More than 400 households in Wicklow reimbursed for housing Ukrainian refugees
Figures released to Sinn Féin's spokesperson on migration, Matt Carthy TD, reveal that the number of properties nationwide in receipt of ARP rose from 4,245 in January 2023 to 21,803 by mid-July of this year, a rise of over 17,500.
In Wicklow, the number has jumped from 154 to 463 over the same period.
Deputy John Brady has raised concern at what he calls 'a significant and worrying increase in the number of private properties being brought into the ARP scheme.
'In Wicklow alone, we have seen ARP properties triple in the space of just 18 months. This is happening while thousands of families in the county are being priced out of the private rental market. This is particularly concerning when only 58 properties are currently available to rent in the county'.
The Wicklow TD said that the government had failed to acknowledge the impact of the scheme on rental supply.
'We are in the middle of a housing emergency', he said. 'Instead of protecting tenants or investing in long-term housing solutions, the government has created a system where landlords can cash in on the ARP, avoid the rules of the private rental sector, and bypass tenant many protections'.
The figures show that 21,803 properties are being paid under the scheme, provided by just 16,900 owners.
Deputy Brady claimed landlords are taking advantage of a state-funded scheme with 'little oversight or long-term benefit to the housing system'.
'This is a direct consequence of the government's failure to plan and their refusal to engage in proper housing reform. Wicklow families are being left behind while landlords are benefitting' he added.
Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
14 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Sinn Fein leader attends public meeting on Irish neutrality in Wexford
Gorey Guardian Today at 03:00 Sinn Féin party leader Mary Lou McDonald recently attended a public meeting held in Wexford. The meeting was organised by Wicklow Wexford TD Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin at a public meeting in the Loch Garman Arms Hotel in Gorey. Deputy Ó Súilleabháin said that Ireland's participation in European military structures would 'put a nail in the coffin of Irish neutrality'. He referred to the recent 'Eire' sign which was unearthed at Cahore Point in Wexford as an important project which directly presents the history of neutrality present in Ireland. 'It was done so that the German Luftwaffee would see that the bomber planes were not over Britain, but rather a neutral state. So, this is timely,' he said. He further said the removal of the triple lock requirement is something that Irish people do not want as shown in opinion polls. 'Would anyone here want to have their son or daughter fight (and possibly die) for Ursula Von der Leyen?' he said. Deputy Ó Súilleabháin added that people must rally around the matter. He said: 'we need to rally around this issue and point out that it's also a core part of republican and internationalist principles on which the struggle for independence was based on. 'It's a fight that we must win, all of us - SF and non-SF-democrats. We all need to come together and co-operate in a broader front as the alternative is the unthinkable and is not a legacy that any of us can leave for our children or our children's children.' Earlier that day, Mary Lou McDonald visited and cut the ribbon on Deputy Fionntán Ó Súilleabháin's new office which is located opposite the Theatre Hall. The office opened at the beginning of the year. 'We were delighted to have Mary Lou McDonald down to officially open the office, it was a lovely evening and we're having great success with the office,' Deputy Ó Súilleabháin added.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Root of All Evil by Cormac Moore: An insightful guide to how the Border came to be where it is
The Root of All Evil: The Irish Boundary Commission Author : Cormac Moore ISBN-13 : 978-1788551779 Publisher : Irish Academic Press Guideline Price : €19.99 Arriving from Belfast at my in-laws' house in Warrenpoint, overlooking Carlingford Lough and therefore the Border, I invariably receive a text message saying: 'welcome to Ireland' (a bizarre experience to northerners who thought they had been there all along). Sometimes a second message appears, a moment later, welcoming me back to the UK. These messages from mobile providers usually have exclamation marks and other excitable punctuation to alert travellers to changes in contractual terms as a result of a border drawn quickly and often arbitrarily a century ago. Understanding why the Border exists has generated a universe of narrative history covering the Ulster Plantation onwards, but as Cormac Moore's crisp and insightful new book The Root of All Evil shows, understanding how diplomatic manoeuvring and bureaucratic inertia created and sustained the Border is essential too. The Boundary Commission is a critical part of that story. The commission has its centenary this year, and it is oddly fitting that it will pass with minimal commemoration. It was an anticlimactic coda to a revolutionary decade. But it was supposed to be a big deal, and was certainly understood as being so by the signatories who agreed its fatally vague terms in article 12 of the 1921 Treaty. READ MORE The principle of 'temporary exclusion' from Home Rule for Ulster was conceded by John Redmond before the first World War. Fast forward through revolution and the Government of Ireland Act of 1920 later created two devolved entities: Northern and Southern Ireland. By the time of the Treaty talks only the first of these was functioning per the terms of the Act, with James Craig ensconced as prime minister and determined to turn Northern Ireland into 'a new impregnable pale'. But the treaty talks were not just between the imperial British government and the 26 counties, but all of Ireland – represented by the plenipotentiaries of the provisional government. Knowing the North would be an area of contention, the British split the Sinn Féin delegation by seeking secret agreement from Arthur Griffith (technically the lead Irish participant) that his delegation would, if pressed, accept continued exclusion of the six counties on the basis that a commission would be appointed to determine the wishes of local inhabitants and adjust the Border. The Machiavellian Lloyd George appears to have given private assurances (or intimations) to Griffith that the commission would transfer vast swathes of the nationalist North, and at a minimum Tyrone and Fermanagh, into the South. These assurances were either lies or artfully constructed so as to be overinterpreted. However, it was not Griffith alone, but the entire Irish delegation who agreed the obviously flawed (from a nationalist perspective) article 12, which qualified the commitment to local wishes being respected by adding the crucial words: 'so far as may be compatible with economic and geographic conditions'. Moore's book expertly explains how these 11 words served to 'nullify' the entire claimed purpose of the commission – to respect the wishes of local inhabitants. The maximum claim prepared by the Free State officials in the North Eastern Boundary Bureau would have moved the Border as far north as my hometown of Downpatrick in east Down. Not only did that not happen, but no major areas of Tyrone or Fermanagh were transferred, nor were Derry or Newry. As Moore's book shows, the fallout from the commission reinforced the Border rather than adjusting or undermining it. And if Griffith gets blamed for his naivety, it pales when set against the 'appalling ineptitude' of Eoin MacNeill , the Free State appointee to the commission. Of the three-man commission, MacNeill was working alongside a South African judge, ostensibly impartial but in reality steeped in imperial influence, and Joseph Fisher, Belfast publisher of the unionist Northern Whig newspaper. [ Micheál Martin talks about Cormac Moore's book The Root of All Evil Opens in new window ] Whereas Fisher constantly and strategically leaked inner deliberations of the commission to the unionist government and ultimately the press, MacNeill treated his role with chaste propriety, believing himself not to be 'a representative of a Government nor ... an advocate for a particular point of view'. In fact, MacNeill was literally a representative of the Free State government, and was chosen because his northern nationalist background would better enable him to articulate their views. His failure to competently perform either of these tasks culminated in his agreeing a boundary with minimal changes, and then resigning in ignominy when the recommendations were leaked to a newspaper to the humiliation of WT Cosgrave's government. The report itself then was buried for half a century. Moore's book succeeds because he tells a story that is both very particular, with close reading of archive material and chronological detail but also, to use the cliche, mindful of the big picture. It wasn't just the mistakes of Griffith or MacNeill, or the canniness of Lloyd George, or the obduracy of Craig, that shaped the Boundary Commission. It was 'facts on the ground', including the construction of Silent Valley reservoir in the Mournes as a source of Belfast's water, and therefore an 'economic circumstance' allowing the wishes of south Down residents to move into the Free State to be overridden. But there was also the erection of customs posts by a Free State government desperate to demonstrate its newly won fiscal independence, and in doing so 'unwittingly aiding' the unionist northern government in creating a sense of permanency around the Border. As we consider the future of the Border in Ireland, and indeed an Ireland without a border, this book is a useful guide to some of how we got here and how we might avoid some of the same mistakes again.
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Clampdown on payments for hosting Ukrainians as new rule to limit some RTB registered properties
GOVERNMENT HAS MOVED to clampdown on the state payment for housing Ukrainians by agreeing today to limit the eligibility of some properties. Concerns have been raised about the scheme's impact on the rental market and it was agreed at the Cabinet Committee on Migration in July to limit eligibility in some specific cases. Justice Ministers Jim O'Callaghan and Housing Minister James Browne got approval today for proposals to limit the eligibility of some properties for the tax-free €600 a month payment. The changes mean any property registered with the Residential Tenancies Board at any time since 1 January 2022 will be ineligible to make a new application for the Accommodation Recognition Payment (ARP). Advertisement Existing claimants are unaffected. It is expected that a memo will got to Cabinet in the autumn seeking the government's approval of the publication of the Housing (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, which will contain the legal changes for this amendment. In March 2025, the payment was extended until 31 March 2026, but the payment was cut from €800 to €600 per month. Rise in households in receipt of payments As reported by The Journal at the weekend , there has been a considerable rise in the number of households in receipt of the state payment for housing Ukrainians, as the government has ended the contracts for over 100 centres that were housing them so far this year. Since January of this year an additional 3,125 payments have been made to property owners, representing a 16% rise in payments made under the ARP scheme since the start of the year. Sinn Féin has called for a full review of the ARP scheme, and said that it is giving landlords 'tax free' payments and reducing the rental stock in certain counties. Related Reads 'They have nowhere else to go': Payments for hosting Ukrainians on the rise as centres close Cabinet green-lights cutting of Ukrainian accommodation payment to €600 per month from June The party has also said that the government has ignored calls for the scheme to be 'means-tested'. At the same time, however, 109 accommodation centres that were hosting Ukrainians have returned to their original use, according to figures provided by the Department of Justice. Agencies involved in arranging local accommodation for Ukrainians told The Journal that hundreds of Ukrainians have sought out hosting arrangements locally due to these closures, as in many cases the alternative accommodation they are offered is far away, and they have become embedded in the local communities they're in. The Department of Justice has said that 16,900 hosts are currently accommodating almost 39,600 people under the scheme in over 21,800 properties. With reporting by Eimer McAuley Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
