India imposes anti-dumping duty on four Chinese chemicals
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
India has imposed anti-dumping duty on four Chinese chemicals so far this month to guard domestic players from unfairly priced imports from the neighbouring country.These duties were imposed on -- PEDA (used in herbicide); Acetonitrile (used in pharma sector); Vitamin -A Palmitate; and and Insoluble Sulphur.In separate notifications, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Department of Revenue, said that the duty imposed will be levied for a period of five years on imports of these chemicals.The duties were imposed following recommendations for the same from the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), an arm of the commerce ministry.While on PEDA, the duty will range from USD 1,305.6 to USD 2017.9 per tonne, a duty of up to USD 481 per tonne has been imposed on Acetonitrile imported from China, Russia and Taiwan.Similarly, the government has imposed a duty of up to USD 20.87 per Kg duty on Vitamin -A Palmitate imported from China, European Union and Switzerland; and up to USD 358 per tonne on import of Insoluble Sulphur, which is used in tyre industry, and imported from China and Japan.Anti-dumping probes are conducted by countries to determine whether domestic industries have been hurt because of a surge in cheap imports.As a countermeasure, they impose these duties under the multilateral regime of the Geneva-based World Trade Organisation (WTO). Both India and China are members of the multilateral organisations, which deals with global trade norms.The duty is aimed at ensuring fair trading practices and creating a level-playing field for domestic producers vis-a-vis foreign producers and exporters.India is taking steps to boost domestic manufacturing and cut imports from China as the country's trade deficit with China widened to USD 99.2 billion during 2024-25.In the last fiscal, India's exports to China contracted 14.5 per cent to USD 14.25 billion as against USD 16.66 billion in 2023-24. The imports, however, rose by 11.52 per cent in 2024-25 to USD 113.45 billion against USD 101.73 billion in 2023-24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
US Tariffs: Why is Trump going soft on China but playing hardball with India?
US President Donald Trump has extended a tariff truce with China while imposing steep duties on India over its Russian oil imports. The US continues to negotiate with Beijing to avoid economic disruption, yet New Delhi faces a combined 50 per cent tariff burden — a starkly different trade approach towards the two major partners read more Traditional Russian wooden dolls called Matryoshka depicting China's President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump at a souvenir shop in St Petersburg, Russia, November 21, 2024. File Image/AP United States President Donald Trump has adopted sharply different approaches toward two of its largest trading partners — maintaining an extended tariff truce with China while imposing steep trade penalties on India. Trump signed an executive order on Monday granting a further 90-day extension to the existing tariff pause between Washington and Beijing. The previous suspension was due to expire just after midnight on August 12. Without action, tariffs on Chinese imports could have risen from the current 30 per cent to as high as 145 per cent, with China prepared to respond by raising its own duties on American goods from 10 per cent to 125 per cent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump announced the extension on his Truth Social platform, stating that 'all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same.' China's Ministry of Commerce confirmed the move, also declaring that it would suspend certain restrictions against American companies previously placed on an export control list and the 'unreliable entities' list. Some companies will see these restrictions lifted entirely, while others will have a further 90-day relief period. The extension gives both countries additional time to address long-standing trade disputes. US officials have described the talks as aimed at tackling 'trade imbalances' and 'unfair trade practices,' while also seeking greater access for American exporters and addressing national security concerns linked to technology and critical materials. China's embassy in Washington stated that 'win-win cooperation between China and the United States is the right path; suppression and containment will lead nowhere.' Beijing also urged Washington to lift 'unreasonable' restrictions, particularly in the semiconductor sector, and work together to ensure stability in global supply chains. What's at stake for US-China Analysts warned that the threatened tariff rates (Washington threatened 145 per cent on Chinese goods, Beijing countered 125 per cent on US exports) would have effectively ended trade between the two economies, triggering severe global market disruption. In May, both sides agreed during talks in Geneva to roll back those rates in order to stabilisde markets and resume negotiations. That agreement also included US pledges to ease export restrictions on items such as advanced computer chip technology and ethane, an important input in petrochemical production. China, in turn, committed to easing access for US firms to rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical for industries ranging from electric vehicles to aerospace. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sean Stein, president of the US-China Business Council, called the extension 'critical' for allowing time to reach a trade agreement that could 'improve their market access in China and provide the certainty needed for companies to make medium- and long-term plans.' He also noted the importance of agreements on issues such as fentanyl, telling AP, 'Securing an agreement on fentanyl that leads to a reduction in US tariffs and a rollback of China's retaliatory measures is acutely needed to restart US agriculture and energy exports.' Why Trump has gone soft on China The US approach toward China has been influenced by Beijing's control over rare earth minerals and components vital to modern manufacturing. In April, China imposed licensing restrictions on exports of rare earth elements and magnets to the US, prompting strong reactions from American industries, particularly automotive suppliers, which rely heavily on these imports. US firms quickly pressed the administration to find a resolution to prevent domestic production slowdowns. According to Claire Reade, senior counsel at Arnold & Porter and former assistant US trade representative for China affairs, 'The US has realised it does not have the upper hand.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The rare earth issue puts into spotlight Beijing's capacity to retaliate in ways that could disrupt US manufacturing and technology sectors, making negotiation a more attractive option for Washington. Ali Wyne, a specialist in US–China relations at the International Crisis Group, assessed that 'by overestimating the ability of steep tariffs to induce economic concessions from China, the Trump administration has not only underscored the limits of unilateral US leverage, but also given Beijing grounds for believing that it can indefinitely enjoy the upper hand in subsequent talks with Washington by threatening to curtail rare earth exports.' Trump plays hardball with New Delhi While the White House has sought compromises with China, it has taken a much harder line against India, particularly over New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. Trump has confirmed that the US has imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on Indian goods, combined with an additional 25 per cent levy on purchases of Russian oil, amounting to a 50 per cent total tariff burden. Speaking from the White House, Trump said the measure had delivered a 'big blow' to Moscow's economy. 'Doesn't help when the President of the United States tells their largest or second-largest oil buyer that we're putting a 50 per cent tariff on you if you buy oil from Russia. That was a big blow,' he remarked, adding, 'No one else would have been so tough, and I haven't stopped there.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also argued that his tariff strategy has yielded diplomatic gains, claiming it contributed to resolving conflicts in several regions. 'The tariffs have helped, gives us not only the money, but it gives us great power over enemies. We solved five wars — Pakistan and India. Azerbaijan and Armenia — it was raging for 37 years, and the two leaders got up and they said, we never thought this would be solved. Russia tried to solve it. They all tried to solve it. It was a very tough situation, but we got it done,' he said. Why the contrasting strategy China remains a central player in US supply chains and a top-tier trade partner. The US trade deficit with China stood at $262 billion last year, the largest with any single country, making continued engagement a necessity for both economic and political reasons. India, by contrast, has been seen by Trump's team as both a competitor in certain sectors and a less indispensable trade partner. Long-standing tensions over H-1B visa policies and outsourcing have already strained relations. The administration has also taken issue with India's role in refining and exporting Russian oil, which reaches markets including Europe — an area where Washington has sought to maintain unity against Moscow following its actions in Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Analysts point out that Trump's policy agenda seems to be anchored in ending the war in Ukraine and reshoring jobs to the US. In this framework, India becomes a target for pressure, while China, despite being a strategic rival, is approached with more caution. What next for Trump, China Despite the extensions and temporary agreements, major points of contention between Washington and Beijing remain unsettled. US concerns include inadequate protection of intellectual property rights in China, extensive subsidies to Chinese industries, and state-led policies that, according to American officials, give Chinese firms unfair advantages in global markets. Jeff Moon, former US diplomat and trade official, warned that while limited agreements — such as increased Chinese purchases of American soybeans or cooperation on countering fentanyl — are possible, 'the trade war will continue grinding ahead for years into the future.' Regarding a possible truce in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Trump stated, 'Well, we're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin. And at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
Hans India
12 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Softens Stance on Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan After 'Very Interesting' Meeting
In a surprising change of tone, US President Donald Trump has praised Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan just days after demanding his resignation. The reversal came following what Trump described as a 'very interesting' meeting with Tan on Monday, according to Reuters. Only last week, the president had called Tan 'highly conflicted' over his past investments in Chinese technology firms, including companies linked to the Chinese military. At that time, Trump declared there was 'no other solution' but for the Intel chief to step down — an unusually direct intervention by a US leader into corporate leadership matters. The shift followed a meeting at the White House attended by Tan, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Trump, speaking afterward, praised Tan's 'amazing story' and revealed that the group would be presenting suggestions to him next week. The change in sentiment appeared to boost investor confidence, with Intel shares rising 3% in after-hours trading. Lip-Bu Tan, a Malaysian-born Chinese American, has been at Intel's helm for roughly six months, taking charge during one of the most challenging periods in the company's history. He has initiated sweeping strategic changes, including asset sales, workforce reductions, and a renewed focus on competitive technologies. Intel has been working to claw back market share in the booming artificial intelligence chip sector, a field currently dominated by Nvidia, while also trying to fix delays and setbacks in its manufacturing operations. Earlier this year, Reuters reported that Tan and funds linked to him had invested more than $200 million in hundreds of Chinese companies, including contractors for the People's Liberation Army. While such investments are legal unless they involve entities on a US Treasury blacklist, the revelations raised concerns in Washington. Intel has since stated that Tan has divested from Chinese entities, though the details remain murky. Following Monday's meeting, Intel issued a statement calling the discussion with Trump 'candid and constructive,' adding that both sides focused on strengthening US technology and manufacturing leadership. The company pledged to work closely with the administration to 'restore this great American company.' The original wave of criticism toward Tan was amplified after Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board questioning the CEO's past business links. The controversy came at a sensitive time for Intel, which last year secured $8 billion in subsidies under the 2022 CHIPS Act to expand domestic manufacturing. Despite the show of unity, Intel still faces steep hurdles. Its massive Ohio factory project has been delayed, with completion now expected sometime in the next decade, while new manufacturing processes have encountered quality issues. Plans for overseas expansion have also been scaled back. Trump's change of heart underscores his hands-on approach to strategic industries such as semiconductors — ensuring that corporate leadership aligns with broader US national and economic priorities.
United News of India
38 minutes ago
- United News of India
US, China agree to critical extension on tariff surge
Washington, Aug 12 (UNI) The United States and China agreed to pause tariff hikes on each other's goods for an additional 90 days, according to an executive order signed by President Donald Trump here. Without the agreement, tariffs were set to immediately surge, risking a return to ultra-high levels that had formed an effective blockade on trade between the world's two largest economies, reports CNN. The news, first reported by CNBC, comes hours ahead of a deadline when tariffs on Chinese goods were set to rise to 54 percent from 30 percent, and Chinese tariffs on American exports would return to 34 percent from 10 percent. In a joint statement with the US on Monday, China confirmed the 90-day trade truce extension and said it would maintain the 10 percent tariffs it has imposed on American goods during that period. The statement was based on the bilateral negotiations that took place in Sweden last month, it said. The extension comes after Trump imposed a slew of 'reciprocal' tariffs on trading partners around the world, which have raised the United States' effective tariff rate to levels not seen since the Great Depression. UNI XC SS
