Ukraine was betrayed years ago. Cutting aid is just a final insult
America has supported Ukraine with military aid transfers since the beginning of the war. No longer: Trump has prevented Biden-era defence authorisations from being fulfilled, cutting off Kyiv from the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative which allows Ukraine to purchase hundreds of millions of dollars of weaponry from US defence companies. Barring a reversal predicated on humiliating grovelling from Zelensky, America's underwriting of the war effort has ended.
Understandably, Ukraine views Trump's devastating cut-off of military assistance as an act of betrayal. Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, claimed that Trump was trying to force Ukraine to capitulate to Russia, warning the cut-off was an even worse foreign policy disaster than the 1938 Munich Agreement, as no-one then claimed that Czechoslovakia was the aggressor against Nazi Germany.
While Ukrainians have every right to be outraged by Trump's decision, America's abandonment of Ukraine was set into motion long ago: indeed, it was baked in from the first days of the invasion. For years, the West has given Ukraine enough military equipment to avoid defeat but not the tools that it needed to win the war. A succession of half-measures created countless missed opportunities for Ukraine and enabled a potential ceasefire on President Vladimir Putin's terms.
The most striking manifestation of the West's half-hearted support for Ukraine transpired during the fall of 2022. In five days in September 2022, Ukraine's counter-offensive in Kharkiv forced Russian troops to ignominiously withdraw from all positions west of the Oskil River.
Ukraine capitalised on this success with victories in Izyum, Lyman and Kherson. Russia's manpower shortages forced Putin to announce a chaotic 'partial mobilisation' drive and war materiel deficits necessitated imports of Iranian drones. A severe rift was also festering between the Wagner Group chief Yevgeny Prigozhin and the Russian Ministry of Defence.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine was on the verge of implosion, but how did the West respond? With weakness and indecisiveness. While Ukraine lobbied for airtight sanctions against Putin's war machine, Europe continued to purchase Russian gas and the US left nuclear energy giant Rosatom off the sanctions list. Zelensky urged the West to supply Ukraine with Nato-class tanks, long-range missiles to strike Russian targets and F-16 fighter jets. We refused to accede to these urgent requests and caved to Putin's nuclear bluffs.
Although the West eventually provided all these technologies to Ukraine, it was too little, too late. By the time Ukraine's counter-offensive began in earnest in June 2023, Russia had built impenetrable fortifications in Zaporizhzhya, conscripted hundreds of thousands of soldiers and sanctions-proofed its military supply chains. Ukraine's dreams of victory were chimeric and by late 2023, Ukraine's soon-to-be-ousted Armed Forces chief Valery Zaluzhnyi was forced to concede that the war had become a stalemate.
Even as Russia made incremental gains at a staggering human cost in 2024, the West refused to change tack. According to a recent Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air report, Europe spent more on Russian energy (21.9 billion euros) than on financial aid to Ukraine ($18.7 billion euros). Biden waited until the final days of his presidency to greenlight Ukrainian ATACM strikes on Russia's Kursk region and even the arrival of North Korean forces on the frontlines did not lead to Ukraine securing long-range cruise missiles.
The US and Europe favoured a long-term attritional war that would gradually weaken Russia's economy and military capabilities. Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin admitted this in April 2022 when he claimed that 'We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can't do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine.'
While Trump has dealt a potentially terminal blow to Ukraine's resistance to Russian aggression, the meat-grinder stalemate we see today was of the West's creation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Please review your details and accept them to load the content 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and ‘we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning
Moscow has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years GONE TO WAR Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and 'we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning RUSSIA is already at war with Britain, an author of the Government's defence review has warned. Fiona Hill, who was the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump's first term, delivered the stark warning of the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. 4 An author of the Government's defence review has warned that Britain is already at war with Russia Credit: EPA 4 Kharkiv, in Eastern Ukraine, was blitz by Russian missiles in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack Credit: East2West 4 Fiona Hill, an author of the Government's defence review Credit: Getty She said: 'We are in pretty big trouble. "Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't anticipated.' Ms Hill said Moscow has been 'menacing the UK in various different ways' for years, including poisonings and assassinations on British soil, carrying out cyber attacks and cutting sea cables. In her grim alert, the Kremlin expert said: 'Russia is at war with us.' read more on russia WHITE VAN WHAM Army bosses to buy drones that can be fired from VANS after Ukraine op And she warned that Britain can no longer rely on US military might to protect itself from enemy states. Ms Hill co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, which warned the UK is facing its biggest threats since the Cold War — and set out plans to urgently build more bombs and guns to arm ourselves. Her comments came as Russian missiles blitzed Kharkiv, killing three people and injuring at least 22, including a six-week-old baby and a 14-year-old girl. The eastern Ukrainian city was struck by 48 drones, two missiles and five glider bombs as part of a huge, countrywide bombardment by Putin in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack on his nuclear bombers. PM Sir Keir Starmer used an article in last week's Sun on Sunday to deliver his starkest warning yet of the danger of war. Putting the nation on a war footing, he said Britain must prepare to 'sight and win' against our enemies. New footage of Op Spiderweb shows drone blitzing Putin's burning aircraft
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and ‘we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning
RUSSIA is already at war with Britain, an author of the Government's defence review has warned. Fiona Hill, who was the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term, delivered the stark warning of the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. 4 4 4 She said: 'We are in pretty big trouble. "Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't anticipated.' Ms Hill said Moscow has been ' menacing the UK in various different ways ' for years, including poisonings and assassinations on British soil, carrying out cyber attacks and cutting sea cables. In her grim alert, the Kremlin expert said: 'Russia is at war with us.' And she warned that Britain can no longer rely on US military might to protect itself from enemy states. Ms Hill co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, which warned the UK is facing its biggest threats since the Cold War — and set out plans to urgently build more bombs and guns to arm ourselves. Her comments came as Russian missiles blitzed Kharkiv, killing three people and injuring at least 22, including a six-week-old baby and a 14-year-old girl. The eastern Ukrainian city was struck by 48 drones, two missiles and five glider bombs as part of a huge, countrywide bombardment by Putin in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack on his nuclear bombers. PM Sir Keir Starmer used an article in last week's Sun on Sunday to deliver his starkest warning yet of the danger of war. Putting the nation on a war footing, he said Britain must prepare to 'sight and win' against our enemies. New footage of Op Spiderweb shows drone blitzing Putin's burning aircraft 4
