logo
Trump wants to protect South Africa's White farmers. But potential changes to trade privileges would hurt them

Trump wants to protect South Africa's White farmers. But potential changes to trade privileges would hurt them

Yahoo02-03-2025

A contentious law that allows South Africa's government to expropriate land – without compensation in some cases – has enraged the United States, triggering aid cuts by Washington and outbursts from President Donald Trump.
Many fear that the African nation could now potentially lose some of its US trade privileges as relations between the two countries deteriorate.
South Africa is the largest beneficiary of the African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA), a US trade agreement that provides preferential duty-free access to US markets for eligible Sub-Saharan African nations.
Some US lawmakers want those benefits withdrawn when AGOA is reviewed this year.
In January, South Africa enacted the Expropriation Act, seeking to undo the legacy of apartheid, which created huge disparities in land ownership among its majority Black and minority White population.
Under apartheid, non-White South Africans were forcibly dispossessed from their lands for the benefit of Whites. Today, some three decades after racial segregation officially ended in the country, Black South Africans, who comprise over 80% of the population of 63 million, own only around 4% of private land.
The expropriation law empowers South Africa's government to take land and redistribute it – with no obligation to pay compensation in some instances – if the seizure is found to be 'just and equitable and in the public interest.'
President Cyril Ramaphosa said the legislation would 'ensure public access to land in an equitable and just manner.' But the White House disagrees.
Trump and his South African-born billionaire adviser Elon Musk believe that the land reform policy discriminates against White South Africans. Sanctions have since followed.
Responding to a post by Ramaphosa on X about the new legislation, Musk asked: 'Why do you have openly racist ownership laws?'
In an executive order issued on February 7, Trump revoked all aid for South Africa, accusing the country of human rights violations. He also denounced South Africa's stance against Israel's war in Gaza, saying the nation undermined US national interests.
The executive order did not specify what aid was being halted but nearly $440 million was committed to South Africa in 2023 – the bulk of which went to its health sector – according to data on the US Foreign Assistance website.
Ramaphosa said in a post on X before the order was issued that, 'with the exception of PEPFAR Aid (the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) which constitutes 17% of South Africa's HIVAids programme, there is no other funding that is received by South Africa from the United States.'
Economist Ndumiso Kubheka told CNN that South Africa could be on the verge of losing its trade benefits with the US under AGOA.
'Based on the changes in trade policy and national interests of the US government, the possibility of changes and South Africa's exclusion does exist,' he said.
To remain eligible for AGOA, a benefiting nation 'must demonstrate respect for rule of law, human rights … (and) should also not seek to undermine US foreign policy interests,' according to requirements outlined on its website.
In a letter to Trump on February 11, US Rep. Andy Ogles and three other Republican congressmen called for South Africa's duty-free access to the US market to be withdrawn and for diplomatic ties to be suspended, expressing disapproval of its land reforms, its alleged 'vendetta against Israel' and its 'embrace of China.'
South Africa's exports are partly driven by agriculture, which accounted for 10% of the country's total export earnings in 2021, according to the National Agricultural Marketing Council (NAMC). South Africa is the main agricultural exporter under AGOA and its largest beneficiary, according to the US Department of Agriculture.
In a 2023 report, the department said that two-thirds of South Africa's agricultural exports to the US 'are exported tariff-free under AGOA,' with exporters of citrus, wine and fruit juice among the top beneficiaries.
Victor Thindisa, a senior manager for Markets and Economic Research at NAMC, told CNN that removing the nation from AGOA would deal a serious blow to its agricultural industry.
'South Africa is likely to face higher tariffs of about 3% for agricultural exports to the USA should the country be ineligible for AGOA benefits,' he said.
'The loss of preferential market access for the agricultural sector could lead to reduced foreign exchange earnings, decreased competitiveness of South African agricultural products in the USA, and potential job losses,' Thindisa added.
The move might also run counter to the Trump administration's apparent aims. Stripping South Africa of its AGOA privileges on account of its expropriation law would hurt the same White farmers whom the US seeks to protect, according to Chrispin Phiri, a spokesperson for the country's foreign minister.
'If you look at the produce that finds its way into the US markets, it primarily comes from our agricultural sector, which is primarily White farmers,' Phiri told CNN.
He added that: 'It's a known fact that most of our commercial farmers are White. They are the ones who are in the majority in the commercial agricultural sector, and they have a commercial gain from an agreement like AGOA. So, the very same people that you believe are being persecuted would be persecuted by such a volatile decision.'
Citrus grower Gerrit van der Merwe, who exports to the US from Citrusdal in the Western Cape province, told CNN that South Africa's likely exclusion from AGOA would lead to job cuts.
'It would affect us considerably and threaten local jobs,' he said. 'It is difficult to estimate precisely to what extent. Citrus is the economic heart of Citrusdal, and any shocks or changes in the industry affect the entire rural community.'
Justin Chadwick, who heads South Africa's Citrus Growers Association (CGA), said the group was concerned about the situation.
'If AGOA is not renewed, it will create a challenging environment for South African citrus. AGOA ensures our citrus isn't subject to US tariffs. A US tariff on South African citrus would make our fruit more expensive for American consumers.'
Chadwick told CNN that thousands of rural jobs were at risk.
'To give you an idea of how many jobs are currently connected to US citrus export: an estimated 35,000 local jobs from farm level throughout the supply chain as well as an additional 20,000 jobs in the US are sustained by US-SA citrus exports. Without AGOA, these jobs will surely be under threat.'
At least 100,000 pallets of citrus are shipped to the US from South Africa annually, he said, adding that 'South Africa's entire North American exports make up around 9% of our total citrus exports.'
Outside the Americas region, which accounted for 6% of South Africa's agricultural exports in 2024, the African continent is the main market for the country's agricultural goods, making up 42% of its agricultural exports, according to the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
Other export destinations include Asia and the Middle East, which together totaled 21%, and the European Union, which made up 19% of South Africa's agricultural exports for 2024, Agbiz data showed.
Despite the comparatively lower trade volume, the US market 'matters significantly,' according to Wandile Sihlobo, chief economist at Agbiz.
'Firstly, the exports (to the US) are concentrated in specific industries, mainly nuts, citrus, wines, grapes, and fruit juices. This means while the risks associated with this market are not as significant in proportion to overall agricultural exports, they present challenges to specific industries,' he said.
Secondly, Sihlobo said, 'the negative sentiment arising from any confrontation with the Americas region would have negative effects on South Africa's agriculture.It is, therefore, vital that South Africa maintains positive agricultural relations with this region.'
For the citrus grower Van der Merwe, finding an alternative destination for his produce if South Africa is removed from AGOA and exporting to the US becomes less profitable would not be easy.
'We would still probably export quantities (of) citrus to the US, but given that the usual tariffs would then apply, it would be a big setback,' he said. 'South African citrus is valued in other markets like the Middle East and the EU, and switching to those markets if it is more profitable can be considered. But the volume of exports for us to the US is large, it will be difficult for it to be absorbed elsewhere.'
South African leader Ramaphosa said on Thursday he was ready to 'do a deal' with the US to repair their plummeting relations.
'We would like to go to the United States to do a deal,' he said while responding to questions from Richard Gnodde, vice chairman of US bank Goldman Sachs, during a conference in Johannesburg.
'We don't want to go and explain ourselves,' he added. 'We want to go and do a meaningful deal with the United States on a whole range of issues.'
Ramaphosa did not specify what the deal would entail but noted it would span trade, diplomatic and political issues.
'We decided that it's not best to have a knee-jerk reaction,' Ramaphosa said of Trump's executive order cutting aid to his nation. 'We wanted to let the dust settle.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As legal fight over National Guard plays out, Kristi Noem vows to continue President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown
As legal fight over National Guard plays out, Kristi Noem vows to continue President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown

Chicago Tribune

time3 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

As legal fight over National Guard plays out, Kristi Noem vows to continue President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown

LOS ANGELES — Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry on with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown despite waves of unrest across the U.S. Hours after her comment Thursday, a judge directed the president to return control to California over National Guard troops he deployed after protests erupted over the immigration crackdown, but an appeals court quickly put the brakes on that and temporarily blocked the order that was to go into effect on Friday. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. Chicagoans continue protests against Trump and ICE Thursday as demonstrators rally across USThe federal judge's temporary restraining order said the Guard deployment was illegal and both violated the Tenth Amendment and exceeded President Donald Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. Gov. Gavin Newsom who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the order before it was blocked saying 'today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test' and had said he would be redeploying Guard soldiers to 'what they were doing before Donald Trump commandeered them.' In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump thanked the appeals court Friday morning. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now,' he said. White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said the president acted within his powers and that the federal judge's order 'puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief.' The developments unfolded as protests continued in cities nationwide and the country braced for major demonstrations against Trump over the weekend. Noem said the immigration raids that fueled the protests would move forward and agents have thousands of targets. 'This is only going to continue until we have peace on the streets of Los Angeles,' she said during a news conference that was interrupted by shouting from U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, a California Democrat who was forcibly removed from the event. Newsom has warned that the military intervention is part of a broader effort by Trump to overturn norms at the heart of the nation's democracy. He also said sending Guard troops on the raids has further inflamed tensions in LA. So far the protests have been centered mostly in downtown near City Hall and a federal detention center where some immigrants are being held. Much of the sprawling city has been spared from the protests. On the third night of an 8 p.m. curfew, Los Angeles police arrested several demonstrators who refused orders to leave a street downtown. Earlier in the night, officers with the Department of Homeland Security deployed flash bangs to disperse a crowd that had gathered near the jail, sending protesters sprinting away. Those incidents were outliers. As with the past two nights, the hourslong demonstrations remained peaceful and upbeat, drawing a few hundred attendees who marched through downtown chanting, dancing and poking fun at the Trump administration's characterization of the city as a 'war zone.' Elsewhere, demonstrations have picked up across the U.S., emerging in more than a dozen major cities. Some have led to clashes with police and hundreds have been arrested. The immigration agents conducting the raids in LA are 'putting together a model and a blueprint' for other communities, Noem said. She pledged that federal authorities 'are not going away' even though, she said, officers have been hit with rocks and bricks and assaulted. She said people with criminal records who are in the country illegally and violent protesters will 'face consequences.' 'Just because you think you're here as a citizen, or because you're a member of a certain group or you're not a citizen, it doesn't mean that you're going to be protected and not face consequences from the laws that this country stands for,' she said. Noem criticized the Padilla's interruption, calling it 'inappropriate.' A statement from her agency said the two met after the news conference for about 15 minutes, but it also chided him for 'disrespectful political theater.' Padilla said later that he was demanding answers about the 'increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions' and only wanted to ask Noem a question. He said he was handcuffed but not arrested. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers throughout the Los Angeles community,' he said. The administration has said it is willing to send troops to other cities to assist with immigration enforcement and controlling disturbances — in line with what Trump promised during last year's campaign. Some 2,000 Guard soldiers were in the nation's second-largest city and were soon to be joined by 2,000 more, along with about 700 Marines, said Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who is in charge of the operation. About 500 of the Guard troops deployed to the Los Angeles protests have been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations, Sherman said Wednesday. The Guard has the authority to temporarily detain people who attack officers, but any arrests must be made by law enforcement. With more demonstrations expected over the weekend, and the possibility that Trump could send troops to other states for immigration enforcement, governors are weighing what to do. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, has put 5,000 National Guard members on standby in cities where demonstrations are planned. In other Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they may deploy troops. A group of Democratic governors earlier signed a statement this week calling Trump's deployments 'an alarming abuse of power.' There have been about 470 arrests since Saturday, the vast majority of which were for failing to leave the area at the request of law enforcement, according to the police department. There have been a handful of more serious charges, including for assault against officers and for possession of a Molotov cocktail and a gun. Nine officers have been hurt, mostly with minor injuries.

Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of President Donald Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of President Donald Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda

Chicago Tribune

time3 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of President Donald Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda

WASHINGTON — Just hours before Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, President Donald Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that a long-simmering dispute over Tehran's nuclear program could be resolved without military action. But with the Israeli military operation called 'Rising Lion' now underway — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will go on for 'as many days as it takes' — Trump will be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the U.S. from foreign conflicts. Israel attacks Iran's nuclear and missile sites, prompting Iranian drone-strike retaliation'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,' Trump said in a Friday morning social media post. 'I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done.' The administration's first reaction to the Israeli assault came not from Trump, but from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is doubling as Trump's national security adviser. He sought to make clear that the U.S. was 'not involved' and that the Republican administration's central concern was protecting U.S. forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. But Trump on Friday urged Iran to make a nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.' 'No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' Trump added. Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating' in the military strikes. But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.'

For Trump, the military is just another extra in his reality show presidency
For Trump, the military is just another extra in his reality show presidency

San Francisco Chronicle​

time6 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

For Trump, the military is just another extra in his reality show presidency

For someone who seems to hold the U.S. military in contempt (suckers, losers, bone spurs, V.A. cuts, mocking Gold Star families), President Donald Trump likes surrounding himself with the trappings of armed power. The military is now just another television-friendly prop for whatever Trump wants to promote, which is usually Trump himself. Trump's 79th birthday — it's the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army! Really! We swear! — on Saturday will feature a $45 million tank parade and fighter jet flyover in Washington, D.C. The weather forecast for D.C. calls for showers, making it rain on his reign parade, which, of course, is bad television. Trump's chartreuse cotton-candy hairstyle could collapse like a soufflé, for example. He was afraid that it would happen in France at a D-Day event in 2020. He canceled. Meanwhile, Trump's war gaming has spread to Los Angeles, where, against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, he called in 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 U.S. Marines. There will be more cities, too, so watch for troops on Union Square. That'll help San Francisco tourism. Trump's obsession with the military-as-extras-in-a-reality-show approach is not only lousy politics, it's antithetical to the American nonpartisan approach to its military. According to historian Michael Beschloss, the late president and former Gen. Dwight Eisenhower felt that a military parade like one would see in totalitarian countries '(imitating) what the Soviets are doing in Red Square would make us look weak.' Yet another reason to like Ike, a sensible Republican president who knew the power of military imagery. Trump's sham-handed response to the Los Angeles protests against immigration raids has sent America reeling. While there certainly has been property damage in L.A., most Angelenos are going about their business at brunch, hardly the urban hellscape so ably exploited by the president's media handmaidens. When Trump marched over to Washington's Lafayette Square in 2020 and held up a bible in front of a church like some '700 Club' pitchman, he asked/ordered Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley to accompany him. Later, Milley said he thought it was terrible that he did that, saying Trump was a 'wannabe dictator' and a 'fascist to the core.' Wannabe? For example, Trump installed as secretary of defense a Fox News talking head/blowhard, Pete Hegseth, who is more than willing not to stand up to the president, unlike former Defense Secretary Mark Esper, who managed to wave off 47's fascist impulses. Esper said, 'We reached that point in the conversation where (Trump) looked frankly at Gen. Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?'' Um, no. No, we can't. Now there is no Milley or Esper at the table. Just Pete's tats. Sen. Alex Padilla was forcibly shown the door on Thursday during a press conference featuring cosplaying Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose previous experience was being governor of a state with a population slightly more than San Francisco. Padilla was handcuffed and hustled out of the news conference after saying to Noem, 'You insist on exaggerating.' Padilla may find himself the latest star of the L.A. ICE Raids News Cycle, after Gov. Gavin Newsom had his 15 minutes of fame on Tuesday. At this point, it's not at all difficult to imagine Trump wearing a gold-epaulette uniform, resplendent with medals more appropriate for the Chilean Pinochet regime than the American presidency. Why not throw his Ceaușescu -aspirational sons into uniforms as well? After all, they haven't managed to channel their patriotic juices into actually going in the military, either. That's for the little people. Get the Proud Boys into some snappy military blues, too. They're now Trump J6 heroes. That insurrection was OK. No need to bring in the National Guard or the Marines. It was in the service of Trump, not democracy, which is all that matters now. Other than damaging D.C.'s boulevards with tank treads and sending the Marines over the Grapevine, perhaps the clearest sign that Trump's military fetish has crossed the line is his performance at the Fort Bragg Army base, where reported that a unit-level message said there were to be 'no fat soldiers … If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience, then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out.' Since norms are now antiquarian afterthoughts, do all soldiers have the choice going forward, or is this just a trial run for a quasi-Nuremberg rally? My guess is that President Joe Biden placed no such restrictions when he addressed troops. Oh, and his son Beau was an Army Reserve major. That separation of civilian and military is so 2024. Another Trump fetish is his demand that Army bases revert to their Confederate hero names, like Robert E. Lee. Memo to Trump: They put Arlington National Cemetery in Lee's front yard, as a warning to future traitors. One would think that leading an armed rebellion against the U.S. government and President Abraham Lincoln, the first GOP president, might be disqualifying for a military base name. Other than virtual signaling to racists, it's just another day in the conundrum Trump has created for the military. The tanks will roll by on Saturday, chewing up the streets and delighting our juvenile president. But the U.S. Constitution has tread marks on it already.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store