CAQM unveils 19-point plan to stamp out stubble burning in Delhi-NCR
As part of the plan, each farm across Punjab, Haryana, and NCR districts of Uttar Pradesh must be mapped with a proposed mode of paddy stubble management.
'The management strategy may include crop diversification, in-situ methods such as mulching and use of decomposers, or ex-situ solutions like baling and biomass use,' said a CAQM official, who did not wish to be named. 'Each group of up to 50 farmers will be tagged to a nodal officer to ensure effective monitoring and implementation at the ground level.'
Other major directions include a gap analysis of Crop Residue Management (CRM) machinery availability, planning for proper storage of paddy straw bales to avoid losses due to fire, and setting up robust supply chains for transporting straw for ex-situ use—such as in power plants, packaging material or brick kilns. District-level supply chain management plans are to be created across the region to support these efforts.
Stubble burning, particularly in October and November after the paddy harvest, has long been a major source of air pollution in Delhi and NCR. Every winter, smoke from tens of thousands of fires in Punjab, Haryana, and western Uttar Pradesh combines with local emissions to create a toxic smog that chokes the region. Despite repeated crackdowns, subsidies, and technological interventions, governments have failed to eliminate the practice. Public health experts and environmentalists have long warned that unless stubble burning is decisively tackled, efforts to improve air quality in Delhi will remain futile.
Taking note of the urgency and observing the recommendations submitted, the Supreme Court,while hearing the matter on April 3, 2025, directed Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh to constitute state-level committees headed by their Chief Secretaries to monitor implementation of CAQM's directives. 'Chief Secretaries of the States shall submit monthly reports to CAQM starting from June 1, 2025. The report shall be submitted to CAQM by the 10th of every calendar month,' the court said, adding that CAQM may approach the Court for further directions based on these reports.
To track progress, CAQM will also establish an online platform for real-time data reporting on crop residue generation and its utilisation, both in-situ and ex-situ. In addition, a pilot common boiler powered by paddy straw will be installed in an industrial estate to supply steam to multiple units, demonstrating a viable model for industrial use.
Among the most stringent measures announced is the formation of a dedicated 'Parali Protection Force' at the district and block levels. The task force will include officers from police, agriculture, and administrative departments, and will be responsible for strict monitoring and enforcement.
Patrolling during late evening hours—the time when most farm fires are set—will be intensified. Citizens will also be encouraged to report incidents via social media platforms, and authorities have been directed to respond swiftly to these complaints. Farmers who continue to burn stubble will face environmental compensation (EC) penalties and have 'Red Entries' marked in their farm records, which could impact future subsidies and benefits.
'In view of the compelling need to control air pollution from burning paddy straw, the Commission hereby directs the State Governments of Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh to effectively implement their revised Action Plans in letter and spirit, focusing on the mandates issued by CAQM,' the directive stated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Road ministry makes frequent inspection NH mandatory to ensure no encroachment
NEW DELHI: The road transport ministry has made frequent inspection of highway stretches mandatory for engineers and officers to ensure there is no encroachment of these corridors. Moreover, videography using drones has also been made compulsory for collecting regular updates. Encroachers will have to pay for the expenditure incurred in removal of unauthorised occupations as well as an additional charge and a penalty. The ministry has issued a detailed standard operating procedure (SOP) following a Supreme Court direction on a PIL highlighting encroachments on the NH network, which cause congestion and is a factor for road crashes. The SOP said to ensure NHs remain free from unauthorised occupation and are safe, it is 'obligatory' on the part of all inspecting authorities of *the ministry and its implementing agencies — NHAI and NHIDCL —* to ascertain such violations and bring them to the notice of officers concerned promptly. The officials must upload inspection notes, along with visual and other evidence on the designated portal. The ministry has specified that every regional officer of the ministry and its agencies will have to inspect stretches under their jurisdiction at least once in three months. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo The project directors and engineers heading project implementation units need to inspect the stretches under them every month. It also said that contractors and supervision consultants are also responsible for detecting and removing encroachments as per law. They must report such matters to engineers or officers concerned for quick action. For objective monitoring, the highway agencies will carry out drone survey and get aerial imaging done and upload them on the designated portal. While quarterly drone survey has been made mandatory during construction, this exercise will be a monthly routine on highways passing through urban limits having more than a lakh population. In less populated urban limits and rural areas, it will be done in every three and six months, respectively. The SOP has also specified how highway officials will report and take up the matter with local administrative and police authorities, and they can even invoke the jurisdiction of district magistrates, for removal of encroachments. As per the National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, highway administrations are responsible for prevention of encroachment and their removal, recovery of cost of removal and imposing fine, to regulate right of access to highway and traffic.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
How villagers fought for an elephant
The rains in August bring joy to Kolhapur, a part of Maharashtra's sugarcane belt. The fields thrive and people get respite from the heat that parches land and spirit. This year, the villages in the area are in mourning. Madhuri, 36, also called Mahadevi, was transferred from her home in Nandani village to Vantara, a wildlife rehabilitation facility run by the Ambani industrialist family, in Jamnagar, Gujarat, over 1,170 km away. Her mahout (elephant handler) Ismail Nidgun, 56, is no longer with her. 'It feels like I have lost my daughter. My days are empty just like this gajshala (elephant home),' Nidgun says. Originally from Davangere in Karnataka, he had been with Madhuri for seven years. Her transfer order came on July 28 after a Supreme Court directive. She was moved from the 1,300-year-old Jain Mutt, the Shree Digambar Jain Atishay Kshetra Vrishabhachal to Vantara, 'Anant Ambani's dream project,' as per information on the website. Anant is one of three children of Reliance chairperson Mukesh Ambani, one of the wealthiest men in the world. On August 3, images began pouring in of thousands of people marching early in the morning, in protest, from Nandani to the Kolhapur District Collectorate, about 40 km away, appealing to get Madhuri back. 'Did Ambani get only our Madhuri to take?' asks Mahavir Jugale, 56, a Nandani-based farmer. Shopkeeper Vijay Teli, 51, in the Gandhi Chowk area, a bustling market in the village, says, 'Mate pasun mula la vegla kela ahe,' (They separated the child from her mother). Whenever the bell rings, we still think she is coming.' Madhuri wore a bell around her neck which would ring each time she ambled along. 'Children used to line up to play with her,' he adds. Everyone has a Madhuri moment to share. Points of view On July 28, the Supreme Court upheld the July 16 Bombay High Court order to transfer the elephant to the Radhe Krishna Temple Elephant Welfare Trust (RKTEWT), a part of Vantara, registered in 2019. Vantara, which describes itself as being committed to 'rescuing, rehabilitating, and protecting endangered species' spans 998 acres. The affidavit filed by Vantara indicates that the facility houses 238 elephants. In the lane adjoining the Mutt, Sushila Kambhoje, 70, says, 'They called Madhuri dangerous and ailing. How could she be dangerous? On the day of her farewell, 2,000 people surrounded her. Did she even hurt a single person? An ailing animal can never be active. They used all the means to take her away.' Sushila, a homemaker, remembers Madhuri from when she was three years old. The elephant, locals say, was brought to the Mutt from the Sakrebailu elephant camp, Shimoga in Karnataka in 1992. The Mutt, which makes decisions on the socio-religious affairs of the Digambar Jain community of a few villages in Maharashtra and Karnataka, has a history of domesticating elephants for the last 400 years, say leaders in the community. Elephants have been part of religious processions, and participate in festivals like Ganeshotsav and Muharram. 'We have treated her as a family member. PETA's (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) claims that she is distressed are false,' says the financial manager of the Mutt, Shirish Herwade. He says PETA officials visited the Mutt in 2020 and proposed moving Madhuri to Vantara. 'They offered us a robotic elephant. When the Mutt refused, PETA offered us money and infrastructure development,' he adds. PETA claims that the elephant had 'untreated ailments including foot rot, overgrown nails, abscesses, arthritis and behavioural distress' says an SC-approved high-power committee (HPC) report. The HPC had been set up by the Tripura High Court in November 2022, after a lawyer, Sudipta Nath, had filed a public interest litigation seeking an inquiry into past transfers of elephants to RKTEWT. After the public outcry, the Maharashtra government intervened, holding meetings with a delegation from Kolhapur and the Vantara team. On August 6, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced publically, 'Vantara has offered to set up a satellite rehabilitation centre in Nandani and join the Maharashtra government's application in court, requesting the return of Madhuri.' Vantara put out a statement on social media saying, their 'involvement in this matter has been limited to acting strictly in accordance to the binding directions issued by the Supreme Court and Bombay High Court.' It said Vantara's role was simply as a caretaker to the animal. Vantara proposed a centre in Nandani, which will include a hydrotherapy pond for joint and muscular relief, a larger water body for swimming and natural movement, laser therapy and a treatment room for physical rehabilitation, a covered night shelter, an open space for unrestricted movement without chains, a sand pit, and an on-site veterinary clinic, among other facilities. 'From the beginning these people should have used their specialists in the village itself instead of relocating the elephant,' says Sagar Shambhushete, one of the Mutt's trustees. The Mutt alleges that after the 2020 meeting, PETA started documenting pictures of Madhuri while socialising with the villagers. Between the Mutt and the HPC The Mutt's top authority says on condition of anonymity, 'PETA is less of an animal rights organisation and more of a mediator for big people.' He alleges that PETA joined hands with Vantara, who has collected animals from all over the country. The Jain Mutt had an ownership certificate under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. PETA dismisses the claims, saying it was the decision of HPC. They also say the Mutt has disregarded wildlife protection laws on several occasions. 'The temple was provided an in-person opportunity to make their case at all levels of the process, but failed,' says Khushboo Gupta, Director of Advocacy of PETA, adding this was not the first elephant taken to Vantara from Maharashtra. An elephant from Sangli district's Vita was taken too. The Mutt's stone building, with wooden interior, sees thousands of devotees from across the Kolhapur-Sangli region and from some parts of Karnataka. 'When nothing worked, PETA approached the HPC; they just wanted our elephant at any cost,' says Shambhushete. Former Judge Deepak Verma led the HPC and issued the first order on December 28, 2023. The HPC's June 3 report suggests that PETA India highlighted the need for Madhuri's transfer to a 'scientifically managed sanctuary' such as the RKTEWT, Jamnagar. The Mutt has also alleged that HPC's sub-committee report findings are 'biased' and 'exaggerated', and that PETA's photographic and veterinary material 'lacks context'. The sub-committee, comprising officials from the Forest Department, visited the Mutt premises on June 12, 2024, inspected the facilities, and recommending improvements, including an opportunity for socialisation. The committee also confirmed that the elephant's physical well-being, diet and nutrition were being maintained. After three months, Vivek Khandekar, Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife), inspected the facility, making observations that the 'elephant's back and toenails are showing good improvement and she is walking properly'. He noted other improvements as well, including a daily walk of 5 to 10 km and a weekly bath in the Panchganga River. A representative of the Mutt says, 'Within three months of the first inspection in June 2024, we implemented all the recommendations made by the team.' Protests echo through the village The hoardings outside Nandani read: 'One signature for Madhuri'. Every corner of the village is plastered with such banners. MLC Satej Patil launched an online signature petition, which received 2,04,421 signatures from across the country. 'We have sent the hard copies to President Droupadi Murmu via post,' he says. Meanwhile, a 'Boycott Jio' movement intensified in Kolhapur with as many as 743 villages participating. The movement, which started on social media, was later spearheaded by former MP and a farmer leader Raju Shetti. He claims, 'At least 2 lakh people ported their Jio numbers to other networks.' Shetti claims PETA offered him ₹2 crore to help convince the Mutt to transfer the elephant. Meanwhile, a letter Shetti had allegedly written in 2018 went viral. It had asked that the Madhuri be shifted to Gadchiroli animal centre until they found a mahout. Shetti says, 'The Mutt approached me then to do something. But we found a mahout in a month. At the time no one was bothered, so why now?' Vantara's involvement The locals and their representatives have also raised concerns over similar notices sent to several mutts in Maharashtra and Karnataka. The villagers ask whether PETA and the HPC are in the business of transferring elephants to Vantara. In Kolhapur's neighbouring district of Sangli, the Ganpati Panchayatan Devasthan Trust in Tasagaon say they received a phone call from a man, who claimed to be a vet with a government facility, offering to provide an unfit certificate to transfer the trust's elephant Gauri to Vantara. 'I asked him to give us a proposal in writing. In the meanwhile, Nandani's issue flared up,' says Rajendra Patwardhan, the president of the trust in Tasagaon, who brought in the elephant in 1998. Patwardhan says similar complaints have been filed against the Karisiddeshwara Mutt in Karnataka's Belagavi district and Mahanteshwar Swami in Raichur. An environmentalist from Bengaluru filed a complaint with the Forest Department concerning the rehabilitation of elephants Padma from Shedbal in Maharashtra, Dhurva from Alakhnur, and Meenika from Bichale. Conservationists see this situation as a government convenience due to limited resources. The Co-Founder of Stripes and Green Earth Foundation, Sagnik Sengupta, said, 'This situation is arising because Vantara offers facilities that can aid elephants in distress, but this could be effective if there are rescue centres across the country. At the same time, the Wildlife Protection Act offers no safeguards for exotic pets. In the absence of government infrastructure, Vantara's resources could fill critical gaps.' Meanwhile, a Bengaluru-based wildlife conservationist, on condition of anonymity, says, 'For the government, private rescue centres are the first choice to save costs. However, handing over exotic animals to private players is not viable.' Edited by Sunalini Mathew
The Print
3 days ago
- The Print
Greed is killing the Himalayas, dams to Dhams. Dharali is paying the price
Infrastructure development is necessary in the mountains, but not at a pace and manner that threatens the ecological balance and disrupts the delicate ecosystem. The Supreme Court had warned that the state of Himachal Pradesh may 'vanish' if we continue to meddle with nature in the name of development. The upper areas of the hillock that virtually dissolved in the cloudburst—although by some accounts it was just incessant rain—could be attributed to several tonnes of soil excavated and dumped into the Kheer Ganga river that was quietly flowing into Dharali. Thousands of trees, whose roots were holding the loose soil and preventing erosion, were reportedly cut down to construct a two-lane state highway in the hills, meant to benefit the tourism industry somewhere in the upper reaches of the mountain. The initial reports of the flash flood that devastated Dharali village in Uttarkashi, Uttarakhand, attribute the tragedy to a cloudburst, which is not unusual in the mountains, especially during monsoon. While this might explain the volume of water, the massive mountain of silt and clay that flattened the village appears to be largely man-made. Also Read: Flash floods due to heavy rainfall in Uttarkashi's Dharali, but IMD yet to confirm 'cloudburst' Fragile beginnings Natural imbalance leading to disasters can happen anywhere, including coastal areas, but the Himalayas are more vulnerable. In just over three years, from January 2022 to March 2025, the fragile Himalayan region saw extreme weather events on 822 out of 1,186 days, according to data from India's Atlas on Weather Disasters, compiled by the Centre for Science and Environment and Down to Earth. In total, 2,863 people were killed in 13 Himalayan states and Union territories. Several studies pertaining to the formation of the Himalayas, their ecological vulnerabilities, and possible sustainable solutions are being conducted. The fragility of the range lies not just in recent ecological damage, but also in its geological volatility. The Himalayas are considered geologically young, as the mountain range and the Tibetan plateau were formed from the collision between the Indian Plate and the Eurasian Plate, which began nearly 50 million years ago. As the southern landmass drifted northward, the Indian continental plate slowed to around 4-6 cm per year. This slowdown is believed to mark the beginning of the collision of the plates, the closing of the former Tethys Ocean, and the initiation of Himalayan uplift. Some geologists suggest that Proto-India detached from the south-eastern margin of Africa and began to drift slowly northward until the Eurasian landmass intercepted it. The present Himalayan mountain range rose from the resulting faulting during this massive collision, which occurred in the latter part of the Tertiary Period. Fossil records show a massive spread of Eurasian fauna across the Indian landmass. The tremendous energy released by this collision gradually dissipated, giving rise to some of Asia's most distinctive geographical features, including the compression of the Tibetan Plateau, the distortion of Asia's southern margin, and even the Annamite mountain range in Indochina. According to research findings, the Deccan Plate is still 'inexorably moving northward', resulting in both Tibet and the Inner Himalayas being pushed upward even today. The Himalayas are drained by 19 major rivers, of which the Indus and the Brahmaputra are the largest, each having mountain catchment basins of about 260,000 sq km. Five of the 19 rivers, with a total catchment area of about 132,000 sq km, belong to the Indus system—the Jhelum, the Chenab, the Ravi, the Beas, and the Sutlej—and collectively define the vast region divided between Punjab state in India and Punjab province in Pakistan. Of the remaining rivers, nine belong to the Ganges system, and three to the Brahmaputra system. Glaciers also play an important role in draining the higher elevations and in feeding the Himalayan rivers. When this drainage system is disrupted, the consequences can be swift and catastrophic downstream. Also Read: Linking trade and geopolitics will hurt US more than India Put Himalayas above greed Since time immemorial, for millions of Indians all over the world, Himalaya, literally meaning the 'temple of snow', is not just a mountain but the abode of the Gods, regarded and revered as one of the gateways to salvation. Being the largest and highest of the mountain ranges, it is diverse in geology, ecology, communities, traditions, and heritage. Its natural timberline elevations are higher at the south-facing slopes, with altitudes differing by up to several hundred metres, affecting solar impact and radiation. Naturally, the sunny slopes are much more utilised for inhabitation, cultivation, and pastoral use. Over the years, increasing habitation and seasonal influx of people, tourists, and illegal settlers have resulted in a disproportionate increase in population, unplanned urbanisation, ecologically damaging infrastructure development, and unrestricted tourist influx. There's an increasing threat to both its environment and socio-economic balance. The ecological diversity in the Himalayan region plays a critical role in maintaining integration, interdependence, and sustainability of ecosystems. This can no longer be overlooked. As a precautionary measure, all ongoing hydel projects should be suspended, and a serious review of the ecological damage should be conducted before re-starting them. Desilting work must be undertaken before the monsoon arrives, and this needs to be done with the help of machines to cover more area in less time and with better efficiency. The political class, which depends on corrupt contractors for such crucial work, cannot escape blame for the havoc and loss of life caused by flash floods. Pilgrimages like the Char Dham Yatra have continued for centuries without turning into tourism. The Himalayan states must work together to segregate these two social activities, instead of giving in to the lure of linking them. The extreme greed to extract commercial dividends from religion can be detrimental in the long run. During its G20 presidency, India effectively showcased its worldview of vasudhaiva kutumbakam (the world is one family) and linked it to the Sustainable Development Goals. India's own development paradigm is built on a template of sustainability, aligned with the G20's priorities: green development, climate finance, and Life Style For Environment (LiFE); accelerated, inclusive, and resilient growth; accelerating progress on SDGs; technological transformation and digital public infrastructure; multilateral institutions for the 21st century; and women-led development. While all these objectives are important for sustainable growth, the first one—green development, climate finance, and LiFE—is of greater salience and urgency, especially in the context of maintaining balance between utility and preservation of the natural boundaries of India: the oceans and the mountains, more importantly, the Himalayas. Let us not allow politics and commerce to play with them. Seshadri Chari is the former editor of 'Organiser'. He tweets @seshadrichari. Views are personal. (Edited by Asavari Singh)
