Former Premier League ref Coote charged by FA for offensive comments about Klopp
LONDON (AP) — Former Premier League referee David Coote was charged by the Football Association on Tuesday for making offensive comments to friends about ex-Liverpool manager Jürgen Klopp in a private video that ended up being widely circulated on social media, leading to the match official getting fired.
Coote is alleged to have 'acted in an improper manner and/or used abusive and/or insulting words,' the FA said about a video recorded around July 2020.
Advertisement
The governing body said it's alleged that the official's actions constitute an 'aggravated breach' of rules because they 'included a reference — whether express or implied — to nationality.'
Two videos, apparently filmed using a phone, circulated on social media appearing to show Coote giving his personal opinion on Liverpool and Klopp, its long-time former manager, when asked by an unidentified man.
Coote uses an expletive for Liverpool and a derogatory term for Klopp, saying he disliked the German manager because he was 'arrogant' and 'accused me of lying' after one game.
Coote was initially suspended for his conduct and then fired in December because his position was deemed 'untenable' by English soccer's referees body following an investigation into his conduct.
Advertisement
Coote was also investigated by the FA following allegations in British newspaper The Sun that he discussed with a fan the possibility of giving a yellow card to a player in a match. Coote denied any wrongdoing and the FA said Tuesday no charges were issued in relation to that investigation.
Separately, UEFA launched an investigation into Coote following a video, again published by The Sun, allegedly showing him using cocaine during the European Championship this year.
___
AP soccer: https://apnews.com/hub/soccer
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News24
32 minutes ago
- News24
FIFA Club World Cup: Ulsan HD FC v Mamelodi Sundowns
Live coverage of the FIFA Club World Cup Group F clash between Ulsan HD FC and M...
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
LeBron James makes stance clear on coaching following eventual NBA retirement
Between being an NBA champion, MVP and even a barbie doll, LeBron James has seen and done almost all of it — and you can scratch being a coach off that list. James said on his 'Mind the Game' podcast with co-host Steve Nash that he'd never become a coach after a fan posed the question. 'Let me just stop that one right now and say, please don't coach,' Nash said while reading a question about who James would coach for — if anyone. 3 LeBron James will not be coaching, he said on his podcast. X, @mindthegamepod 'There's no way, guys,' James said while laughing and making hand gestures to further show his denial. 'Appreciate you for the kind question, but it ain't happening. No team. Zero chance.' James, 40, is approaching the end of his NBA playing career and his future beyond playing is a mystery. James is a part-owner of the Fenway Sports Group, which is a stakeholder in Liverpool and the Red Sox, so he'll be involved in professional sports in some capacity. He had also been rumored to be involved in a potential NBA expansion team that James could lead upon his retirement. 3 LeBron James coaches up Austin Reaves YouTube | Daniel Li 3 LeBron James has long been a player coach. AP James has been seen on the sidelines for much of his career, coaching younger players on his teams, including a viral clip with Austin Reaves in his rookie year. He had recently teased his retirement in an advertisement, with his $52.6 million option for the 2026 season still waiting to be picked up. He is widely expected to return to the Lakers this offseason, although this is supposed to be an extremely active trade season and it seems like anything is possible at this point.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
U.K. parliament votes to bar prosecution for abortions in England, Wales
LONDON — British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize the termination of pregnancies after 24 weeks in England in Wales, marking the biggest change to abortion laws in England and Wales in decades. Lawmakers voted 379 to 137 in favor of an amendment that would prevent the criminal prosecution of someone suspected of having an unlawful abortion. Abortion in England and Wales is illegal under the 1861 Offences against the Person Act — a Victorian-era law that makes abortion a criminal offense that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. That bill was written at a time when women could not vote, own property after marriage, or access higher education. Tuesday's vote follows an increase in recent years in investigations and prosecutions of people suspected of having illegal abortions. That abortion is technically illegal in England and Wales surprises many people, including those living here, as access to the procedure is widespread. The amended 1967 Abortion Act carved out exceptions, allowing abortions at up to 24 weeks if approved by two doctors. But outside of specific criteria, it is still a criminal offense. Tuesday's vote will remove the criminal penalties for having an abortion, even outside of these parameters. Tonia Antoniazzi, the Labour lawmaker who championed the amendment, said it was a 'once in a generation' opportunity and the 'right change at the right time.' Antoniazzi also insisted that the rules under the 1967 Act for how abortion services are provided will not change. Until recent years, prosecutions were almost unheard of. But campaigners say that around 100 women over the past decade were investigated for suspected unlawful abortions. Since December 2022, six have been charged. Among them was Nicola Packer, 45, who was arrested in a hospital after taking abortion pills during the coronavirus lockdown. She denied knowing that she was 26 weeks pregnant. Four years later, after a trial in which intimate details of her personal life were examined, a jury found her not guilty. But the case sparked calls to update abortion laws. 'There must be no more Nicola Packers,' Antoniazzi told the House of Commons on Tuesday. Louise McCudden, U.K. head of external affairs for MSI Reproductive Choices, one of Britain's biggest abortion providers, called the prosecutions 'a real anomaly in our law. Even in places like Texas, they don't tend to prosecute the woman herself.' 'The investigations themselves have been horrific,' McCudden said. 'In some cases, women have been separated from their children, their names made public, they've received death threats, they didn't take pills but had a stillbirth or a miscarriage.' The rise of investigations coincided with a legal change that allowed access to abortion pills that can be taken at home at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy. Surveys show that the overwhelming majority of Britons favor making abortion legal. But polls also show that most people don't support extending the legal time limit beyond 24 weeks' gestation. Critics of the amendment argued that it would effectively legalize self-induced abortion at any point up until birth. Rebecca Paul, a Conservative member of Parliament, told the House of Commons that the change would mean 'fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences.' Many European countries in recent years have expanded abortion rights. Denmark and Norway recently extended the legal limit from 12 to 18 weeks. Last year, France enshrined abortion as a 'guaranteed freedom' into its Constitution, and Ireland liberalized its laws after a public referendum in 2018. Other countries have maintained or tightened access. The current Polish government has failed to deliver on a pledge to liberalize the country's extremely restrictive laws. In 2022, Hungary made it mandatory for those seeking an abortion to listen to fetal vital signs. Campaigners on both sides of the debate have said they have been energized by the rollback of abortion rights in the United States. Stella Creasy, a Labour lawmaker who has been pushing for a more comprehensive reform of abortion law, told Parliament on Tuesday: 'Listen to our American counterparts who bitterly regret not having acted under Biden and Obama … and now find themselves with medics being prosecuted and dragged across state lines.' Tuesday's vote was a free one, allowing lawmakers to vote their conscience rather than in line with their party — as is customary with ethical issues such as abortion or assisted dying. The amendment is part of the Crime and Policing Bill, which is weaving its way through Parliament and is likely to become law later this year.
