Iran expands dog-walking ban, citing 'public health, peace and comfort' concerns
The ban echoes a 2019 police order which barred walking dogs in Tehran, and has been expanded to at least 18 other cities in the past week, according to local media.
This included Isfahan in the centre and Kerman in the south.
Owning and walking dogs has been a contentious issue in Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, though there is no law completely banning dog ownership.
Many religious scholars consider petting dogs or coming into contact with their saliva as "najis" — ritually impure.
Some officials view them as a symbol of Western cultural influence.
Local authorities have periodically introduced bans on walking dogs in public spaces or carrying them in vehicles as part of a wider campaign to discourage their ownership.
However, enforcing the restrictions has been largely inconsistent, with many owners continuing to walk their dogs in Tehran and elsewhere across the country.
On Sunday, local time, the reformist Etemad newspaper quoted an official from Ilam city as saying that "legal action will be taken against violators", without elaborating.
The day before, the state newspaper Iran said the latest measures were aimed at "maintaining public order, ensuring safety and protecting public health".
"Dog walking is a threat to public health, peace and comfort," Abbas Najafi, prosecutor of the western city of Hamedan, was quoted as saying.
In 2021, about 75 lawmakers condemned pet ownership as a "destructive social problem", saying it could "gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life".
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has previously said that keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guarding is "reprehensible".
"If this practise resembles that of non-Muslims, promotes their culture or causes harm and disturbance to neighbours, it is deemed forbidden," he said, according to local media.
AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 days ago
- ABC News
Comedian Maz Jobrani to ramp up Donald Trump jokes, after CBS cancels Stephen Colbert's Late Show
Iranian-American comedy veteran Maz Jobrani believes US President Donald Trump is trying to censor free speech in America, and he intends to hit back. With more jokes, that is. Jobrani's been a long-time guest of Stephen Colbert's top-rating The Late Show, which was axed by CBS last month. He believes the decision to end the show's three-decade run — which began with David Letterman in 1993 — was politically motivated. According to the network's parent company Paramount, Colbert's cancellation was "purely a financial decision", and the US president has denied he had anything to do with the popular show's cancellation. The axing came after Colbert criticised Paramount's controversial $US16 million legal settlement with Mr Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. In the same week CBS announced Colbert's show would be cancelled, Paramount was in the final stages of a multi-billion-dollar merger with Skydance Media. In July, the deal was approved by the Trump administration. In Jobrani's mind, the axing of Colbert's show is no coincidence. "I love Colbert — I get my news from Colbert — he makes the news fun," he told ABC News in a Melbourne interview last month, after landing from Los Angeles for the start of his latest Australian tour. The tour across six Australian cities ended on Sunday, but Jobrani's been coming to Australia since 2008. He says Melbourne, as home of the annual International Comedy Festival, has "good comedy audiences". Colbert has vowed to continue speaking "unvarnished truth to power" and sharing "what I really think about Donald Trump". Jobrani, who also regularly speaks out against Trump in his comedy skits — most commonly against the administration's deportation policies — says he intends to do the same. "I thought Trump would maybe send the IRS out to audit them or something, just make their lives hard, because Trump unfortunately does not have a sense of humour, he doesn't know how to take a joke, which is what dictatorships usually are like." Since CBS announced the axing in June, there's been much talk in the US entertainment and media industry about how far the Trump administration might go in censoring free speech. Jobrani has united with some of the biggest names in entertainment and late-night television to show support for Colbert, and to fight for free speech. "The job of the comedian is to reveal the emperor has no clothes. I think we need to keep doing that — if we don't, we're going lose our democracy," he said. Jobrani has called on others in comedy and the wider entertainment and media industry to stand their ground. "I always say the whole point of America is, I can make fun of the president in America. I couldn't make fun of the president of Iran, that wouldn't work," he said. Jobrani's family left Iran for the US in 1978, when he was six years old. It was just a year before Iran's Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi fell to Islamist rulers, and his family, like many others at the time, made the decision to flee. In our interview he talks of how growing up as an Iranian in California at that time was a struggle. But he says it framed the backdrop to much of his comedy, which focuses on the weird and often hilarious events that occur as a child of immigrants. While his parents hoped the UC Berkeley graduate would become a doctor, lawyer, or engineer, he had other plans. And now he's among several Iranian-Americans showcasing Iranian culture on stages around the world, and making audiences laugh with Iranians, instead of at them. This was something Jobrani never envisaged back in November 1979 – when 52 Americans were taken hostage in the US Embassy in Tehran and held for 444 days. "For my entire life in America, I've had to explain Iran … I just try to find funny ways to explain to people what I'm feeling. Like I say, 'I wish I were Swedish' because if you're Swedish, you wouldn't have to explain anything, right? You just talk about IKEA, ABBA. "[Being Iranian] has been a challenge, but it also obviously is giving me plenty of material because I have been able to try and present people from Iran and other people from that part of the world, hopefully in a positive light versus what you see when they show us in the news." Jobrani's career took off in the post 9/11 era. He had first toured with other "brown comedians", including Ahmed Ahmed, Aron Kader and Sam Tripoli, on a show called the Arabian Nights, which was aimed at showcasing the voice of Muslim/Middle Eastern people a year before 9/11 happened. But as they toured under that name, they decided to change the title. At that time, then-US president George Bush had called Iran, Iraq, and North Korea an "Axis of Evil". So the trio settled on "Axis of Evil Comedy Tour" as the show's name. Since then, Jobrani has gained worldwide fame and in many ways paved the way for a new generation of comedians from Iranian backgrounds to make it to the world stage. On his Australian tour, Jobrani was joined by another rising star, Iranian-African American comedian Tehran Ghasri. "Comedy is part of the Iranian heritage," Ghasri tells ABC News. Jobrani says when he started out, being a comedian was frowned upon by the Iranian diaspora, including his parents. "I was of the generation where I should have been a doctor, lawyer, engineer, but I fell in love with comedy and performing at a young age," Jobrani explains. He says he was an anomaly when he first started. "Now 20-some-odd years later, there's Tehran and there's Max Amini, and there's Amir K … there's Melissa Shoshahi, and there's Peter the Persian, and there's Omid Djalili — and it really does make me happy to see all of these people in this business now. "Once the next generations realise, 'Oh, you can make a living doing other things' or you should live your life doing what makes you happy, they start doing it. "It's really something that's just great for our community … because until we're telling the stories, no-one's going to tell our stories the way we want to tell them. They're just going to keep making us the bad guy." In recent years Jobrani's played a prominent role in diaspora activism against the Islamic Republic, particularly in the aftermath of the #Women, Life, Freedom protests spurred by the death in custody of Mahsa Jina Amini. "I grew up in America, so I always say that I'm not in Iran, but Iran is in me. I feel an affinity towards the country of Iran. I feel an affinity towards the soccer team when they play," he said. Jobrani says the various waves of massive protests inside Iran, the recent Israel-Iran war, and people's suffering under Iran's regime is "heartbreaking". He points to the forced veiling of women, "discrimination against women, the discrimination against the LGBTQ community, the discrimination against religious minorities like the Baha'i's and others" as examples of that. "I do feel that I want to support the people of Iran, and I do pray and hope for a day where Iran can become a functioning part of the world." Jobrani fears Trump's America is becoming more like Iran's repressive regime. He says comedy can be a unifying force and a way to fight rising anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. "I think that there's people out there that are waiting to pounce" he said. "Hate and hatred, it's easier to go that way and I think that comedy can counter that. "Like when I do a show, I have people from all backgrounds, all religions in the room, we're laughing together and we're humanising each other. What war does is it dehumanises. "You get a room where you have a Palestinian, and you have a Jew, and you have a Muslim — people from different backgrounds and we're laughing together — then people realise, 'Oh, he's human. I'm human.'"
News.com.au
5 days ago
- News.com.au
Russia cautious on Armenia-Azerbaijan deal, Iran reject border corridor
Russia cautiously welcomed a US-brokered draft deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Saturday, but Moscow's regional ally Iran rejected the idea of a new border corridor backed by President Donald Trump. The two former Soviet republics signed a peace deal in Washington on Friday to end a decades-long conflict, though the fine print and binding nature of the deal remained unclear. The US-brokered agreement includes establishing a transit corridor through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States would have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. But Russia's ally and the warring parties' southern neighbour Tehran said it would not allow the creation of a such a corridor running along the Iranian border. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Akbar Velayati, an advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the Tasnim news agency. The planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries", he added. In a similar tone, Moscow said it would "further analyze" the corridor clause, noting there were trilateral agreements in place between Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, from which no one had yet withdrawn. "It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards," said Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Moscow, previously a key backer of Armenia, still has a military base there. Embroiled in its Ukraine operation, launched in 2022, it did not intervene in the latest conflict. This has strained the historically warm ties between Yerevan and Moscow, home to a large and influential Armenian diaspora, triggering Armenia's drift towards the West. - Waning influence - Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan went to war twice over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. Moscow, once the main power broker in the Caucasus, is now bogged down in its more than three-year offensive in Ukraine, diverting political and military resources into the grinding conflict of attrition. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan praised the US efforts in settling the conflict. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev even said he would back President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US-led NATO alliance welcomed the deal as a "significant step forward". But in Moscow, Zakharova refrained from even calling it a deal, referring to it merely as "the meeting of the leaders of the South Caucasus republics in Washington" -- adding, however, that it still deserved "a positive assessment". - Repackaging for Trump? - Analysts also sounded a note of caution, with the International Crisis Group pointing out that the deal left "a lot of questions unanswered". The two countries went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. Much of the White House agreement was a "repackaging" of that, which helped both countries get on Trump's good side "by giving him a role," the Crisis Group's senior South Caucasus analyst Joshua Kucera said. Azerbaijan later added a host of demands to that March deal, including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh, before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with Kucera warning that this could yet derail the process. Kucera called the corridor "one potentially significant development" from the White House meeting, but added that missing key details could prove "serious stumbling blocks". The US-brokered deal was "definitely a testament to the fact that Russia has been losing its influence" as its Ukraine operation had "diverted its attention and resources from some other areas of its traditional interest", Olesya Vardanyan, an independent analyst on the South Caucasus, told AFP. Nevertheless, she added, even if many details were still missing and nothing was guaranteed, the deal still gave Armenians "a promise of a better life and then maybe even more peace in the region".
The Australian
6 days ago
- The Australian
Israeli intelligence has helped the West
Israel's furious reaction to Sir Keir's move underlines one of the disadvantages of acting hastily to recognise a non-existent state, the future of which is up in the air, without borders or leadership, in defiance of a longstanding democratic ally. In recent years Israeli intelligence has given crucial help to Britain's spy agencies about Iranian-backed threats that pose as big a danger to the UK as Russia does. Mossad, Israel's highly effective spy agency, is believed to have supplied crucial information that thwarted an alleged Iranian-linked terrorist plot in London. It led to two of the largest counter-terror raids in Britain in recent years, when five men were arrested in connection to an alleged plan to target the Israeli embassy in Kensington, west London, The Times reports. In Australia in February 2018, Peter Dutton, the Coalition government's home affairs minister, thanked Israeli authorities for an intelligence tip-off that helped police stop a terrorist plot to blow up an Etihad Airways flight leaving Sydney bound for Abu Dhabi in July 2017. The plot involved smuggling a bomb inside a meat grinder on to the plane. 'This Etihad flight was almost blown out of the sky and it would have resulted in hundreds of people losing their lives, so we are very grateful for the assistance Israel provided in that matter,' Mr Dutton said. Israel's intelligence gathering had 'enormous' capacity, he said, and its relationship with ASIO and the Australian Federal Police was important. It should not be taken lightly. And the news on Friday that the Israeli cabinet has ratified Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's controversial and risky plan to occupy Gaza for about five months does not negate the folly of Western nations' moving towards recognising a Palestinian state prematurely. Mr Netanyahu's plan involves evacuating Gaza City and sending a million people into temporary humanitarian facilities to be set up by Israel further south. Mr Albanese has said Australian recognition would be dependent on several conditions, namely that Hamas had no role in a future Palestinian government and that a Palestinian state would not pose a security risk to Israel. Yet, as Greg Sheridan writes in Inquirer, 'those conditions mean a resolution of all the final status issues, in which case Australian recognition wouldn't come until a peace deal was signed between Israel and Palestine'. Hamas's triumphalist response to Britain's plan to recognise a non-existent Palestinian state – claiming 'the fruits of October 7' had been vindicated – shows the terror group is not planning to go away, despite being heavily depleted by Israel. And its raison d'etre is destruction of the Jewish state. Given those obstacles, and the importance of our bilateral relationship with Israel, Australia has no reason to blindly follow France, Britain and Canada at the UN General Assembly next month and push ahead with recognition of a Palestinian state. As Mr Albanese says, his government makes decisions on behalf of Australia, a sovereign nation. He has long wanted to see Israelis and Palestinians live side by side in peace and security, in a two-state solution. That major step must be taken at an optimal time, which is not now. Diminution of democratic nations' relationships, including intelligence sharing, with Israel – a stalwart of the Western alliance for 75 years, – would be a detrimental rupture for the free world.
