
PFAS exposure before birth could put your teen at risk for high blood pressure, study finds
Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Prenatal exposure to a class of dangerous, widely used chemicals could be linked to your child having high blood pressure as a teen, according to a new study.
Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS — sometimes called 'forever chemicals' because they don't fully break down in the environment — are a class of about 15,000 human-made chemicals linked to cancers, endocrine-related conditions and developmental problems in children.
New data shows the synthetic compounds could also be linked to a teen's risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life, according to the study published Thursday in the Journal of the American Heart Association.
Researchers looked at data from 1,094 children over an average of 12 years. The study team compared measurements of eight types of PFAS chemicals in maternal plasma samples 24 to 72 hours after birth and the children's blood pressure from medical records, according to the study.
The kids who were exposed to higher levels of PFAS chemicals in utero were more likely to have higher blood pressure in childhood and adolescence, the research found. The connection was particularly strong in adolescents, male children and Black children, said senior study author Dr. Mingyu Zhang, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
The study is observational, meaning that while it shows associations, it cannot prove that PFAS exposure is the cause of the elevated blood pressure, Zhang said.
While researchers did adjust for other factors that could be at play, there could be other elements driving the connection between PFAS and blood pressure, he added.
That said, the results are strong because this study is one of the largest and most diverse while also using rigorous methods, said Dr. Carmen Marsit, Rollins Distinguished Professor of Research at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta. He was not involved in the research.
The topic is important to investigate because if a child has high blood pressure, they are more likely to also have higher blood pressure later on, Zhang said. And that is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the No. 1 cause of death in the United States.
The largest effects were shown in adolescents who were exposed to a mixture of different PFAS chemicals during pregnancy compared with those who were not, which implies that there may be a synergistic impact on cardiometabolic health, Marsit said.
'Most children will be exposed to multiple different PFAS chemicals, so this is worrisome,' he said.
The fact that adolescence is the age when prenatal exposure to PFAS is most linked with higher blood pressure suggests that some of the PFAS chemicals could take a long period of time to show their impacts, Marsit said.
A long latency of the effects would mean that people don't just need to worry about reducing exposures, but interventions also need to be developed to prevent the health outcomes in people who were exposed earlier, he added.
Not only are PFAS forever chemicals –– they also are everywhere chemicals.
Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey shows that this class of chemicals can be found in nearly every person in the United States, Marsit said in a previous CNN story.
There are things you can do to reduce your exposure, however, he added.
Major sources of exposure include food, water, and waterproof or stain-resistant items, Marsit said.
Helpful steps include drinking filtered water –– using filters like those listed by the Environmental Working Group –– out of metal or glass containers, he said. Plastics contain PFAS and other toxic chemicals, Marsit said.
A focus on fresh food can also help, as packaging for foods are often coated in PFAS chemicals, he added. And avoid using nonstick cookware, opting instead for metal, cast-iron or ceramic pots and pans, he said.
Dusting, vacuuming, and washing your hands before eating or drinking can also reduce PFAS exposure, Marsit said.
Healthy lifestyle choices can reduce the risk of high blood pressure for children who have been exposed to PFAS, Zhang said.
'These include maintaining a healthy weight, eating a balanced diet, reducing salt intake, and encouraging physical activity,' he added.
But ultimately, an individual cannot solve PFAS exposure alone, Zhang said.
'We also need policy-level actions to limit and phase out PFAS use in products and industry, and to strengthen monitoring and regulation of PFAS in water systems,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Neuralink Device Helps Monkey to See Something That's Not There
Elon Musk's Neuralink Corp. used a brain implant to enable a monkey to see something that wasn't physically there, according to an engineer, as it moves toward its goal of helping blind people see. The device, called Blindsight, stimulated areas of a monkey's brain associated with vision, Neuralink engineer Joseph O'Doherty said Friday at a conference. At least two-thirds of the time, the monkey moved its eyes toward something researchers were trying to trick the brain into visualizing.


Medscape
36 minutes ago
- Medscape
EULAR 2025
Updated SSc Recommendations Use 'Therapeutic Continuums' The recommendations highlighted the use of immunosuppressive agents and antifibrotics to treat skin fibrosis and lung fibrosis, as well as changes to upfront treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Medscape Medical News , Jun 26, 2024 Updated SSc Recommendations Use 'Therapeutic Continuums' New Gout Drugs Might Increase Patients at Target Urate Level New options in late stages of clinical testing for refractory gout promise to increase the chances of reaching the guideline uric acid target with relatively modest risks for adverse events. Medscape Medical News , Aug 01, 2024 New Gout Drugs Might Increase Patients at Target Urate Level Taper, Dose Down, Discontinue: Striving for Less Steroid Use Now in the 75th year since the first presentation on the clinical use of glucocorticoids, what consensus has been reached in sparing their use to avoid their many potential adverse effects? Medscape Medical News, Jul 25, 2024


Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
RFK Jr. Spreads Disinformation To Congress. Here's What That Means For Public Health
Under Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the HHS sent a document to Congress defending their stance on removing COVID-19 recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women. The problem? Many of the studies cited in the document are taken out of context, unpublished or are under dispute. As an example, the HHS document cites a study and states the study found 'an increase in placental blood clotting in pregnant mothers who took the (COVID-19) vaccine.' However, the study makes no references to placental blood clots in pregnant females. In addition, the HHS document also cites additional studies to support the claim that the COVID-19 vaccine can be dangerous to pregnant women, but the studies mentioned actually support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. There are several other instances of questionable citations and unpublished studies cited. But what does this all mean for public health and policy going forward? The majority of Congress are not scientists and may not have the expertise to recognize false citations or mischaracterized findings from studies. However, proper citations to substantiate claims that will undoubtedly affect public policy should not be optional- it is critical to ensure the health and well-being of all Americans. If studies that are misinterpreted or unpublished without peer-review are being used to justify public policy for the general public, then the recommendations should not be upheld because they are not grounded in evidence or real facts. If the recommendations are upheld, as may be the case for COVID-19 vaccines not being recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, less Americans will have access to life-saving vaccines and Americans will get sicker. Remember, COVID-19 vaccines were responsible for saving more than 14 million lives, according to research, and this includes the lives of children and pregnant women. Policies and recommendations not based on science and evidence also open the door for the promotion of fringe theories that have no basis in facts or science. If vaccines are not promoted by the federal government, vaccine hesitancy soars and more people will opt out of getting vaccinated or may not have access to getting vaccines even if they desire it since insurance coverage for vaccines is largely dependent on endorsement from the federal government and government-based advisory committees. Lower uptake of vaccines means more infectious disease outbreaks and cases rising throughout the country, just as is occurring currently with whooping cough and measles. Currently, well over 1,000 cases of measles have been documented throughout America, largely fueled by vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccination rates among children. Deeper than just the health and public health effects is the strained trust for science that will continue to pervade the United States. If agencies like HHS and the CDC are viewed as politicizing decisions to promote various agendas of those in power, the public will become skeptical of following important health guidelines for public health issues. Without trust and transparency in public health, parents and Americans cannot make informed decisions to uphold their health. Public health depends on trust, and trust is built on evidence-based recommendations that have been shown to benefit society, not theories that cannot be substantiated. RFK Jr. promised 'radical transparency' as well as gold-standard science. This would be impossible to accomplish by sending documents to lawmakers that are filled with unpublished studies and citations that are completely misinterpreted. Gold-standard science is based on facts, evidence and rigorous peer-review, all noticeably absent from the document the HHS sent to Congress. Public health cannot survive in a world where misinformation comes from the top.