Let's not rewrite history: Nicola Sturgeon was a truly dire politician
Leaving aside all that gender stuff which she got completely wrong right from the start and which proved to even her most ardent fans that she was, well, nuts in thinking that a woman with a penis guilty of rape should go to a woman's prison.
Oh yes, and there was that other stuff which some people might remember such as the battle she and her former mentor turned deadly enemy, Alex Salmond, fought over who was conspiring against whom about claims of sexual assaults against staff.
Yet, still the idea seems to have grown legs that she was some kind of wonderful politician – a veritable genius who showed that even when in charge of a country with only five million souls doing the right thing by those people gets you a place on the international stage. The trouble is that Sturgeon seldom did the right thing.
Her reputation has grown like Topsy even before her book was even written, never mind published. So much so that she was compared in the S unday Times magazine as 'Britain's most successful female politician since Margaret Thatcher'. I'm bound to confess that I had to read that more than a few times… but on each occasion I concluded that this was a nonsense verdict with no basis in fact as history has shown and is still showing.
The plain fact is that Nicola Sturgeon was an extremely poor politician. Oh yes, she was a pretty good debater, well able to best many of her opponents, and was a more than decent public speaker, if you like your tub to be thumped. However, there's a whole host of Glasgow University graduates – as she is – including two ex-prime ministers and several very able MPs, a famous journalist and – I didn't know this – an Archbishop of Canterbury who could claim those attributes.
But to be a good politician requires more than debating and speaking skills. Judgment is what's required, specifically about policies and on these she was nigh-on useless.
Think of the gender row she began and continues to fight; of the stupid coalition deal she struck with the Marxist Greens; of the plan to ban all new North Sea oil and gas development; of the multi-million pound ferries debacle; of the record drug deaths; of poorest kids failing in schools; her total shut down policy during the Covid pandemic. All of these issues and others brought the SNP to its knees in last year's election and her current successor spends most of his time trying to undo the damage she caused. She'd retired by then but she nearly killed her party in absentia.
Given all these failures, how is it that a book she's written is getting pretty fair and positive licks in the media. How come? One reason for this adulation is that she long ago completely conned a large part of the Fleet Street commentariat. She knew they wouldn't know all the details of her stuff and wouldn't bother trying to find out, either, and so she skated through their questions with a smile on her face.
They admired her then and still do because she launched a determined and successful campaign to court them. She was all over them like a cheap suit when there was a press conference attended by London journalists. They hung on her every word and one has even asked her about her tattoo.
I've known her for longer than most – for a quarter of a century in fact. A colleague and myself helped her and Peter Murrell, her estranged husband, celebrate their marriage with a bottle of champagne in a Perth restaurant several years ago. She has many good qualities… a wicked sense of humour among them and she also knows her way around a wine list, displaying much better taste than Alex Salmond.
However, it's her gallus nature – Scots for chutzpah – much more than political judgment that's got her to where she is today.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sturgeon: ‘Witch-hunt' MSPs investigating me were being directed by Salmond
Nicola Sturgeon has said she believes some MSPs who investigated the Scottish Government's handling of sexual harassment allegations against Alex Salmond were 'taking direction' from him. The former Scotland first minister wrote in her autobiography, Frankly, that she thought either Mr Salmond or his allies were guiding some opposition MSPs on what to ask her. She accused her opponents in the special Holyrood committee of a 'witch-hunt' against her. The committee ultimately found Ms Sturgeon misled the Scottish Parliament over the Salmond inquiry. However, she said the probe that 'really mattered' was the independent investigation by senior Irish lawyer James Hamilton which cleared her of breaking the ministerial code. The former SNP leader said that while she was 'certain' she had not breached the code, 'I had been obviously deeply anxious that James Hamilton might take a different view', admitting that 'had he done so, I would have had to resign'. She said that she felt 'on trial' as part of a wider phenomenon that when men were accused of impropriety, 'some people's first instinct is to find a woman to blame'. Ms Sturgeon did admit to 'misplaced trust and poor judgment' in her autobiography, which was published early by Waterstones on Monday, having been slated for release this Thursday. She wrote: 'This feeling of being on trial was most intense when it came to the work of the Scottish Parliament committee set up to investigate the Scottish government's handling of the original complaints against Alex. 'From day one, it seemed clear that some of the opposition members of the committee were much less interested in establishing facts, or making sure lessons were learned, than they were in finding some way to blame it all on me. 'If it sometimes felt to me like a 'witch-hunt', it is probably because for some of them that is exactly what it was. 'I was told, and I believe it to be true, that some of the opposition MSPs were taking direction from Alex himself – though possibly through an intermediary – on the points to pursue and the questions to ask.' Ms Sturgeon described the inquiry, to which she gave eight hours of sworn evidence, as 'gruelling' but also 'cathartic'. MSPs voted five to four that she misled them. The politicians began their inquiry after a judicial review in 2019 found the Scottish Government's investigation into Mr Salmond's alleged misconduct was unlawful, unfair and tainted by apparent bias. Mr Salmond, who died last year, was awarded £500,000 in legal expenses. Ms Sturgeon wrote of the inquiry: 'It also gave the significant number of people who tuned in to watch the chance to see for themselves just how partisan some of the committee members were being. 'Not surprisingly, the opposition majority on the committee managed to find some way of asserting in their report that I had breached the ministerial code. 'However, it was the verdict of the independent Hamilton report that mattered.' She said her infamous falling out with her predecessor was a 'bruising episode' of her life as she accused Mr Salmond of creating a 'conspiracy theory' to defend himself from reckoning with misconduct allegations, of which he was cleared in court. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor was 'never able to produce a shred of hard evidence that he was' the victim of a conspiracy. She went on: 'All of which begs the question: how did he manage to persuade some people that he was the wronged party, and lead others to at least entertain the possibility? 'In short, he used all of his considerable political and media skills to divert attention from what was, for him, the inconvenient fact of the whole business. 'He sought to establish his conspiracy narrative by weaving together a number of incidents and developments, all of which had rational explanations, into something that, with his powers of persuasion, he was able to cast as sinister.' Ms Sturgeon speaks about Mr Salmond several times in her autobiography, which also has a dedicated chapter to him, simply titled 'Alex Salmond'. In it, she speaks of an 'overwhelming sense of sadness and loss' when she found out about his death, which she said hit her harder than she had anticipated. Ms Sturgeon says the breakdown in their relationship happened long before Mr Salmond's misconduct allegations. She said it had begun to deteriorate when she became first minister in 2014 following his resignation in light of the independence referendum defeat. Ms Sturgeon claims her former boss still wanted to 'call the shots' outside of Bute House and appeared unhappy that she was no longer his inferior. She also accuses him of trying to 'distort' and 'weaponise' his alleged victims' 'trauma' through his allegations of conspiracy. Ms Sturgeon claims that Mr Salmond, who later quit the SNP to form the Alba Party, would rather have seen the SNP destroyed than be successful without him. Despite her myriad claims against her predecessor, though, Ms Sturgeon said: 'Part of me still misses him, or at least the man I thought he was and the relationship we once had. 'I know I will never quite escape the shadow he casts, even in death.'
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer faces furious backlash to ban on Palestine Action
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a furious backlash after the arrest of hundreds of people during a protest in support of Palestine Action, a recently proscribed organisation, on Saturday. The 532 arrests mark the highest number by the Metropolitan Police at a single protest since the 1990s, with many of those held reported to be over 60. Politicians from across the spectrum, including David Davis and Peter Hain, alongside civil liberties groups like Amnesty and Liberty, have condemned the arrests as an excessive use of counter-terrorism powers. Labour peer Shami Chakrabarti said the Palestine Action proscription 'is in danger of becoming a mistake of poll tax proportions' – a reference to Margaret Thatcher 's unpopular policy that sparked riots. The government defended the proscription, citing alleged criminal damage and targeting of Jewish-owned businesses by the group.
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Manchester United fan group postpones protest against Sir Jim Ratcliffe
A Manchester United supporters' group has postponed a demonstration against the club's ownership planned for the day of their opening game of the Premier League season. The 1958 had organised a protest march to Old Trafford on August 17, ahead of United's clash with Arsenal, with banners referring to minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. The 1958 has overseen numerous demonstrations in recent years, principally aimed at unpopular majority shareholders the Glazers, but frustration has now spread to Ratcliffe. The billionaire British businessman, who owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United, has instigated wide – often unpopular – changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and, in our opinion, is helping keep them in charge,' said a group representative, who added Ratcliffe was 'no saviour' and 'like a (red) devil in disguise,' last week. However, after conducting a survey, the group has acknowledged opinion is split and the time is not right for a protest. A statement read: 'With a fanbase as diverse and passionate as ours, finding the right balance isn't always easy. We've had to consider momentum, timing, fan appetite, broader consequences of protest activity whilst assessing how current and future decisions may impact us as fans. 'Given the current sentiment within the fanbase and particularly in light of these recent survey results, it's clear there is no unified view on the direction of the club under Ratcliffe. 'That split is real, and we believe it would be irresponsible to risk creating a situation that could result in any 'red on red' conflict inside or outside the stadium.' The group say almost 63 per cent of the near 26,000 respondents to their survey said Ratcliffe and his Ineos company should be held to account for their decisions so far by means of a protest. However, 68 per cent also believed they should be given more time.
