After six-year saga, Najib rests his case in RM2.27b 1MDB trial; final arguments up next
PUTRAJAYA, May 6 — Former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak today officially closed his defence in his trial involving RM2.27 billion of 1Malaysia Development Berhad's (1MDB) funds, after getting 26 defence witnesses including himself to appear in court.
At slightly before 3pm today, Najib's lead defence lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah told the High Court: 'Yang Arif, we are closing our case, the defence's case. Yang Arif, we officially close the case.'
Shafee said Najib had started defending himself in his 1MDB trial on December 2, 2024, with 26 defence witnesses called over a span of 58 days including today.
All that is left now is for both Najib's lawyers and the prosecution to present their final arguments before the High Court decides on whether Najib is guilty or not in the 1MDB trial.
Trial judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah then asked both sides to file their written submissions by September 30 and any replies to be filed by October 10.
The judge also ordered both Najib's lawyers and the prosecution to present their final arguments in court over nine days from October 21 to October 24 and from October 27 to October 31.
'I trust that the submissions will focus on the main issues raised by the defence. I don't think I need to give further instructions. All dates fixed prior to October 2025 are hereby vacated. So once again I thank parties for their assistance,' the judge said.
This brings the 1MDB trial closer to a conclusion, after close to six years of trial so far.
The then 65-year-old Najib was charged close to seven years ago on September 20, 2018, and the 1MDB trial began on August 28, 2019.
The prosecution had called in 50 prosecution witnesses during 235 days of trial from August 2019 to May 30, 2024.
The High Court on October 30, 2024 ordered Najib to enter his defence.
Najib began his defence on December 2, 2024 and read his witness statement numbering 678 pages in court and answering questions over 26 pages in the witness stand, before getting 25 others to come as his defence witnesses.
Najib, who is turning 72 later this year, is facing charges of abusing his power in three roles — as prime minister, finance minister, and 1MDB's board of advisers' chairman — over 1MDB matters for his own financial benefit amounting to RM2.27 billion.
He is also facing charges for allegedly laundering more than RM2 billion of 1MDB's money.
MORE TO COME
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
High Court dismisses committal bid by former KL Tower operator
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today dismissed the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower's leave application to commence committal proceedings against seven individuals and the government. The former operator, Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd, and its parent, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd, are seeking contempt of court action against the eight for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain, who rejected the application, ordered the two companies to pay RM25,000 to the respondents, including Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. Six other officials were also named as respondents, including Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman, Federal Land Commissioner Datuk Muhammad Azmi Mohd Zain and Communications Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Mohamad Fauzi Md Isa. In her judgment, Judge Roz Mawar ruled that the court was not satisfied there was a prima facie case to warrant the granting of leave for contempt proceedings. She further held that the court was not persuaded by Hydroshoppe's assertion of encroachment on its properties, regardless of the manner, given that its contract with the government had lapsed on March 31. The court also dismissed the inter partes injunction application by Hydroshoppe and Menara KL, ordering both companies to pay RM20,000 each in costs to the government, as well as to LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. The court then fixed July 14 to hear the striking-out applications filed by Fahmi and the three companies. Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed a breach of contract suit against the respondents, alleging that LSH Capital and its subsidiaries induced a breach of an agreement purportedly reached with the government during a meeting in August 2022. The plaintiffs further claimed that the respondents engaged in dishonest assistance and are seeking a declaration that the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master is void and unlawful. In addition, they are claiming an estimated RM1 billion in damages and are seeking the concession of the iconic Kuala Lumpur landmark to be transferred back to them.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
High Court dismisses former KL Tower operator's committal bid
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has dismissed the leave application by the former operator of Kuala Lumpur Tower to commence committal proceedings against seven individuals and the government. The former operator, Menara Kuala Lumpur Sdn Bhd, and its parent, Hydroshoppe Sdn Bhd, are seeking contempt of court action against the eight for allegedly disrupting the administration of justice amid ongoing legal proceedings. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain, who rejected the application, ordered the two companies to pay RM25,000 to the respondents, including Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil. Six other officials were also named as respondents, including Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Sulizmie Affendy Sulaiman, Federal Land Commissioner Datuk Muhammad Azmi Mohd Zain and Communications Ministry Secretary-General Datuk Mohamad Fauzi Md Isa. In her judgment on Monday (June 9), Judge Roz Mawar ruled that the court was not satisfied there was a prima facie case to warrant the granting of leave for contempt proceedings. She further held that the court was not persuaded by Hydroshoppe's assertion of encroachment on its properties, regardless of the manner, given that its contract with the government had lapsed on March 31. The court also dismissed the inter partes injunction application by Hydroshoppe and Menara KL, ordering both companies to pay RM20,000 each in costs to the government, as well as to LSH Service Master Sdn Bhd, LSH Best Builders Sdn Bhd and Service Master (M) Sdn Bhd. The court then fixed July 14 to hear the striking-out applications filed by Fahmi and the three companies. Hydroshoppe and Menara KL filed a breach of contract suit against the respondents, alleging that LSH Capital and its subsidiaries induced a breach of an agreement purportedly reached with the government during a meeting in August 2022. The plaintiffs further claimed that the respondents engaged in dishonest assistance and are seeking a declaration that the award of the KL Tower concession to LSH Service Master is void and unlawful. In addition, they are claiming an estimated RM1 billion in damages and are seeking the concession of the iconic Kuala Lumpur landmark to be transferred back to them. - Bernama
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Getty's landmark UK lawsuit on copyright and AI set to begin
FILE PHOTO: An AI (Artificial Intelligence) sign is seen at the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai, China July 6, 2023. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo LONDON (Reuters) -Getty Images' landmark copyright lawsuit against artificial intelligence company Stability AI begins at London's High Court on Monday, with the photo provider's case likely to set a key precedent for the law on AI. The Seattle-based company, which produces editorial content and creative stock images and video, accuses Stability AI of breaching its copyright by using its images to "train" its Stable Diffusion system, which can generate images from text inputs. Getty, which is bringing a parallel lawsuit against Stability AI in the United States, says Stability AI unlawfully scraped millions of images from its websites and used them to train and develop Stable Diffusion. Stability AI – which has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding and in March announced investment by the world's largest advertising company, WPP – is fighting the case and denies infringing any of Getty's rights. A Stability AI spokesperson said that "the wider dispute is about technological innovation and freedom of ideas," adding: "Artists using our tools are producing works built upon collective human knowledge, which is at the core of fair use and freedom of expression." Getty's case is one of several lawsuits brought in Britain, the U.S. and elsewhere over the use of copyright-protected material to train AI models, after ChatGPT and other AI tools became widely available more than two years ago. WIDER IMPACT Creative industries are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce their own work after being trained on existing material. Prominent figures including Elton John have called for greater protections for artists. Lawyers say Getty's case will have a major impact on the law, as well as potentially informing government policy on copyright protections relating to AI. "Legally, we're in uncharted territory. This case will be pivotal in setting the boundaries of the monopoly granted by UK copyright in the age of AI," Rebecca Newman, a lawyer at Addleshaw Goddard, who is not involved in the case, said. She added that a victory for Getty could mean that Stability AI and other developers will face further lawsuits. Cerys Wyn Davies, from the law firm Pinsent Masons, said the High Court's ruling "could have a major bearing on market practice and the UK's attractiveness as a jurisdiction for AI development". (Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
