Macron Decries Antisemitic 'Hatred' After Memorial Tree Cut Down
Politicians across the political spectrum condemned the act as an attack against the memory of Ilan Halimi, who was kidnapped by a gang of around 20 youths in January 2006 and tortured in a low-income housing estate in the Paris suburb of Bagneux.
Found three weeks later, the 23-year-old died on the way to hospital.
An olive tree, planted in 2011 in Halimi's memory, was felled, probably with a chainsaw, earlier this week in the northern Paris suburb of Epinay-sur-Seine.
The incident stoked fresh concerns about an increase in antisemitic acts and hate crimes in France as international tensions mount over Gaza.
Fresh flowers have been left at the memorial stone next to the tree stump, according to an AFP journalist.
"Every effort will be made to punish this act of hatred," Macron said on X, adding France's fight against antisemitism will be "uncompromising".
"The nation will not forget this son of France who died because he was Jewish."
Prime Minister Francois Bayrou called the tree "a living bulwark against oblivion".
"The never-ending fight against the deadly poison of hatred is our primary duty," he added.
Officials pledged to plant a new tree "as soon as possible".
"It is not just a tree that has been cut down, it is a hope that has been sabotaged," France's chief rabbi Haim Korsia said before praying in front of the memorial with other members of the Jewish community.
'Murdered His Memory'
France's Jewish community -- one of the largest in the world -- says the number of antisemitic acts has surged following the attack by Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023 which was followed by Israel's bombardment of the Gaza Strip and aid blockade.
In 2006, Halimi's murder struck horror into France's Jewish people and stirred debate about antisemitism in France. Police at the time initially refused to consider the murder a hate crime, and tens of thousands took to the street to demand justice.
Yonathan Arfi, president of the Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF), said the felling of the tree was "extremely painful".
"There is nothing more cowardly, and those who have murdered his memory are no better than those who took his life 20 years ago," Arfi told AFP.
"This is not just another antisemitic act, it is a way for antisemites to shout that they are here more than ever."
Herve Chevreau, the mayor of Epinay-sur-Seine, filed a criminal complaint.
Paris police chief Laurent Nunez condemned what he called a "despicable act" and said an investigation had been launched.
Halimi was lured by a 17-year-old girl to a housing estate basement in the suburbs, where he was attacked and subdued with ether.
Held prisoner for ransom, Halimi was tortured for 24 days before he was found naked, bound and gagged on February 13, 2006.
Youssouf Fofana, the head of the gang dubbed the "Barbarians", was sentenced to life in prison.
The son of Ivorian immigrants, Fofana had recruited followers among youths from Paris's bleak immigrant suburbs.
Two other trees planted in tribute to Halimi were vandalised and sawn down in 2019 in the southern suburb of Sainte-Genevieve-des-Bois, where Halimi was found dying near a railway track.
Reported antisemitic acts in France surged from 436 in 2022 to 1,676 in 2023, before dipping to 1,570 last year, according to the interior ministry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Israel is quietly in talks to relocate Palestinians from Gaza
Israel and the U.S. are pushing forward efforts to relocate hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, a move they have presented in humanitarian terms but which governments in Europe and the Arab world have criticized as unrealistic and a potential violation of international law. The idea, which Israeli officials have publicly mulled since the beginning of the war in Gaza, got its biggest airing early this year when President Trump said the U.S. should take over the enclave and redevelop it as an international tourist destination while relocating many of its two million residents. That spotlight has moved on, but advocates of the idea are still pursuing. Israeli officials have sounded out their counterparts in half a dozen countries and territories including Libya, South Sudan, Somaliland and Syria about taking in Palestinians who agree to leave Gaza, people familiar with the matter said. Israel and the U.S. have also been pressing Egypt to resettle people from the enclave in the Sinai Peninsula, some of the people said. Egypt, which once controlled the Gaza Strip, has strongly resisted the idea. Its border with Gaza makes it a logistically attractive destination, in the eyes of the idea's proponents. The pressure has led to a number of contentious meetings, including shouting matches between Israeli and Egyptian officials, some of the people said. 'President Trump has long advocated for creative solutions to improve the lives of Palestinians, including allowing them to resettle in a new, beautiful location while Gaza rebuilds,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said. 'However, Hamas must first agree to disarm and end this war, and we have no additional details to provide at this time.' Israel's talks to resettle Gazans in South Sudan or Libya are continuing, some of the people said. Earlier talks to settle Palestinians in Syria or Somaliland—a breakaway region of Somalia—didn't make much progress, one of the people said. Most of the destinations under consideration have their own problems with civil strife and economic dislocation and would likely struggle to absorb hundreds of thousands of migrants. Their battered conditions, however, have opened the possibility of deals that might confer economic support or other benefits in exchange for taking in people relocated from Gaza or elsewhere. The Trump administration deported a handful of migrants in the U.S. to South Sudan last month and has pressed a number of African countries to also take in U.S. deportees. South Sudan, officials said, has been eager to reset ties with Washington, leaving it open to taking additional U.S. deportees and engaging in discussions with Israel on accepting Palestinians. The issue of relocations is sensitive. Legal organizations, humanitarian groups and some governments have questioned whether exits would be truly voluntary. Some including Malaysia, the United Nations and Human Rights Watch have warned the idea could be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. South Sudan's Foreign Ministry said claims that it is in such talks with Israel are baseless. A representative of Somaliland's government said no talks are ongoing. Libyan and Syrian officials didn't respond to requests for comment. Current and former U.S. officials said the U.S. wasn't involved in the discussions between Israel and African countries on resettling Palestinians. At the White House in July, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel and the U.S. are trying to find homes for Palestinians who want to leave Gaza. 'We are working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realize what they always said—that they wanted to give the Palestinians a better future,' Netanyahu said, as Trump sat in front of him. Israeli officials had advocated transferring Palestinians out of Gaza long before Trump floated his idea for a 'Riviera of the Middle East.' Within a week of the deadly Hamas-led attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel's intelligence minister at the time, Gila Gamliel, presented the cabinet with a plan to promote migration from Gaza with the goal of getting 1.7 million to leave, she said in a post on X in May. The most enthusiastic supporters have been far-right officials such as Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, who have pushed for this idea for years. 'Encourage migration! Encourage migration! Encourage migration!,' Ben-Gvir said at a conference for Jewish settlement of the enclave in October. 'Honestly, this is the most moral and correct solution. Not forcibly, but tell them: We are giving you the option to leave to different countries. The land of Israel is ours.' When Trump announced the idea of moving Palestinians out of Gaza, Netanyahu and his government were quick to adopt it and praise it. In February, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz set up a new division in the ministry to oversee the voluntary departure of Gazans. Forcible displacement is a crime under the Geneva Conventions, to which Israel is party, and is permissible only in narrow circumstances such as temporary evacuation for civilian safety or military necessity. The bar for meeting those criteria is high and Gaza's war-torn environment complicates arguments that transfers would be voluntary, Israeli and international legal experts said. The effort to encourage departures creates a dilemma for many Palestinians stuck in the enclave, where food is in short supply. Many have been displaced from their homes, most structures are damaged, and more than 61,000 people have been killed, according to Palestinian authorities, who don't say how many were combatants. Many Gazans, particularly young people or families with children or relatives suffering from disease, would like to leave. But the decision now carries political overtones, as well as the risk that they won't be able to return. Humanitarian groups and regional governments who might want to help Palestinians leave face a similar dilemma. 'The issue is that Israel needs to guarantee that people will be able to return if and when they would like to,' said Tania Hary, executive director of Gisha, an Israeli human-rights and legal organization. 'These voluntary emigration schemes or other plans to deport people don't have anything to do with the safety or humanitarian needs of Palestinians.' Among Gazan Palestinians reached in a May survey by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, 43% said they would be willing to emigrate after the war. Khalil Shikaki, director of the center, said the most likely demographic to leave are young, educated men, which could contribute to brain drain in Gaza. 'Among this group, based on surveys from before the war, two-thirds to three-quarters expressed willingness to leave Gaza to go elsewhere for economic and security reasons,' he said. Many showed interest in moving to Europe, the U.S., Canada, Arab Gulf states or Turkey, he said. Most Palestinians in Gaza haven't had the ability to leave the territory even if they wanted to during the war, with crossings into Egypt and Israel largely closed. Those who could leave often had a second passport or a close relative who left, or were among the thousands of Palestinians selected for outside medical treatment in countries such as Egypt, Jordan and the United Arab Emirates. Ramez Musmar, a 24-year-old Gazan, was accepted to Trinity College Dublin last spring. The university and the Irish government intervened to help him leave, he said. His father died during the war and he fears for the safety of his mother and siblings, who remain in Gaza. 'I had applied to the university mainly so I could leave Gaza and eventually get my family out,' he said. 'My mom told me, 'Go for your future. Don't worry about us. Hopefully you can bring us later.' ' Write to Summer Said at Robbie Gramer at and Omar Abdel-Baqui at
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How to make sense of Donald Trump's bizarre tariff rates
ON AUGUST 11TH an unpredictable president did a predictable thing: Donald Trump extended America's tariff truce with China for at least another 90 days. The decision followed a frenetic spell of dealmaking and tariff-setting that has changed the terms of entry to the American market for dozens of other trade partners, from Canada to Congo. America has struck deals with the European Union, Japan, Britain, South Korea and Vietnam among others. It has announced punitive duties on Brazil, Canada and India, and set surprisingly harsh terms for Switzerland. It has also had to undo some of what it has done. In recent days Mr Trump has said on social media that gold will not, in fact, face tariffs. Japan's government has also said its exporters will be compensated for new American duties that were wrongly stacked on earlier levies. Containers are seen at the port in Qingdao, in China�s eastern Shandong province on August 11, 2025. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT(AFP) Chart As the dust begins to settle, it is a good time to take stock of the tariff wall Mr Trump has built. Which countries have the easiest and toughest access to the world's biggest market? America's tariff menu has over 17,000 lines, making it difficult to summarise. It distinguishes between horses and asses, fine wool and coarse, grinding machines and kneading machines, small cars (with a cylinder capacity of 1,500cc), even smaller cars (1,000cc) and bigger ones. Some of Mr Trump's tariffs are sweeping, such as the 'fentanyl' duties he has imposed on Canada, Mexico and China because of their role in the illegal opioid trade. Other levies are more targeted, such as his 'sectoral' tariffs on car parts and metals. Mr Trump's 'reciprocal' tariffs, first announced on 'Liberation Day' on April 2nd and revised on July 31st, are somewhere in between (see chart 1). They exempt several important categories of goods, such as smartphones. But they still touch more than half of the goods America bought from abroad last year. One way to sum it all up is to take a simple average across all tariffs. But that would give equal weight to every product, whatever its prominence in international trade. An alternative approach is to compare the duties America now collects with the amount it imports. If customs collects $10bn in duties on $100bn-worth of goods, then the tariff is, in effect, 10%. But this approach has some perverse implications. As the tariff on a product rises, imports will shrink, reducing the tariff's weight in the calculation. Indeed, if it is high enough, imports might grind to a halt. The exorbitant levy will then have no weight in the calculation at all. For that reason, we have weighted America's tariffs on its biggest trading partners according to its import patterns in 2024, before Mr Trump returned to office (see chart 2). The calculations do not yet take account of his recent social-media post on gold or the late tweak to Japan's tariffs. But we have estimated the impact of the 50% tariff imposed on Brazi l to punish it for prosecuting Jair Bolsonaro, its former president. We have also included the extra 25% tariff that India will face from August 27th because of its purchases of Russian oil. Our calculations show that China, despite the truce, still faces the highest average tariff among America's big trading partners at almost 45%. If Mr Trump carries out his threat to punish India for buying Russian oil, the tariff it faces will jump from 21% to 36%, the second highest on our list. Although Brazil's 50% headline rate looks even higher, it does not apply to over 40% of its exports to America. As a consequence, its average tariff, weighted by 2024 imports, is 29%—the third highest among America's big trading partners. Mr Trump has, so to speak, built a tariff wall out of the BRICs. Malaysia (almost 13%) also fares better than many of its regional rivals, such as Thailand (almost 21%) and Vietnam (23%), largely because more of its goods fall into categories exempted from Mr Trump's reciprocal tariffs. Ireland and Singapore also escape lightly, although that may change if Mr Trump introduces new levies on pharmaceuticals. These tariff calculations reveal some winners and losers from Mr Trump's new trade policy. But they are not by themselves a good guide to who will suffer the most. For some exporters, America is a captive market. They can safely add the tariffs to their prices without sacrificing many sales. Others sell more price-sensitive goods, which will lose a lot of their appeal if they become more expensive. Some countries also depend more heavily on sales to America than others. Exports to America are equivalent to almost 28% of Mexico's GDP, for example, but less than 2% of France's. To gauge an economy's vulnerability to American protectionism, Oxford Economics, a consultancy, has combined these three factors: the average tariff a country faces, the price-sensitivity of their exports, and the importance of the American market to their economy (see chart 3). The result provides a rough guide to an economy's direct exposure to American tariffs. Among America's largest trading partners, Oxford Economics finds that Vietnam could suffer the biggest direct hit to GDP. Britain and France will suffer the least. Although China faces a high average tariff, the damage to its economy is relatively modest. After many years waging a trade war, direct exports to America have become a relatively small part of its economy. 'Tariffs are making our Country Strong and Rich,' Mr Trump crowed on social media on August 11th. They also, however, guarantee that America will become steadily less important to its trading partners. That is one predictable consequence of an unpredictable presidency. How-to-make-sense-of-Donald-Trump-s-bizarre-tariff
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump speaks with Zelenskiy, NATO leaders after summit with Putin
By Steve Holland and Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON -Donald Trump held a lengthy phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and subsequently spoke to NATO leaders after the U.S. president's Friday summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the White House said. Trump held the calls on his way back to Washington, landing in the early hours of Saturday morning. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was among those on the call, in which Trump briefed European leaders about the summit, von der Leyen's spokesperson said. A NATO official said NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also took part, while the Elysee confirmed French President Emmanuel Macron's participation. Leaders from Germany, Finland, Poland, Italy and Britain also joined the call, according to the European Commission. Axios reporter Barak Ravid said, citing a source, that Trump spoke for more than an hour and a half with Zelenskiy and European leaders. Zelenskiy later said he would travel to Washington on Monday. The highly anticipated summit in Alaska yielded no agreement to resolve or pause Russia's war in Ukraine, although both Trump and Putin described the talks as productive before heading home. During a brief appearance before the media following the nearly three-hour meeting in Alaska, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues. But they offered no details and took no questions. Trump also did not take questions when he landed in the United States at Joint Base Andrews. During his presidential campaign and upon taking office, Trump had vowed to quickly end the war in Ukraine that began with Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022 but has thus far failed to deliver on that promise. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
