
India-Canada ties are having a summer thaw. Now we need answers on Kanishka bombing
Right-thinking people, officials, and leaders in both countries must watch with caution since Canadian soil is still being used for anti-India and anti-Hindu activities.
However, Canada's silence on the Kanishka bombing—the worst bombing in aviation history, where 329 people lost their lives—remains salt in the wounds of the loved ones of the victims. While the Canadian authorities condemn these acts of terror, activists designated as terrorists by the Indian authorities continue to roam freely in the country with no apparent fear of the consequences of their actions.
Today marks the 40th anniversary of the Kanishka bombing. And India-Canada relations seem to be witnessing an Indian summer, undergoing a thaw after the nearly year–long diplomatic freeze. Prime Minister Modi's visit to Alberta last week, where he attended the G7 Summit at the invitation of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, has led to optimism in diplomatic circles. There is also much cheer at the resumption of diplomatic services between India and Canada.
Under the visionary leadership of PM Modi and through its 'Vishwamitra' policy, India has earned its well-deserved place on the diplomatic dining table. Carney has rightfully acknowledged India's importance in the G7 and the larger geopolitical space. It is the 7th largest country in terms of sheer size and the fourth largest economy at USD 4.2 trillion. The most populous country with about 60 per cent youth, it is central to supply chains as well. Carney made the right call by extending an invitation to PM Modi, albeit last minute.
The freeze
Over the last few years, Canada has allowed free run of its territory to Khalistan terrorists. They have not only engaged in criminal intimidation of Indian diplomats and leaders but also indulged in terrorist activities on Indian soil. In 2021, the New Democratic Party, led by pro-Khalistan leader Jagmeet Singh, was key to Justin Trudeau's victory.
For over 40 years, India hasn't forgotten the Kanishka bombing. Trudeau's father, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, ignored a request by New Delhi for the extradition of Babbar Khalsa terrorist Talwinder Singh Parmar in 1982.
On the eve of the 40th anniversary of the Kanishka bombing, Canada identified Mr 'X', who was complicit in the attack, but refused to share his identity, citing 'privacy' laws. Meanwhile, the previous regime in Canada was all too comfortable in falsely implicating Indian High Commissioner Sanjay Verma in the alleged killing of Sikh separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar.
Canada's soil has been used by anti-India activists in the name of Khalistan, backed by vested interests, including ISI. Justin Trudeau's public accusation of Indian agents in the killing of Nijjar was the proverbial final straw, resulting in the expulsion of diplomats.
Also read: India is losing information war—US backs Israel, hosts Munir, but asks Delhi to show restraint
From deadlock to diplomacy
Carney's olive branch, the invitation to the G7 Summit, was graciously accepted by PM Modi despite geopolitical uncertainty. The two leaders had a bilateral meeting in Kananaskis on the sidelines of the Summit.
'The leaders reaffirmed the importance of India-Canada ties, based on shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law, and commitment to upholding the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. They underlined the need to pursue a constructive and balanced partnership,' read a PIB release.
The two countries have agreed to the return of high commissioners, positions that were vacant since the targeting of Verma last year. They will also resume full visa services and consular facilities. Ministerial level talks will also be resumed to bring about a modicum of trust in India-Canada relations.
Lots of positive winds are flowing, including prospective collaboration in clean energy, food security, critical minerals, higher education, mobility, and supply chains. Negotiations that had reached an impasse on the EPTA (Early Progress Trade Agreement) are likely to resume to pave the way for CEPA (Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement). The two countries have also reaffirmed their commitment to a 'free and open Indo-Pacific'.
Modi and Carney have also agreed to stay in touch and make concerted efforts to meet at the earliest opportunity. A much-needed thaw based on mutual respect seems to be the return gift from PM Modi's Canadian visit.
Also read: Trump tried to belittle India, but his Iran gamble has handed Modi unexpected diplomatic space
Recalibration requires reworking
A lingering flavour of caution remains. Indian diplomats experienced the most harrowing experience when they feared for their lives and safety during the repeated attacks by pro–Khalistan activists, in clear violation of the Vienna Convention. High Commissioner Sanjay Verma and his wife were attacked by sword–bearing miscreants in Alberta. Between 2023-24, there were numerous attacks on Indian High Commissions, including even incidents of grenade-throwing.
There have been numerous instances where Hindu temples all over Canada were defaced and vandalised by miscreants claiming to be sympathetic to the Khalistan cause. The BAPS Swaminarayan Temple in Toronto, Ram Mandir in Mississauga, Gauri Shankar Mandir in Brampton are among those defaced with anti–Hindu posters and graffiti.
Posters targeting Indian diplomats were removed by volunteers from Bharat Mata Temple in Brampton. Many Indians watched in agonised dismay the videos of assaults on Hindu worshippers. In one such video, the police discriminated against Hindus who were protesting the desecration of their temples.
While Modi and Carney have discussed topics ranging from trade to consular ties, how do we ensure that Hindus feel safe in Canada? The elephant in the room has to be talked about with more clarity.
Also read: Assam is wary of digital payments. It's stalling the growth of MSMEs
Diaspora, diplomacy, and divide
Hindus comprise 2.3 per cent of the Canadian population, with over 8,30,000 Canadians practising Hinduism—as compared to 2.1 per cent Sikhs, amounting to 7,70,000 people. It must be remembered that only a small fraction of the Sikhs in Canada support the anti–India activists who have branded themselves as pro-Khalistan. The optics, rhetoric, and loud jingoism, however, have branded the entire Canadian political system as anti-India.
Canada cannot afford to alienate a community of scientists, businessmen, and hard–working immigrants, who are beginning to voice their own reply to Gurpatwant Singh Pannun's 'Leave Canada, go back to India' posturing.
Indian students are a cash cow for the Canadian economy. In 2022 alone, they contributed approximately CAD 10.2 billion out of a total of CAD 22.3 billion generated by international students in Canada in 2022. A whopping 40 per cent of all international students, they support not only Canadian educational institutions but also prop up local economies through rent, food, transport, and general consumption.
Canadian authorities must create the confidence that Indians are safe in Canada, and Carney has been provided with a huge diplomatic opportunity to do so. The optics of the Carney–Modi handshake may give a burgeoning boost to the tourist economy—India is among the top source countries for tourists visiting Canada. But Indians spending their hard-earned money would like to be assured of their safety. And as long as those responsible for the Kanishka attack remain protected in Canada, Indian respect is going to be like the mythical chimaera.
A Canadian rapper has misrepresented and disrespected the goddess Kali in an explicit video, highlighting utter disregard for Hinduism. In all likelihood, it's an act of agent provocateurs and is seen as just that by the more tolerant Hindu community. The truth remains, however, that such nuisance makers are hard to ignore.
Veteran journalist and Khalistan expert, Terry Milewski, writes about the Kanishka bombings in the foreword to On Angels' Wings: Beyond the Bombing of Air India 182:
'Justice was denied. Witnesses were intimidated or murdered. Wiretaps were inexplicably erased. Crucial evidence was discarded or ruled inadmissible on grounds that often seemed bizarre. A stinging sense of betrayal left some of the family members barely able to speak.'
The loved ones of the victims of the Kanishka bombing, like aviation expert Sanjay Lazar, who lost his entire family, have waited 40 years. At the very least, they deserve a memorial site where they can mourn. Building such a memorial will go a long way in establishing goodwill.
The true reparation and reconciliation can be achieved under the present leadership, guided by international law and the principles of the UN Human Rights Office.
Let this relationship be strategic, permanent, and one that ensures long-term stability and prosperity.
Meenakashi Lekhi is a BJP leader, lawyer and social activist. Her X handle is @M_Lekhi. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The Emergency and politics of the body
For the average Indian, it was through the tyranny of the dreaded nasbandi (sterilisation) camps that the worst consequences of the suspension of civil and political rights under the Emergency manifested itself in their everyday lives. In September 1976, India recorded over 1.7 million sterilisations, a figure that equalled the annual average for the 10 preceding years. By 1977, Sanjay Gandhi, the younger son of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, and his bulldozer gang had overseen the conduct of more than 8 million sterilizations. The predominance accorded to forced sterilisation was intertwined with Sanjay Gandhi's growing influence. He needed to consolidate his hold on power within the Congress, family planning (and his other obsession, urban gentrification) became his preferred tools. In the process, he unleashed the worst form of State violence, stripping ordinary citizens of agency over their bodies. The political and administrative zeal to comply with Sanjay Gandhi and his bulldozer gang was shaped by the nature of power he wielded over regional leaders. (HT Photo) Much has changed in India's approach to family planning since those dark Emergency years. However, 50 years on, Sanjay Gandhi's weaponisation of family planning and exertion of power over individual bodily rights afford important lessons for how we respond to demographic challenges in the contemporary moment. Above all, it serves as a critical reminder to be patient with democracy, for it is the only pathway for sustainable, socially just economic growth and development. On the surface, Sanjay Gandhi's approach to family planning was not new. Malthusian worries had shadowed India's demographic debates long before independence and India became the first country in the world to launch a national family planning programme in 1952. And as Christophe Jaffrelot and Pratinav Anil argue in India's First Dictatorship: The Emergency, 1975-77, elements of eugenics, visible in the Emergency, undergirded these debates. 'Undesirable others' – minorities and lower castes – were the targets. Coercive population control measures were introduced as necessary tools for 'modernisation' and 'development'. But it was only in the late 1960s that sterilisation acquired wide policy acceptance. On paper, India took a 'cafeteria approach' with sterilisation offered as one of many forms of family planning. In practice, however, sterilisation was prioritised. Targets were introduced and vasectomy camps, cash incentives, citizen motivators, and active coercion became acceptable methods to control India's 'population bomb'. But like most policies, implementation waxed and waned. India's sterilisation drive peaked in 1972-3 with 3.1 million sterilisations, falling to just under a million the next year. What differentiated mass sterilisation during the Emergency from the past was the scale and aggressiveness with which it was pursued. International agencies from the World Bank to the United Nations played their part, financing what they called 'crash sterilisation'. Sanjay Gandhi effectively leveraged Emergency conditions to direct political and administrative functionaries to use force and coercion with a vengeance. He bypassed the health ministry to directly hand out targets to states and used his powers to harass and intimidate regional leaders, bureaucrats and district administrators to comply. Over time, his tactics became almost necessary to feed the Emergency myth: That suspension of democracy and centralisation of power was necessary to ensure the 'trains run on time'. Eugenics, Jaffrelot and Anil, note were implicit in this framing in the targeting of Muslims and the poor. The horror that unfolded has been widely chronicled. The political and administrative zeal to comply with Sanjay Gandhi and his bulldozer gang was shaped by the nature of power he wielded over regional leaders. Inevitably, Delhi and the Hindi heartland became Sanjay Gandhi's playground, with party leaders and willing bureaucrats jostling to curry favour. Family planning policy was now no longer about broader societal goals but a weapon for political power and control. In the process, individual citizens were effectively stripped of any agency over their bodies. From nudging railway commuters to getting vasectomies if caught ticketless by waiving paying fines, to threatening slum dwellers with eviction notices, denying government benefits and when needed enabling violent use of force, Gandhi's bulldozer gang zealously did all that was demanded of them to coerce the poorest and most vulnerable citizens into sterlisation camps thereby fulfilling the political myth of the Emergency. Those who sought to protect their dignity and individual agency by escaping the sterilisation net, lived in terror. As ethnographer Emma Tarlo notes in her account of the nasbandi tyranny in Delhi, for anyone who escaped, public spaces and civic institutions like hospitals, schools and government offices, were places to avoid. Unsurprisingly, in many parts of the country, fear led to violence. Nasbandi was widely attributed to have contributed to Indira Gandhi's resounding electoral defeat. In a direct and tactile way, the ordinary Indian experienced the terror of the powers of the State over their bodies and they used democracy to reclaim control. Since that dark period, India's family planning policy, in tune with global trends, has evolved adopting a much more central focus on reproductive rights. Sterilisation, and associated policies like incentives and camps, continue to be part of the repertoire, indeed they often make headlines for medical negligence and death, but it no longer carries the zeal of the Emergency. The burden has now shifted to female sterilisation. The Emergency was an illustration of how the body is used as a site for exerting State power. In the contemporary moment, loose remarks by politicians in South India telling women to 'have more children' as they navigate delimitation politics is a warning signal that population policy may once again be weaponised. Ironically, these very states offered India an alternative to the tyranny of nasbandi: A model embedded in economic growth, choice and reproductive rights. Democracy afforded the path to achieve population goals. Today's politicians would do well to heed to the message that Indians gave to Indira and Sanjay Gandhi in 1977. Yamini Aiyar is senior visiting fellow, Brown University. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
FATF's Pak challenge: Tracing routes of funds
At one level it seems like a huge win for India. At least one major body has focused on the Pahalgam terror attack rather than the operation that followed it, and ensuing calls for restraint. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), the foremost authority on money laundering and terrorist finance, has not just condemned the terror attack, but, last week, resolved to launch a probe noting that it could not have been carried out 'without money and the means to move funds between terrorist supporters'. Unlike various groups asking for proof of who did the attack, the FATF proposes to find it for itself. The Pulwama terror attack that killed 40 security personnel happened even as Islamabad was threatened with blacklisting. (Waseem Andrabi/HT) The FATF was formed in 1989 by the G-7 countries, the European Commission and eight others (who are not listed), to combat money laundering, including 'terrorist financing and the financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction'. Over the years, it steadily increased its mandate to include all manner of actors including narcotics networks. India joined in 2010, after a rigorous examination of its banking systems, a review which happens periodically to protect the global system from danger. In 2024, India again got an 'outstanding' report for its financial stability and probity, though the FATF warned about 'non-profit' associations being used for terrorist finance. A number of NGOs were shut down, causing a cry of illiberalism. Pakistan, on the other hand, was put on a 'grey list', which means its financial systems have significant deficiencies, three times: Once in 2008, and taken off the list in two years after some improvements; again in 2012 for not curbing terrorist financing among other things; and again in 2018 for the same reason. This time it kept it there until October 2022, during which period Islamabad sentenced Lashkar-e-Taiba leader Zaki ur Rehman Lakhvi to five years imprisonment, Hafiz Saeed to 33 years in jail, and set in place legislation including an Anti-Terrorism Act (Amendment) Bill, 2020 which updated the legal definition of terrorism to international standards. A legislation was introduced to bring Pakistan's laws in line with the UN laws on terrorist financing, 20 years after Resolution 1373 had been enacted, and further gave the State Bank of Pakistan a degree of autonomy to implement much of this. That was when Imran Khan was in office, against an Opposition which feared their large unaccounted funds would come under scrutiny. Khan, who had a clean record on corruption, warned that going onto the 'black list' would mean an economic crash. A country on the black list is sealed off from the rest of the world in financial terms and faces serious difficulties in securing loans. At that time, Pakistan's external debt was 37.6% of GDP! But terrorism did not stop. The Pulwama terror attack that killed 40 security personnel happened even as Islamabad was threatened with blacklisting. It paused after India retaliated with air strikes deep inside Pakistan for the first time. Subsequently, government reports showed a significant drop in infiltration attempts from 216 incidents in 2019 to 53 in 2022 (according to MHA reports). But terrorist tactics simply shifted. Narcotics trafficking long associated with terrorism in Punjab returned. According to reports, some 251 transborder sorties by drones brought in weapons and drugs, this time mostly methamphetamine and derivatives from Lahore, even as underground tunnels were spotted along the international border. Second, terrorist groups became smaller in size but better trained and equipped. The personnel could live off the land for months in thick forests and were equipped with phones that evaded mobile towers. Then Pahalgam happened. As the FATF swoops in, two things matter. The first is whether our forces have managed to crack the communication system of terror groups to trace the source areas. That is vital. Second, Pakistan, despite the Taliban's crackdown on opium cultivation, seems to be able to access vast amounts of meth, as seen in the 300-kg seizure in April 2025 off the Gujarat coast. Pakistan also has money to continuously raise not just its defence budget — now far above the mandated 1.9% of its GDP when pensions are included — but also the pay of parliamentarians (by 138%) and defence personnel. Then, the FATF has to examine how Chinese funds are coming in to support the army, since none of it is evident in the budget papers. The FATF may also find other sources of financing, from outside the country. The sum of all this is to find out why Pakistan doesn't seem to care even if access to international financial assistance, crucial for it, is cut off. If Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's call for peace has some basis, he could start by emulating Indian initiatives like linking national identity cards with bank accounts, use its very capable investigative agencies to root out terrorist accounts, and those of 'charitable' organisations such as the highly suspect Al Khidmat Foundation. The army will, of course, oppose this. But major financial institutions must back the politicians, by linking aid with democracy. Otherwise nothing at all will move forward. Meanwhile, India had better look at hawala networks at home. Money has no nationality and no morals, and it could be used by hostile agencies as well. Time to get cracking for our own interests. Meanwhile, the Sharifs might actually find the going easier as terrorists are curtailed, and the army's powers with it. Tara Kartha is director (research), Centre for Land Warfare Studies. The views expressed are personal.


India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
India-US Trade Deal To Increase US Exports To India: Crisil
New Delhi: Given that India has much higher tariffs than those imposed by the US, the impending Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) — which would reduce tariffs — is set to increase US exports to India more than vice versa, according to an analysis by Crisil. India would be able to import more energy products, certain agricultural products, and defence equipment, among others, from the US, Crisil said in a 'Quickonomics' report. India, according to Crisil, should be prepared to see more imports from the US under the BTA. A lowering of tariffs under the agreement would make US goods more competitive in India, it argued. "This is because India's tariffs are much higher than those of the US, and bringing these down would be advantageous to exporters in the US," Crisil said. India's exports, however, are unlikely to see a major spike because the focus of President Donald Trump's administration is to reduce its trade deficit with India, and most of India's top exports to the US are already duty-free (excluding the baseline 10 percent tariff applicable since April 10). Besides, the export potential would also depend on the level of tariffs India faces compared to other competing nations, Crisil noted. The US has categorically stated that it wants to reduce its trade deficit with India (among other nations) and has complained that India's high tariffs and non-tariff barriers have hindered American companies from increasing their exports. Even though India has shown its discomfort with allowing US agricultural products into the country, imports of certain items such as walnuts, pistachios, and cranberries could rise, as India's share in US exports of these items was relatively low — at 19.4 percent, 5.0 percent, and 3.1 percent, respectively — in 2024. This contrasts with almonds, where India's share was a hefty 70.5 percent in 2024 — making it one of the US's top agricultural export items to India. Further, with India's aviation sector growing, there is scope to increase imports of civilian aircraft, engines, and parts. According to Crisil, there also seems to be strong complementarity in the energy sector, as the US is a large exporter and India a large importer of energy commodities. Even though India has a significant opportunity to import crude oil from the US, Crisil said the prospects of increasing such imports would have to be weighed against challenging factors — such as the higher cost of transportation and longer transit times. "The US is a large exporter and India a large importer of LNG, providing a mutually beneficial ground. Here, the synergy seems to be much better than that in crude petroleum, as the US is already among the top three suppliers of LNG to India," Crisil said. "With favourable factors such as US natural gas prices being more stable than those in the Middle East (India's largest LNG import partner) and long-term contracts being signed between Indian entities and US suppliers, there has been an increase in the import of this commodity from the US," it added. Defence imports into India could also rise under the BTA. "Even as India is trying to increase its defence production and export capabilities, it remains one of the largest arms importers. At the same time, the US is the world's largest arms exporter. While Russia has traditionally been India's largest arms supplier, its share in India's arms imports has declined in recent years. This has created space for Western suppliers, led by the US, to step up their sales," the report said. In fact, in 2023, the US and India launched a bilateral Defence Acceleration Ecosystem (called INDUS-X) to facilitate defence collaboration between the two countries. Combining all these opportunities, India's trade surplus with the US is expected to come down — a major demand from the US, which has implemented reciprocal tariffs on countries in proportion to their trade surplus with it. On the other hand, India may see some gains in exports of smartphones, certain pharmaceuticals, and labour-intensive sectors such as textiles and gems and jewellery. The US announced reciprocal tariffs on India and a host of other nations on April 2, and then paused the increase for 90 days from April 10 to negotiate trade deals with these countries. (For India, the reciprocal tariff was 26 percent — lower than the tariff on many other Asian peers.) During the pause period, a 10 percent base tariff remains applicable (over and above the existing tariffs) on all countries, including India. India is currently negotiating a trade deal with the US, known as the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) — the first tranche of which is targeted to be completed by the fall of 2025.