1stDibs reports 2% revenue growth in Q1`
The New York-based company said net revenue for the first quarter reached $22.5 million, up 2% from the same period last year.
Gross profit also rose 2% to $16.3 million, while gross margin held steady at 72.4%. However, the company's net loss widened to $4.8 million, compared to $3.3 million a year ago.
The number of orders held steady at approximately 35,000 in Q1, while active buyers climbed 7% to roughly 65,000.
"Our momentum continued in the first quarter, with strong execution, market share gains, and steady progress on our roadmap,' said David Rosenblatt, 1stDibs chief executive officer.
'While the macro environment remains unpredictable, we believe our model and strategy position us well for the road ahead.'
Tom Etergino, chief financial officer added, 'We delivered a solid quarter, gaining market share while diligently managing expenses and making progress against our 2025 plan. We remain focused on executing efficiently.'
Looking ahead to the second quarter, 1stDibs expects GMV between $85 million and $92 million, with net revenue ranging from $21.2 million to $22.5 million. The company expects an adjusted EBITDA margin of 14% to 10%.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
2 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Why Swatch is facing tough times
The Swatch brand is credited with having saved a Swiss watch industry that had been laid low by the so-called quartz revolution. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, these less expensive and more accurate watches from an ascendant Japan upended European mechanical watchmaking. Swatch's response? Tap into the '80s zeitgeist with colourful, low-priced designs—funky, artistic, eclectic and made for collectors along with a whole new demographic that saw them as fashion, not function. Swatch used its skyrocketing revenue to support its more staid, traditional brands while acquiring new ones. But fast forward to today, and the market's changed: phones and smartwatches have undercut low-cost watches, leaving luxury as the main engine for growth. And a new set of problems, from low sales in China to Donald Trump 's tariffs, have made matters even worse. The luxury spending slowdown in China has hurt all brands, but Swatch got hit more than most, given that 27% of its 2024 sales were attributable to the Asian nation. While the company said last month that sales data now show a possible turnaround, any recovery in China is expected to be slow. Meanwhile, Trump's radical imposition of a 39% tariff on imports from Switzerland puts high-end watch brands in a corner, since they can't raise prices much more in the current environment. Simultaneously, investors have been calling out Swatch, urging it to capitalise on the still-lucrative high-end segment. Steven Wood, founder and chief investment officer of New York-based GreenWood Investors, even mounted a campaign to win a seat on Swatch's board. He was defeated, but his intervention may underline the frustration among investors worried about the company's future. The Hayek family, which controls more than 40% of Swatch voting rights, has pushed back by saying it shouldn't just be making watches for the wealthy. To be sure, Swatch managed some mainstream success as recently as 2022, with the MoonSwatch. The quartz-driven timepiece leaned on the heritage and look of the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch, an iconic watch worn on Apollo moon missions. Swatch sold more than a million of them that year, but it's struggled to generate the same sort of buzz across the rest of the group.
Fashion Network
4 hours ago
- Fashion Network
Why Swatch is facing tough times
The Swatch brand is credited with having saved a Swiss watch industry that had been laid low by the so-called quartz revolution. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, these less expensive and more accurate watches from an ascendant Japan upended European mechanical watchmaking. Swatch's response? Tap into the '80s zeitgeist with colourful, low-priced designs—funky, artistic, eclectic and made for collectors along with a whole new demographic that saw them as fashion, not function. Swatch used its skyrocketing revenue to support its more staid, traditional brands while acquiring new ones. But fast forward to today, and the market's changed: phones and smartwatches have undercut low-cost watches, leaving luxury as the main engine for growth. And a new set of problems, from low sales in China to Donald Trump 's tariffs, have made matters even worse. The luxury spending slowdown in China has hurt all brands, but Swatch got hit more than most, given that 27% of its 2024 sales were attributable to the Asian nation. While the company said last month that sales data now show a possible turnaround, any recovery in China is expected to be slow. Meanwhile, Trump's radical imposition of a 39% tariff on imports from Switzerland puts high-end watch brands in a corner, since they can't raise prices much more in the current environment. Simultaneously, investors have been calling out Swatch, urging it to capitalise on the still-lucrative high-end segment. Steven Wood, founder and chief investment officer of New York-based GreenWood Investors, even mounted a campaign to win a seat on Swatch's board. He was defeated, but his intervention may underline the frustration among investors worried about the company's future. The Hayek family, which controls more than 40% of Swatch voting rights, has pushed back by saying it shouldn't just be making watches for the wealthy. To be sure, Swatch managed some mainstream success as recently as 2022, with the MoonSwatch. The quartz-driven timepiece leaned on the heritage and look of the Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch, an iconic watch worn on Apollo moon missions. Swatch sold more than a million of them that year, but it's struggled to generate the same sort of buzz across the rest of the group.
Fashion Network
2 days ago
- Fashion Network
Tapestry quarterly revenue likely rose 5.5% as Coach bags drew young shoppers
Tapestry kept up a brisk pace of sales in the April-June quarter, with revenue likely growing 5.5%, thanks to growing demand for its stylish handbags that are more affordable than traditional luxury labels. Accessible luxury companies, including Tapestry and Ralph Lauren, are gaining momentum in an economy hit by tariffs and inflation, where younger shoppers are being more prudent with their purchases. Shoppers are walking away from the more opulent wares offered by luxury firms, including Kering. Revenue in the New York-based company's fiscal fourth quarter is expected to have climbed to 1.7 billion dollars, its second-quickest pace of growth in 12 quarters, according to LSEG data. Last week, Tapestry's rival and Michael Kors -owner Capri forecast quarterly revenue above estimates. Shares of Tapestry, which beat Wall Street revenue estimates in the past four quarters, have surged more than two-thirds this year. Revenue from the Coach brand, which accounted for 82% of the company's revenue for the first nine months of the year, likely grew almost 11% in the June quarter, according to LSEG estimates. "They've successfully repositioned the brand to target younger demographics with their Tabby and Brooklyn Bag brands," said Adam Steffanus, a managing director at Advisory Research Investment Management, which owns Tapestry stock. Steffanus noted that sales of European luxury brands LVMH and Chanel have suffered because they raised their prices too high. Tapestry said in May that it was well covered on cross-border tariff risk thanks to less than 10% of production from China and a diversified manufacturing base that includes 70% of production from Vietnam, Cambodia, and the Philippines. Still, Tapestry's other brand, Kate Spade, has been a drag on its performance. The brand has suffered from heavy promotions that have hurt its status as an upscale brand, Steffanus said. Morningstar analyst David Swartz said Coach could raise prices without driving away customers because of its high margins, but Tapestry cannot do the same for Kate Spade handbags. Kate Spade's revenue likely fell 13% in the April-June period, according to LSEG estimates. Tapestry reports earnings on Thursday. At least 16 analysts rate it "buy" or higher, with five rating it "hold." It has no "sell" calls, according to LSEG data.
