O'Reilly signals Trump ‘making a mistake' with Abrego Garcia stance
O'Reilly, speaking on his 'No Spin News,' said he thought Trump could be alienating the Supreme Court by not facilitating Abrego Garcia's return.
'The Trump administration's making a mistake not bringing the man back because the Supreme Court wants the man back,' O'Reilly said in comments highlighted by Mediaite. 'And if I'm President Trump, I don't want to alienate the Supreme Court, period.'
O'Reilly noted that Abrego Garcia is a Salvadoran citizen who is in the U.S. immigration system after a 2019 court order granted him permission to evade life-threatening conditions in El Salvador.
The Maryland man's deportation has become a flashpoint in American politics, with Democrats demanding he be returned.
The Supreme Court's order for the administration to 'facilitate' his return has led Trump officials to place responsibility with the Salvadoran government, which has said they will not be returning Abrego Garcia.
The battle also highlights the executive branch's struggle with judicial power as the case plays out in the courts.
O'Reilly was in favor of bringing Abrego Garcia back to the U.S. and letting the justice system handle the case.
Abrego Garcia has been under scrutiny from the administration for being involved with 'human trafficking' and the MS-13 gang. The Department of Homeland Security revealed he was suspected of human trafficking while pulled over for a traffic stop in Tennessee in 2022 while driving with eight other people.
'The authorities in Tennessee did not charge this guy, Garcia, with anything, but they caught him. No, he's not some guy cutting the lawn on Saturday in Maryland,' O'Reilly argued.
'But let the Justice Department prove it, and then you boot him,' he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Ontario premier says he doesn't trust Trump and warns the US president could reopen trade pact
The new tariff, which took effect on Friday after the two countries failed to hit an Aug. 1 deadline to secure a new trade agreement, applies only to goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated during his first term. Advertisement Trump previously hailed the agreement as 'the fairest, most balanced and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed. ' Carney has said about 85% of trade with the U.S. remains tariff-free because of USMCA. Ford said Trump likely won't wait for the scheduled review of the agreement next year. 'He's not waiting until 2026. At any given time, President Trump — not that he even follows the rules — he can pull the carpet out from underneath us,' Ford told reporters in Toronto Wednesday. 'I'm going to ask the people, do you trust President Trump? I don't.' Carney told a press conference on Tuesday that he has not talked to Trump in recent days but would speak with him 'when it makes sense.' Sector-specific tariffs on Canada, like the 50% duty on steel, aluminum and copper, remain in place. Advertisement Carney also suggested he may lift counter-tariffs if that helps Canada in the ongoing trade dispute.
Boston Globe
9 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun policies
Questions about why soldiers didn't have weapons were buzzing online after at least one video of the incident on social media appears to show service members in uniform running to safety amid a lockdown that lasted about an hour, instead of firing back at the shooter. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up While some have questioned why many service members in the area during the shooting didn't use weapons to defend themselves, others have questioned whether existing regulations do enough to prevent shootings on bases. The shooting is the latest in a growing list of violent incidents at American military installations over the years — some claiming upward of a dozen lives. Advertisement Experts say that there are reasons for long-standing regulations on military bases, despite their limitations. Department of Defense policy in place for decades Department of Defense policy prohibits military personnel from carrying personal weapons on base without permission from a senior commander, and there is a strict protocol for how the firearm must be stored. Advertisement Typically, military personnel must officially check their guns out of secure storage to go to on-base hunting areas or shooting ranges, and then check all firearms back in promptly after its sanctioned use. Military police are often the only armed personnel on base, outside of shooting ranges, hunting areas or in training, where soldiers can wield their service weapons without ammunition. The federal policy leaves little room for local commanders to use discretion about how the policy is enforced. That means the regulation applies even in Georgia, a state with some of the most lax gun regulations in the country, where Fort Stewart is located. Designed to protect national security Robert Capovilla, a founding partner for one of the largest military law firms in the country, strongly believes in the Second Amendment. But he said that the strict firearm policies on military bases exist for a reason. 'A lot of these installations are involved in top-secret operations, dealing with top-secret information, and because of that you need a heightened security,' said Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and defense attorney. 'You simply don't want folks walking around a federal installation with personal weapons.' He said he has traveled to 'nearly every single major military installation' in North America for his work. Whenever he visits an installation, he said armed military police have a visible presence almost constantly on base. He added that he doesn't believe Wednesday's shooting could have been prevented if military personnel had been armed at the time. Limitations to military gun regulation Firearms on military bases are more regulated than most states in some ways, according to former military prosecutor and defense counsel Eric Carpenter. But he said that the limitations on gun control on military bases parallel gun policy debates in the public more broadly. Advertisement 'You don't forfeit all of your rights when you enter the military,' Carpenter said. 'Outside of a military situation, the service member has just as much Second Amendment right as anyone else.' For example, it could be fairly straightforward for a service member living off-base to bring a weapon onto the military installation, Carpenter said, because a senior commander can't regulate gun ownership off base. There is also scant legal ground for leadership to confiscate a gun when a service member is exhibiting signs of a mental health crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially posing a threat to themselves or others. In recent years, those gaps have come under more scrutiny because of mass shootings, he said. 'All those rules aren't going to prevent someone from doing what the guy did today,' Carpenter said.
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
China's Exports Surged Again in July, but Not to America
China's exports surged even more than expected in July, as Chinese companies raced to ship goods to Southeast Asia and other regions, often for onward shipment to the United States, before President Trump could raise tariffs on imports. China's overall exports were up 7.2 percent in July from the same month last year, while imports were up 4.1 percent. Its exports to Southeast Asia and Africa, key regions for reshipment to the United States, rose more than twice as fast as its overall exports. China's exports to the European Union, its main alternative to the American market, were also up very strongly. By contrast, China's exports directly to the United States were down by more than a fifth in July, as buyers in the United States appeared wary of paying Mr. Trump's extra 30 percent tariffs. China's economy relies heavily on exports, in part because a steep fall in apartment prices in recent years has ruined the personal finances of millions of households, leaving them unable to afford the vast quantities of goods pouring out of China's factories. China's trade surplus reached almost $1 trillion last year, with its surplus in manufactured goods equal to a tenth of the country's entire economic output. Ever since senior American and Chinese officials reached a truce on tariffs in Geneva in mid-May, the United States has been charging an extra 30 percent tariff on imports from China. That is in addition to existing tariffs, notably the 25 percent tariff that Mr. Trump had imposed on roughly a third of American imports from China in his first term. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
