Gov. Evers earmarks $25 million for Milwaukee County's crumbling courthouse complex
Milwaukee County's crumbling courthouse complex could receive a helping hand from the state after Gov. Tony Evers announced he wants to award $25 million for the massive project estimated to cost nearly $500 million.
The recommendation came as Evers laid out his proposed 2025-2027 capital budget Monday for projects across the state totaling about $4 billion.
While the county had requested $250 million in state money and proposed supplementing it with $245 million in gifts and grants, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley still praised the governor for his support.
'It is critical to pursue this generational investment now to improve outcomes for all impacted by the justice system, address significant safety and constitutional concerns tied to the facilities, create new operational efficiencies, and preserve the continuity of court operations," Crowley said in a statement.
'Partnership will be key. Nearly 80% of Milwaukee County's property tax levy is dedicated to state-mandated services. That's why State investment is needed to help protect taxpayers and resources for critical services — including other state-mandated services."
Almost 100 years old, the roughly 320,000-square-foot courthouse complex is home to the county's criminal courts and the Sheriff's and District Attorney's offices. In a report shared by the county late last year, the current judicial buildings are "severely outdated" and, in a handful of cases, "functionally obsolete," creating public safety and security issues. The complex includes the historic County Courthouse, County Jail and the Public Safety Building.
In the last decade, the county has highlighted the need to tackle severely backlogged maintenance and the need to invest in the courthouse facilities following advice from advisory and policy groups. Deferred maintenance, code compliance upgrades and upkeep needs exceed $333 million, with the Public Safety Building reporting more than $75 million in deferred system replacements, not including code and safety issues.
Some other problems with the current complex include: poor building design resulting in slow transportation for defendants and juries; spaces that are not compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act; air quality issues; poor technology; crumbling façade and plaster; broken windows, plumbing leaks; as well as $500,000 reserved annually for emergency repairs.
The design phase of the new courthouse complex began late last year and is expected to wrap up in 2028. The earliest the county would break ground, however, would be in 2027.
Chief Judge Carl Ashley previously called the project "long overdue," saying: "The fact of the matter is, the Safety Building is a relic ... It's clearly outdated, functionally obsolete. It has significant public safety and security issues, and it does not reflect the quality of service for which the county is responsible.
On March 25, the state building commission will take up Evers' proposal, which will later need lawmakers' approval. Historically, Evers' list has been significantly slimmed down, with the budget cycle seeing Evers' $3.8 billion proposal cut to roughly $2.7 billion.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Evers proposes $25M for crumbling Milwaukee County courthouse complex
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wisconsin immigrant work; what to know among rising deportations
The Brief Undocumented workers do an estimated 70% of the work on Wisconsin's dairy farms. White House border czar Tom Homan said the country could see more workplace immigration actions than ever before. All United States employers and their new hires must fill out a Form I-9, proving they are legally able to work with required government documents. WISCONSIN - Gov. Tony Evers said he's worried about the growing push for deportations, while the Trump administration said it's restoring the rule of law. What we know White House border czar Tom Homan said the country could see more workplace immigration actions than ever before, saying these undocumented people have no right to be in the United States. "We're gonna increase the teams greatly, so you're gonna see more teams on the streets you've never seen before. You're gonna see more work site enforcement than you've ever seen in the history of this nation," Homan said. "If we can't find them in the community, we're going to find them at the work site. So we're going to flood the zone and sanctuary cities will get exactly what they don't want: more agents in their neighborhoods, more work site enforcement, because we're going to get the bad guy." Local perspective This is not just worrying Evers, but some Wisconsin farmers. Undocumented workers do an estimated 70% of the work on Wisconsin's dairy farms, according to a University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Workers study. "I don't know who the hell is going to milk the cows," Evers said. "So I'm fearful [...] if it's suddenly people who are not appropriately documented who are waiting to be documented, and they're picked up because they don't have a document, and that makes them a criminal, that's just bulls—, frankly." FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android The Dairy State has about 70,000 undocumented immigrants, and about 47,000 of them are working, per the Migration Policy Institute's 2019 estimates. "It's certainly something that is a fear of many farmers across the state that have hispanic labor, immigrant labor," Wisconsin Farmers Union President Darin Von Ruden said. "We all have the knowledge that most of our workers are documented, and we shouldn't be having an issue, but what happens when the ice enforcement agents show up and want to go after more people than those who have criminal records?" All United States employers and their new hires must fill out a Form I-9, proving they are legally able to work with required government documents. "All of this needs to be done in the first three days of employment," said Brook Mayborne, Metro Milwaukee Society of Human Resource Management president-elect. It's a felony to use a fake ID for this – and if someone doesn't have the documents within those three days? "They should be taken off the schedule. They shouldn't be allowed to work until they're able to produce it. That does happen quite a bit, where they're not able to show their documentation," Mayborne said. "The paperwork is retained with the employer. They must retain it for at least three years or for the duration of employment. It's kept on file in case of any questions or audits or things like that." It's not just the immigrant at risk of deportation, but employers can also face fines and even prison. Dig deeper So, when employers are checking papers in the U.S., there are two primary categories of visas: non-immigrant visas and immigrant visas. The purpose of the non-immigrant visa is temporary stay in the U.S., which means the holder is expected to leave the U.S. when the visa expires. SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News Examples include business visas and student visas, as well as visas for crime victims and human trafficking victims. With a non-immigrant visa, there's no intent to immigrate. So applicants have to prove they plan to return to their home country when their visa expires. The purpose of an immigrant visa is to obtain permanent residence in the U.S. that leads to green card status, or lawful permanent resident status. Examples include family-based immigration, like the spouse of a U.S. citizen, employment-based immigration and diversity visas. The Source The information in this post was collected and produced by FOX6 News.
Newsweek
15 hours ago
- Newsweek
Is This the Real Reason Southwest Changed Its Boarding Policy?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On a recent Southwest flight from Las Vegas to San Jose, so many passengers requested wheelchair pre-boarding that the plane took off late—only for most of those passengers to walk off the aircraft upon arrival, no wheelchair necessary. Frequent fliers call them "Jetway Jesuses" — apparently disabled passengers who take advantage of the perks of boarding via wheelchair, only to miraculously recover in the air and deplane with full use of their legs. Travel industry outlets have repeatedly called out what has become a common practice—part of a growing trend that is drawing increased scrutiny from airline analysts, truly disabled travelers and even law enforcement. Now, some regular Southwest fliers are wondering if this surge in last-minute wheelchair requests is one of the reasons the airline is changing its signature open-seating policy. Newsweek reached out to Southwest for comment but did not immediately hear back. A boarding agent (r) checks his computer as travelers wait to board a delayed Southwest Airlines flight inside Denver International Airport's Concourse C. A boarding agent (r) checks his computer as travelers wait to board a delayed Southwest Airlines flight inside Denver International Airport's Concourse C. Getty Images The Context For years, Southwest maintained an open policy where passengers could take any available seat upon boarding. That meant those who were first in line to board would have the best options available to them. The way to board early? Be a frequent flier, buy a higher-tier ticket — or use a wheelchair. Then last summer, Southwest stunned the travel industry by announcing it would move away from that well-known practice of not assigning seats—the biggest change in the company's 53-year history. The Dallas-based airline made the announcement in July 2024, following a tough year in which profits fell more than 46 percent compared to 2023. Southwest said the move was intended to "elevate the Customer experience, improve financial performance, and drive Shareholder value." What to Know Under federal law, airlines are not permitted to require medical proof of disability or inquire into the nature of a passenger's condition. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and subsequent aviation-specific guidelines are designed to ensure accessibility for all. But that openness, critics argue, has made the system vulnerable to exploitation. Reports of wheelchair pre-boarding followed by miraculous recoveries at arrival gates have become frequent enough to gain their own nickname in the industry. "We used to call them 'Miracle Flights,'" said a former Southwest flight attendant quoted in a Simple Flying article. "The worst were flights from LaGuardia to Palm Beach—40 wheelchairs on, nearly all of them walked off." The consequences are not just logistical, say industry insiders—they're ethical and financial. Passengers with genuine mobility limitations often find themselves waiting behind those using wheelchairs for convenience. In View from the Wing, travel pundit Gary Leff put it bluntly: "They don't all need a wheelchair. They've just cracked the code." Beyond perceptions of unfairness, the policy also affects scheduling. Wheelchair pre-boarding can add at least several extra minutes to the already tight boarding process—delays that cascade across an airline's daily operations. "A 10-minute delay can affect passengers with connections and delay downline flights operated by the same aircraft or with the same crew," Leff noted. Hey @SouthwestAir it is absurd that people have to pay extra to board as early birds so we can feel safe in your boarding process and then see 25 individuals in wheelchairs, boarding first for free and running and walking once we land. Stupidity or miracles? — Rubén Ortiz (@rubennortiz) December 12, 2020 The shift to assigned seating won't affect Southwest's legal obligation to accommodate passengers with disabilities. The airline will still offer wheelchair boarding and assistance. What changes is the outcome: those who pre-board will go directly to their assigned seats—not to the prime spots near the front of the plane. "This is going to eliminate a lot of the nonsense," Leff wrote. "Seat savers, the wheelchair scams, and the last-minute disputes over row space—it all goes away." Among other changes, Southwest has updated its checked bag policy. For the first time, passengers with a standard ticket will no longer get two free checked bags. Instead, the airline will begin charging fees for checked luggage. What Happens Next Southwest plans to eliminate its open seating model and shift to assigned seating starting next year. In a press release, the airline said it would begin selling tickets with seat assignments in late 2025.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Republican lawmakers introduce bill to keep stewardship grant program alive
Republicans on the Legislature's Joint Finance Committee rejected a funding request from the City of Ashland to build a new boat launch at Kreher Park. (City of Ashland) A pair of Republican lawmakers has introduced legislation that would re-authorize the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Grant program, a popular program that allows the state Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to fund the purchase of public land and the upkeep of recreational areas. The decades-old program is set to expire next year and despite its bipartisan support among the state's voters, a subset of Republicans in the Legislature — largely from the northern part of the state — have become increasingly opposed to the program due to concerns that it stops land from being developed for commercial activities. Until a 6-1 decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court last summer, members of the Legislature's powerful Joint Finance Committee had the ability to place anonymous holds on proposed grants through the program, which resulted in many projects being delayed or prevented altogether. Without that ability, Republicans who were already wary of the program became more opposed because of what they characterize as a lack of legislative oversight. Proponents of the program say the Legislature exercises oversight through the budget writing process when it allocates funding for the program. In recent years, the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship program has received $33 million annually in the state budget. In his budget request this year, Democratic Gov. Tony Evers proposed re-authorizing the program with a $100 million annual budget. Republicans stripped that provision out of the budget along with most of Evers' other proposals. Last week, Rep. Tony Kurtz (R-Wonewoc) and Sen. Patrick Testin (R-Stevens Point) introduced a bill that would keep the program alive with $28 million in annual funding. The bill would also create a major land acquisitions program for stewardship grant awards which would require the DNR to annually submit a list of all its proposed land acquisitions costing more than $1 million for that year. Those acquisitions would need to be approved by votes of the full Legislature. Additionally, the bill would create a sub-program to use stewardship grant funds for habitat restoration projects, require the DNR to prioritize projects that develop already existing public lands over new land acquisition, require local governments to match 20% of the state funding, get rid of the current 10-acre minimum size requirement and limit the state's contribution to 40% of the total cost if the sale of a piece of land is already closed when stewardship funds are applied for. In a co-sponsorship memo, Kurtz and Testin, who did not respond to requests for an interview about the bill, said the initial proposal is meant to be the start of negotiations, not the final version of the bill. 'It's important to note what we're proposing is not an agreed upon deal,' the memo states. 'It's a first offer to provide a starting place for negotiations on this important program. It's very likely the bill will continue to change during the legislative process, but it's important to put something forward to allow feedback, have open-minded conversations and ultimately find a good place to ensure the Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Program's legacy continues.' At a meeting with the Wisconsin chapter of the Audubon Society in April, Kurtz said the program was on 'life support' and he was trying to save it from dying but any bill would need to put some oversight on the DNR in order to receive enough Republican support. The opposition to the stewardship program from a subset of the Republican caucus in both chambers means the bill might require Democratic votes to pass the Legislature and reach Evers' desk. Sen. Jodi Habush Sinykin (D-Whitefish Bay) has spent months pushing for the program's reauthorization – often pointing to a stewardship grant project in her district that was subjected to an anonymous hold, the Cedar Gorge Clay Bluffs on Lake Michigan. She said the hold on that project angered a lot of her constituents of both parties. 'That really got people upset,' she told the Wisconsin Examiner. 'People would not at all want to see a reenactment in any fashion of that anonymous objection process.' Habush Sinykin said that she's closely watching the bill to make sure it protects a program that enjoys wide support outside of the Capitol building and will stir up significant opposition if it's allowed to die. 'Once people understand that this program is at risk, they are coming forward to express their opposition to any permanent damage to the program,' she said. 'And so what we are engaged in right now is this process to keep it going forward, and there is going to be ongoing negotiation, because the devil is in the details. We need to make sure that what is one step forward will not ultimately be two steps backward.' Charles Carlin, director of strategic initiatives for Gathering Waters, a non-profit aimed at land conservation across Wisconsin, said that Kurtz and Testin should be credited for working to get the conversation started and provisions in the bill like the habitat restoration program. But he added that there are still a lot of questions about how provisions such as the requirement for legislative approval will work. 'I think part of what they are trying to balance here is a recognition that this is an incredibly popular program with voters, while trying to balance that against the fact that there are a handful of legislators who are deeply skeptical of the DNR and deeply skeptical of additional investments in conservation,' he said. 'So I see that major land acquisitions component as a way for them to try and balance those competing interests. The way that that major land acquisitions program is currently described in the bill just leaves a lot of question marks.' The bill is set to receive a public hearing in the Assembly Committee on Forestry, Parks and Outdoor Recreation Wednesday at 11 a.m.
