Letters: Something needs to be done to discourage speeders on DuSable Lake Shore Drive
We were driving south by the Lincoln Park Zoo when the driver of a Mercedes SUV came flying up in the left lane, found a car's width between my minivan and the car ahead, swung across two lanes, passed a row of cars ahead and swerved back to the middle lane, driving like he had just robbed a bank. Then the Mercedes driver got stuck behind an unintentional four-vehicle wall.
I could see the middle-aged man gesturing wildly in his car, clearly enraged at those who were not involved in the same race he was, before he found the narrowest of space between the obstructors and sped ahead, rolling down his window and giving us all the middle finger for unintentionally stealing seconds from his life.
My Midwest upbringing made me forgive such action; I created a narrative that the driver needed a bathroom. That said, the frequency of such interactions is why I support state Sen. Sara Feigenholtz's bill to study using artificial intelligence cameras to slow down such reckless behavior. ('AI-powered cameras may come to Lake Shore Drive,' April 16).
This makes sense for three reasons. First, speeding on the drive is rampant, and I've rarely seen a driver pulled over, something I forgive, as doing so would put the officer and public at risk. Second, the complete disregard for the speed limit adds to a sense of lawlessness in our city. Third, speeding is pointless. The entire length of DuSable Lake Shore Drive is around 15 miles. Going 20 mph over the speed limit saves you a few minutes off the whole route.
The whole advantage of the drive is to enjoy the view. If you're looking for speed, we have plenty of depressing highways you can enjoy.
As the Tribune article notes, DuSable Lake Shore Drive is dangerous. We should do something to slow people down for our sanity and safety.
— Nicholas Conant, Chicago
Ageism at shelters
Ageism is quite a subtle hard-to-fight prejudice. One organization is notorious for an unintentional form of this prejudice: animal shelters.
Animal shelters broadcast they are bursting at the seams with animals in desperate need of a home. They cry: 'We are waiving adoption fees!' But senior citizens may have their adoption applications declined or ignored.
Shelter may be under the apparent impression that anyone 65 years old or older is going to drop dead as soon as they walk out with an adopted animal. But youth does not guarantee long-term security for a pet.
The simple truth is that seniors are more stable and financially secure than much of the population. They will not be subject to a sudden loss of income from a layoff or firing. Or move to an apartment that does not accept pets, which would lead to adopted animals being returned to the shelter.
Shelters' logic is to keep a dog or cat in a cage rather than take a chance with anyone age 60 or older.
— Peggy Cassidy, Franklin Park
Police at Tesla dealer
A recent Saturday, I walked past the Tesla dealership on Rush Street. There were about 30 people standing and silently holding signs, decrying Elon Musk and the current administration. They were not blocking the sidewalk; they were not accosting pedestrians; they were not preventing anyone from walking into the dealership; they were not interfering with traffic.
Across the street stood about a dozen police officers talking among themselves because there was no activity requiring their intervention.
On another occasion, I saw not a single protester, yet two police officers were stationed outside the showroom entrance.
Given the city's claim of limited police resources, how does this make any sense?
— Jeanne Martineau, Chicago
Libraries are gems
Regarding the editorial 'Leave libraries alone. They more than pay their way' (April 13): How I loved the picture of Eric Phung reading to his son at the library!
My father took me to the library when I was a tot. It was a highly anticipated outing as we walked the several blocks to the Uptown branch. I was told that I would have my own card when I could print my name. I still remember the elation when this memorable event took place.
Parents should take advantage of this wonderful tool. Libraries can create a lifelong love of reading.
I have started volunteering at my local library and am a bit disappointed at the rather low patronage.
— Carole Bogaard, Oak Lawn
Ballpark memories
Kudos to Ron Grossman for his memory-prompting April 13 story 'Chicago's Field of Dreams.'
The year was 1946 when a family fishing vacation in northern Wisconsin was cut short because I had to return home to Chicago to play in a high-stakes 16-inch softball playoff game at Thillens Stadium between Chicago newspaper carrier teams.
Thillens Stadium turned out to be a field of dashed dreams, as I was devastated by our loss and consequent missed trip to Detroit to play the Detroit newspaper-carrier championship team.
However, members of our carrier team formed the nucleus of the Lobos, a Chicago Hermosa Park neighborhood team that went on to become the 1955 Illinois state 16-inch softball champions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Secret documents and a rallying cry: How Lewis Hamilton is trying to revive Ferrari
Prior to a Belgian Grand Prix weekend to forget for Lewis Hamilton, whose last F1 win came here a year ago with Mercedes, the question posed to the Ferrari driver without a podium to his name this year was an innocuous one. His answer, however, was an unyielding message to his beleaguered Ferrari team. Asked whether he'd been at the Maranello factory in the last few weeks, Hamilton replied that he had. A 'couple of days each week', he detailed. Then, untriggered, the British driver, often so reluctant to reveal the inner workings of his mind, went into full disclosure mode. 'I've called on lots of meetings with the heads of the team, so I've sat with John [Elkann], Benedetto [Vigna] and Fred [Vasseur],' Hamilton said, referring to the Ferrari chair, CEO and team principal – the three-pronged executive team who lured the 40-year-old to the Scuderia. 'I've sat with the head of our car development, with Loic [Serra], but also with the heads of different departments, talking about the engine for next year, talking about front suspension for next year, talking about rear suspension for next year. 'I've sent documents; I've done [that] through the year. After the first few races I did a full document for the team, then during this break I had another two documents that I sent in, and so they would come in and want to address those.' Quite aside from the somewhat amusing hypothetical image of seven-time world champion Hamilton sitting astutely at a desk, hunched over a laptop firing off emails to decision-makers and engineers, his words speak volumes as to the current state of the once-great Italian outfit. Because the Brit, having spent 18 seasons at McLaren (one title) and Mercedes (six titles), knows a thing or two about successful motor-racing teams. And it goes beyond the simplicity of a quick driver in the cockpit, or rapid machinery at his fingertips. It is the whole organisation, working in perfect harmony, towards a common goal. Hamilton spoke of 'structural adjustments' within the Ferrari F1 team, alongside issues with the car that need to be changed for 2026, when new engine and chassis regulations come into play. An era in the sport that is likely to be Hamilton's last. And one in which his former team Mercedes – alongside their engine partners McLaren and Williams – seem best-placed for a revival, in contrast to Ferrari. Of course, 13 races into a 2025 season dominated by McLaren, Hamilton already has all his horizons set on next year. Ferrari brought their last major upgrade of the season to Spa – a new rear suspension – and while Charles Leclerc salvaged a respectable podium in Sunday's grand prix, Hamilton had a torrid few days in the Ardennes forest. In practice, he impeded a number of drivers at the top of Eau Rouge. Then, in sprint race qualifying, he spun on his final lap, at the final chicane, due to a rear brake issue. Hamilton, baffled in the media pen afterwards, insisted that such an issue had 'never happened to him before' in his 19-year F1 career. Lewis Hamilton's results in 2025 Australia - 10th China - DSQ Japan - 7th Bahrain - 5th Saudi Arabia - 7th Miami - 8th Imola - 4th Monaco - 5th Spain - 6th Canada - 6th Austria - 4th Great Britain - 4th Belgium - 7th It meant the Saturday sprint race was a write-off as he finished 16th, before an error in qualifying, taking his car outside the remits of the white lines, meant he was eliminated in Q1 for the second day running. By this stage, Hamilton was already writing this one off as a 'weekend to forget'. But on Sunday, sparks of life. Starting in the pit lane, Hamilton stormed up the field as the first driver to make the correct call and switch to dry tyres, and made up 11 places to finish seventh. He was voted driver of the day. But calls from the pit wall to 'lift and coast' – curtailing his ability to go full throttle on straights – highlight more issues for this SF-25 Ferrari car. All of this has placed Vasseur under immense pressure at the start of the season. Asked by The Independent about the morale of the team, and Hamilton, on Sunday evening, Ferrari's team principal replied: 'It's not the result we were expecting with Lewis, but it's part of the life of a racing team to react collectively very well. 'It was a good recovery for him. For sure, we have to do a better job to score podiums or wins; you can't let one session get away. We have to make a step next week, but we are all pushing in the same direction.' The numbers, however, make for grim reading for Hamilton. In his first year in red, it is his worst ever start to an F1 season. While Leclerc has picked up five top-three finishes this year, Hamilton's best result remains fourth. In the 11 remaining races, Hamilton will be desperate not to become the first Ferrari driver since Kimi Raikkonen in 2014 not to record a podium all season. It is not just about the car, either. Hamilton admits that his qualifying displays, much like his final season for Mercedes, have not been up to scratch. Yet the bigger picture – as is the consensus up and down the paddock for every team other than McLaren – is that this season no longer matters. Next year will give the first indications of who will dominate the next generation. And as Hamilton acknowledged pre-race in Spa, in something that amounted to a rallying cry for the thousands of Ferrari personnel in Maranello, it is 'crunch time' for the Brit in his deep-rooted quest for an eighth world championship. 'I feel that it's my job to challenge absolutely every area,' he said. 'If you look at the team over the last 20 years, they've had amazing drivers. Fernando, Sebastian, all world champions. However, they didn't win a world championship, and for me, I refuse for that to be the case. I'm going the extra mile.' But beyond that call to arms, his most telling statement was as follows: 'I'm very fortunate to have had experiences in two other great teams, and things are for sure going to be different. 'I think, sometimes, if you take the same path all the time, you get the same results. So, I'm just challenging certain things.' And as a headline in Italian newspaper La Gazzetta dello Sport read three weeks ago, it's now time for Ferrari to listen to Lewis Hamilton.
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed by liberal attack dog is an over-the-top criticism of Donald Trump
The Tribune's vendetta against President Donald Trump continues. Liberal college lecturer Storer H. Rowley goes after Trump like the newspaper's personal attack dog. His Aug. 3 opinion piece is so over the top that I thought I was reading the satirical Babylon Bee. The headline blares: 'Six months into his presidency, Trump has created a police state.' In Rowley's opinion, Trump has created a 'hellscape' of fear and chaos where unaccountable, masked immigration agents are hunting unauthorized workers 'like animals.' Trump deliberately appeals to white nationalists. His police state tactics are causing blowback. Only people power and voters can stop a criminal president! Nowhere does Rowley admit that the current situation was caused by the Joe Biden administration, which allowed countless immigrants to enter the U.S., and that Trump is trying to fix that situation. But Rowley does admit that 'Americans voted to get the border under control, and to be fair, Trump's administration has done that.' Hmm. On the opposite page in print, eternal liberal Clarence Page dwells on the Jeffrey Epstein files, just like CNN, in his column 'Trump drives a wedge into his own movement.' And no surprise that the Tribune did not report on the Department of Justice investigation into the Democrats' push to sell 'Russia collusion' to the American public during Trump's first op-ed by Storer H. Rowley is right on the mark. I don't believe most Americans want to have a police state that scares Americans and legal immigrants. We should never have masked officers scooping up people from schools, playgrounds and their homes, with no constitutional rights, and whisked away to a foreign gulag. We look like the dictator states we have always and Customs Enforcement has arrested, detained and/or deported tens of thousands of workers; this has chilled many others from reporting to jobs where they fear being picked up by ICE. The Department of Government Efficiency has encouraged tens of thousands of federal workers to retire early or quit and mandated the firing of tens of thousands of additional federal workers by closing departments and offices; this has deterred many individuals who might join the federal workforce in a typical year from seeking federal employment. Is it any surprise that unemployment is up and new jobs are down?Due process is a fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. It protects all people, citizens and noncitizens alike, from arbitrary government decisions and ensures fairness in legal matters. It's a basic promise: Before the government can take away someone's life, freedom, or property, they must have a fair chance to defend themselves. But today, that promise is under serious threat. In April, the U.S. Supreme Court deliberated on whether noncitizens have any right to a fair legal process before being removed from the country. Although the justices had different views on how much process is due, the court decided: Due process protections apply to everyone in America, regardless of immigration status. Due process means having access to a fair hearing before a neutral judge. It means having the right to speak with a lawyer. It means protecting the integrity of our legal system and protecting our communities. The Supreme Court's reaffirmation comes at a time when immigration policies have made it easier to deport people without traditional legal hearings, raising urgent questions about the strength and future of constitutional protections for all of us. Our organization represents residents from Barrington, Hoffman Estates, Inverness, Palatine, Rolling Meadows and Schaumburg, some of whom are immigrants. We are committed to ensuring all residents receive the legal protections to which they are entitled under the law. We value fairness and justice. Weakening due process protections for some puts all of our rights at risk. If the government can take away someone else's rights without a hearing, what prevents them from doing the same to you? Readers can take action by raising their voices in support of a fair legal process for everyone. Most importantly, remember that standing up for due process isn't just about protecting others; it's also about defending the fundamental rights that make America a place of justice and fairness for the last three months, the U.S. created a paltry 106,000 jobs. This, of course, was to be expected, as Donald Trump's tariffs have brought uncertainty and chaos to the economy. His response? Fire the messenger. But this poor jobs report is just another example of history showing that Republicans aren't very good with the economy. As recently as the fourth quarter in 2024, Joe Biden's last in office, the unemployment rate was 4%. Biden delivered the longest stretch of 4% or lower unemployment in 50 years, while creating an impressive 15 million new jobs in just four years. That's almost eight times more jobs what we saw with the last three Republican presidents combined. In his first term, Donald Trump actually lost 2 million jobs. In fact, since 1990, the U.S. has created over 50 million new jobs. Almost 49 million of those jobs — or 96% — were created by Democratic presidents. Poor job growth and economic downturns under Republican presidents are to be expected. Of the last 11 recessions that have occurred post-World War II, 10 have occurred under Republican presidents. In more recent history, George H.W. Bush's recession begat Bill Clinton's economic recovery; more than 18 million new jobs were generated during Clinton's term, the most in our history. George W. Bush's 'Great Recession' begat Barack Obama's economic recovery, one of the longest stretches of economic expansion in our history. Donald Trump's COVID-19-related recession begat Joe Biden's economic recovery. History shows that electing a Republican president often leads to slower growth, while also leading to massive budget deficits driven by tax cuts for the rich — Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is forecast to add over $3 trillion to the national debt. In fact, the only presidents to reduce the deficit in the last 60-plus years were Democrats. The tired belief that Republicans are better at handling the economy simply isn't true.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
U.S. Tariff Snags Add To Europe Carmakers' Weak Sales, China Woes
Europe's carmakers, facing weaker sales and increased Chinese competition, will now have an added burden from U.S. tariff challenges. Sales of sedans and SUVs in Western Europe will likely slip about 2% in 2025, according to Auto Forecast Solutions, while GlobalData expects a 1.4% decline to 11.4 million. That compares with stagnation in 2024 and a big jump in 2023 of nearly 14% after the Covid pandemic. Current sales are still about 3 million shy of pre-Covid. 'Difficulty in foreseeing growth in exports after the U.S. trade deal means the local market will grow slowly over the next few years,' Auto Forecast Solutions said in its latest monthly report. Western Europe includes the big 5 markets of Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Spain. European manufacturers' second quarter financial reports included weaker profits, huge losses, and profit warnings. BMW was hurt the least as its profits declined, although the 5.4% margin was within its guidance. Mercedes cut its profit guidance. Volkswagen took a €1.3 billion ($1.5 billion) hit from tariff issue problems and cut its profit forecast. Multi-brand Stellantis lost €2.3 billion ($2.7 billion) in the first half. Volvo announced a $1 billion operating loss in the second quarter. Renault reported a net loss of €11.2 billion ($13.0 billion) in the first half. Second-quarter poor but could worsen HSBC Global Investment Research called second-quarter results disappointing but things could get worse. 'A tough quarter but it might not be the watershed we hoped for,' HSBC said in a report. HSBC said the reasons were varied, including pricing in the EU and soft volumes. The EU tariff deal with the U.S. was welcomed because it lowered tariffs from the proposed 27.5% to 15%. This compared with the previous 2.5%. 'But most of the carmakers were hoping for something more generous that reflected U.S. exports from BMW and Mercedes, or inward investment in the U.S. for VW.,' according to the report. Perhaps the Europeans should take some comfort after a report from the Wall Street Journal on Thursday which said automakers will take a collective set of losses totalling almost $12 billion from what it called the 'tariff wars'. Many foreign manufacturers will need to move production to the U.S., it said. The list was headed by Toyota with losses of just over $3 billion. Volkswagen was way back in second place on the list with losses about half that, with GM and Ford red ink close to $1 billion. 'Beyond the continuing cost of tariffs, automakers in the U.S., Japan, South Korea and Europe face years of retooling and supply-chain tweaks to adjust to the new realities,' according to the WSJ's Stephen Wilmot. Mergers, or the demise of weaker brands In Europe, manufacturers are being pressured by European Union rules designed to force all new car buyers into electric vehicles by 2035 and 80% by 2030. The rules were set up despite China's clear advantage in EV technology. This will put huge pressure on European profits as they struggle to meet ever-tighter CO2 emissions rules while being forced to shed big profit-making internal combustion engine-powered vehicles. This is likely to force weaker participants into mergers or may see the demise of marginal brands. Meanwhile, the Trump Administration has dumped its mandates to force buyers into EVs. This means that instead of previously mandated 50% share of EV new car sales by 2030, the market will allow consumers to decide, and market share is likely to be closer to 20%. Some politicians in the European Parliament are seeking to dilute EU rules. This may become more urgent if important European manufacturers look to be in danger of collapse at the expense of Chinese success.
