Meet the Harrisburg pastor bringing ‘church' to ‘state'
The Rev. Ron Zeigler has a proposition for Pennsylvania lawmakers: Take a minute from your busy day, sit with him and let him pray for you.
Amid the busyness of the Pennsylvania Capitol as the legislature scrambles to pass the state budget on time, Zeigler frequents the East Wing cafeteria with a sign that invites all who pass by to sit down and talk with him.
The reverend possesses a unique title — state Capitol minister — in which he provides pastoral services to Capitol denizens — lawmakers, civil servants, staff and just about anyone working in the building. By providing a 'political free zone' to talk with him, Zeigler says he's able to connect with state employees and lawmakers across the political spectrum.
'I tell folks if I'm a lobbyist of any kind, it's for Jesus Christ,' he said. 'What's most important to me is not the Republican or Democrat agenda, but the kingdom of Christ.'
An ordained minister of the Presbyterian Church in America, Zeigler has worked full time in the Capitol since March 2024 with the goal of providing religious and spiritual guidance through 'prayer, discipleship and evangelism.'
He works for Ministry to State, a Washington, D.C.-based Presbyterian ministry that reaches 10 state capitals and Washington, entirely funded by donations.
Founder Chuck Garriott was inspired to create the organization after tragedy shook the nation. He was a pastor in Oklahoma City in 1995 when a powerful truck bomb detonated outside the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, killing 167, including 19 children, and injuring more than 600 others.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
The Oklahoma City bombing remains the deadliest domestic terrorist attack in American history.
'In the aftermath of this tragedy, Chuck and the elders at [their church] recognized a profound reality: Those serving in government face unique spiritual and personal challenges, and the church is uniquely positioned to offer them the care and support they need,' according to the organization's website.
'Motivated by this conviction, [they] began a ministry to the Oklahoma state capital, hosting a weekly luncheon Bible study that soon grew to more than 80 regular attendees,' the site says.
In 2003, Garriott moved to Washington to establish Ministry to State, with the goal of replicating its Oklahoma City ministry in state capitals around the country. It maintains its position as a nonpartisan source of spiritual guidance for civil servants and elected officials.
Steve Bostrom, the minister in Montana's Capitol, got involved after moving to Helena from North Carolina to start a church. Soon after, he began ministering to state legislators, leading to his full-time Ministry to State position.
Bostrom sees precedent for Ministry to State's mission in the Bible, pointing to the missionary work of the apostle Paul, who, 'in his travels went to many capitals.'
'He was strategic, trying to reach leadership,' he said.
Zeigler, a former public school teacher turned clergyman, said he was initially intimidated when Ministry to State's associate director for state capitols, Thomas Eddy, offered him the Harrisburg ministry
'I'm just a regular guy. I pastor small churches, and not that many people know me outside of my smaller circles,' Zeigler said. 'These are some significant people that work here in many ways. So I was a bit intimidated.'
Zeigler initially told Eddy he didn't think he was the right fit, but '[Eddy] was really convinced that this ministry was for me,' he said.
He told Eddy that 'the main gift God has given me is that I see people.' Eddy replied with a question: What is a group of people in American culture 'most people would rather not see and don't think well of?' Eddy's answer: civil government leaders.
'You're exactly the kind of person we need here,' Eddy told him.
In his role, Zeigler makes himself available for discussion or prayer with 'anyone who could use someone,' with the goal of building personal, long-lasting connections.
'I'm here to see people not get eaten up by working here, it's a challenging place to be,' he said. 'I pray that they are able to stay faithful to their oath of office and just encourage them.'
From 'long theological conversations' to simply listening to people talk about what troubles them, he said his conversations can vary wildly in topic.
'If there's anything I can do, I can pray, and I can just be available. And that's where this got started,' he said.
During one particularly busy session day in the Capitol, Zeigler greeted a custodian in the hallway: 'I just said, 'Hello, how you doing?' She said, 'I'm feeling pretty sick, but today, it's all hands on deck.'
He asked if he could pray with her. She agreed.
'I prayed that she'd be able to get through the day and that maybe once things settle down, that she might be able to get off early,' he said. 'When I was done, she was in tears, and she reached over and just gave me a big hug.'
As an ordained minister, Zeigler holds his conversations in confidence, which he compared to the confidentiality of a priest or lawyer.
'The most rewarding parts of my ministry at the Capitol are talking with people about what it's important to them, and praying with them and for them,' Zeigler said. 'Simply caring for them as people is very rewarding.'
Although Zeigler is Presbyterian, he works to connect with people of different religious beliefs. He says he is not present in Harrisburg to convert, but to minister, although he is not shy to preach when it's asked for.
'I'm here as a Christian minister, but I'm not pressing on anybody,' he said. 'I make sure it's clear that I'm here to talk about what's important to you. If you want to hear what I think about something I'm glad to tell you, and I'm glad to talk, but I will never press and say 'you got to believe what I believe.''
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy
As American democracy unravels at the hands of President Trump and his enabling congressional and Supreme Court majorities, millions of Americans are desperate to identify whatever possible countermeasures remain to slow the country's descent into fascism. The outcome of the 2026 midterms is unlikely to produce meaningful change, even if the Democrats take control of the House. Without a cooperative Senate, it will be impossible either to pass legislation or secure a conviction on impeachment charges. Oversight hearings can bring public attention to things like rampant corruption, but the threats Trump poses to the rule of law and democracy are already well-known. The courts can only do so much. There's another emerging tool, however: artificial intelligence. Trump seems to understands the transformative power of AI. Last month, the administration announced an ' AI Action Plan ' for 'winning the AI race.' Among other measures, it promises to remove 'onerous Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment, and seek private sector input on rules to remove.' As part of this initiative, the General Services Administration and OpenAI announced earlier this month that the company will be 'providing ChatGPT to the entire U.S. federal workforce' under a 'first-of-its-kind partnership.' Participating agencies will pay a nominal cost of $1 each for the first year to enable federal employees to 'explore and leverage AI.' The company is also 'teaming up with experienced partners Slalom and Boston Consulting Group to support secure, responsible deployment and trainings.' Last week, the AI company Anthropic likewise announced it had struck the same deal with GSA to enable federal agencies' access to its Claude model. The Trump administration's effort to streamline the federal government with AI models makes some sense. Research has shown that generative AI — particularly large language models, which consume vast amounts of data to understand and generate natural language content — can enhance government efficiency in data processing, analysis and drafting, among other potential advantages. But AI systems also increase the risk of widespread government surveillance, personalized misinformation and disinformation, systematic discrimination, lack of accountability and inaccuracy. According to a recent academic paper, 'although many studies have explored the ethical implications of AI, fewer have fully examined its democratic implications.' Trump's alliance with OpenAI head Sam Altman goes back to start of his second term, when he announced a $500 billion joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to build up to 20 large AI data centers. Trump called the venture 'Stargate.' The deal's details are murky, including who will have access to Stargate and how it will possibly benefit taxpayers. Although a spokesman for OpenAI told Fox News Digital that 'Sam Altman sort of planted a flag on democratic AI versus autocratic AI,' let's not forget that Altman is not a government official or employee. As a legal matter, it is unclear whether these ' fast-tracked ' deals will fully comply with traditional oversight and procurement laws and procedures. No major AI company is currently approved under the Federal Risk And Authorization Management Program, for example, which is the process for authorizing the use of cloud technologies by federal agencies. According the GSA website, the program aims to ensure 'security and protection of federal information' by imposing strict cybersecurity controls to protect against data breaches, hacking and unauthorized access, and requiring ongoing monitoring and reporting. Given that the GSA is reportedly working on 'developing a separate authorization' for generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude, the potential threats to national security and private citizens' personal information are significant. The Trump administration's lack of transparency also risks creating a black-box government run by proprietary algorithms that the public cannot inspect — centralizing control over federal AI in two companies whose interests clearly lie in market dominance, not the public good. This is why these kinds of decisions are best made through established legal procedures — including the Federal Competition in Contracting Act (requiring fair and open competition), the Privacy Act of 1974 (limiting how agencies can collect and disclose personal data), the Federal Records Act (requiring the proper retention and archiving of public records) and the Administrative Procedure Act (requiring public comment and input into major policy decisions). For now, OpenAI has promised that its 'goal is to ensure agencies can use AI securely and responsibly. ChatGPT Enterprise already does not use business data, including inputs or outputs, to train or improve OpenAI models. The same safeguards will apply to federal use.' This promise from Altman's company is no substitute for actual legal standards enforced by the federal government. Whether AI tools embedded in federal government systems could one day be used to sway elections to favor Trump and his cronies is a vital question. For now, what's clear is that Democrats need to get into the AI game, and fast. A Democratic political action committee called the National Democratic Training Committee recently unveiled on online course entitled 'AI For Progressive Campaigns,' which is designed to teach candidates how to use AI to help create social media content, draft speeches, craft voter outreach messaging and phone-banking scripts, conduct research into their constituencies and opponents, and develop internal training materials. The founder and CEO of the group, Kelly Dietrich, stated that 'thousands of Democratic campaigns can now leverage AI to compete at any scale.' This effort, although laudable, does not go far enough to capitalize on AI's potential to help outmaneuver authoritarianism in the U.S. There's much more that might be done, including using AI to educate citizens on the benefits of democracy, how institutions work and the facts underlying important issues; to create large-scale, moderated public deliberation and consensus around divisive issues; to detect and alert the public to manipulated media, thus combatting misinformation and disinformation and fostering public trust in an alternative to Trump; and to create and implement effective messaging strategies for alternative visions for the future of the country. AI could be American voters' best friend, not their enemy. It just needs to be asked.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Republican: ‘We've gotten lucky' with Mamdani
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said Monday his party has 'gotten lucky' with the Democrats' nominee for New York City mayor as Zohran Mamdani makes his case ahead of the November election. 'We've gotten lucky — bad for America, good for Republicans — with Mr. Mamdani in New York,' Kennedy told NewsNation's Leland Vittert. 'If I didn't know better, I would think he was a Republican plant. If I didn't know better, I'd think that Republicans had created Mr. Mamdani in a petri dish in a genomics lab.' 'He's clearly from what I call the Gary Busey wing — the cray cray wing — of the Democratic Party. That's bad for New York, but it's certainly good for Republicans,' the Pelican State Republican added, mentioning the actor turned reality star. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, recently shocked political observers with his win over political heavyweight and former Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the Big Apple's primary. Cuomo is now running as an independent against Mamdani. While Mamdani has faced criticism from within the party, some Democrats have defended his rise. In a Sunday interview, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) pushed back against Democratic criticism of the mayoral candidate. 'I don't know why they're attacking him. I think it's stupid when maybe we're not in 100 percent agreement, right? But he has some ideas that are clearly, you know, attracting people. It's OK to say, 'I disagree with this, this and this, but I agree with that,'' Gallego said. 'But the idea that we're again, we're just going to throw out people that are really bringing in new ideas to the fold, exciting people just because they're slightly to the right or to the left of us, I think, is dumb,' he added. The Hill has reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom account knocks Dana Perino over criticism of posts: ‘They still don't get it'
A social media account run by the press office of Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) knocked Fox News anchor Dana Perino after she criticized the Democrat's press strategy. 'ALMOST A WEEK IN AND THEY STILL DON'T GET IT,' the governor's office wrote Monday on social platform X in response to a segment on Fox's daytime table talk program 'The Five.' During the segment, Perino, who served as a top White House aide during former President George W. Bush's administration, said Newsom and his team 'have to stop at with the Twitter thing.' 'I don't know where his wife is,' she continued. 'If I were his wife, I would say you are making a fool of yourself, stop it.' Newsom's press account has in recent days made a series of posts mocking President Trump and his administration, writing in all caps — the president's signature style — and attacking Fox News and its hosts directly. A recent example came amid the redistricting battle that has spread across the U.S. after Texas Democrats fled the Lone Star Stat e to avoid voting on a map that could give Republicans up to five additional House seats in next year's midterms. Newsom pressed Trump to pull back the GOP efforts. 'DONALD TRUMP, THE LOWEST POLLING PRESIDENT IN RECENT HISTORY, THIS IS YOUR SECOND-TO-LAST WARNING!!! (THE NEXT ONE IS THE LAST ONE!),' Newsom's press office posted on X. 'STAND DOWN NOW OR CALIFORNIA WILL COUNTER-STRIKE (LEGALLY!) TO DESTROY YOUR ILLEGAL CROOKED MAPS IN RED STATES.' California Democrats unveiled legislation Monday to move forward with their own redistricting plan to counteract the Texas moves. The governor's pushback on Trump comes amid speculation he could be eyeing a run for president in 2028. 'He's got a big job as governor of California but if he wants an even bigger job, he has to be a little bit more serious,' Perino said.