US Treaty Ally Intercepts Chinese Warships Near Coast: Video
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Philippines dispatched its coast guard over the weekend to challenge a pair of Chinese warships in the Southeast Asian country's maritime zone.
Newsweek reached out to China's Foreign Ministry by email with a request for comment.
Why It Matters
The neighbors are locked in a territorial dispute over China's expanding coast guard and naval presence inside Manila's exclusive economic zone, an area that extends 230 miles from the Philippine territorial sea. The U.S. ally alone is entitled to patrol in the zone under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, to which both the Philippines and China are signatories.
An estimated one-third of the world's ship-borne trade passes through the South China Sea each year. It is the subject of competing claims by several countries, including China.
What To Know
In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Philippine coast guard (PCG) spokesperson Jay Tarriela said the agency deployed its largest vessel, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, to intercept Chinese electronic surveillance ship the Tianwangxing.
The vessel was detected about 80 miles off the coast of Cabra Island, in the Philippine province of Occidental Mindoro.
This photo shows the Philippine Coast Guard tracking Type 051 guided missile destroyer the Guilin in waters off Cabra Island on July 12, 2025.
This photo shows the Philippine Coast Guard tracking Type 051 guided missile destroyer the Guilin in waters off Cabra Island on July 12, 2025.
Philippine Coast Guard
Video released by the Philippine coast guard captured a radio broadcast informing the Chinese ship that it was not authorized to operate in those waters and ordering it to leave.
The Tianwangxing did not react but its Chinese coast guard escort responded by asserting Beijing's claim to the area.
As of 11:00 a.m. Saturday, the Chinese ships had been joined by a second People's Liberation Army Navy vessel—guided-missile destroyer Guilin—which deployed its onboard helicopter in what Tarriela said were landing exercises.
"The PCG remains steadfast in its mission to uphold Philippine sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction in its maritime zones, especially in the West Philippine Sea, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the 2016 Arbitral Award, and the Philippine Maritime Zones Act," Tarriela said.
The West Philippine Sea is Manila's term for those parts of the South China Sea that fall within its exclusive economic zone.
The arbitral award he referenced is a 2016 ruling by a Hague-based tribunal that rejected most of China's expansive maritime claims. Beijing refused to participate in the proceedings and continues to reject the ruling.
Cabra Island is situated nearly 800 miles from China's southernmost province, Hainan.
What People Are Saying
Chinese state-affiliated think tank South China Sea Strategic Probing Initiative wrote on X: "Wow! How brave PCG is! However, what right does the PCG have to intercept a Chinese military vessel in this area?"
The Philippines' Department of Foreign Affairs said in a statement Sunday: "Today, the Philippines commemorates the ninth anniversary of the landmark ruling on the South China Sea Arbitration.
"Since its promulgation by the Arbitral Tribunal, this Arbitral Award continues to serve as a guide for the peaceful resolution of disputes in accordance with international law and its dispute settlement mechanisms, including the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea..."
What's Next
China is likely to continue sending maritime forces into the Philippine EEZ, in what analysts say is a bid to normalize their presence there.
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is expected to continue challenging the Chinese ships and publicizing their movements. Marcos vowed in 2024 not to cede "one square inch" of Philippine territory to any foreign power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
China's super-dam is an ecological and geopolitical time bomb
China has built more dams than any other country and more large dams than the rest of the world combined. This month, it officially acknowledged construction of the biggest dam ever conceived in human history — although satellite imagery suggests the groundwork began much earlier, following the megaproject's approval by China's rubber-stamp parliament in 2021. Located on the Brahmaputra River just before it curves into India, this super-dam is being developed with little transparency in a seismically active and ecologically fragile region near the heavily militarized Tibetan-Indian frontier. Once completed, the massive structure will dwarf the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze, and is expected to generate nearly three times as much hydropower by harnessing the Brahmaputra's sharp descent from Himalayan peaks into the world's deepest canyon. Yet far beyond electricity production, the project portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis. It stands to disrupt the hydrological balance for millions of people downstream, destabilize a delicate Himalayan ecosystem and provide Beijing with a potent new lever over India, its strategic rival. China appears to have learned nothing from its own cautionary tale: the Three Gorges Dam, currently the world's largest. Once hailed as an engineering marvel, the dam has become an environmental nightmare — eroding riverbanks and deltas, degrading water quality, triggering frequent landslides and causing lasting ecological damage. The new super-dam's site is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe. Scientists warn that large dam reservoirs can trigger seismic activity, a phenomenon known as reservoir-triggered seismicity. In this quake-prone region, the tectonic stresses induced by such a megastructure could lead to devastating earthquakes. The Brahmaputra — the world's highest-altitude major river — draws its perennial flow from Himalayan springs, glacial melt, upland wetlands and tributaries. The vast majority of these sources lie within Chinese-occupied Tibet, where the river is known as the Yarlung Zangbo. In contrast, India contributes modestly to the river's year-round volume, though it plays a greater role in its monsoonal surge. After flowing through India's Arunachal Pradesh and Assam states, the river enters Bangladesh before draining into the Bay of Bengal. But a river's flow is not just about water — it also carries nutrient-rich sediment, serving as the ecological lifeblood of entire regions. By building a gigantic dam just before the river exits Chinese-controlled territory, Beijing gains the power to manipulate cross-border flows, including during the critical dry season. It can withhold or release water at will, trap sediment and potentially weaponize water in future disputes. By capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve downstream floodplains of nourishing sediment that replenishes farmland and sustains fisheries. Bangladesh's delta, already threatened by rising seas, will shrink further and become more prone to saltwater intrusion and catastrophic flooding. Equally alarming is the likely disruption of the Brahmaputra's natural flooding cycle. Seasonal floods during the summer monsoon serve vital ecological functions. Disrupting this rhythm could spell disaster for northeast India's agrarian economy and for millions in Bangladesh who depend on the river's pulse. Moreover, by trapping sediment and altering flows, the $168 billion dam could erode riverbeds, degrade habitats and accelerate coastal loss. China would gain not only hydropower but also hydraulic power — the ability to influence political and ecological outcomes in neighboring nations. China's dam-building frenzy on rivers originating on the Tibetan Plateau has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal. What makes this project uniquely concerning is its sheer scale, high-risk location and the strategic signal it sends. For India, the dam represents more than just a hydrological threat. It is a potential geopolitical stranglehold. If tensions escalate again — as they did following China's stealth incursions into Indian territory in 2020 — Beijing could exploit its upstream control to exert pressure. This is especially ominous given China's claim to India's sprawling Arunachal Pradesh state, which it labels 'South Tibet.' Hydropower generation is only one aspect of the dam's utility. Its greater value lies in strategic dominance. Despite the grave implications, international response has been muted. India has voiced concern, but its political response has been measured. The stark reality is that India possesses few diplomatic or legal tools to counter China's upstream assertiveness. Nevertheless, India could take the lead in advocating international recognition of Tibet's status as Asia's 'water tower' and push for binding norms on transboundary river development. China's unilateralism deepens distrust and reinforces strategic asymmetry in the region. Beijing is not party to any binding water-sharing treaty with its neighbors. Nor has it conducted credible environmental or seismic assessments for a project of this magnitude — despite its location in one of Earth's most geologically unstable regions. The Brahmaputra super-dam thus raises profound questions about regional stability. It epitomizes China's strategy of ' hydro-hegemony ' — using upstream control of water to exercise geopolitical influence. This is not just another dam. In an era when control over water is becoming as consequential as control over oil was in the 20th century, China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage. 'Water: Asia's New Battleground.'
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
America's Toymakers are in Trouble
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins and see higher costs being passed onto the consumer. Financial results released last week by America's largest toy manufacturers, Mattel and Hasbro, revealed the continued costs of the trade war and lingering uncertainty around tariffs. Mattel, whose brand portfolio includes Barbie dolls and the UNO card game, reported a 6 percent decline in second quarter net sales. Meanwhile, Hasbro, the company behind Nerf and My Little Pony, reported a 16 percent decline in revenue for its core toys and games business. While this was almost offset by significant improvements in its trading card and digital gaming segments, the company's net sales were nevertheless down 1 percent year-over-year as it reported an $856 million net loss for the quarter. Newsweek contacted Mattel and Hasbro via email on Tuesday for comment. In their results and subsequent earnings calls, both companies cited the continued uncertainty created by tariffs, which continue to weigh on supply chains and inventory levels. Hasbro attributed its net loss in the quarter to a $1 billion impairment charge related to its consumer products segment and caused by the implementation of tariffs. While most sectors of the economy are exposed to major shifts in trade policy, toys are particularly vulnerable given the industry's reliance on globalized supply chains and outsized dependence on Chinese imports, with around three-quarters of the toys sold in America manufactured in China. Prior to the 90-day pause agreed between the U.S. and China in May—which has seen tariffs temporarily lowered from their previous, staggering rates—the two companies were among those who said they may need to raise prices to offset the impact of tariffs. This led to toys—dolls in particular—becoming a surprising flash point in the debate over trade policy, and sparked a confrontation between the Trump administration and Mattel after CEO Ynon Kreiz said that the company had no plans to relocate manufacturing operations to the U.S. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins. America's biggest toymakers are facing down a grim financial reality, as economic headwinds and U.S. trade policy continue to squeeze margins. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty/Canva Though both companies said that tariff-related headwinds had eased from earlier this year, price impacts are still set to take effect. Mattel's CFO Paul Ruh told analysts last week that only 40 to 50 percent of toys would remain under $20 despite given the "pricing actions" tariffs had demanded. Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks told CNN earlier this month that toy prices may increase this fall because of tariffs on Chinese and Vietnamese goods. "We have already raised prices due to the tariffs and, unfortunately, the consumer will be paying for this," said Isaac Larian, CEO and founder of the California-based toy company MGA Entertainment. Larian told Newsweek that MGA, known primarily as the company behind Bratz dolls, had tried to absorb the costs associated with tariffs, but that "with small margins in the toy industry we have no choice but to pass along the tariff increases." The price of toys, games, hobbies and play equipment increased by 2.2 percent between April and May, compared to the 0.1 percent increase for all items, according to Labor Department Data. This was followed by a 1.2 percent jump in June, again outpacing the wider 0.3 percent increase. According to MGA's CEO, the impacts of tariffs have been far greater than anticipated by the industry. "In addition to the increased import and export costs, the constant changes to the imposed tariffs have created a lot of uncertainty and nobody can run a business with uncertainty," Larian told Newsweek. Regarding the possibility of bringing manufacturing to the U.S. to offset these impacts, and increasing the share of toys made in its Hudson, Ohio factory, he said that, were this possible, MGA "would do so immediately." "However, it is just not possible to make certain toys in America," he said. "China is the factory of the world - no other country has the know-how and infrastructure of China to make toys currently." Larian expects further price increases throughout the remainder of 2025, but is holding out hope for negotiations between the U.S. and China to permanently bring down tariffs to a manageable level. Representatives of the two countries recently met in Stockholm for another round of trade talks. While the discussions concluded without a fully-fledged agreement to reduce tariffs, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the meeting as "very productive." International Trade Representative for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce Li Chenggang said that both sides will "continue to push" for an extension on the 90-day pause beyond the deadline of August 12, CNN reports.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
China Is Winning the Trade Talks With Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S.'s latest round of trade talks with China concluded in Stockholm on Monday without much headway in the trade war between the world's two largest economies. While U.S. negotiators continue to use tough rhetoric, including the threat of secondary sanctions to discourage China from fueling Russia's war against Ukraine, geopolitical analysts say President Donald Trump's administration is at a disadvantage in the negotiations. Newsweek has contacted the White House for comment via email. Why It Matters Trump dramatically escalated economic tensions in April. Citing unfair Chinese trade practices and promising to revitalize U.S. manufacturing, he announced heavy tariffs on Chinese goods. The move rattled global supply chains and prompted swift retaliation from Beijing, which introduced its own tariffs and a suite of other tit-for-tat measures. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who led the U.S.'s negotiating team in Stockholm, called the talks productive but said it was up to the president to extend the 90-day pause agreed to in May on the most severe tariffs. A trade truce between the countries is set to expire on August 12. What To Know Trump has already surrendered too much negotiating power in his pursuit of a sweeping deal with China, critics say. This includes the administration's recent decision to reverse restrictions on exports of Nvidia's H20 chips. The H20 is one of many chips to be restricted in a bid to slow China's progress in artificial intelligence—viewed by Washington as a national security threat given Beijing's policy of military-civil fusion. Additionally, the U.S. Commerce Department has been instructed to hold off on imposing new export controls on China, in what officials describe as an effort to keep trade talks on track, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing both former and current U.S. officials. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Chinese President Xi Jinping, left, and U.S. President Donald Trump during a welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on November 9, 2017. Andy Wong/Associated Press Other alleged concessions center on Taiwan, the self-governed island that China claims as its territory and has vowed to unify with, by force if necessary. The Trump administration has blocked Taiwanese President Lai Ching-te from making a brief stopover in New York during a planned trip to visit Taiwan's diplomatic allies in Latin America, according to the Times, which cited multiple sources. Both Lai's predecessors and Lai himself in his previous role as vice president were permitted to make brief stopovers in the U.S., during which they met with supporters and officials. A separate report from the British paper said a planned meeting between the Taiwanese Defense Minister Wellington Koo and the U.S. Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby was canceled at the last minute last month. Newsweek was unable to independently confirm either of these reports. The move sparked criticism from prominent China watchers, who warned against using the self-ruled democracy and key trade partner as a bargaining chip. Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., told Newsweek that he was not aware of the details of the reports. He emphasized Beijing's firm opposition to visits to the U.S. by Taiwanese leaders, invoking the "one China" policy—which holds that the government in Beijing is the sole legal government of China. China's concessions during the talks have been limited by comparison. They include designating two more chemicals as precursors to fentanyl, the powerful opioid behind the U.S. overdose crisis that has become a sticking point in bilateral ties—with Washington pressing Beijing to do more to stem the flow of the drug into the U.S. Following the first round of talks in May, China also announced it would ease some restrictions on rare earth magnets, which are vital for a range of both military and civilian technologies. However, the U.S. and other countries continue to complain of ongoing delays in the export of these resources. Beijing weaponized its dominance over rare earths in April by curbing exports in response to Trump's tariff salvos. What People Are Saying Li Chenggang, the Chinese vice minister of commerce and international trade representative, told state media: "Both sides had candid communication regarding each other's important economic and trade concerns. … The two sides will continue to push for the extension of the pause on 24 percent of reciprocal tariffs of the U.S. side, as well as counter measures of the Chinese side." David Sacks, a fellow for Asia studies at the Council of Foreign Relations, wrote in an article: "The cancellation of President Lai's transit, paired with the Trump administration's decision to allow Nvidia to sell its H20 inference chip to Chinese customers and to freeze planned export controls, suggests that the administration is pausing any actions that China may find offensive in favor of setting the table for a meeting between Trump and Xi." What Happens Next Trump administration officials have suggested that an in-person meeting between the president and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, is likely by the end of the year. On Monday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he would consider such a meeting only if Xi extended an invitation, adding, "otherwise, no interest!"
