Hamas faces leadership vacuum with demise of Gaza 'War Council'
With the confirmed killing of Hamas's top military commander Mohammad Sinwar in an Israeli strike, a chapter has closed on the elite leadership group in Gaza that orchestrated the events of 7 October, 2023.Sinwar's demise follows the confirmed killings of other central figures who sat on what came to be known inside Hamas as the War Council.Sinwar, his brother Yahya, Marwan Issa and a fifth unidentified figure formed the clandestine core that decided on and directed the unprecedented assault on Israel - one which shook the region and set off the conflict still unfolding in Gaza.The War Council, sometimes also known as the Quintet Council, operated under conditions of extreme security and secrecy.Direct meetings between its members were exceedingly rare. Instead, communication occurred through older technology deemed more secure, like cable phones, or via trusted intermediaries, all in an effort to minimise the risk of interception or detection.This level of secrecy was not just tactical: it reflected the council's critical role in Hamas's strategic decision-making, especially in preparation for what became the most complex and deadly attack in the organisation's history.
The known members of the council included:Mohammed Deif - the commander of Hamas's military wing, the Izzedine al-Qassam Brigades, who is believed to have masterminded the 7 October attack. He was killed in an Israeli air strike in July 2024Yahya Sinwar - the political leader of Hamas in Gaza and its most influential decision-maker in recent years. He was killed in a firefight with Israeli troops in October 2024Mohammad Sinwar - a senior military figure and Deif's trusted lieutenant. Israel said this week that it had identified his body in Gaza following an air strike in MayMarwan Issa - Deif's deputy and a vital link between Hamas's military and political spheres. He was killed in an Israeli air strike in March 2024A fifth figure - whose identity remains unknown to the public - who was in charge of organising Hamas's security apparatus. He was targeted in assassination attempts before the war and an air strike during it, and suffered such severe injuries that he can no longer communicate or carry out any activities, according to one source
The 7 October attack marked a seismic shift in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.The scale and brutality of the attack stunned observers worldwide - not just for its immediate impact, but for its unprecedented scale.Hamas's military preparations took years - including extensive tunnel construction and the steady accumulation of rockets and weapons - but few analysts, regional actors, or even rival Palestinian factions foresaw the magnitude of the offensive.The group had long maintained strict control over Gazans and had often imposed harsh economic measures, including heavy taxes, on an already impoverished population to fund its military build-up.Yet even within the movement, there appears to have been a limited understanding of the scale and consequences of the plan hatched by the War Council.
Its demise raises a profound question: what exactly drove its members to pursue a course that many Palestinians have described as politically suicidal?With Israel's overwhelming military response and the international isolation that followed, the 7 October attack has increasingly been viewed as a desperate gamble - one that lacked a clear political exit strategy and led to massive suffering for Gaza's civilian population.Now, with most of the core decision-makers dead, uncovering the deeper motivations and strategic calculus behind the attack may no longer be possible.What internal debates occurred within the council? Were there dissenting voices? Was this a bid for regional relevance, a provocation timed with regional shifts, or a last-ditch effort to break a long-standing siege?Answers to these questions may have died with the men who conceived the plan.The dismantling of the war council leaves Hamas facing a potential leadership vacuum at a critical time.Its military capabilities have been severely degraded, its political leadership - who operated out of Qatar until November 2024, after which their whereabouts became unclear - is under intense pressure, and its traditional mechanisms of control within Gaza have been deeply disrupted.
The absence of a centralised strategic command may lead to fragmentation within Hamas, or the rise of new, perhaps more radical factions.Alternatively, it may open a pathway for recalibration - if not by Hamas, then by other Palestinian actors seeking to fill the void left behind.The fall of Hamas's War Council marks the end of a shadowy but powerful inner circle that shaped one of the most consequential decisions in the movement's history.Whether their legacy will be seen by Palestinians as one of bold resistance or catastrophic miscalculation, one thing is certain: with their departure, a defining era in the leadership of Hamas has come to a close.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves is leaving Britain defenceless
Last week, the Prime Minister said that we 'need to see the biggest shift in mindset in my lifetime: to put security and defence front and centre – to make it the fundamental organising principle of government'. The unfolding crisis in the Middle East underscores the need to do so. Now, more than ever, our national security must be the Government's overriding priority, trampling on any other competing demands for government money and ministers' time. But it isn't. This noble organising principle seems not to apply where it matters most: the Government's economic strategy. In her spending review this week, the Chancellor gave us her own definition of security: 'securonomics'. This ugly word, reeking of socialist greyness and uniformity, means – to quote Rachel Reeves – 'government must step up to provide security for working people and resilience for our national economy.' She is right about the need for economic resilience. For years, it has been clear that, in a turbulent world, the scale and structure of debt, combined with anaemic growth, makes our economy highly vulnerable to global shocks. Yet instead of rebuilding a fiscal buffer, the Chancellor has left us with a fiscal wafer so thin it could crack at the merest tap. Instead of bringing debt down, it will be higher at the end of the Parliament than today – and the cost of servicing it is already more than we spend on defence. And instead of supporting growth – critical to everything – the Government has suffocated it with higher taxes. Next, how has the Chancellor helped deliver 'security for working people'? For most working people, job security – the ability to find and keep a steady job – is key. Yet job insecurity is rising. By raising National Insurance on employers – a £25bn jobs tax – Rachel Reeves has provoked the biggest fall in employment in five years. Unemployment is ticking up. The broader definition of 'security' obviously encompasses our nation's defence. Although defence spending is set to rise to 2.5 per cent GDP during this Parliament, this is clearly not enough. At the upcoming Nato summit, the UK will be pressed to raise it to at least 3.5 per cent. But in Wednesday's spending review, what was the Chancellor's 'choice'? To give the NHS, not defence, a bigger slice of government largesse. 90 per cent of the total increase in spending from 2025-6 will go to health. The NHS will see a record cash investment: real-terms, day to day spending is set to increase by 3 per cent per year, costing an extra £29 billion. A government that sees defence as the organising principle of government would not have made that choice. It would have made the case that we need to move from a state that prioritises welfare to one that prepares for warfare. And as part of a strategy to put debt on a gradual downward path, it would have made tough decisions on spending overall – starting with a reform of incapacity and disability benefits, which now cost more than the defence budget. Instead, as her speech took us from spending more on affordable homes, to car production to training to buses in Rochdale, the Chancellor disorganised her Downing Street neighbour's organising principle, showing it the respect Tracey Emin had for her bed. There is only one conclusion one can draw from all this. Last week, when the Prime Minister said we need to make security and defence 'the organising principle of government', he left off four words: 'for this week only'.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israelis in triumphant but foreboding mood after unprecedented Iran strikes
Trepidation mixed with triumphalism in Israel on Friday, after an unprecedented attack on Iran's military and nuclear programme brought ordinary life to an abrupt halt. The country's main airport was closed 'until further notice' with no flights expected for days and hospitals began moving hundreds of vulnerable patients to emergency underground facilities and sending home anyone who could be discharged. From Jerusalem to Tel Aviv, streets that are normally crowded at the start of the weekend were empty on Friday morning, with most shops and cafes shuttered. There were long queues at the handful of places still open as people rushed to get last minute supplies of essentials, canned goods for some and espressos for others. 'I am not giving up on my coffee, but I'm heading back home now,' said Guy Weinberg, 30, who had been woken by sirens at 3am and spent the night in a shelter with his sister and niece. Nearly two years into Israel's longest war, people have got used to alarms warning of missiles fired by Yemen or rockets from Gaza. But this felt different, he said. 'After seeing all the people who have been killed there, it is clear [Iran] will try to attack back. We don't know where or when, but we are ready.' The TV studios were as frenetic as the streets were empty, with all the main channels going live from the moment news of the attacks first broke. The dominant mood was celebration, as military correspondents and analysts pored over satellite images and grainy video to discuss Israel's targets, methods and the impact of their strikes. 'Interim summary: a glorious intelligence and operational success for the State of Israel. The (air raid) alarms at 3am were unnecessary,' said Roy Sharon, a military correspondent and analyst with Kan news, in one post on X that captured national pride at Israel's ability to strike high-level targets deep inside Iran Sigalit, 50, and Barack, 54, teachers from southern Israel who had come to Tel Aviv for pride weekend, agreed. 'We feel safe now, more safe than ever, because we know we destroyed their nuclear weapons,' said Sigalit. Even so, the couple were heading back home after just one night because the parties had been cancelled, and they worried traffic might build up on roads out of Tel Aviv. Tourists who flew in from further away, including the parade's guest of honour, Caitlyn Jenner, were stranded in Israel and Israelis abroad took to social media to ask for help getting home. Most international airlines rapidly suspended flights to Israel. Even Israel's national carrier El Al, which has flown almost without interruption throughout the war in Gaza, cancelled flights on Friday, told travellers with tickets for Saturday and Sunday not to come to the airport and said it had suspended bookings through to the end of the month. For Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, the attacks brought a paralysing shutdown, with roads and checkpoints closed as Israel focused its military attention on Iran. The Palestinian Red Crescent warned that the blockades were costing lives because they were struggling to reach patients with ambulances or get them to hospitals. Israel also closed al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, one of the holiest sites in Islam, and often a flashpoint for regional tensions. In an address to the nation overnight, the Israel prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, had told people the crisis 'may take much longer than you are used to' and urged Israelis to stock up on supplies 'but the most important thing is to equip yourself with patience'. As attacks on Iran continued through Thursday, some in Israel said they were determined to carry on with normal life. Keter Benchimol, 55, had just flown back into Israel and on Friday she was headed to the beach with her son for a swim. Stretches of sand normally packed with sunbathers were emptier than usual but not deserted. 'There's no need to fear, God has us. If it's my day to go, I could go anywhere,' she said, in a sentiment echoed by dozens of others. 'I'm just relieved to be back here with my kids, not worrying about them from far away.'
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newscast Israel Strikes Iran In Major Escalation
Available for over a year Today, Israel has carried out strikes in Iran targeting nuclear sites and military commanders in a major escalation of tensions. Israel say they targeted the 'heart' of Iran's nuclear programme, whilst also killing Hossein Salami, chief of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards. Civilians, including children, were also among those killed, state media reported. In response the Israeli military said Iran launched about 100 drones towards Israel on Friday morning, with Israeli media reporting all the drones were intercepted. Adam is joined by Americast host Justin Webb and the Economist's defence editor Shashank Joshi. You can now listen to Newscast on a smart speaker. If you want to listen, just say "Ask BBC Sounds to play Newscast'. It works on most smart speakers. You can join our Newscast online community here: New episodes released every day. If you're in the UK, for more News and Current Affairs podcasts from the BBC, listen on BBC Sounds: Newscast brings you daily analysis of the latest political news stories from the BBC. It was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Jack Maclaren. The technical producer was Jonny Hall. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The senior news editor is Sam Bonham.
