logo
President Donald Trump on attack at Al Udeid: Iran got revenge out of its 'system'

President Donald Trump on attack at Al Udeid: Iran got revenge out of its 'system'

Yahoo5 days ago
WASHINGTON — Iran's first major response to the June 21 U.S. attack on its nuclear facilities appears to have been mostly foiled and launched against a base that had been largely evacuated, according to U.S. officials.
What comes next? A spiraling conflict or an uneasy, unspoken ceasefire? President Donald Trump signaled its the latter with Iran getting revenge out of its "system."
Iran targeted, Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar, the sprawling command center for the Pentagon's air war operations in the Middle East, with a barrage of short- and medium-range ballistic missiles. There were no U.S. casualties, according to a Defense official who was not authorized to speak publicly.
There about 10,000 U.S. troops stationed at Al Udeid, on the outskirts of Qatar's capital of Doha. Its air operations center has overseen fighters, bombers and drones that have conducted combat missions in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.
Dignitaries make stops there frequently, including Trump and secretaries of Defense.
The Qatari military shot down most if not all the missiles, according to a second U.S. official who also was not authorized to speak publicly. Trump, in a social media post, said 13 of the 14 missiles were intercepted and one caused "hardly any damage."
Iran gave advance notice of the attack, Trump said, and that with that volley of missiles they had "gotten it all out of their 'system.'"
Iran could continue to fire missiles at bases housing 40,000 U.S. troops in the Middle East. Its missiles have the range to hit all of them, the second official said. The official agreed with Trump that, just as likely, Iran could cite Monday's attack as its response to "Operation Midnight Hammer" and stand down, the official said.
For two weeks, Israel has conducted punishing raids on Israel, destroying much of its air defense and leaving it vulnerable to attack. The June 21 attack by the Pentagon employed the world's most potent bunker-buster bombs and has damaged if not destroyed a good portion of its nuclear enterprise, Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters Sunday. A more thorough assessment of the damage at Fodrow, Natanz and Isfahan will take time, he said.
More: How does a bunker-buster bomb work? A closer look at the GBU-57
Michael O'Hanlon, a military expert at the Brookings Institution, said Trump and the Pentagon would be wise to read Iran's intent behind its counterattack and wait to determine if a response is warranted.
'With this attack, Iran is signaling a desire to save face while deescalating,' O'Hanlon said. 'I'd be inclined to let it be, especially because other things are still unfolding — specifically, our efforts to figure out what really happened at Fordow in terms of bomb damage assessment and consider next steps from there. We don't need to worry about face ourselves, in my judgment.'
Trump has shown a willingness to end the cycle of tit-for-tat attacks with Iran. In 2020, he ordered the killing by drone of Qasem Soleimani, the Iranian general who led its Quds Force. Iran responded by attacking al Asad Air Base in western Iraq, wounding more than 100 U.S. troops.
Trump downplayed the significance of Iran's response and did not retaliate.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump: attack on Al Udeid got revenge out of Iran's 'system'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paramount gives Trump $16 million, no apology
Paramount gives Trump $16 million, no apology

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Paramount gives Trump $16 million, no apology

Trump's feud with Paramount is over (for now, at least), and it ended about as expected. The broadcaster agreed to pay the president $16 million to settle his $20 billion suit against it, initially filed in October 2024 over a 60 Minutes segment the president claims was edited in Kamala Harris' favor, per The Hollywood Reporter. The settlement money will go towards Trump's presidential library. Paramount did maintain a small bit of dignity in its refusal to apologize to the president for the interview, which was one of his demands. The company did agree, however, to release transcripts of interviews with all presidential candidates after those interviews have aired. While apologizing may have made it a tiny bit worse, settling was still seen by many as the less palatable option. Paramount's own attorneys previously denounced the suit as a 'meritless assault on the First Amendment,' with multiple legal experts opining that it would surely have been dismissed had it gone to court. Rumors of the settlement also led to significant internal tension within CBS' ranks. High-ranking executives Bill Owens and Wendy McMahon both resigned in the months prior to today's announcement, citing loss of journalistic independence. 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl also told The New Yorker Radio Hour that she was 'beginning to think about mourning, grieving. But I'm holding out hope… I know there's going to be a settlement. I know there's going to be some money exchanged… And then we will hopefully still be around, turning a new page, and finding out what that new page is gonna look like.' So why did Paramount capitulate? As 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley said on-air after Bill Owens' departure, 'Our parent company, Paramount, is trying to complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it.' We'll see if the settlement leads to FCC approval for that all-important merger with Skydance in the coming weeks and months. In the meantime, the Writers Guild of America East has derided the settlement as a 'transparent attempt to curry favors with an administration in the hopes it will allow Paramount Global and Skydance Media merger to be cleared for approval,' per a statement. 'Paramount's decision to capitulate to Trump threatens journalists' ability to do their job reporting on powerful public figures.' We'll also see if this settlement sets a precedent for how media bosses deal with Trump's inevitable future suits moving forward. More from A.V. Club 3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend Spoiler Space: Jurassic World Rebirth once again makes dinosaurs everyone's problem Alicia Silverstone screws the wrong boy toy in the terrible erotic thriller Pretty Thing

Trump threatens political consequences for any Republicans trying to help PBS, NPR
Trump threatens political consequences for any Republicans trying to help PBS, NPR

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump threatens political consequences for any Republicans trying to help PBS, NPR

When news of Paramount's $16 million settlement with Trump broke last week, industry veterans and other government officials were quick to warn that it would only spur on the president's crusade against the media. It seems like that's already happening. In a pretty naked display of The Way Things Work Now, Trump threatened to revoke his endorsement from any Republican who voted against his plan to slash billions in funding from public broadcasters like NPR and PBS in a post on Truth Social Thursday night. The president specifically wrote that it was 'very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill [sic] and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together. Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement.' In June, the House of Representatives narrowly approved a bill that would cut $1.1 billion in funding that had previously been approved for public media such as PBS and NPR. The vote followed a May executive order that claimed the broadcasters were 'biased' and suggested that 'government funding of news media in this environment is not only outdated and unnecessary but corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.' Congress had already allocated $535 million for public broadcasters this fiscal year, per TheWrap. PBS is specifically receiving $325 million, which it says accounts for 22% of its total funding. While he may be attempting to shame his own party out of standing in opposition to the bill, Trump is facing legal challenges from both NPR and PBS. PBS' suit specifically names the president's claim of bias as 'viewpoint discrimination' and accuses the administration of violating its First Amendment rights with the executive order. The funding cuts will also force multiple local stations to go dark if they go through, PBS chief Paula Kerger shared during a May interview with Katie Couric (via TheWrap). 'I think we'll figure out a way, through digital, to make sure there is some PBS content,' Kerger said. 'But there won't be anyone in the community creating local content. There won't be a place for people to come together.' The rescissions bill now needs a majority of votes in the Senate for approval. That vote is expected to occur next week. More from A.V. Club 3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend Nacho Vigalondo retreats to an unimaginative dream world for Daniela Forever George Lucas making first-ever official appearance at Comic-Con this year

EU, Mexico open to trade negotiations after latest Trump tariffs announced
EU, Mexico open to trade negotiations after latest Trump tariffs announced

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

EU, Mexico open to trade negotiations after latest Trump tariffs announced

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, in response to President Trump's latest tariff announcement, say they are open to trade talks but won't rule out taking countermeasures. Trump in his Saturday letters to von der Leyen and Sheinbaum announced a 30 percent tariff rate on goods imported into the U.S. beginning Aug. 1, after an initial 90-day pause and deadline delay lapses on the import taxes. 'Imposing 30 percent tariffs on EU exports would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic,' the European Union (EU) leader wrote in a statement. 'Few economies in the world match the European Union's level of openness and adherence to fair trading practices,' von der Leyen continued. 'The EU has consistently prioritized a negotiated solution with the U.S., reflecting our commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership.' Still, the European leader said the commission is open to working toward an agreement before the latest deadline arrives. 'We remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1,' von der Leyen wrote. 'At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required.' She added, 'Meanwhile, we continue to deepen our global partnerships, firmly anchored in the principles of rules-based international trade.' Sheinbaum on Saturday said Mexican leaders met with the Trump administration on Thursday to discuss 'issues of security, migration, border and water management.' 'We mentioned at the meeting that this was an unfair deal and that we disagreed,' she wrote in a statement, according to translation. She added later, 'In other words, Mexico is already in negotiations.' In April, Trump hit the EU with a 20 percent tariff. Following his 'Liberation Day' announcement, von der Leyen said the commission was open to trade discussions. Later in the month, she lashed out at Trump, accusing him of leaning on an 'unpredictable tariff policy.' The president has in the past claimed the EU has been unfair to the U.S. and argued that the bloc of nations was created to 'screw' America. Several of the union's member states — including Germany, Italy, France and the Netherlands — are considered top trading partners. Mexico, which is the U.S.'s top trading partner, along with Canada earlier this year were slapped with 25 percent tariffs — with the exception of goods covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. Sheinbaum and Trump have also clashed in the past over the import taxes. In her statement Saturday, the Mexican leader said trade talks were focused on looking to protect companies and jobs 'on both sides of the border.' Trump in recent days began sending letters to various countries with new tariff rates set to begin on Aug. 1. The duties on goods coming into the U.S. have hit top trade partners and poorer countries alike as he reorients the nation's trade policy. So far, the leaders of 25 countries have received letters with updated 'retaliatory' tariff rates ranging from 20 percent to 50 percent. While he originally said the August date was 'not firm' for imposing the taxes, the president has since doubled down on the deadline — though the Trump administration has left open the door for more trade deals. Trump has so far announced just one official agreement with the United Kingdom as well as frameworks for deals with China and Vietnam.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store