logo
As repression deepens, can Tunisia's opposition bring the country back from the brink?

As repression deepens, can Tunisia's opposition bring the country back from the brink?

Middle East Eye03-05-2025

Last month, Tunisia witnessed several days of brutally repressed protests and a sham trial of over 40 opposition figures, transporting citizens back to the dark days before the revolution.
Protests erupted in Tunisia's central city of Mezzouna on 14 April after three students were killed when a school wall collapsed. Mezzouna lies in the Sidi Bouzid region, the birthplace of the 2011 revolution that toppled the dictatorship of Zine el Abidine Ben Ali and ignited the Arab Spring.
The protests continued throughout the week. Shops and schools in the area shut down, while demonstrators burned tyres and chanted angrily against government neglect.
Rather than engaging with residents or the victims' families, the authorities dispatched hundreds of security vehicles.
Security forces used tear gas to disperse gatherings, including mourners paying tribute to their loved ones. Many were injured, with several transferred to nearby hospitals. Electricity was cut, telecommunications were restricted, and reporters were assaulted and prevented from covering the events.
More than a day passed without any official acknowledgement of the tragedy or the mounting public outrage. When President Kais Saied finally gave a televised speech, he offered no sympathy - only astonishment that "the wall had withstood seismic tremors" in the past, while "fate had willed that it collapse at this time".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Instead of taking responsibility, he ordered the arrest of the school principal who had warned the authorities months earlier about the wall's deteriorating condition.
No accountability
Protests continued both in Mezzouna and in the capital, Tunis, where demonstrators were blocked from reaching the Ministry of the Interior.
Despite dismantling all democratic safeguards, bending the judiciary to his will and jailing his critics, the paradise Saied promised has never materialised
After days of blaming "provocateurs", "traitors" and fate, Saied visited the grief-stricken town at 4am (3am GMT), when few residents were present. Somehow, a few carefully selected individuals appeared to thank him and chant his praises.
He again blamed "traitors" for the town's failing public services and claimed that "troublemakers" had been sent to provoke the security forces.
Popular anger and widespread protests came after nearly four years of repression and zero accountability under Saied, who now controls all power. Protesters know that no minister, governor or representative holds real authority under the one-man regime he has built.
Saied appoints and dismisses prime ministers and ministers at will and has severely repressed political parties, civil society and trade unions.
Since he seized power in a coup in July 2021, he has blamed everyone but himself for the country's decline - the "dark decade" of democracy, corrupt businessmen, opposition politicians, foreign agents and a rotating cast of scapegoats.
But this tactic is losing its effect. He may now be forced to face a population that once believed his populist promises. Despite dismantling all democratic safeguards, bending the judiciary to his will and jailing his critics, the paradise he promised has never materialised.
Tunisians burn tyres and block a road in Mezzouna, Sidi Bouzi, on 15 April 2025, during a protest demanding justice after a school wall collapse killed three students (Saber Sboui/AFP)
Instead, his dictatorship has only exacerbated the country's problems, with inflation and poverty reaching unprecedented levels.
Yet, Saied's response to this growing realisation has been to double down on his populist narrative of blaming traitors and conspirators, while further relying on security forces and subservient sections of the judiciary to repress any criticism or challenge to his disastrous rule.
Sham justice
Last week's sham verdicts against 40 opponents for "conspiring against state security" have further illustrated the regime's desperation.
Over 40 defendants were sentenced, many after spending over two years in pre-trial detention. My sister, an academic who has never been politically active nor had any contact with the other defendants, found herself added to the list and sentenced to 33 years in prison.
The sole evidence presented by the state prosecution for the alleged "conspiracy against state security" consisted of WhatsApp messages and meetings with foreign journalists and diplomats.
How Kais Saied's tyranny went from tragedy to farce Read More »
With no trial in sight after years in detention, some of the defendants began a hunger strike, including Jaouhar Ben Mbarek, a leading member of the National Salvation Front, and Ennahda MP Said Ferjani.
Sentences were handed down less than a minute after the hearing began, ranging from four to 66 years. Defendants were barred from attending their own trial, while journalists, observers and family members were turned away from the courtroom.
Defence lawyers denounced the absurd conditions and blatant violations of legal procedure. To add a foreign twist to the plot, French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy was included among the defendants and also sentenced to 33 years in prison.
The lightest sentence - four years - was given to a man who had merely parked his car outside the home of opposition figure Khayam Turki, a person he had never met.
Turki, a social-democrat politician, received the harshest sentence: 66 years. His crime? Organising meetings with other opposition figures to discuss how to unite their ranks and find a way out of Tunisia's political crisis after Saied's coup.
Two days later, Ahmed Souab, a prominent former judge and member of the defence team, was arrested at his home for statements he made in court.
Around 100 other opposition figures, journalists, activists and civil servants have also been charged under vague accusations in dozens of other cases.
Among them is former Prime Minister Ali Larayedh, who has been held in pre-trial detention since December 2022.
My father, Rached Ghannouchi, faces charges in more than a dozen separate legal cases.
At the age of 83, he has already been sentenced to a total of 27 years in sham trials he refused to attend - fully aware that judicial decisions are pre-determined under Saied's orders.
A country unravelling
Saied appears to have no solution for the country's soaring debt, rising unemployment and rampant inflation. Many Tunisians are struggling to afford basic necessities, while the government itself faces unprecedented food shortages, power outages and water cuts.
Under the current regime, Tunisia has recorded its lowest economic growth in a decade - apart from the first pandemic year of 2020 - amid dwindling external funding and rising domestic borrowing.
As my father wrote from prison: 'The only solution lies in responsible freedom, inclusive justice and democracy based on equal rights for all'
Economic collapse and political repression have deepened public despair, fuelling a brain drain that increased by 28 percent last year, as thousands of Tunisians leave in search of safety and dignity elsewhere.
Yet, while European governments express concern over Saied's 2021 coup, they continue to back him despite his failure to address the very crises he exploited to justify his power grab.
As my father wrote from prison on the second anniversary of his unjust detention: "The only solution lies in responsible freedom, inclusive justice, and democracy based on equal rights for all."
The question now is whether Saied's indiscriminate repression will prompt the opposition to overcome their differences and political calculations to unite their ranks to restore democracy and bring Tunisia back from the brink of disaster.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Saudi top diplomat to make rare trip to occupied West Bank
Saudi top diplomat to make rare trip to occupied West Bank

Middle East Eye

time8 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Saudi top diplomat to make rare trip to occupied West Bank

Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan will visit the occupied West Bank this weekend, making him the highest ranking Saudi official to visit in almost 60 years, the Palestinian Authority (PA) revealed on Friday. Bin Farhan will lead a ministerial delegation comprised of his counterparts in Jordan, Egypt, and other Arab nations, the Palestinian ambassador to Saudi Arabia told local media, adding that the trip is intended to convey the centrality of the Palestinian cause to Arabs and Muslims. The move appears similar to the trip bin Farhan organised to Washington in the early months of Israel's war on Gaza, in a bid to showcase a united Arab front in support of a ceasefire. It also appears to be an attempt at lending credibility to the PA as an alternative to Hamas in Gaza, despite the PA's plummeting popularity among Palestinians. The trip is rare and unusual, given that the last time a Saudi official visited Ramallah, he had been appointed a non-resident ambassador to Palestine. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Nayef al-Sudairi arrived just weeks before the 7 October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel, and before him, King Faisal had visited in 1966. Those attacks were intended to and indeed derailed Saudi-Israeli normalisation talks, Hamas officials revealed over the course of the war. With the kingdom being the de facto leader of the Arab world, it can set an agenda with the kind of influence few of its neighbours possess - and normalising with Israel would have likely dashed ambitions for Palestinian statehood. Since 2023, Saudi Arabia has made it clear that normalisation would only be pursued with a clear pathway to a Palestinian state. Earlier this year, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called Israel's now 19-month-long war on Gaza a "genocide", echoing assessments by the United Nations and countless rights organisations, among other leading historians and experts. More than 54,000 Palestinians have been killed so far, with some experts believing the figure to be a significant undercount. Next month, a meeting in New York co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France is expected to outline the necessity of establishing a Palestinian state, and rebuild support for the concept of the two-state solution, a plan outlined in the 1993 Oslo Accords. Several European nations have recently recognised the state of Palestine, including Ireland, Spain, and Norway.

Arab Group calls on UN Security Council to bring end to 'catastrophic' Gaza war
Arab Group calls on UN Security Council to bring end to 'catastrophic' Gaza war

The National

time9 hours ago

  • The National

Arab Group calls on UN Security Council to bring end to 'catastrophic' Gaza war

The Arab Group called on the UN Security Council on Friday to take urgent action to halt Israel's 'catastrophic' war in Gaza. The group of Arab states also demanded an end to Israel's blockade of the enclave and the lifting of restrictions on humanitarian aid, as UN officials say the entire population faces famine. Israel has faced mounting international pressure over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where the UN says only a 'teaspoon' of aid has been allowed in after a more than two-month blockade. Speaking on behalf of the Arab Group as chairman for the month of May, the UAE's UN envoy Mohamed Abushahab accused Israel of using starvation as 'a weapon of war' and rejected its proposed aid mechanism, calling it a breach of international law. The US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which began operations this week, distributes aid through several 'secure' sites – manned by private security contractors – with the aim of keeping supplies out of the hands of Hamas. The mechanism cuts out traditional UN and other aid distributors, and critics have accused it of militarising humanitarian assistance. 'Palestinian lives are not less valuable than any other lives,' Mr Abushahab told reporters in New York. Negotiations to end nearly 20 months of war in Gaza have so far failed to achieve a breakthrough, with Israel resuming military operations in March following a short-lived truce. But a new proposal submitted by the US was approved by Israel on Thursday, and Hamas has said it is reviewing it. Palestine's deputy ambassador Majed Bamya said that international condemnation of Israel's actions in Gaza was insufficient. 'There is international outrage, but our outrage is not good enough,' Mr Bamya told reporters. 'It's not good enough for the people of Gaza to know that the world condemns this action, condemns these crimes, stands against them. We need actions.' He accused Israel of attempting to forcibly erase the Palestinian cause and people, warning that such efforts would fail. Mr Bamya also pushed back against expectations that Palestinians should endure the crisis alone. 'The world cannot expect Palestinians to be superheroes, that they need to resist all of this on their own, that they need to figure out the way to survive, that they need to figure out how to stay in their land,' he said. 'Israel wants to convince them that if they want life, they can only find it away from them.' This week, Israel announced the creation of 22 new settlements in the West Bank. On Friday, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz vowed to build a 'Jewish Israeli state' in the Palestinian territory which Israel has occupied since 1967. Britain called the move a 'deliberate obstacle' to Palestinian statehood, and UN chief Antonio Guterres's spokesman said it pushed efforts towards a two-state solution 'in the wrong direction'. Mr Abushahab said the Arab Group looks forward to the upcoming conference in June on the two-state solution co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France as it is 'critical' for member states take concrete actions to advance sustainable peace. 'We salute those countries that recognised the state of Palestine and strongly encourage others to follow their example,' he said. 'Recognition is not just a symbolic gesture; it is a concrete step for the just and lasting peace.'

Judge rules in favour of Harvard University keeping its international students
Judge rules in favour of Harvard University keeping its international students

Middle East Eye

time10 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Judge rules in favour of Harvard University keeping its international students

Harvard University on Thursday won a brief reprieve in its fight to continue enrolling international students after a federal judge upheld a block on a governmental order. US district judge Allison Burroughs ruled to uphold the terms of a temporary restraining order (TRO), which froze the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) revocation of the university's student and exchange visitor programme (SEVP) certification programme, the process that enables universities to enrol foreigners, and preserved the status of international students. The news came as Harvard's Class of 2025 was assembling for commencement exercises. The order grants relief to around 7,000 international students - a quarter of Harvard's student body - whose lives have been thrown into limbo over the last few weeks. 'Harvard will continue to take steps to protect the rights of our international students and scholars, members of our community who are vital to the University's academic mission and community - and whose presence here benefits our country immeasurably,' Harvard said in a public statement about Thursday's court decision. Burroughs indicated that she will issue a longer-term hold while litigation continues. This would enable international students, staff, and faculty to continue to study and work at the Ivy League school. The TRO will stay in place until a broader injunction is agreed upon. The next hearing has yet to be scheduled. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Last Thursday, DHS told Harvard that its international students must either transfer to other institutions or face deportation, as its continued fight for academic autonomy faced another round of repercussions from the Trump administration. Harvard sued in response, and last Friday, a judge temporarily blocked the DHS's revocation of the university's SEVP programme. Trump administration backtracks Before the order, the Trump administration appeared to waver on its initial decertification, potentially on procedural grounds. The Department of Homeland Security said on Thursday it would now give Harvard University a 30-day response time to prove it meets the requirements of the SEVP programme. After 30 days, the DHS could still revoke Harvard's SEVP certification if it still claims that Harvard broke the law, unless a preliminary injunction is granted. The New York Times reported last week that the administration is poised to cut all remaining federal contracts with Harvard, which are estimated to be worth $100m. The two sides have been in a legal war for months now. The US State Department and DHS began cracking down on any pro-Palestinian sentiment expressed by student visa holders in the US after the nationwide campus protests in 2024 in support of Gaza. At the end of March, the Trump administration announced it was reviewing $9bn in federal funds and grants to Harvard. It said it would review more than $255.6m in current contracts and $8.7bn in grants spread over multiple years. The administration accused the university of failing to adequately protect Jewish students on campus from antisemitic discrimination and harassment, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 'Are they troublemakers?': Trump questions why Harvard has so many international students Read More » On 3 April, the Trump administration sent an initial list of demands to 'right these wrongs', as part of its crackdown on what it calls antisemitism on campuses across the US, referring to the widespread campus protests against Israel's war on Gaza. Then, on 11 April, the Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism sent Harvard an expanded list of demands. Harvard rejected the government's demands, which included reporting foreign students for code violations, reforming its governance and leadership, discontinuing its diversity, equity, and inclusion programmes, and changing its hiring and admission policies, especially for international students. In response to the list of demands, the institution took a stand against the Trump administration, saying in a letter, issued by Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and King & Spalding LLP, that 'The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights'. In response, the Trump administration hit Harvard with a $2.3bn federal funding freeze, which represents 35.9 percent of Harvard's $6.4bn operating expenses. Then, the US Department of Health and Human Services said that it was terminating $60m in federal grants to the university, saying it failed to address antisemitic harassment and ethnic discrimination on campus. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based institution has said it 'cannot absorb the entire cost' of the frozen grants, and that it was working with researchers to help them find alternative funding. It is also suing the Trump administration over its decision to cut grants. The Federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism is made up of four government agencies, including the Department of Justice, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the US General Services Administration. The task force was set up in February following Trump's executive order, Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism, signed at the end of January.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store