
Eat, nap, vote: Inside the conclave to choose the next pope
Cardinals are in the Sistine Chapel for the second day of the conclave to elect a new pope, following two votes so far that have ended with black smoke – a signal that no new pope has been elected.
Thursday's voting has been highly anticipated, as the previous two popes were both announced on the second day of the conclave.
Here is what we know about what the cardinals do all day:
Out of 252 cardinals, only those less than the age of 80 are eligible to participate in the papal conclave.
Currently, 135 cardinals meet this criterion. However, two have chosen not to travel to Rome, citing health issues, and bringing the number of confirmed voting participants to 133.
A two-thirds majority is needed to elect a new pope; that's 89 votes out of the 133 eligible cardinals. If no candidate reaches that threshold, another vote is held. After each round, ballots are burned.
If black smoke appears from the chimney on top of the Sistine Chapel, it means no pope has been chosen. White smoke signals the Catholic Church has a new pontiff.
'In the past, fresh straw was used to produce white smoke, and water was added to produce black smoke,' Father Francis Lucas, a Catholic priest and executive director of the Catholic Media Network, told Al Jazeera.
'However, this sometimes resulted in grey smoke, which led to confusion. Now, chemicals are added to ensure the smoke is distinctly black or white,' he added.
Voting after the first day occurs a maximum of four times per day: Twice in the morning and twice in the afternoon
Each cardinal receives a ballot marked 'Eligo in Summum Pontificem' ('I elect as Supreme Pontiff') and writes in their chosen candidate. They are not permitted to vote for themselves.
They then fold the ballot, hold it up for visibility and carry it to the altar, where a chalice covered by a plate awaits. One by one, the cardinals approach the altar before Michelangelo's Last Judgement, swear an oath and place their votes in the chalice.
According to Vatican News, each cardinal says aloud, in Italian:
Each cardinal places his ballot on a plate, uses it to drop the vote into the chalice, bows towards the altar and then returns to his seat.
Cardinals who are present but unable to walk to the altar due to illness give their folded ballot to one of the scrutineers – a number of cardinals chosen to oversee the voting. The scrutineer brings it to the altar and deposits it in the same manner, without reciting the oath again.
No one except the cardinals is permitted inside the chapel during the conclave. Outside the chapel, there are others involved in the process, such as personnel handling logistics and security, cleaners, medical support staff and other clerics in supporting roles. About 100 additional people have taken the oath of secrecy over and above the voting cardinals.
Conclaves are inherently secretive, but experts say some information is available about what happens when the cardinals are not voting.
'In the course of the days of the conclave, they will move by charter bus around St Peter's to the Sistine Chapel, enter and have the morning vote,' Steven P Millies, professor of public theology at the Catholic Theological Union, a Catholic graduate school of theology in Chicago, Illinois, in the United States, told Al Jazeera.
'They will return to the Domus Sanctae Marthae (Latin for Saint Martha's House, the Vatican guesthouse) and have their midday meal, take their midday nap, and then return for the evening vote (to the Sistine Chapel). And then back again (to the Domus Sanctae Marthae) for a nighttime meal,' he added.'The Church emphasises that the conclave is a spiritual and sacred process, not a political one,' Father Francis Lucas said.
Some experts argue that most of the social activities and reflections on the previous vote might take place during their time in Saint Martha's House.
'One imagines that it is in the cafeteria at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, where people do eat cafeteria style, they put food on their own trays and that sort of thing,' Millies said.
'There is a lot of time over meals and informal conversations for the cardinals to decipher the meaning of what just happened in the last vote and to try to figure out where their support might go best. This is where coalitions and alliances are made,' he added.
'That doesn't exclude the guidance of the Holy Spirit, but there certainly is a certain amount of negotiation, alliance-making, shifting alliances, those kinds of things that will happen in those spaces too,' he explained.
According to reports, food is not great during the Conclave.
'The food is pretty ordinary, pasta, soup and fruit, which is how Francis wanted it,' a Vatican insider who has eaten there told the UK's Times newspaper.
While food during the papal conclave has traditionally been a plain affair, Francis, known for his focus on simplicity and humility, has been partly blamed for the further decline in quality, according to a report by The New York Times. Some cardinals have complained about bland vegetables and uninspired pasta dishes.
'You don't eat very well,' Cardinal Gianfranco Ravasi of Italy, a supporter of Pope Francis, told The New York Times.
After his election, Pope Francis broke with more than a century of Vatican tradition by declining to move into the papal apartments in the Apostolic Palace. Instead, he chose to live in a simple suite at Santa Marta (Saint Martha's), where the voting cardinals are currently lodging.
'This room where we are now was a guest room,' Pope Francis said in an interview.
'I chose to live here, in Room 201… The papal apartment in the Apostolic Palace is not luxurious. It is old, tastefully decorated and large, but not luxurious. But in the end, it is like an inverted funnel. It is big and spacious, but the entrance is really tight. People can come only in dribs and drabs, and I cannot live without people. I need to live my life with others,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
03-06-2025
- Al Jazeera
Inzaghi leaves Inter Milan amid Saudi Pro League interest
Simone Inzaghi has announced that he will leave Inter Milan following the Italian club's defeat in the Champions League final, and amid heavy interest in his services from the Saudi Pro League. The 5-0 rout by Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) in the final of European football's premier club competition on Saturday was Inzaghi's final game in charge of the Serie A runners-up. 'The time has come for me to say goodbye to this club after a run of four years during which I gave everything,' Inzaghi wrote in a letter to Inter fans on the club's website on Tuesday. The loss to PSG on Saturday marked the most lopsided defeat in the 70-year history of major European finals. Saudi Arabian club Al-Hilal is reportedly trying to lure Inzaghi with an offer of more than 20 million euros ($23m) per season. Inzaghi coached Inter to the Serie A title last year, and was also in charge when the Nerazzurri lost the 2023 Champions League title to Manchester City. He was at Inter for exactly four years and had one more season remaining on his contract. It's unclear now who will coach Inter at the FIFA Club World Cup in the United States starting June 14. Inter opens against Monterrey on June 17 — a day before Al-Hilal opens against Real Madrid. There has been speculation that Inter would go after Cesc Fabregas, who coached Como to a 10th-place finish in Serie A. Inter finished second in the Italian league last month, one point behind champion Napoli. The Milan-based football club was in the running for a treble until it lost to city rival AC Milan in the Italian Cup semifinals in April. Having also been beaten by Milan in the Italian Super Cup final in Saudi Arabia in January, the Nerazzurri didn't win a trophy this season. The coaching change at Inter is just one of many managerial moves among the top Italian teams this off season, with Milan, Roma, Atalanta and others making changes.


Al Jazeera
28-05-2025
- Al Jazeera
Trump warns Netanyahu off Iran strike as nuclear talks continue
United States President Donald Trump has said that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to hold off on any strike against Iran to give his administration more time to push for a new nuclear deal with Tehran, as several rounds of talks have been held in Oman and Italy. Trump told reporters on Wednesday at the White House that he relayed to Netanyahu a strike 'would be inappropriate to do right now because we're very close to a solution'. The Israeli leader has been threatening a bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities. Iran has said it would respond with severity if any such attack were launched. In the meantime, Iran may pause uranium enrichment if the US releases frozen Iranian funds and recognises its right to refine uranium for civilian use under a 'political deal' that could lead to a broader nuclear accord, two Iranian official sources told the Reuters news agency. The sources, close to the negotiating team, said on Wednesday that a 'political understanding with the United States could be reached soon' if Washington accepted Tehran's conditions. The sources told Reuters that under this arrangement, Tehran would halt uranium enrichment for a year. The latest developments came as the head of the UN's atomic watchdog group said that 'the jury is still out' on negotiations between Iran and the US over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme. But Rafael Mariano Grossi described the ongoing negotiations as a good sign. 'I think that is an indication of a willingness to come to an agreement. And I think that… is something possible.' The 2015 nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), placed limits on Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. It collapsed after Trump unilaterally withdrew the US from the agreement in 2018, leading to a sharp escalation in tensions and a breakdown in diplomatic relations. US officials have repeatedly said that any new deal must include a firm commitment from Iran to halt uranium enrichment, which they view as a potential pathway to building nuclear weapons. However, Iran has consistently denied seeking nuclear arms, insisting its programme is solely for civilian purposes. It has rejected Washington's demand to eliminate enrichment capabilities, calling it an infringement on national sovereignty. It remains the critical sticking point after negotiators for Tehran and Washington met for a fifth round of Oman-mediated talks in Rome. Instead, Iran has reportedly proposed that the US publicly recognise Tehran's right to enrich uranium under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), and approve the release of Iranian oil revenues frozen under US sanctions.


Al Jazeera
23-05-2025
- Al Jazeera
‘Red lines' stalk fifth round of Iran-US nuclear talks
Iran and the United States are set to hold a fifth round of talks on Tehran's nuclear programme amid uncompromising rhetoric on both sides. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff are due to meet in Rome on Friday. The ongoing talks, mediated by Oman, seek a new deal in which Iran would be prevented from producing nuclear weapons while having international sanctions eased. However, little progress has been made so far, and both Washington and Tehran have taken a tough stance in public in recent days, particularly regarding Iran's enrichment of uranium. Witkoff has said Iran cannot be allowed to carry out any enrichment. Tehran, which has raised its enrichment to about 60 percent, well above civilian needs but below the 90 percent needed for weaponisation, has rejected that 'red line'. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called the demand 'excessive and outrageous,' warning that the ongoing talks are unlikely to yield results. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Tuesday that Washington is working to reach an agreement that would allow Iran to have a civil nuclear energy program but not enrich uranium, while admitting that achieving such a deal 'will not be easy'. On Thursday, the State Department announced new sanctions on Iran's construction sector. 'Figuring out the path to a deal is not rocket science,' Araghchi said on social media on Friday morning. 'Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal. Time to decide…' A spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Tehran took aim at the new sanctions, calling the move 'vicious, illegal, and inhumane'. The stakes are high for both sides. Trump wants to curtail Tehran's potential to produce a nuclear weapon that could trigger a regional nuclear arms race. Iran insists its nuclear ambitions are strictly civilian, but seeks to ease international sanctions that hamper its economy. During his first term, in 2018, Trump nixed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a 2015 agreement that saw Iran scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for eased sanctions. After his return to the White House for a second term in January, Trump renewed his 'maximum pressure' programme against Iran, piling further economic pressure, for example, by choking the country's oil exports, particularly to China. Iran responded defiantly, promising to defend itself against any attack and escalating enrichment far beyond the 2015 pact's limits. Tensions began to ease in April as the two countries launched the talks mediated by Oman, but Tehran's enrichment programme has become a major point of contention. Should that see the talks fail, the cost could be high. Trump has repeatedly threatened military action if no deal is reached. Israel, which opposes the US talks with its regional foe, has warned that it would never allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons. Following reports that Israel may be planning to strike Iran's nuclear facilities, Araghchi warned on Thursday that Washington will bear legal responsibility if Iran is attacked.