logo
The strategic reforms that could transform South Africa's economy

The strategic reforms that could transform South Africa's economy

Daily Maverick6 hours ago

The key is to break the strangleholds that Eskom and Transnet have on our electricity, ports and railways.
Introducing real competition into electricity generation and the operation of ports and railways is the key to unlocking real growth in South Africa's stagnant economy.
So said Deputy Finance Minister Ashor Sarupen at a seminar organised by the In Transformation Initiative last week, where Jakkie Cilliers, head of the African Futures unit at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), presented the unit's latest report, co-written with Alize le Roux, which forecasts SA's growth trajectory to 2043.
The seminar pondered why, despite the creation of a government of national unity (GNU) last June and the virtual end of load shedding, the South African economy only grew by a miserly 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025.
Cilliers said South Africa was caught in a 'classic upper middle income growth trap'. From 1990 until 2025, South Africa's economy had grown by an average of 2.3% a year, and on its current path, without significant reforms, he forecast it would grow at an average 2.4% annually from now until 2043. That would expand GDP from about $402-billion in 2025 to about $628-billion in 2043, in constant 2017 US dollars.
This 'slow but steady growth' would not be enough to dent poverty. It would barely keep pace with the population, which the unit forecast would expand from about 65.5 million in 2025 to about 77 million in 2043.
Cilliers said annual GDP per capita would therefore rise from $12,600 in 2025 to about $14,700 in 2043 — with South Africa falling behind the rest of the world (except Africa) where he forecast average annual GDP per capita would climb from $20,300 in 2025 to $28,500 in 2043.
He noted that on its current development trajectory it would take South Africa until 2037 to return to the peak GDP per capita of $13,800 that it reached in 2013.
South Africa had been stagnating for years, with steady deindustrialisation, weak investment, and a growing dependence on social grants undermining growth, particularly during the Jacob Zuma presidency, Cilliers said.
Cilliers noted that 740,000 South Africans entered the labour market every year, and because of slow growth and a very capital-intensive economy the number of unemployed people increased annually.
In 2023, the International Labor Organization (ILO) found that South Africa had the highest unemployment rate globally after only Eswatini. Because being part of the informal sector is considered 'work' by the organisation, South Africa's relatively small informal sector contributed to this high percentage. In South Africa, only about 18% of the labour force is employed in the informal sector.
Cilliers noted that about 62% of South Africans were now living below the World Bank's poverty datum line for upper middle income countries, of $6.85 per person a day. On South Africa's current economic path, that percentage would decline 'modestly' to 58% in 2043, though the absolute number of people living below that poverty datum line would increase, from some 40.9 million in 2025 to 44.4 million in 2043 (because the overall population would rise).
Cilliers said South Africa should now be reaping a 'demographic dividend' because its ratio of working age population – aged 15 to 64 — to its dependent population (children and elderly) had now reached 2.1. In the African Futures calculations, the demographic dividend should kick in when the ratio of working people to dependents reached 1.7. he said,
Economic growth stunted by poor human capital
But South Africa was not earning this dividend largely because economic growth was being stunted by poor human capital, mainly an unhealthy population, many of whom were still afflicted by HIV/Aids and tuberculosis and low-quality education.
The question, he said, was why South Africa did so poorly on social capital, education and health, given the very high levels of expenditure on those services.
'And the only answer that you can come up with is government inefficiency, the poor use of existing funds. And the question is, how do we escape the middle-income trap?' Cilliers asked.
He said the African Futures team had modelled the effects of reforms in eight different sectors on South Africa's economic development. These were demographics and health; agriculture; education; manufacturing; infrastructure and 'leapfrogging' (i.e. bypassing older technologies); free trade; financial flows; and governance.
They found that the largest return was from increased manufacturing, followed by freer trade and then better governance. So, for instance, all eight sectors combined would increase GDP per capita in 2043 by about 33%, from the $ 14,750 on the current path to $19,650.
Of this, increased manufacturing would contribute about $930; freer trade (with the full implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement) would contribute about $900; and better governance about $800.
The combined impact of those eight reforms would decrease the percentage of South Africans living below the $6.85 a day poverty rate to 50% by 2043, down from 62% in 2023. This would represent 6.1 million fewer poor people than if the economy remained on its current path, though still leaving South Africa with a large poverty burden, Cilliers said.
The African Futures team had compiled a laundry list of recommendations, starting with the need to strengthen governance and accountability through evidence-based policies, curtailing corruption and increasing accountability and inclusivity.
Deputy Finance Minister Sarupen, of the DA, said much of Cilliers' analysis resonated with assessments by the Treasury's own economic policy team and the work being done by the government's Operation Vulindlela and by various parties in the GNU.
He agreed that merely 60% growth in the size of the economy over the next two decades 'will not get us out of the trap that we're in' and that South Africa was in danger of falling from upper middle to lower middle income status.
Structural constraints
The low growth was driven by structural constraints, weak productivity, low investment in capital, higher inequality and an underperforming formal labour market. The Treasury was 'acutely aware of this'.
But he said the government had to prioritise its reforms to tackle the problem because of the many competing demands of a massive amount of social ills and a very strong active civil society.
He noted that South Africa had a system of fairly autonomous government ministries that made it harder to pursue coherent policies.
Cilliers had identified manufacturing and freer trade as South Africa's best paths forward. Sarupen noted that cheap reliable energy with stability of pricing and supply underpinned manufacturing and industrialisation .
'And one of the drivers of our de-industrialisation has been excessive pricing and inefficiency of supply that really hurts manufacturing in South Africa,' he said.
He noted that while prices in the rest of the economy had risen 196% since 2009, Eskom's prices had increased by 403%. So Eskom was driving inflation and deterring investment.
Sarupen added that part of the reason GDP growth had been so low over the past year, despite an end to load shedding, was because companies had sunk so much money into load-shedding-proof themselves over the past few years that they had not spent enough on actual business expansion and employment.
Sarupen also noted that free trade — another key reform advocated by Cilliers — 'requires you to be able to actually move goods and services cheaply and easily around, so the logistics reforms need a lot of depth and need to maximise competition.
'And so in the reform process that we're undergoing we need to be careful to not just bring the private sector into Transnet's monopoly structure. But rather how do we create competition, across multiple ports for example.'
Likewise, South Africa had to maximise competition in railway freight lines.
He agreed with Cilliers that crime had to be tackled much better as it was discouraging investment as well as acting as a deterrent to economic activity inside South Africa because, for example, citizens were fearful of using public transport to go to work.
Rule of law
He said the rule of law was the foundation of all other economic reforms, followed by macroeconomic stability, and then better education and health, and only after that global competitiveness and industrial masterplans.
Sarupen did note though that South Africa's foundation of macroeconomic stability was 'probably one of our saving graces'.
He also said that the government had to reduce debt. He noted that about 90% of South Africa's debt was denominated in rands, and about 75% of that was purchased by domestic markets. Rand debt was generally better than debt in foreign currency but the scale of government borrowing, about R300 to R400-billion a year, was crowding out the amount of capital that could be invested in business ventures and therefore growth.
He added that the relatively high premium of about 11% on a 10-year South African Government Bond was discouraging businesses from investing in riskier ventures.
He noted that many of the investments in this year's controversial national Budget were important — such as in public transport. He said, for example, that while a lower income worker in Vietnam earned a similar wage to a lower income worker in South Africa, the Vietnamese worker spent about 10% of his or her income on transport, the South African workers spent around 50%.
'People are going to work to earn money to be able to go to work,' he said. And this was diverting money away from workers buying goods and services, which was essential for economic growth. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The logic behind Dawie Roodt's conclusion that 'Most South African universities must be closed'
The logic behind Dawie Roodt's conclusion that 'Most South African universities must be closed'

IOL News

time40 minutes ago

  • IOL News

The logic behind Dawie Roodt's conclusion that 'Most South African universities must be closed'

History has no blank pages. Lest we forget the teaching of Hendrik Verwoerd that: 'There is no place for [the Bantu] in the European community above the level of certain forms of Labour…. What is the use of teaching the Bantu child mathematics when it cannot use it in practice'. Exactly 31 years into a democracy, Roodt still dreams of an apartheid where whites saw themselves as the chosen (theologically, racially, politically, economically) nation of South Africa, 'De la Rey, De la Rey, sal jy die Boere kom lei'. A declaration by Roodt that 'most South African universities must be closed' and that only 10% should be allowed at universities is traced in the Afrikaner ideology, apartheid and a view 'net vir die blankes', an education for a few. Apartheid was a policy of segregation and political, social, and economic against black South Africans. The current statistic suggests that there are around 7% whites in the country, and this is the basis of Roodt's argument. In apartheid South Africa, schooling was compulsory for whites but not for Africans. Roodt has exceptions a 3% perhaps for future expansion of the white race or he wants to have exceptions for 'clever blacks' or house negros or Uncle Toms or Tengo Jabavu(s) who might be useful for the system for a whiteness project. Before we rush to conclude and argue that at least the 1953 Bantu Education Act created an opportunity for blacks to study or to even suggest that Verwoerd did not imply exclusion of black in all education, it is important to recall that the Act was created for black South Africans and to prepare them for lives as labouring class. Roodt base his argument on skills relevancy and on performance, and of course, the preceding sentence exposes his background and that his logic is rooted in the Bantu Act.

'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid
'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid

South Africans have mixed views over former Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Helen Zille's potential bid to become Joburg's next mayor next year. While the outspoken political leader – dubbed 'Godzille,' – won the World Mayor of the Year in 2008 for governing the city of Cape Town, many believe the two cities are worlds apart in comparison. Dada Morero is the current mayor of Johannesburg, the latest in a long list of short-lived stints by various candidates. One of them is the DA's Mpho Phalatse. Last week, Helen Zille confirmed that she was contemplating the monumental task of running for mayor of Johannesburg. The 74-year-old told the media: 'I have been approached to put my hat in the ring for mayor. I am still considering it and consulting my family.' 'GodZille' – who has been critical of the state of Joburg and its local government – revealed that she would have to make the move alone, as her family is settled in Cape Town. Helen Zille will have until 15 June to make her formal application. On social media, South Africans have been on the fence about Helen Zille possibly being Joburg's next mayor. Some, like author Khaya Dlanga, have urged the country to give her a chance to 'turn things around'. He posted: 'Let me tell you now, if she does, she will win. And not by accident. Like it or not, she has a proven record of turning a city around. Just look at Cape Town. 'You can debate her politics all you want, but she gets things done. Joburg, as it stands, is crying out for that kind of leadership. They want working traffic lights, clean streets, functioning municipalities, not endless excuses. Right now, everyone is complaining about what the ANC has done to the city. Zille offers a real, visible alternative.' However, others argued with Khaya that the DA had failed to govern Johannesburg and even Tshwane, whose mayor, Cilliers Brink, was ousted last year. X user @KobeMalebo posted: 'The DA has actually run all the key metros in Gauteng before and botched it!'. @luphumlongcayis replied: 'The DA or Zille is not some governance miracle. Just look at the City of Tshwane. Under DA leadership, the city fell into chaos: coalition collapse, unpaid workers, budget paralysis, and service delivery failure, especially in black communities and black working-class areas'. Some even pointed to Cape Town's vast divide between the rich and poor, and how the DA under Helen Zille failed to adequately address it. @papizwane2 shared: 'It's so easy to service wealthy people/areas. The true judge of service delivery is what you do for POOR people. So with that being said, how are Khayelitsha, Gugulethu, and the Cape Flats doing? Have their living standards turned around and doing better?' Another, @NkoTengimfene replied: 'The Cape Town you speak of is not the Cape Metro of the poor and working class' And @NolwAzi_Tusini added: 'What metrics are you using to judge Zille's 'success' in Cape Town when that city is so blatantly anti-poor? While many are backing Helen Zille to'save' Mzansi's financial hub, it's clear many South Africans – who reside in both Joburg and Cape Town – believe that the latter is not the benchmark for success. The public complaints around the DA-governed city and tourist hotspot are centred around the following issues… The widening gap between the wealthy and the poor. Poor service delivery in disadvantaged communities. Influx of illegal immigrants. Prevalence of crime and gang violence in townships. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Presiding Judge in Meyiwa trial willing to recuse himself if lawyers believe he's biased
Presiding Judge in Meyiwa trial willing to recuse himself if lawyers believe he's biased

Eyewitness News

time2 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Presiding Judge in Meyiwa trial willing to recuse himself if lawyers believe he's biased

PRETORIA - The presiding judge in the Senzo Meyiwa trial has invited lawyers in the matter to apply for his recusal if they believe he is unfit to run the trial Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng made an extensive apology for the race-based comments he made in court last week. As he rebuked a lawyer for asking for time off to run the comrades marathon, Mokgotlheng made comments about black lawyers and South Africa being run by blacks. The judge has since apologised for the comments. ALSO READ: If Judge Mokgoatlheng recuses himself from the trial, the matter would have to start from scratch for a third time, and a third judge would be appointed to preside. On Monday, Judge Mokgoatlheng, who has come under fire for his race-based comments, apologised and also extended an invitation to the lawyers before him. 'If you believe that I, as a judge, am so useless, dumb, and you think you can't get a fair trial from me, please tell me, I will recuse myself. I don't want to impose myself on people who doubt my integrity, honour and dignity.' Judge Mokgoatlheng, who has been accused of being racist, gave a detailed apology for his comments and went to great lengths to give reasons why he is not. 'If I trampled on anybody's toes because of my racism, despite being in adherence to the Freedom Charter of 1955, I was there in Kliptown with my father, I wish to apologise for being a racist. I will try and mend my ways,but I can tell you, it's not a conscious thing about me to be a racist.' He extended his apology to all South Africans, all judges, and in particular, Chief Justice Mandisa Maya.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store