
California invested millions pushing these careers for women. The results are disappointing
As the economy improved in the years after the Great Recession, women were slower to return to the workforce, causing alarm, especially in vital fields like computing. State and federal leaders turned their attention to women in science, technology, engineering and math, known by the acronym STEM.
Over the next few years, they poured millions of dollars into increasing the number of women pursuing STEM degrees. But the rate of women who attain those degrees has hardly improved, according to an analysis of colleges' data by the Public Policy Institute of California on behalf of CalMatters.
'The unfortunate news is that the numbers haven't changed much at all,' said Hans Johnson, a senior fellow at the institute who conducted the analysis of California's four-year colleges using data from the 2009-10 school year and comparing it to the most recent numbers, from 2022-23. The share of women who received a bachelor's degree increased from roughly 19% to about 25% in engineering and from nearly 16% to about 23% in computer science. In math and statistics, the percentage of women who graduate with a degree has gone down in the last five years.
'It's not nothing, but at this pace it would take a very long time to reach parity,' Johnson said.
Girls are also underrepresented in certain high school classes, such as AP computer science, and while women make up about 42% of California's workforce, they comprise just a quarter of those working in STEM careers, according to a study by Mount Saint Mary's University. Fewer women were working in math careers in 2023 than in the five or 10 years before that, the study found.
'It's a cultural phenomenon, not a biological phenomenon,' said Mayya Tokman, a professor of applied mathematics at UC Merced. She said underrepresentation is a result of perceptions about women, the quality of their education, and a lack of role models in a given field.
Science and technology spurs innovation and economic growth while promoting national security, and these jobs are often lucrative and stable. Gender parity is critical, especially as U.S. science and technology industries struggle to find qualified workers, said Sue Rosser, provost emerita at San Francisco State and a longtime advocate for women in science. 'We need more people in STEM. More people means immigrants, women, people of color as well as white men. There's no point in excluding anyone.'
She said that recent cuts by the Trump administration to California's research and education programs will stymie progress in science, technology and engineering — and hurt countless careers, including the women who aspire to join these fields.
Over the last eight months, the federal government has made extensive cuts to scientific research at California's universities, affecting work on dementia, vaccines, women's issues and on health problems affecting the LGBTQ+ community. The administration also ended programs that support undergraduate students in science. In June a federal judge ruled that the administration needs to restore some of those grants, but a Supreme Court decision could reverse that ruling.
More recently, the administration halted hundreds of grants to UCLA — representing hundreds of millions in research funding — in response to a U.S. Justice Department investigation into allegations of antisemitism. Now the Trump administration is asking for a $1 billion settlement in return for the grants. A California district judge ruled on Tuesday that at least some of those grants need to be restored.
'The cultural conversation has changed'
In the past five years, attention has shifted away from women in science. Nonprofit leaders and researchers across the state say that many lawmakers and philanthropists turned away from women in STEM during the COVID-19 pandemic and focused more on racial justice following the police killing of George Floyd.
Since 1995, women have been outpacing men in college, and women are now much more likely to attain a bachelor's degree. The unemployment rate for men is higher, too, and men without college degrees are opting out of the labor force at unprecedented rates.
On July 30 Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order saying the state needs to do more to address the 'growing crisis of connection and opportunity for men and boys.' It's not a 'zero-sum' game, he wrote: the state can, and should, support everyone.
But some state investments for women's education are lagging.
In 2018, the Legislature agreed to put $10 million each year into a new initiative, the California Education Learning Laboratory, to 'close equity and achievement gaps,' including the underrepresentation of girls and women in science and technology. But two years later, the state imposed large-scale cuts to the initiative due to the pandemic. As the state faced more fiscal challenges in 2024, lawmakers cut its budget to about half its former size.
This year, Newsom proposed cutting the Education Learning Laboratory altogether. After negotiations with the Legislature, Newsom agreed to fund the initiative through next year, at which point it's set to close unless new funding is secured.
'While I think women are faring better in college generally, I would be skeptical that we can say 'mission accomplished' in terms of achieving parity for women in STEM undergraduate degrees,' said Lark Park, the director of the Education Learning Laboratory, which uses public money to provide grants to schools and nonprofits. 'I think we've just gotten distracted and the cultural conversation has changed.'
Private and corporate foundations fund numerous nonprofit organizations that support girls and women in STEM, but grant recipients say some money has moved toward other, more popular topics or less controversial ones. 'Funders focus on trends and they're very trendy in how they give,' said Dawn Brown, president of the EmpowHer Institute, which offers education programs to girls and women across Los Angeles County.
One of her programs provides a free, five-week summer camp to girls, including a trip to Catalina Island, where they learn about environmental science and climate change. Since Trump took office, some corporate funders have pulled back support for the organization's programs, which may be perceived as supporting 'DEI,' she said. 'The words 'women,' 'girls,' 'climate change' — those are banned words.'
Supporting women in math
When Chloe Lynn, a rising junior at UC Berkeley and a double major in applied math and management science, started taking higher-level courses, she noticed a trend in her math classes: fewer women. 'I'll be one of three girls in a 30, 40-person class,' she said during an interview at the university's division of equity and inclusion.
UC Berkeley has a center dedicated to promoting diversity in STEM, known as Cal NERDS, which features cozy study spots, a high-tech makerspace and various multi-purpose meeting rooms. The center receives much of its funding from the state but has a few grants from the federal government, some of which are currently on hold.
On a Thursday last month, Lynn was one of 10 students who came to present their summer research in one of the multi-purpose rooms. More than half of the presenters were women or non-binary, and the rest were part of other underrepresented groups in STEM, including Hispanic, Black and LGBTQ+ students. She stood in front of a large poster, waiting for people to stop by and ask about her work.
'Say you're at an auction, and say there's n bidders and k identical items,' she said as another student approached. Over the next two hours, fellow mathematicians, classmates, friends and family stopped by, listening as she explained her formula for allocating resources in an optimal way. Some understood her work and asked questions about her variables, formulas or 3-D models. The rest nodded in admiration.
By the end of the event, many students had abandoned their own posters in order to learn about their friends' research. In her free time, as the vice president of UC Berkeley's undergraduate math association, Lynn has been trying to build this kind of community among other female math majors by organizing events where students can meet each other. Her end goal is graduate school, either in applied math or industrial engineering. Women are also underrepresented in those graduate programs.
'Creating an inclusive and uplifting community is so important for anyone that's underrepresented,' she said after finishing her presentation.
How STEM helps people
The lack of women in STEM has nothing to do with their abilities. In fact, women who major in STEM at California State University campuses are more likely than men to graduate, according to data from the college system, and in biology, women are overrepresented. Over 64% of biology bachelor's degrees awarded in California during the 2022-23 school year went to women, according to the analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California.
Brown said some female alumni of EmpowHer have said that college advisers push biology over other science, engineering or math courses, claiming that it's 'easier.' Better advising could create more parity, she said.
Rosser, who trained as a zoologist before becoming a college administrator, said women's shift toward biology was a slow process, beginning in the 1970s. 'Women are particularly attracted to STEM when they can see its usefulness, particularly to help people,' she said. Biology is often 'an entryway to the health care professions,' she added, many of which are predominately female. She recommends that professors promote the application of their research as a way to increase the percentage of women in these fields.
In her studies at UC Berkeley, Lynn said she's struggled with the relevance of her research. 'There's a lot going on in the world right now and I feel called to help,' she said. 'Even though I did theory research this summer, I've been thinking about ways to apply this theory to real-world applications I care about.' In particular, she wants her research to help her community in the Bay Area, where she grew up.
'Say you're an architect and you're in charge of reinforcing San Francisco's concrete structures in the event of an earthquake,' she said. 'You want to minimize cost in San Francisco, and that's going to help you choose which building you're going to reinforce.'
It's just another resource allocation problem, she said, so it could be solved with a similar formula.
'It does hit close to home,' she said. In fact, the UC Berkeley campus lies on a fault line.
___
This story was originally published by CalMatters and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fast Company
3 hours ago
- Fast Company
New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch
Coffee drinking has been studied for decades as researchers have aimed to answer one burning question: Is it good for you? Or is it better to stick to joyless drinks like, you know, tap water and mint tea? While there have been cases for just about every argument, one recently published study in The Journal of Nutrition just added another check in the 'healthy' column. Of course, there's a catch. You have to drink your coffee in a specific way. For the study, researchers at Tufts University analyzed the coffee-drinking habits of 46,332 Americans from 1999 to 2018. They found that drinking a cup of coffee each day has some major effects in terms of lowering mortality rates. One cup of joe per day was linked to a 16% lower risk of death, not just related to cardiovascular disease, which has been well-documented, but from any cause. More coffee is better, too—but not too much more. Drinking two to three cups per day showed a 17% lower risk of mortality. More coffee than that didn't offer any additional health benefits. However, these benefits didn't apply to all coffee drinkers across the board. The benefits were most pronounced in those who drank theirs sans cream and sugar (or with a very little amount of sugar). The ones who added cream and sugar had the same rates of all-cause mortality as those who tended toward non-coffee drinks. Essentially, the more cream and sugar added, the lower the benefits. 'Coffee is among the most-consumed beverages in the world, and with nearly half of American adults reporting drinking at least one cup per day, it's important for us to know what it might mean for health,' said Fang Fang Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Tufts. 'The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits.' Given that there is so much research around coffee, we always have to take findings with a grain of salt (and sans sweetener), but the good news does seem to be adding up for regular coffee drinkers. A study earlier this year similarly found lower rates of premature death for morning coffee drinkers. Another published in June 2025 found that coffee drinking is linked to healthy aging, particularly in women.


Digital Trends
6 hours ago
- Digital Trends
SpaceX reveals target date for Starship's 10th flight test
SpaceX's Starship rocket last flew at the end of May. Just over two weeks later, as it prepared for the 10th flight test, the upper-stage Starship spacecraft suddenly exploded on the ground at SpaceX's Starbase facility near Boca Chica, Texas. Not surprisingly, the setback delayed plans for the 10th flight test, but on Friday, SpaceX announced a target date for the highly anticipated event: Sunday, August 24, with a launch window opening at 6:30 p.m. CT (7:30 p.m. ET). The tenth flight test of Starship is preparing to launch as soon as Sunday, August 24 → — SpaceX (@SpaceX) August 15, 2025 The Starship, which comprises the first-stage Super Heavy booster and the upper-stage Starship spacecraft, is the most powerful rocket ever to fly, generating around 17 million pounds of thrust as it leaves the launchpad. NASA is planning to use the rocket for crew and cargo missions to the moon as part of the Artemis program, and even for the first crewed missions to Mars. But before then, SpaceX needs to fully prove the rocket's capabilities and safety through continued refinement and testing. Recommended Videos In a post on its website on Friday, SpaceX said that its engineers have been spending the last few months making hardware and operational changes to increase the vehicle's reliability. Notably, the upcoming flight test will not see the upper-stage booster landing back at the launch tower as seen with some of the earlier flights. Instead, the 71-meter-tall booster will descend into the ocean, allowing SpaceX to test various controlled landing burns and recovery techniques without risking damage to the Starbase facilities. SpaceX also said it will run several experiments focused on enabling the Starship's upper stage to return to the launch site in a future test. 'Flight tests continue to provide valuable learnings to inform the design of the next generation Starship and Super Heavy vehicles,' the company said on Friday. 'With production ramping up inside Starfactory at Starbase alongside new launch and test infrastructure actively being built in Texas and Florida, Starship is poised to continue iterating towards a rapidly and fully reusable launch system.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Panic spreads over exaggerated claims of 'tentacled' rabbits invading US
Shocking images of rabbits with deformities on their heads are spreading across platforms in posts warning about a mysterious "black tentacle virus" that can infect other species, with some calling for the animals to be shot if encountered. While the affliction is real and stems from a cancer-causing strain similar to the human papillomavirus, experts say it is nothing new and is not dangerous to humans or any other species besides rabbits. "WARNING: 'DO NOT TOUCH!' - RABBITS INFECTED WITH BLACK TENTACLE VIRUS," says an August 14, 2025 Facebook post sharing dramatic photos of rabbits with thick, spiky growths on their heads. "In Colorado, wild rabbits are being found with black, horn-like growths erupting from their heads caused by a mysterious viral infection. Officials warn it can spread to pets through direct contact. #rabbitsinfected #blacktentaclesvirus." The images circulated widely across social media, with some posts suggesting that people shoot the infected animals if encountered in the wild. "If I see tentacles sprouting out of somebody's head because they decided to touch one of the ... rabbits, click clack boom," a person says in an August 13 video viewed over 12,000 times on TikTok. Computer-generated images of bunnies with tentacles coming out of their noses later started spreading online. But wildlife experts told AFP that while the posts reference a real disease, they are exaggerated (archived here). The condition is not new and does not pose a serious threat to humans or other animal species. The reported sightings likely stem from the same few rabbits being spotted by different residents, Colorado wildlife services said, and most rabbits can live normally with the condition, which occasionally clears on its own. Advanced cases of the condition have been documented over the years. AFP was, for instance, able to identify the rabbit in one of the pictures shared online as a taxidermied cottontail from the University of Kansas Natural History Museum's collection by matching the background to that of a photo from a 2015 history blog (archived here). 'Same rabbits' Kara Van Hoose, northeast region public information officer for Colorado Parks and Wildlife, told AFP on August 13 that the pictures likely show an outbreak of Shope papillomavirus in the Fort Collins area (archived here and here). "We have started to take more reports of rabbits in the northern Colorado area affected with the virus since photos were first published last Friday," she told AFP August 13. "We're up to maybe a dozen or so reports, but it's most likely people reporting the same rabbits and not a dozen rabbits infected." The disease, spread through biting insects including fleas and ticks, causes wart-like growths, usually on the face and neck of rabbits. The animals can also clear the virus from their systems on their own in most cases, which remain benign. "We would be concerned only if the growths are on the eyes or impede the rabbit's ability to eat," Van Hoose said. The growths on rabbits have been observed in the United States for well over a hundred years, experts say, and were first documented by Richard Shope in 1933 (archived here). The cases are even thought to have inspired the American myth of the "jackalope" (archived here). "Using historical specimens in mammal collections here at the University of Kansas, we have been able to recover the virus from a hundred-year-old preserved specimen of an eastern cottontail," said Robert Timm, an associate professor emeritus from the University of Kansas who has studied the disease in rabbits (archived here). Not dangerous to humans Timm also dismissed the claims that the August 2025 sightings amount to a "recent invasion" that could threaten humans. "The virus has been in the environment for perhaps tens of thousands of years," he said August 14. Colorado Parks and Wildlife does not recommend killing the infected rabbits if found in nature, but "as with any wildlife, pets should not interact or come in contact with the rabbits," Van Hoose said. Karen Fox, a pathologist at the Colorado State University Veterinary Diagnostic Lab (archived here), confirmed the virus does not affect humans, dogs, or cats. Domesticated bunnies, however, are at risk of catching the virus from a wild infected specimen. Fox cautioned the disease "is often more severe in pet rabbits than in wild rabbits." "The best way to prevent infections in pet rabbits is to keep pet rabbits indoors, especially during the summer and fall months when insect activity is highest," she told AFP on August 15. According to University of Kansas's Timm, there are no known cases of this virus ever being transmitted to humans either from mosquitoes or rabbits. AFP previously investigated other claims about wild animals and viruses.