worryingly, it is now slithering back into public debate. Labour inherited a broken asylum system. But it also inherited a poisoned political environment. The risk is that by trying to neutralise extremism with incremental reform and datasets, it lends legitimacy to the deeper narrative: that the migrant is, at root, the problem. Britain is playing with fire, not just because its systems are failing, but because the public's trust in those systems has been methodically eroded. That is harder to repair. And far more dangerous to ignore.
Telegraph
2 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer's local council could become fully vegan
A Labour-led council covering Sir Keir Starmer's constituency could become fully vegan. Camden council, in north London, commissioned a report that concluded a 100 per cent plant-based catering regime was 'in line' with their 'food mission', according to the environmentalist group Plant Based Councils. Under the plans, which the group expects to be formally incorporated next year, only plant-based food would be served at council-catered events and meetings. 'Draconian ban' There is no expectation that Camden residents, nor workers at the local authority, would be prohibited from eating meat. But critics have claimed the council is 'wasting vital time and resources ramming through a draconian ban on meat and dairy '. Mo Metcalf-Fisher, director of external affairs at the Countryside Alliance, said Camden council 'should instead be supporting our British farmers who produce some of the most sustainable food in the world, regardless of whether it's meat, dairy or vegetables.' Plant Based Councils has claimed credit for moving seven councils to a 'plant-based' diet. Oxfordshire county council, held by the Liberal Democrats, as well as Labour-held Calderdale and Exeter councils, committed to the move in 2015, 2020 and 2022, respectively. Kush Naker, a leading member of the Camden Plant-Based Councils campaign, described it as a 'huge moment', and said he was 'thrilled that our council has listened to the science and the local community and shown real leadership.' He added: 'This policy isn't about telling individuals what to eat. It's about ensuring that our public institutions reflect the urgent need to shift toward sustainable, inclusive, and compassionate food systems.' The campaign said in its announcement of the move that it 'hopes Camden's bold move will inspire other councils across London and the London Assembly to follow suit. As the capital of the UK, London should lead the way for others to do the same.' '10 councils reject compulsory veganism' But the Countryside Alliance have claimed councils should be championing local sourcing and freedom of choice, instead of banning meat and dairy. A campaign led by the group has seen 10 councils reject 'compulsory veganism', and promote the importance of shopping locally and supporting UK farmers. So far Suffolk, Cornwall, Portsmouth, Fenland, Peterborough, the Highlands, Dorset, Wiltshire, Staffordshire Moorlands and Rutland have all signed up to the alternative campaign. Mr Metcalf-Fisher also said there were 'questions for the local MP and leader of the Labour Party, Keir Starmer, who should clarify whether more Labour councils will be going vegan'. A Camden council spokesman said: 'We are not a fully plant-based council but we are looking at ways of moving towards serving more healthy, seasonal and locally grown food.'
