
White House to ask Congress to codify DOGE cuts to USAID and public broadcasting
WASHINGTON — Congressional leaders are expecting the White House to send them a package as soon as Tuesday that would claw back $9.4 billion in approved spending, most of it for foreign aid.
The so-called rescissions package will include money that has been approved by Congress that the Trump administration no longer wants to spend, according to a list of talking points obtained by NBC News.
It would slash funding to the U.S. Agency for International Development, NPR and PBS, according to the talking points, and would aim to codify cuts proposed by Department of Government Agency, the advisory entity that was helmed by Trump's billionaire ally Elon Musk until he left his post last week.
The package would require simple-majority support in the House and the Senate to pass, meaning Republicans could bypass Democrats.
The package is expected to contain $8.3 billion in cuts to foreign aid, including a number of programs designed to support LGBTQ communities, according to the talking points. There are also cuts to education and transportation programs, reproductive health, funds for the World Health Organization, about $142 million in cuts for the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), nearly $9 million in cuts to the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). And the package includes $1.1 billion in cuts to funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
The $9.4 billion represents a drop in the bucket when set against the $6.8 trillion that the U.S. government spends annually. And it comes as congressional Republicans are seeking to pass a sprawling domestic policy bill, which would add more than $2 trillion to the debt. Still, spending hawks see it as an important step toward undoing authorized spending, which is rare.
Rescission packages usually fail because Congress, which controls the power of the purse, typically rejects attempts by a president to decline to allocate certain spending it has directed.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Monday that the expectation is the House would consider the rescissions package first and then the Senate would take it up 'as quickly as we can.'
He said the Senate will have to juggle it with a crypto regulation bill and the legislation for Trump's agenda already in the pipeline. Congress would have 45 days to pass the package once it is submitted.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, the chair of the Appropriations Committee, said there are still some questions about the process, telling reporters on Monday, 'We're still talking with the parliamentarian about what can and can't be done,' referring to the in-house referee for Senate rules.
'It's extremely complex and the rules, because there hasn't been a successful rescission package in many, many years,' she said.
The House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative hardliners, is pushing for a speedy vote on the package.
'The House Freedom Caucus strongly supports these critical rescissions, and we will support as many more rescissions packages the White House can send us in the coming weeks and months,' the group, led by Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., said in a statement. 'While the Swamp will inevitably attempt to slow and kill these cuts, there is no excuse for a Republican House not to advance the first DOGE rescissions package the same week it is presented to Congress then quickly send it for passage in the Republican Senate so President Trump can sign it into law.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
15 minutes ago
- BBC News
All di court cases wey Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan dey face
Justice Idris Kutigi of di Federal High Court Abuja don order di Senate President of Nigeria, Godswill Akpabio to appear bifor am, sake of one defamation case wey Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan bin file against am. Dis na just one out of di plenty court cases wey involve Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan, di suspended lawmaker wey dey represent Kogi Central Senatorial District for di National Assembly. According to tori by local media, Justice Kutigi bin grant di lawyer of Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan, Victor Giwa, permision to serve Akpabio wit di court proceedings thru substituted means, since di senate president bin no show face for court on 7 May, 2025 wey di matter bin suppose start. Di Judge order Akpabio to show face for di court on Monday, 9 June, 2025. Though e neva dey clear weda dis date go get head since di Nigeria goment don declare am as public holiday for di muslim celebration of Eid-El-Kabir. Since late February dis year wen di crisis start between di female lawmaker and di senate president Akpabio, na so court cases dey pile up betwin di two. Some of dem na Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan start am, di odas na either di Nigeria goment or Akpabio family start am. Remember say Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan dey accuse Akpabio of sexual harrasment, wey she claim say e happen several times including for Akpabio house and for di senate premises. However, Akpabio don deny di allegations. Here na listicle of dis court cases and wetin be di issues: 350 billion naira suit by Mrs Akpabio Shortly afta Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan accuse Akpabio of sexual harassment during one TV interview, Mrs Ekaette Akpabio, wife of di senate president, call a press conference, wia she tok say she don sue Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan for defamation against her husband. Akpabio wife say she file two court cases - marked CV/814/25 and CV/816/25 - for di federal high court Abuja, demanding damages of N250 billion and N100 billion respectively. She tok say di allegations against her husband don cause her and her children "emotional and psychological abuse", and e don make her family to dey live for constant fear of threat to dia lives. She want make di court restrain Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan from making defamatory statements against di Akpabio family, and for her to withdraw di allegations and tender "unconditional apology to di senate president" wey go dey published for two national newspapers. 100 billion naira suit by Akpoti-Uduaghan Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan bin also file court case against Godswill Akpabio and imegislative aide, Mfon Patrick, wia she allege say di aide bin post one article on Facebook wey wan damage her reputation. Di Kogi lawmaker ask di court to order di defendants to pay her N100 billion for damages and anoda N300 million in litigation costs. Inside di suit, marked CV/737/25, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan say di post by Mfon Patrick dey "defamatory, provocative, and damaging to her reputation". Oga Patrick bin make dis post afta di wahala wey happen for di senate chambers on 21 February, 2025, wia Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan bin para and shout for di senate president afta dem change her sitting position. Di incident wey show for national TV bin see di female lawmaker telling Akpabio say "I am not afraid of you", "I don take a lot from you. I bin no wan go public, but if you want I go let Nigerians know how you don discriminate against me, how you dey malign me..." Days later, oga Patrick den post di article on Facebook wit di title: "She di Local Content Committee of di Senate be Natasha Birthright?" Di legislative aide say Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan dey para bicos di Senate President bin remove her as di chairman of dat senate committee. But di female lawmaker vex for di part wia Patrick say she no sabi anything about being a legislator except to dey "pancake her face and dey wear transparent outfits to di chambers." Dis remarks, she tok, "dey false and na to ridicule her, damage her credibility, and expose her to public contempt". Natasha vs Senate, Akpabio, Senate committee E also get anoda court case wey Natasha file to challenge her six-month suspension from di senate, afta a report by di senate comittee on etichs, privileges, and public petitions. Di committee bin recommend di suspension afta Natasha fail to appear bifor dem for investigation into her conduct for di senate chambers on February 21. Natasha hersef explain say she no attend dat investigation sake of say court bin don order di committee to postpone di hearing pending di determination of di matter bifor di court. But di committee members say dem no dey bound by any court order since dem dey do dia work as independent arm of goment. Dis matter on weda Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan suspension dey valid or not, dey bifor Justice Binta Nyako of di federal high court Abuja, and e dey expected say sho go deliver di judgement dis July. AGF vs Natasha Most recently, di office of di Attorney General of di Federation file anoda court case for di Federal Capital Territory High Court, sake of allegations of defamation against di senate president Godswill Akpabio and di former guvnor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello. For di three-count charges wey di goment bring against di female lawmaker, dem say Mrs Akpoti-Uduahan bin claim say Akpabio and Bello bin get plans to kill her, and say dis allegation na lie. According to di AGF, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan know or she suppose know say "dis imputations go harm di reputation of Senator Godswill Akpabio, President of di 10th senate of di Federal Republic of Nigeria, and di reputation of Yahaya Adoza Bello, former guvnor of Kogi State". Di witnesses wey di FG say dem go call for dis matter include Akpabio, Yahaya Bello and one oda senator Asuquo Ekpenyong plus three oda pipo. Dis matter suppose start on Tuesday, 3 June, 2025, but e no come go ahead bicos of strike wey di Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (Jusun) bin start di previous day. E never dey clear wen di new date go be.


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump travel ban to ‘sow division and vilify communities'
Update: Date: 2025-06-05T09:38:37.000Z Title: Nearly five months into his second term,', 'Donald Trump', 'has announced a new sweeping travel ban that could reshape the US's borders more dramatically than any policy in modern memory. Content: Nearly five months into his second term, Donald Trump has announced a new sweeping travel ban that could reshape the US's borders more dramatically than any policy in modern memory. The restrictions, revealed through a presidential proclamation on Wednesday, would target citizens from more than a dozen countries – creating a three-tiered system of escalating barriers to entry. The proclamation represents one of the most ambitious attempts to reshape the US's approach to global mobility in modern history and potentially affects millions of people coming to the United States for relocation, travel, work or school. Update: Date: 2025-06-05T09:29:06.000Z Title: Opening summary: Trump travel ban to 'sow division and vilify communities' Content: Good morning, and welcome to our blog covering developments in US politics and Donald Trump's administration as international aid groups and affected countries reacted to the sweeping order banning travel from 12 countries and restricting visitors from seven others, with claims that it will sow division and vilify communities. The nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be 'fully' restricted from entering the US, according to the proclamation. Meanwhile, the entry of nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted. In a video released on social media, Trump tied the new ban to Sunday's terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. The suspect in the attack is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The Department of Homeland Security says he overstayed a tourist visa. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America. Few of the affected countries have so far responded but Somalia immediately pledged to work with the US to address security issues. 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised,' Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, a close ally of president Nicolas Maduro, described the US government as fascist and warned Venezuelans of being in the US. The truth is being in the United States is a big risk for anybody, not just for Venezuelans … They persecute our countrymen, our people for no reason.' We'll be covering all the developments in this story and you can read our report here: In other news: Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into Joe Biden's actions as president, alleging top aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline'. The investigation will build on a Republican-led campaign already under way to discredit the former president. Biden issued a statement dismissing the idea of a cover-up as 'ridiculous'. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is set to meet with Trump on Thursday, hoping to build a personal relationship despite discord over Ukraine and the threat of a trade war. The president is due to greet Merz at 11.30am EST. Trump is committed to passing his so-called 'big beautiful' tax bill in the US Senate despite opposition from billionaire Elon Musk, a White House official said on Wednesday. The official, speaking to Reuters on condition of anonymity, added that the White House will not consult Musk on every policy decision. Estimates say that the bill could add $2.4trn to the deficit. Musk has stepped up attacks on the bill on X, urging supporters to 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.'


Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Trade war: What a weakening dollar means for Trump
The weakening of the US dollar has arguably been the story of the year for financial markets. The mighty greenback is the world's reserve currency by virtue of the fact that so many nations and investors hold it. But it has taken a mighty tumble under the Donald Trump 2.0 presidency - to the point this week that the dollar index, which measures it against six other major currencies, is down 9% this year and on course for its worst annual performance since 2017. It is no coincidence that that decline also took place under a Trump-controlled White House. The reasons for it are similar but against a far weaker domestic and global economic backdrop than seen last time round. Why is the dollar falling? It all forms part of the wider investor turmoil over the president's trade war, its implications for the US economy and, crucially, the impact of his agenda on the public finances. The main cause for concern recently had been the potential for recession in the world's largest economy due to trade war import duties - tariffs - stoking inflation. The fallout has damaged the potential for interest rate cuts by the US central bank - a scenario that would normally be supportive of a currency. But attention has increasingly turned towards the US budget deficit and total debt pile, given Mr Trump's controversial tax cut and spending hike plans. Independent figures suggest they will add about $2.4trn to the $36.2trn total for US government debt - a debt pile that has become more expensive to service. 1:00 It's fair to say weaker stock markets, bond sell-offs and a weaker dollar are not the reactions the president wants to see at the start of his second term. For all the headline-seeking slogans of "America First" and "Make America Great Again", the on-off trade war designed to restore US manufacturing might and jobs is taking a toll. It explains the tax cut push but the president cannot escape the fact that federal, corporate and personal finances - such as investments and pension values - have taken a hit. Despite that, YouGov poll data this week showed that for the first time in two months, less than half of US adult citizens strongly or somewhat disapproved of how he was handling the job. What does it all mean for Americans? If you strip out the short-term hits to pensions and asset values, a weaker dollar will offset some of additional tariff-related costs paid by importers to the US, as a dollar will go further when buying goods in a currency that has strengthened. In theory, it will help limit the impact of any rising costs paid by consumers once goods have made their way down the supply chain. Conversely, Americans heading abroad will find their buck doesn't get them as much. How about for us Brits? 5:08 We have not been immune from the market turmoil - with pension and fund holdings (especially those containing US interests) taking a knock. The weaker dollar is bad news for UK-based firms booking dollar earnings back home as they won't go as far when recorded in pounds. But a weaker dollar means a pound will go further if you're travelling to the US. Sterling is more than 8% up versus the dollar in the year to date and the spot rate currently stands at $1.3566 - around levels last seen in 2022. Travel money sites suggested that UK tourists heading stateside would get a conversion around the $1.3230 level. What about the outlook? 9:28 Much will depend on how the Trump trade war plays out in the months ahead. These values say more about the dollar weakness than pound strength because the UK has many similar challenges to the US - sticky inflation, worries about the sustainability of government debt and weak growth. The currency shift MAY help to further reduce UK inflationary pressure. It is hoped, for example, that the weakening dollar will continue to help drive down oil costs. Brent crude - priced in dollars, crucially, - struck a four-year low in April and a barrel is currently $1 above that level at $64.