At 7.4%, India's growth steps on race pedal in Q4
India's economy surpassed expectations with a 7.4% growth in the March quarter, boosting FY25 growth to 6.5%. Investment recovery and strong construction drove this expansion, despite concerns about tepid urban demand and global uncertainties. While marking a four-year low, India remains the fastest-growing economy, poised to become the fourth largest, with economists projecting continued growth around 6.5%.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Urban Demand an Issue
India's economy expanded faster than expected at a four-quarter high of 7.4% in the March quarter from a year earlier, lifting overall growth in FY25 to 6.5%, data released on Friday showed. The high growth belied concerns about a softer print amid risks from higher US tariffs, as a recovery in investment and a stronger construction sector propped up the economy.An ET poll conducted earlier this month had pegged growth at a median 6.8% for the quarter and 6.3% for FY25.Key risks to growth include tepid urban consumer demand , muted private investment demand and a volatile global environment. India has held its own in a 'growth-scarce' post-Covid global environment amid rising uncertainties due to political conflicts and trade tensions, said chief economic advisor V Anantha Nageswaran To be sure, the full-year gross domestic product (GDP) growth of 6.5% marks a four-year low. India's GDP had grown 9.2% in FY24. Despite the slowdown, India was the fastest-growing economy in the year and is on course to become the fourth largest later this year, overtaking Japan.The nominal GDP growth rate was 9.8% in FY25 against a 12% rise in FY24, indicating a broadbased decline in inflation. The gross value added (GVA) grew 6.8% in the fourth quarter and 6.4% in FY25.The economy had grown 6.4% in the December quarter and 8.4% in the year-earlier period. Gross fixed capital formation, an indicator of investment, rose 7.1% in FY25 and 9.4% in the March quarter. 'Real GDP was expected to fare strongly, partly due to a boost from net indirect taxes,' said Radhika Rao, senior economist at DBS Bank.'A catch-up in government spending, accompanied by betterperforming construction output, has lifted the headline figure,' Rao said.Agriculture grew 5.4% in the fourth quarter, compared with 6.6% in Q3 and 0.9% a year ago. Manufacturing sector growth was 4.8% in the three months ended March, lower than 11.3% in Q4 of the previous year. Construction output surged 10.8% driven by high government capex. The 60 basis point gap between GDP and GVA in the fourth quarter was due to higher net indirect taxes, which rose 12.7%.However, private consumption growth eased to a five-quarter low of 6% while government final consumption expenditure contracted 1.8% in the fourth quarter after a gap of two quarters. 'The unevenness witnessed in the consumption recovery remains a critical monitorable going forward,' said Rajani Sinha, chief economist, CareEdge Ratings. 'The softness in urban demand continues to be an area of concern.'Economists said private sector participation in investment hanot yet taken off on a durable basis across sectors and, going ahead, India's FY26 GDP growth is estimated at 6-6.6%.US President's Donald Trump tariff threats also loom large. 'The reciprocal tariff is casting its shadow over global GDP and trade growth, which may force investors to postpone their investment decisions,' said Paras Jasrai, associate director, India Ratings and Research, adding that the investment outlook is still hazy.Rao expects growth to stabilise around the 6.5% level at the start of FY26, supported by farm output, lower inflation and monetary easing, as well as continued public spending.However, external uncertainties could have an impact through trade and investment channels. 'We believe that the Indian economy is poised to remain the fastest-growing major economy in FY26 (GDP growth expected at 6.3-6.5%) by leveraging its sound macroeconomic fundamentals, robust financial sector and commitment towards sustainable growth,' said Soumya Kanti Ghosh, group chief economic adviser, State Bank of India
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
New Covid vaccine developed by USA researchers is ready to fight Coronavirus. How effective it is?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Amid fresh surge in Covid-19 cases, a team of US researchers has developed a new type of mRNA vaccine that is more scalable and adaptable to tackle continuously evolving viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1. While the currently available mRNA vaccines are highly effective at inducing an immune response against Covid , they present challenges like the high amount of mRNA needed to produce them and the constantly evolving nature of the pathogen."The virus changes, moving the goal post, and updating the vaccine takes some time," said senior author Suresh Kuchipudi, chair of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public address these challenges, the researchers created a proof-of-concept Covid vaccine using what's known as a "trans-amplifying" mRNA this approach, the mRNA is separated into two fragments -- the antigen sequence and the replicase sequence -- the latter of which can be produced in advance, saving crucial time in the event a new vaccine must be developed urgently and produced at addition, the researchers analysed the spike-protein sequences of all known variants of the SARS-CoV-2 for commonalities, rendering what's known as a "consensus spike protein" as the basis for the vaccine's mice, the vaccine induced a robust immune response against many strains of SARS-CoV-2."This has the potential for more lasting immunity that would not require updating, because the vaccine has the potential to provide broad protection," said Kuchipudi."Additionally, this format requires an mRNA dose 40 times less than conventional vaccines, so this new approach significantly reduces the overall cost of the vaccine."The study, published in the journal npj Vaccines could inform more efficient vaccine development for other constantly evolving RNA viruses with pandemic potential, Kuchipudi said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The silent impact: How COVID-19 affected mental health globally
When the pandemic hit, the world focused on physical health; flattening the curve, increasing ICU beds, securing vaccines. But while the virus attacked lungs and immunity, it also quietly infiltrated our minds. The psychological toll of COVID-19 has been immense, yet much of it remains unseen, unspoken, and under-addressed. Each nation experienced its own kind of lockdowns, losses, and uncertainty. But across continents, there was one common thread: a silent mental health crisis playing itself out behind closed doors. The pressures of solitude, pain of loss, economic uncertainty, and fear of the unknown were a recipe for emotional stress. In countries like India, where extended family and social gatherings form the fabric of daily life, sudden isolation led to deep emotional disconnection. For many living in multi-generational homes, the fear of infecting vulnerable elders caused lingering anxiety. Elsewhere, in cities across Europe or North America, living alone became a double-edged sword, offering safety from the virus but amplifying loneliness. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Durable Perforated Stainless Steel Sheets Online – Trusted Suppliers Stainless Steel Sheets | Search ADS Search Now Undo Anxiety, depression, insomnia, and burnout surged quietly, globally, and persistently. A 2022 WHO report estimated that the global prevalence of anxiety and depression increased by over 25% during the pandemic's first year alone. That number only begins to scratch the surface. Many who needed help didn't seek it. Some didn't recognize what they were feeling. Others feared the stigma. Mental health was tested not just by the virus, but by the silence around it. People grieved loved ones they couldn't say goodbye to, lost jobs they built their lives around, missed milestones they'd dreamed of. The parents overnight turned into teachers. Healthcare professionals strained themselves to the limit. Students lost the precious years of social development. The record continues. And yet, amid all this, we would constantly remind ourselves to be grateful. Grateful we lived. Grateful others were worse off. But gratitude and sorrow don't have to be mutually exclusive. You can be thankful and still wounded. That's what makes this emotional damage so confusing. For many, the pandemic didn't cause mental health struggles it magnified what was already there. Pre-existing anxiety worsened. Past trauma resurfaced. Coping mechanisms, like alcohol or overworking, quietly spiraled into addiction. Even those who appeared fine on the outside were often managing an invisible storm within. One of the hardest-hit groups? The youth. Teens and young adults who are already navigating identity, relationships, and career pressure, were suddenly cut off from the very social systems that helped them grow. Online classes, canceled exams, and uncertainty about the future created a unique kind of emotional whiplash. In India, mental health services were overwhelmed, especially in urban centers. But rural areas, where awareness and access were already limited, faced an even greater challenge. The digital divide became not just an educational issue, but a mental health barrier too. Here's how to address these things: First, we must acknowledge that healing from the pandemic isn't just about physical recovery but it's also emotional. We need global and local mental health systems that are responsive, affordable, and stigma-free. Governments, employers, schools, and families all have a role to play. Second, we must normalize asking for help. Therapy isn't a sign of weakness. It is a step toward understanding. Whether you're dealing with anxiety, fatigue, or just feeling 'off,' it matters. You matter. This approach goes beyond diagnosis we create compassionate, culturally aware support that helps people find their footing again. The pandemic may have been global, but healing starts one mind at a time. Whether you're still carrying the weight of those years or just beginning to unpack them, know this: you're not alone, and recovery is possible. (Dr. Tonmoy Sharma, Psychiatrist Founder and CEO, Merlin Health) One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sulphur-cleaning device in coal plants not necessary: Central scientific committee
A high-powered committee of experts, chaired by Principal Scientific Advisor (PSA) Ajay Sood, has recommended that India do away with a decade-long policy of mandating equipment, called Flu Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) units, in all coal-fired thermal power plants (TPPs), according to documents perused by The Hindu. These FGD units are required to be retro-fitted in TPPs to cut harmful sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions. While 92% of India's 600 TPPs have not yet installed FGD units, the recommendation would exempt about 80% of them from needing to install such equipment. The limited number of vendors capable of installing such equipment in India, the high installation costs, the potential rise in electricity bills, and disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic have been some of the reasons historically cited by the Power Ministry, the overseer of India's TPPs, for plants' inability to adhere to previous deadlines. In theory, the costs of non-compliance could run to crores of rupees in fines, though these have not materialised thanks to deadline extensions. 'FGD not necessary' However, this was the first time that multiple arms of the government congregated to deliberate on whether FGDs were required in the first place. Their verdict draws on three reports by the CSIR-NEERI, the National Institute of Advanced Studies, and the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi. The lead scientists of these three institutions – each 'supported' by different arms of the government – were at the meeting on April 23, along with representatives from the Office of the PSA, the Union Power Ministry, and the NITI Ayog. They were all largely unanimous that FGD 'was not necessary.' The guiding principles informing the committee's recommendation are that: SO2 levels in ambient air across the country are around 10-20 micrograms/cubic metre, well below India's air quality norms of 80; Indian coal is low in sulphur; SO2 levels in cities near plants with operational FGD units do not differ significantly from those without these units, and all of these were anyway well below permissible levels. The committee opined that concerns about sulphates – a potential by-product when SO2 emissions reach certain atmospheric levels, thus forming particulate matter (PM) – are unfounded. They cited an analysis of 5,792 PM samples across the country, which found 'low elemental sulphur' content (max 8 micrograms/m3 after outlier removal) which was deemed 'insignificant — for considering PM removal as a benefit of FGD.' FGDs may worsen carbon emissions One argument mentioned in the report was that using FGDs might result in additional carbon dioxide emissions and accentuate global warming. 'Installing FGDs in all TPPs by 2030 will increase the Auxiliary Power Consumption (APC) of the TPPs, thereby adding approximately 69 million tons of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere (2025-30) while reducing SO2 emissions by —17 million tons. Adding more long-lived CO2 emissions while removing short-lived SO2 emissions by installing FGDs indiscriminately in all TPPs in India despite the low Sulphur content of Indian coal will enhance global warming.' On the other hand, given that burning coal is India's primary source of electricity, India's annual SO2 emissions has risen from 4,000 kilotonnes in 2010 to 6,000 kilotonnes in 2022. By comparison, Indonesia, a source of imported coal to India has averaged about 2,000 kt in the same period, according to data from the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), a Helsinki-based think tank. This is when India's emission standards, at 100 micrograms/m3 (thus requiring FGD), is lower than Indonesia's 800. Environment Ministry 'studying' order Those who attended the meeting included the Secretary, Minister of Power and three other senior officials; Secretary, Environment and Forests and two other officials; four officials of the Office of the PSA; representatives of the NITI Ayog, Central Electricity Authority (the power regulator), Central Pollution Control Board, and academicians. A detailed questionnaire to the Power Ministry was unanswered until press time. Tanmay Kumar, Secretary, Environment Ministry, told The Hindu that his Ministry was 'studying' the order. India has 180 coal-fired thermal power plants, each of them with multiple units. The 600 TPPs, depending on their size, age, proximity to densely populous cities, and background pollution levels, were given different timelines by the Environment Ministry to comply with the FGD installation requirements. Deadlines have been shifted three times, with the most recent extension coming on Dec 31, 2024. Major population centres The committee, according to the minutes of the meeting seen by The Hindu, will 'recommend' to the Power and Environment Ministers that only power plants located within a 10-km radius of the National Capital Region and other cities with a million-plus population be required to install FGDs. These are called Category A plants. There are 66 such plants, and only 14 of them have installed FGDs. Currently, all these plants are required to comply by 2027. Plants within a 10-km radius of 'Critically Polluted Cities' or 'Non Attainment Cities', called Category B plants, would be eligible for exemption on a 'case by case' basis, on a joint review by the Central Electricity Authority or Central Pollution Control Board. There are 72 such plants, with only four having installed FGD. These plants currently have a deadline of 2028. The remaining 462 plants all come under Category C, of which 32 have installed FGDs. These plants have been given a 2029 deadline, but the committee has now recommended that Category C plants be exempted completely, along with some units in Categories A and B which were set up at least 20 years ago. 'Will not affect public health' 'The key common point in these studies is that fitment of FGDs in all TPPs in India is not necessary to comply with the NAAQ (National Ambient Air Quality) standards whose compliance is essential to safeguard public health. While all TPPs must comply with the December 2015 stack emission standards for PM pollution and freshwater consumption, the SO2 stack emission standards can be relaxed to ensure that they are in conformance with the NAAQ standards which are notified by CPCB, keeping in mind the human health and other aspects. This way, TPPs may be able to comply with these standards without fitting FGDs. Since the existing NAAQ standards (for ambient SO2) must be complied with, this change will not affect human health in India,' the committee concludes. Currently, State governments or affiliated companies run a majority of the Category A TPPs, whereas private authorities hold the highest share in Categories B and C.
