WorldPride organizers consider cautioning transgender visitors from abroad
'It's possible that we may actually issue a statement telling trans folks internationally not to come, or if they come, they come at their own risk,' Capital Pride Alliance Executive Director Ryan Bos said this week at a monthly meeting of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
International travelers are already facing heightened difficulties entering and leaving the country, said Ashley Smith, Capitol Pride Alliance's board president, and some transgender people from abroad are wary of visiting the U.S. with passports or other identity documents that do not match their sex at birth.
The State Department in January suspended a policy allowing trans, nonbinary and intersex Americans to update the sex designations on their passports, causing confusion and concern about whether it is safe for them to travel overseas. The department previously allowed U.S. passport holders to self-select their sex designations, including an 'unspecified' gender marker denoted by the letter X.
The new policy stems from President Trump's Jan. 20 executive order declaring the U.S. recognizes only two sexes, male and female.
Officials in Denmark and Finland last month advised transgender and gender-nonconforming citizens to practice caution when traveling to the U.S., and trans people across the nation — including the actress Hunter Schafer — have shared on social media stories of their passports being involuntarily updated to reflect their sex at birth, rather than their gender identity.
Seven transgender and nonbinary Americans are challenging the new policy in federal court, arguing it is motivated by 'impermissible animus.'
Smith said WorldPride organizers are addressing visitors' concerns as they come.
'We're communicating as best as possible about the different safety measures,' he said. 'We're talking consistently, and we're having meetings nearly every single day, all day long, to go through this as well as so many other things.'
Council of Governors Vice Chair Charles Allen said he attributes any decline in international travelers to the celebrations next month in Washington 'completely to the change in administration.'
Potential warnings to visitors from abroad, he said, 'have nothing to do with the local communities, the state communities, the County communities, and fall squarely with the incredibly shameful tactics we've seen in language from the federal administration.'
Allen added that he was 'deeply disappointed' by reports that corporate sponsors had backed away from WorldPride since Trump's return to office in January.
'It can't be lost on us that fear is used as a weapon,' he said.
WorldPride organizers have said they expect roughly 2 million people to attend the event, which will run between May 17 and June 8 in Washington.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Is the A.I. Sell-off the Start of Something Bigger?
Andrew here. The Trump administration is reportedly considering taking stakes in semiconductor companies — beyond Intel — that were granted money as part of the CHIPS and Science Act, in a major shift toward industrial policy. Cabinet members have said that U.S. taxpayers should have received shares in exchange for funding chipmakers. But there's some important missing context: At the time, companies like TSMC probably wouldn't have taken CHIPS Act money if they had to give up equity. The law was meant to persuade such companies to do something that they believed wasn't economical, namely building factories in the U.S. But the landscape has changed amid President Trump's tariffs, which has made producing chips abroad much more expensive — and made CHIPS Act money more valuable. It appears that the administration's approach has been more stick than carrot. What are the implications? Will U.S. companies take government money in the future? And will this approach get the right results? Tell us what you think. Is the A.I. pendulum swinging again? For years now, investors have clambered to get a piece of the action in artificial intelligence. That's pushed up valuations to nosebleed-inducing levels, even as some market observers (and Sam Altman) warn that things are getting out of hand. For now, private-market investors still appear to be eager to bid up the value of A.I. start-ups. But on Tuesday's market moves suggest that public investors are getting more jittery, raising at least some questions about the future of the tech boom. Things still look bubbly for privately held start-ups — including OpenAI, which is in talks to let current and former employees sell about $6 billion worth of stock at an astonishing roughly $500 billion valuation. That's nearly twice the market capitalization of Salesforce. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Kinzinger: Trump claiming to be war hero ‘just nuts'
Former Republican Rep. Adam Kinzinger (Ill.) criticized President Trump for claiming to be a war hero in the wake of the Iran strikes, arguing it is offensive to those who have served in combat. 'Yeah. I mean, look, this is just nuts. This is nuts. And they're going to find — his people are going to find a way to justify this,' Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic, told CNN's Erin Burnett on Tuesday. 'Listen, when they were putting out something honoring the Army's 250th anniversary, they put out a picture of Donald Trump in his military academy uniform, which has nothing to do with the military except they drill you.' Kinzinger, who retired from Congress in 2021 and is now a senior contributor on CNN, was asked to weigh in on Trump's recent remarks on 'The Mark Levin Show.' 'He's a war hero because we work together. He's a war hero,' Trump told conservative radio host Mark Levin, referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 'I guess I am too.' 'Nobody cares, but I am too. I mean, I sent those planes,' he added, just months after the U.S. bombed three nuclear facilities near Tehran in defense of Israel. Kinzinger, who served in the Air Force and was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, pressed back against the rhetoric but added that he hopes the president is able to facilitate a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. 'You can like what he's done. That's fine. I hope he gets a resolution in Ukraine,' he said. 'But to put himself on the same level of people that have actually gone out and served this country, not claimed bone spurs, is an offense to anybody who served.' 'And frankly, you just take somebody that served, calling themselves a war hero, even that would be inappropriate,' the former GOP lawmaker, who said recently that he feels closer to a Democrat nowadays, told CNN. 'For a guy that never served to say it, it's nuts.' Kinzinger added, 'But somebody, they'll defend it, they'll find a way.' The comments come as Trump is looking to facilitate a Russia-Ukraine peace deal after meeting with both leaders and seeking another ceasefire in the Middle East between Isreal and Hamas.
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Palestinians deserve a state now for the same reasons Jews did in 1948
Soon, the Palestinian people will be recognized as a sovereign nation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank by most countries. They now have the political and moral momentum toward achieving this goal. The world owes Palestinians independence and sovereignty for the same reasons it granted the Jews living in British Mandatory Palestine their independent state in 1948, only a few years after six million Jews had been gassed to death in German concentration camps. This will happen despite an expected U.S. veto next month in the United Nations, and in spite of the political alliance between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump is pragmatic; he will come to support the creation of a Palestinian state, as most Americans already do. This is because the case for Palestinian independence has been getting clearer and more urgent with every Israeli bombing of mostly innocent Gazans, and with every death from starvation caused by Israel's withholding of food. Most countries now recognize a sovereign Palestinian state. In total, 147 members of the United Nations, or 76 percent of its members, have already recognized the Palestinian state. And of the five members with power to reject Palestinian independence, China and Russia are already known supporters. France and the United Kingdom said they will support sovereign Palestine next month before the U.N. votes on the matter. The lone veto is expected from the U.S., but Trump is likely to change his mind. Ehud Olmert, Israel's Prime Minister from 2006 to 2009, supports an independent Palestinian state. A large segment of Israelis already supports the creation of an independent Palestine, though such support has has declined as the war has progressed. Hundreds of high ranking past members of the Israeli government, the Israeli Parliament, and Israel Defense Forces support Palestinian independence. And for the first time, Israeli human rights organizations such as B'Tselem, and medical associations are calling on the international community to stop the indiscriminate killing of Palestinians by the Israel's Defense Forces. The Arab League of twenty-two Arab nations has called Hamas to disarm and relinquish the Gaza Strip to make peace possible. According to recent Gallup poll, 55 percent of Americans and 41 percent of Republicans support an independent Palestine. And according to The Times of Israel, President Trump recently said that the destruction, killing, and starvation of Palestinians in Gaza were done by Benjamin Netanyahu to keep him in office. This points to a likely U.S. backing of independence. Furthermore, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — a ardent Trump supporter — recently characterized Israel's actions against the Palestinians in the Strip as genocide. Netanyahu himself is partly responsible for the expected creation of an independent Palestinian state because of his increasingly brutal tactics and strategies against the Palestinians. For example, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's actions have violated the Genocide Convention and issued a warrant for Netanyahu's arrest. Israel had worldwide sympathy and empathy when Hamas invaded its territory and savagely murdered 1,200 Israelis. That action led to a declaration of war against Hamas. But the situation has since changed. The war quickly devolved into a war against all Palestinians in the strip. If the strategy were to get rid of them through indiscriminate killing and mass starvation of innocent people, I am not sure what they would be doing differently. Netanyahu's failure has led much of the world community to believe that that the war in Gaza is no longer a retaliation against Hamas for the atrocities of October 2023, but rather a war to do away with a whole people. The world community in the U.N. will soon reject such behavior and vote to grant independence to Palestine. It is about time for the U.S. to join such cause.
