Gina Rinehart spends thousands evacuating media chief from Israel
Having friends (or rather bosses) in high places has never been more helpful for well-connected PR and government relations guy James Radford, who was stuck in Israel over the weekend as Iranian missiles rained down. But not stuck for long.
Radford, who runs his own Radford Consulting and is external affairs manager for Hancock Prospecting, was able to call upon his boss, mining billionaire Gina Rinehart, to get him out of Israel pronto. Others, who were part of an official delegation, were not so lucky.
It seems when Rinehart isn't keeping the Australian swim team afloat and giving out $100,000 cheques to her staff, she is saving them from war zones. Benevolent capitalism at work. And obviously, billionaire-tier travel insurance is many rungs above Budget Direct.
One estimate put the cost of the extraction at $60,000, but Radford said it could be even higher.
'Gina Rinehart was incredible – she worked day and night to try and get us out of there by whatever means possible and safe,' Radford told CBD from Melbourne.
'We definitely tried to get the entire group out, multiple Australians out – however there was no capacity in the system as this was the first day,' he said.
'My first evacuation was cancelled.'
Radford spent part of his time in the country on an official Israeli government-organised Australian Pride Mission to Israel, a two-week culture tour which was to culminate in Tel Aviv Pride. He also caught up the Australian-Israel Chamber of Commerce group, visited a kibbutz that was a site of an October 7 massacre and spent time with former Labor senator Nova Peris and media personality Erin Molan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
11 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
New French laws have put ultra-fast fashion companies on notice. Should we follow suit?
Loading Some environmental advocates have criticised the legislation's relatively light approach to 'classic' fast fashion retailers like Zara compared to Shein or Temu. Maguire says shielding domestically owned corporations is partly spurred by a global political trend towards protectionism. Professor Justine Nolan, director of the Australian Human Rights Institute at the University of New South Wales, acknowledges the scope of the law is narrow, but says it's a step in the right direction. '[The law] sends a signal to all fashion labels that their business models need to mainstream environmental considerations as they are in the sight of regulators,' she says. Both Shein and Temu say they operate ethically and are not fast fashion brands. What's happening in Australia? The Australian government has been slow to regulate the fast fashion industry, but some action is taking shape. In 2024, clothing stewardship scheme Seamless was launched by the federal government, with the aim of reducing our local fashion industry's carbon footprint. The stewardship is funded by a levy of 4 cents per sale paid for by participating brands, including David Jones, Country Road and M.J. Bale. Yet some experts say initiatives like Seamless are not enough. 'There's lots of evidence to suggest you need a mandatory scheme to actually drive change,' says Maguire. 'Otherwise, you get free riders – a few good brands and retailers having to cover the costs of everybody else's recycling.' She also thinks the levy of 4 cents should be closer to France's tax of up to $9 if it is to meaningfully influence consumer behaviour. In 2024, then environment minister Tanya Plibersek said Seamless would introduce mandates if not enough brands signed on. Around 60 brands and retailers are currently partners. Danielle Kent, general manager of industry transformation at Seamless, says while the scheme is still in its nascency, they have established a circular design training program and are starting to look at what collecting, sorting and recycling clothing at scale might look like. 'The French scheme started in 2007, so they're 18 years ahead.' 'We do not want to find ourselves in another soft plastics debacle where we are collecting and there's nowhere to go. It's really important we are measured in the way that we go forward.' She says Seamless is aiming for a regulatory framework but will remain voluntary for now. Australia also has a National Waste Policy Action Plan, aimed at transitioning to a circular economy. But it does not include specific guidelines or targets for textile waste, despite the fact that around 60 per cent of modern clothing is made from synthetic fibres and more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing go to landfill each year. A spokesperson for the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water says they 'support the fashion industry in Australia to be more responsible for the environmental impacts of clothing,' such as through funding Seamless. What would similar laws look like here? So, why does Australia lag so far behind countries like France in holding the fashion industry to account? 'Australia has tended to be a follower in developing legislation to regulate human rights and environmental impacts,' says Nolan, adding that Australians are some of the top consumers of new apparel globally. Jaana Quintance-James, CEO of the Australian Fashion Council, praises the French legislation but is unsure whether similar laws would be suitable in Australia at this point, given the current lack of environment and ethical reporting capabilities that would be used to inform legislation. She first wants to see greater government investment in Australian manufacturing to support our local textile, clothing and footwear industries. 'The Australian government is not recognising the powerhouse that our industry is. We employ 500,000 people. It's $28 billion worth of value added into the economy,' she says. 'About 97 per cent of what is sold in Australia is made offshore. The tariffs are the latest example of when we are at the mercy of international supply chains, and we need to build greater resilience.' In 2024, The Australia Institute called on the federal government to support programs for waste repair and recycling and develop a French-style tax on fast fashion. Loading Nina Gbor, director of the institute's Circular Economy and Waste Program, says while 'everyone has a responsibility' to shop sustainably, it is time for regulation to come into force. 'We've passed the stage of what individuals can do. There's too much focus on individual action. Right now, we need to all be screaming at the government to do something.' Her policy recommendations include investment in on-shore recycling, expanded education programs, tax incentives, and supporting Australian brands with capital and marketing. The Australian Retailers Association has called on the government to take similar action, with CEO Chris Rodwell, saying: 'The rise of ultra-cheap global online retailers, like Temu and Shein, is changing the retail landscape at pace.' 'The ARA is advocating for government action to close tax loopholes, enforce compliance with Australian consumer protection laws, and level the playing field across sustainability, safety, and modern slavery requirements.' Neither the Australia Institute nor the ARA has submitted formal proposals to the government yet. While Australia instituted a Modern Slavery Act in 2019, Nolan says: 'It has not substantially addressed the problem or facilitated significant changes in business practices.'
The Age
11 minutes ago
- The Age
New French laws have put ultra-fast fashion companies on notice. Should we follow suit?
Loading Some environmental advocates have criticised the legislation's relatively light approach to 'classic' fast fashion retailers like Zara compared to Shein or Temu. Maguire says shielding domestically owned corporations is partly spurred by a global political trend towards protectionism. Professor Justine Nolan, director of the Australian Human Rights Institute at the University of New South Wales, acknowledges the scope of the law is narrow, but says it's a step in the right direction. '[The law] sends a signal to all fashion labels that their business models need to mainstream environmental considerations as they are in the sight of regulators,' she says. Both Shein and Temu say they operate ethically and are not fast fashion brands. What's happening in Australia? The Australian government has been slow to regulate the fast fashion industry, but some action is taking shape. In 2024, clothing stewardship scheme Seamless was launched by the federal government, with the aim of reducing our local fashion industry's carbon footprint. The stewardship is funded by a levy of 4 cents per sale paid for by participating brands, including David Jones, Country Road and M.J. Bale. Yet some experts say initiatives like Seamless are not enough. 'There's lots of evidence to suggest you need a mandatory scheme to actually drive change,' says Maguire. 'Otherwise, you get free riders – a few good brands and retailers having to cover the costs of everybody else's recycling.' She also thinks the levy of 4 cents should be closer to France's tax of up to $9 if it is to meaningfully influence consumer behaviour. In 2024, then environment minister Tanya Plibersek said Seamless would introduce mandates if not enough brands signed on. Around 60 brands and retailers are currently partners. Danielle Kent, general manager of industry transformation at Seamless, says while the scheme is still in its nascency, they have established a circular design training program and are starting to look at what collecting, sorting and recycling clothing at scale might look like. 'The French scheme started in 2007, so they're 18 years ahead.' 'We do not want to find ourselves in another soft plastics debacle where we are collecting and there's nowhere to go. It's really important we are measured in the way that we go forward.' She says Seamless is aiming for a regulatory framework but will remain voluntary for now. Australia also has a National Waste Policy Action Plan, aimed at transitioning to a circular economy. But it does not include specific guidelines or targets for textile waste, despite the fact that around 60 per cent of modern clothing is made from synthetic fibres and more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing go to landfill each year. A spokesperson for the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water says they 'support the fashion industry in Australia to be more responsible for the environmental impacts of clothing,' such as through funding Seamless. What would similar laws look like here? So, why does Australia lag so far behind countries like France in holding the fashion industry to account? 'Australia has tended to be a follower in developing legislation to regulate human rights and environmental impacts,' says Nolan, adding that Australians are some of the top consumers of new apparel globally. Jaana Quintance-James, CEO of the Australian Fashion Council, praises the French legislation but is unsure whether similar laws would be suitable in Australia at this point, given the current lack of environment and ethical reporting capabilities that would be used to inform legislation. She first wants to see greater government investment in Australian manufacturing to support our local textile, clothing and footwear industries. 'The Australian government is not recognising the powerhouse that our industry is. We employ 500,000 people. It's $28 billion worth of value added into the economy,' she says. 'About 97 per cent of what is sold in Australia is made offshore. The tariffs are the latest example of when we are at the mercy of international supply chains, and we need to build greater resilience.' In 2024, The Australia Institute called on the federal government to support programs for waste repair and recycling and develop a French-style tax on fast fashion. Loading Nina Gbor, director of the institute's Circular Economy and Waste Program, says while 'everyone has a responsibility' to shop sustainably, it is time for regulation to come into force. 'We've passed the stage of what individuals can do. There's too much focus on individual action. Right now, we need to all be screaming at the government to do something.' Her policy recommendations include investment in on-shore recycling, expanded education programs, tax incentives, and supporting Australian brands with capital and marketing. The Australian Retailers Association has called on the government to take similar action, with CEO Chris Rodwell, saying: 'The rise of ultra-cheap global online retailers, like Temu and Shein, is changing the retail landscape at pace.' 'The ARA is advocating for government action to close tax loopholes, enforce compliance with Australian consumer protection laws, and level the playing field across sustainability, safety, and modern slavery requirements.' Neither the Australia Institute nor the ARA has submitted formal proposals to the government yet. While Australia instituted a Modern Slavery Act in 2019, Nolan says: 'It has not substantially addressed the problem or facilitated significant changes in business practices.'
Sky News AU
16 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Australian universities' drop in global rankings is Donald Trump's fault, according to The Guardian
The 2026 QS World University Rankings released on Thursday revealed 25 out of Australia's 36 universities had experienced a substantial fall and equated to the third biggest drop in the world. In The Guardian's article covering the drop, "attacks from Donald Trump" were one of the leading reasons for the slip in standards. "Dozens of Australia's top universities have dropped in a global ranking amid a 'turbulent year' for higher education, as attacks from Donald Trump's second administration exacerbated years of disruption for the embattled sector", The Guardian claimed in the article's opening sentence. The rankings reflected growing competition in the region with institutions across Asia climbing up the charts, including in Hong Kong, Thailand, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam. The University of Melbourne, the country's top higher education institution fell six spots to 19th in the world, with the University of NSW falling to 20th down one and the University of Sydney plummeting from 20th to 25th position. In its coverage of the slump, The Guardian listed 'attacks from Donald Trump's second administration', referring to the US President's crackdown on funding to Australian universities as a prime reason for the poor result. Despite the article detailing a range of local policy issues that have contributed towards Australia's poor performance in the global ranking, The Guardian chose to attack the US President in the opening line of its article. "At least seven Australian universities have had research programs temporarily suspended by the Trump administration this year, while a dozen universities were sent a questionnaire asking to confirm whether they aligned with US government interests," The Guardian wrote. "The chief executive of the Go8, Vicki Thomson, said the results came against a backdrop of global uncertainty and 'mixed messaging' from Australia's largest research partner, the US." Although the US government provides Australian universities with a considerable amount of funding, the federal government's caps on international students and declining government funding of the higher education industry have substantially impacted the operational capabilities of the nation's top tertiary institutions. The Albanese government in mid-2024 announced its plan to cap international student enrolments in 2025 at 270,000 students, with publicly funded universities allocated 145,000 new international student commencements. The federal government also implemented stricter visa and financial requirements for international students, increasing visa fees from $710 to $1,600 dollars in July 2024 with graduate visa restrictions also imposed on international students over 35. The Group of Eight – a coalition of Australia's top universities slammed the move and said at the time the decision had 'significantly damaged the global reputation of Australia's international education sector' and would result in up to $1 billion less revenue for their member universities in 2025. Universities reliant on international enrolments were hit hard by the move, with Macquarie University implementing sweeping course cuts and staff layoffs in late May to bring about short-term savings due to the sudden drop in tuition fees. Macquarie University's proposed cuts will impact 42 FTE (full-time equivalent) roles in arts and 33 in science and engineering, eliminating popular majors like music, politics and archaeology saving $15 million amid declining enrolment rates. QS chief executive Jessica Turner said international education was worth an estimated $51 billion in Australia in 2023-24, and that Australia faced mounting competition from multiple Asia-Pacific countries. 'Emerging markets such as Hong Kong SAR, Malaysia, and the UAE are making impressive strides and steadily closing the gap with more established study destinations,' Ms Turner said speaking to the Sydney Morning Herald. Director of Western Civilisation Program at the Institute of Public Affairs Dr Bella d'Abrera said that campus safety, governance, a rise in antisemitism and free speech concerns were also directly impacting the performance rankings of Australian universities. "It's hardly surprising that Australian universities are slipping down the league tables, they are no longer places of higher learning but have become ideological training camps where free speech is dead, dissent is punished, and students are forced to toe the activist line or risk academic penalties,' Dr d'Abrera said. "Free speech in Australian universities is not just under threat—it's extinct. And until we stop rewarding mediocrity and punishing independent thought, our universities will continue to slide into irrelevance.'
