
Benefits reforms would decimate my £14k handouts, without PIP my luxuries like fags & posh pet accessories would be gone
PIP HOORAY Benefits reforms would decimate my £14k handouts, without PIP my luxuries like fags & posh pet accessories would be gone
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A SENSE of ease comes over me, as I read the news on the sun-trap terrace which overlooks my sprawling garden as I realise my benefits aren't going anywhere.
Until Tuesday a guillotine was hanging above me, threatening to cut off my monthly PIP payments, but thanks to a retreat from Keir Starmer they're safe… for now.
5
Erica Crompton says she depends on her £295 PIP she receives a month
Credit: SUPPLIED
5
She believes should be able to spend her stipend on little luxuries
Reforms would have seen disabled Brits like me face stricter tests to qualify for support the changes have now been shelved entirely — with no set date for when, or if, they will happen
How long my comfortable life will last remains to be seen as it seems my £14,400 income from Universal Credit and PIP are always up for grabs, no matter the party in power.
I've come to see the majority of political parties as the real thugs.
Whoever is in power, you can guarantee they'll have threatened - or have already implemented - major cuts to my income.
Had Labour's suggested cuts come into play I may have lost £600 of the total sum of £1200 I receive in benefits a month.
It might seem like a lot but I implore you to bear in mind that minimum wages, full-time, meets £2,000 a month. So, my total benefits aren't exactly a footballer's salary or an heir's trust fund.
For Universal Credit, I now get £381 housing benefit; £201 for caring over 24 hours a week and £400 for being unemployed due to my schizophrenia (it seems to change month-by-month and is constantly under review meaning this could also be up for grabs).
PIP is a standard, monthly payment of £295 I always get. It helps with costs associated with my illness - regardless of whether or not I'm in work.
The proposal of a points system for PIP meant I would lose it completely as I only score 2 points for a few concerns over 12 questions (in total mine was 11 points).
For example: communication can be hard in groups and I often fall out with friends and family - especially on the internet, phone or Whatsapp.
Disability benefit explained - what you can claim
Or I might need prompting for my weekly bath, simply because I'm getting smelly.
These side effects all only score 2 points, not the proposed 4 to keep PIP.
This week Reeve's plans were watered down by Starmer, thanks to some more moral Labour backbenchers (with backbones?)
Given the hateful responses I receive when I speak publicly about claiming benefits, I doubt I've heard the last of any of our 'disability benefits being axed.'
As I casually scroll through the comments I received on social media, I get more angry faces and hateful comments than murderers, child killers and rapists.
I have to disagree with all of them and believe I - we - deserve support from the state for a severe mental illness, mine is schizo-affective disorder, and for putting in 50 hours a week caring for my partner, a wheelchair user.
I also believe without the cost of children, I should be able to spend my stipend on little luxuries like my 60 fags a day habit and hand-painted cat food bowls which I imported for £75 from India.
I'm aware that many countries' welfare states don't exist, like India where my cat bowls hail from, so I'm still grateful for any support I do receive.
What is PIP?
HOUSEHOLDS suffering from a long-term illness, disability or mental health condition can get extra help through personal independence payments (PIP).
The maximum you can receive from the Government benefit is £172.75 a week.
PIP is for those over 16 and under the state pension age, currently 66.
Crucially, you must also have a health condition or disability where you either have had difficulties with daily living or getting around - or both- for three months, and you expect these difficulties to continue for at least nine months (unless you're terminally ill with less than 12 months to live).
You can also claim PIP if you're in or out of work and if you're already getting limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCWRA) payments if you claim Universal Credit.
PIP is made up of two parts and whether you get one or both of these depends on how severely your condition affects you.
You may get the mobility part of PIP if you need help going out or moving around. The weekly rate for this is either £26.90 or £71.
While on the daily living part of PIP, the weekly rate is either £68.10 or £101.75 - and you could get both elements, so up to £172.75 in total.
You can claim PIP at the same time as other benefits, except the armed forces independence payment.
Make a claim by calling the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) on 0800 917 2222.
5
Erica qualifies for PIP due to her schizo-affective disorder but she would have lost it had Labour's proposed reforms come into place
Credit: Supplied
5
As well as Universal Credit she receives a carers allowance for acting as her partner Paul's carer
Credit: Erica Crompton
It's not just trolls saying I'm a 'leech' or 'scrounger' who I face criticism from though - even doctors can't agree on what schizophrenia is and many naysayers even go as far as to say "it's only in the mind & there's nothing wrong at all" or that it's just a 'human response to traumatic life events'.
But what they don't factor in is the major physical toll my mental health takes on my body.
I'd like to offer these negative Nellys a day's worth of my medication and see how they get on.
My boyfriend Paul was mostly in bed asleep for three days after just one dose he mistook for a paracetamol which I've taken three times a day for over two decades.
This tiredness is real.
Paranoia is real, it's hard to be around more than one person when you're trying to read code behind everyone's speech (a typical schizo-spectrum symptom known as 'thought broadcasting').
The poor personal hygiene is real, I might only bathe once a week. My anxiety is crippling, too, but I've learned to put on a brave face and try to remain calm and positive. Still, even a brave face doesn't erase a churning stomach.
But Reeve's 'four point' system didn't take these things into account. You may well have needed to prove that you have an actual carer come in to wash your bottom twice a day to get 4 points on PIP benefits.
WHAT WERE THE PROPOSED CHANGED TO PIP?
DISABLED Brits would have faced stricter tests to qualify for support under the original benefits crackdown.
They would have needed to score at least four points in one activity like washing, dressing, or preparing food.
Currently, people can qualify by scoring eight points across multiple tasks, making it easier to access the benefit.
Last week, Labour agreed to limit the crackdown to new claimants only after a backlash from MPs.
But under the latest retreat, the changes have now been shelved entirely — with no set date for when, or if, they will happen.
Sir Keir Starmer suffered a major rebellion this week by 49 of his own MPs tonight as his welfare reforms scraped through after another round of last-minute concessions.
But after more fury from the backbenches, he shelved controversial disability benefit reforms to stave off a Labour revolt.
Ministers have now scrapped plans to tighten rules for Personal Independence Payments (PIP) after furious backbenchers warned they would sink the controversial Bill.
In the end, MPs voted the legislation through by a majority of 75, with 335 in favour and 260 against.
Any proposed changes to Personal Independence Payments now won't kick in until after a review has taken place.
The PIP benefits - the main disability welfare payment for those with a disability - is subject to a review by Welfare Minister Sir Stephen Timms.
The benefit payments are in place to help those affected with daily tasks such as mobility.
Payments currently start at £1,500 but rise to £9,600 which are paid out even if someone is still working.
The daily living rate comes in at £73.90 for the lower rate and £110.40 for the higher rate.
Figures show that the mobility rate is worth £29.20 and rises to £77.05 for the higher rate.
Ministers have revealed that 1,000 people per day are claiming PIP - which is the equivalent of the size of Leicester every year.
Following a major rebellion, those who are now claiming PIP be able to claim the same amount of money.
But for new claimants from November 2026, there will be a set of stricter measures set out as the government aims to reduce spending on the benefits and get people back to work.
Never mind reeking too much to leave the house and be in public - let alone in an office.
This idea that work might make us better - which Reeves drove home and used to justify her cruel cuts - felt like gaslighting. 'We believe if you can work, you should work.' she stated.
But PIP is a benefit you can also claim while working.
Like me, many need their benefits - both PIP and Universal Credit - to 'top-up' part-time work wages and that allows them to manage their disability, to care for a loved one, or both.
For ten years in my twenties I worked two-three jobs to make ends meet. I always ended up on the mental health crisis phoneline, with a duty nurse telling me I needed to take substantial time off or quit my job.
Eventually I quit working full-time for good, and my mental health has improved markedly.
I now care full-time and put in 10-16 hours of writing a week.
I know first hand, poverty doesn't cure mental illness (or any disability) - it exasperates them, and only makes them worse - putting even more strain on an already underfunded NHS.
Therefore any kind of cuts to disability benefits, particularly those that penalise people with mental health issues will only cost us more in the long run, both in budgets and lives.
And while I appreciate that reforms may be on hold for now I dread to think what could come out in Sir Stephen Timms' PIP review at the end of 2026.
But I beg Labour not to cast people like me aside. We're not scroungers and for us PIP is a lifeline.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
35 minutes ago
- The Sun
After Two Tier Keir, we now have Two Tear Rachel… Reeves is finished but how long before her boss exits too?
IF there is one cast-iron rule in politics, it's this: If the Prime Minister is having to say he has full confidence you will stay in your job, your days are definitely numbered. So no wonder then that Rachel Reeves was moved to tears as she sat behind Sir Keir Starmer at PMQs on Wednesday when, after months of saying she would be his Chancellor until the next election and beyond, he chose to studiously dodge the question. 2 2 After Two-Tier Keir, we now have Two-Tear Rachel. As those tears rolled down her cheeks, the Chancellor prompted feverish speculation about the cause of her sobs — wiping £3billion off the markets, pushing up government borrowing costs and devaluing the Pound into the bargain. Wheeled out to face the cameras yesterday, Reeves plastered on the make-up and a beaming smile to insist she had been upset about a ' personal issue ' and had been 'having a tough day' which, unlike most people's bad days, was broadcast 'on the telly' for all to see. We may never know the true reason behind her blubbing, but what we do know is that her wobbly bottom lip didn't just wobble the markets, it also sent trembles through the entire Government. Facing a swift exit There is no doubt now that Rachel Reeves is facing a swift exit from the Treasury, even if she does survive until the autumn Budget. Yet the real question mark now is not over HER future but that of her boss, the Prime Minister. This, after all, was supposed to be a week of celebration for Labour's first year in office after winning a landslide victory in the General Election last July. Instead the PM has suffered a humiliating defeat in the Commons over his welfare reforms at the hands of his own backbenchers and been forced to deny he plans to sack his Chancellor while facing approval ratings so low that they've surfaced in New Zealand. Some of us knew this Labour government would be bad but not many realised just how bad they would turn out to be. It would have been inconceivable a year ago to imagine, after being elected to Downing Street with a whopping 411 MPs, that Starmer would be facing questions about not only his Chancellor's future but even his own so soon. Even Britney Spears has had longer honeymoons than this. Squirming Keir Starmer refuses to say Rachel Reeves will be Chancellor at next election after horror Budget And for all the PM's claims that Reeves will be Chancellor for years to come, after months of broken promises and U-turns no one actually believes a word he says any more. After all, Rachel From Accounts hardly had a great start in the job. From the disastrous decision to cut winter fuel payments to ten million pensioners to the inflation-busting pay rises for train drivers and doctors, to the revelations that her CV was full of exaggerations and her taste for freebie tickets to Taylor Swift concerts, the Chancellor's reputation has long been in tatters. The sight of Reeves blubbing in the Commons this week wasn't just embarrassing for her — it embarrassed the whole country. And the desperate cries of 'bullying!' and 'sexism!' by Labour MPs are shameless coming from a party that happily attacked both Margaret Thatcher and Theresa May for crying as they left office. If you can't stand the heat, Rachel, get out of the Number 11 kitchen. The Chancellor's claims to have had a 'tough day' will fall flat with many voters who are having tough days EVERY day thanks to this Government's policies. What about people struggling to pay their bills as the cost of living continues to rise and taxes go up? What about pensioners worried about putting the heating on last winter after Reeves took away their winter fuel allowance? What about the farmers who face losing their family farm thanks to the inheritance tax hike? What about the small business owners who have had to shut up shop after the Chancellor's employer National Insurance rises? Everyone in Westminster knows that the only thing keeping Reeves in her job right now is that she acts as the PM's human shield — someone he can blame for every mishap, every poor judgment, every U-turn and every tax rise to come in the next Budget. From being hailed as Labour's greatest asset, as 'the first woman Chancellor' (as if anyone cared), Reeves has quickly become the Government's punching bag. No wonder the tears have started rolling. It is obvious to everyone that Rachel From Accounts is way out of her depth. But she isn't alone. Starmer is also flailing around like a drowning man, desperate to blame anyone and anything else for his own failings. Nothing of substance Ultimately, though, everyone knows he is in charge and the buck stops with him. Reeves may have exposed a fatal weakness with her tears, but the past 12 months have revealed far greater failings in her boss. As he marks his first year in office, we now know that underneath Starmer's shiny helmet of Brylcreemed hair, there is absolutely nothing of substance. Sir Keir has proved himself to be a Prime Minister with no ideas and no philosophy, no policies and no plan; a man with no backbone and no moral compass. He is a leader who cannot lead, a manager who cannot manage, a politician with no political instinct. The Prime Minister is just an empty suit — and he likely didn't even pay for the suit himself. He probably got Labour donor Lord Ali to buy it for him. Starmer can keep telling us that his Chancellor is going nowhere but we all know her exit from the Treasury will come sooner rather than later. The question remains, after his damaging and chaotic first 12 months in office, can the country survive another year of this Prime Minister? VYLAN COUNT COST OF HATE WORDS have consequences, as the Left-wing cancel culture mob have cried for years as they happily ended the careers of anyone who dared to question them. Well, indeed they do for Bob Vylan, the punk-rap duo from the mean streets of Ipswich, who led chants of 'Death, death to the IDF' and ranted about 'f***ing Zionists' during their Glastonbury performance as it was live-streamed on the BBC iPlayer. Not only do they now face a criminal investigation over their antisemitic chants, they've been dropped by their management, seen visas for a US tour revoked, and UK gigs have been cancelled. Oops. There have been consequences too for the BBC, where institutional antisemitism is now so part and parcel of the corporation's culture that, no one – not even the Director General Tim Davie – could spot the obvious anti-Jew hatred in those chants and shut down the live feed from public view. Now the BBC has said it will no longer live-broadcast 'high risk' performances and staff may face disciplinary action for any failures. As Bob Vylan face the fallout from their 'music' hate-fest, they should learn a lesson from another Glasto performer. As Rod Stewart proved, there's a lot more longevity in showbiz for entertainers who show musical talent than there is for those spewing vile torrents of hate. Oh yes, and a bevy of beautiful leggy blonde backing singers helps too.


Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves has made herself unsackable by crying at PMQs, claim Labour critics
Rachel Reeves has made herself unsackable by crying at Prime Minister's Questions, Labour critics have claimed. The Chancellor's display of emotion in the Commons on Wednesday was followed by Sir Keir Starmer giving her his unequivocal backing. The Prime Minister committed to keeping Ms Reeves in the Cabinet for the rest of his first term as colleagues publicly rallied around the Chancellor, who said she was dealing with an unexplained 'personal issue' when she burst into tears. However, a government source complained that Sir Keir 'seems to have tied himself to her' after her tears, which triggered a £3bn market sell-off and crash in the value of sterling. 'I thought at the beginning of Wednesday she would go, then thought it was confirmed when I saw her crying at PMQs, but then she didn't,' said the source. Another source said Ms Reeves had enjoyed an 'outpouring of sympathy' over an incident that was still 'inescapably linked to the political facts' of the welfare rebellion. A third added that being pictured distraught on television had 'shored up her position'. One insider said that, since Monday, the mood in Whitehall has transitioned from 'head in hands' over the welfare rebellion to the 'surreal horror' of watching Ms Reeves cry in the Commons. 'The dark clouds were descending,' said another source. 'Not in a terminal sense, but that everything was going wrong at once.' Some Labour MPs have privately suggested that the Chancellor should be sacked for her opposition to reducing the benefit cuts. Ms Reeves and Sir Keir put on a united front on Thursday, hugging in front of the cameras as they launched the Government's health strategy. The Chancellor said: 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job.' She later added that 'when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly, and most people don't have to deal with that'. Sir Keir said politicians are 'humans in the end' as he praised Ms Reeves, adding that she would serve in her role 'for many years to come'. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said: 'She is a tough character. She is resilient, and she will bounce back' The Telegraph understands that the Chancellor also spoke to Angela Rayner, with whom she has previously had a difficult relationship, about the emotional episode on either Wednesday night or Thursday morning. Rumours that her tears came after a row with either Sir Keir or Ms Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, were denied on Wednesday. While Ms Reeves is now considered safe, there is still talk of a reshuffle of other Cabinet ministers, their aides or more junior colleagues. Some advisers think Sir Keir will launch a 'reset' just before the parliamentary summer break, which begins on July 22, to allow new ministers to familiarise themselves with their brief before the Labour Party conference at the end of September. Others think the Prime Minister is more likely to wait until early in the new year, noting that he 'seldom rushes things' and has a tendency to give members of his team plenty of time to improve before sacking them. The PMQs session followed a week of tense negotiation between the Government and Labour rebels, who forced almost £5 billion in concessions on Sir Keir's benefits reforms. Ms Reeves, who opposed a Government U-turn, will now be forced to find that money in her autumn Budget, on top of existing commitments and a black hole of around £20bn. She has promised to do that without breaching Labour's fiscal rules or raising any of the 'big three' taxes – VAT, National Insurance and income tax. Treasury sources insist that the fiscal situation could improve later this year if the cost of servicing government debt falls or Britain experiences significant economic growth. But there is a consensus in other departments that Ms Reeves is now boxed in by her previous commitments. 'I can't see how she can pull it off after all the promises she has made,' said one source. Another added: 'She's in an impossible position, but that wasn't a secret. Now it's even more impossible.' A new poll by YouGov, published on Thursday, showed almost three-quarters of voters now expect Labour to break its manifesto pledge to not raise the three largest taxes. 'My guess is that we will keep to those promises, but there are decisions to be taken,' a source said. 'We didn't want to come in and raise taxes last year, but circumstances meant we had to do something.' There is disagreement over how politically damaging it would be for Labour to break its manifesto pledges on tax, after a year of turmoil with the election of Donald Trump and war in the Middle East. It may not be mathematically possible to raise as much as Ms Reeves requires in the autumn without touching those taxes. Freezing income tax thresholds, which would not be a manifesto breach, would raise around £10 billion, while some form of wealth tax or higher rate of capital gains tax could make up some of the rest of the shortfall. But higher taxes of any kind are unlikely to be popular, regardless of whether they come as a surprise to the public. 'Is the Treasury orthodoxy running Britain without any political lens?' asked a source. 'They are just looking at a column on a spreadsheet that says they need £5bn and they go to another column in the Budget and get it from there, without thinking about the politics.'

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Ex-Labour MP says she will set up new party with Jeremy Corbyn
Zarah Sultana – who had the Labour whip suspended last year – said she was resigning from Sir Keir Starmer's party and would 'co-lead the founding of a new party' with the ex-Labour leader. In a statement posted on X, Ms Sultana, who represents Coventry South, said that the project would also involve 'other independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country'. Today, after 14 years, I'm resigning from the Labour Party. Jeremy Corbyn and I will co-lead the founding of a new party, with other Independent MPs, campaigners and activists across the country. Join us. The time is now. Sign up here to stay updated: — Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) July 3, 2025 She said that 'Westminster is broken but the real crisis is deeper' and the 'two-party system offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises'. She added: 'A year ago I was suspended by the Labour Party for voting to abolish the two-child benefit cap and lift 400,000 children out of poverty. I'd do it again. I voted against scrapping winter fuel payments for pensioners. I'd do it again. Now, the Government wants to make disabled people suffer; they just can't decide how much.' She urged people to 'join us'. Ms Sultana was one of seven MPs who had the Labour whip suspended last summer when they supported an amendment to the King's Speech which related to the two-child benefit cap. Four of the seven had the whip restored earlier this year but Ms Sultana was not among them.