Texas legislative standoff continues, flurry of lawsuits flung at state House Democrats protesting redistricting proposal
Speaker Dustin Burrows has scheduled a House session at 1 p.m. Monday afternoon. The Texas House failed to meet quorum for the third time on Friday, with only 95 lawmakers present. The House needs 100 members in attendance to make quorum so they can vote on new Congressional maps in Texas that would give Republicans five extra seats, at the expense of Democrats.
Most of the Democrats flew to other states, meeting with Democratic Governors in Illinois, New York, Massachusetts, and California on Friday. They want those states, which are run by Democrats, to change their Congressional maps too, to neutralize Republicans' efforts in Texas to gain more seats in Congress.
Republican State Representative Jeff Leach of Allen expressed his frustration saying, "It absolutely bothers me. It bothers the people of Texas, too. I wish it bothered our Democrat colleagues more that they seem to be spending more time in blue states like Illinois, New York and now California, um, then they are here in the state of Texas where they're required to show up for work."
"We had had long discussions about this prior to us, leaving prior to us, breaking quorum," State Representative and House Democratic Caucus Chairman Gene Wu told Jack Fink Tuesday evening. "We are under no illusion about how dangerous this could be and what risk it holds for all of us. But we are all doing this because we love our state, because we value the people in it, and because we are tired of watching the corruption that has invaded our system. We are doing this to save the state."
Attorney General Ken Paxton filed an emergency lawsuit with the Texas Supreme Court on Friday to have 13 House Democrats removed from office. This includes four Democrats from North Texas: Ana Maria Rodriguez Ramos, Jessica Gonzalez, and Mihaela Plesa, all of Dallas, and Chris Turner of Grand Prairie.
"This is just more bluster and rhetoric from Abbott, Paxton," said Turner. "My democratic colleagues and I are fulfilling our legislative duties by exercising our right to break quorum and stop consideration of this discriminatory redistricting map."
Earlier last week, Governor Abbott filed an emergency petition with the Texas Supreme Court to remove State Representative Gene Wu of Houston. He's the House Democratic Caucus Chairman who is leading Democrats on this quorum break. The Governor called him the "ringleader of the derelict Democrats." Wu filed his response with the Texas Supreme Court Friday.
Republican State Representative, Katrina Pierson, of Rockwall posted on social media that she agreed with the Governor's actions. She told Jack in an interview, "We are constitutionally required to be here. So pulling political sense like that is not representing your districts, because again, you have buttons on your desk. That is your voice for your people. So this is upended. All kinds of things like property, taxes and flood victim relief. And these guys are fleeing for political purposes, and there should be accountability."
At the Texas Capitol, Speaker Dustin Burrows signed civil arrest warrants for all of the Democratic lawmakers who left the state. Burrows also met with Texas DPS leaders, and DPS went actively searching for House Democrats who may still have been in Texas, to bring them back to the Capitol so they could reach quorum.
In addition to that, for the first time, the Speaker asked Attorney General Ken Paxton to help them bring the lawmakers who went to Chicago home. Paxton sent Illinois a request to serve the civil arrest warrants and said he will do the same for other states. Senator John Cornyn said he requested assistance from FBI Director Kash Patel, and that the FBI agreed to help Texas locate the House Democrats who left Texas.
Speaker Burrows also told House Democrats that if they left the Capitol to break quorum, they would have to pick up their paychecks in person - they could no longer get direct deposit - until they return to the Capitol.
The Attorney General filed a lawsuit against former Congressman Beto O'Rourke and his organization Powered by People in Tarrant County Court. Paxton accused O'Rourke and his group of illegal fundraising to pay for Democrats to leave Texas to break quorum. O'Rourke said Paxton wants to make examples out of those who fight so that others won't. The court issued a temporary restraining order against O'Rourke and Powered by People late Friday afternoon.
When looking at the current Congressional Districts in Texas, there are 25 seats held by Republicans and 13 seats held by Democrats. When looking at the new statewide map of the new districts drawn by Texas Republican lawmakers two Democratic seats from South Texas, one from Houston, one from Austin, and one from North Texas expected to be won by Republicans. In North Texas, there are currently three districts held by Democrats but under the new map, there would be only two seats held by Democrats.
The existing 32nd Congressional District largely in Dallas County is represented by Democrat Julie Johnson. Under the changes, the 32nd Congressional district would become Republican and extend to far east Texas.
"I just think the whole process is really unfortunate and terrible that the Republicans are marching down this road," Johnson said in an interview with Jack Fink. "They're having a desperate attempt to try to alienate and marginalize voters. And I was very disappointed to see what they're doing...we're focusing on killing the maps, and we're focusing on making sure that the scheme that the Republicans have to try to steal some seats doesn't actually ultimately happen, and that is the sole source of my focus."
The existing 33rd Congressional seat is held by Democrat Marc Veasey and is in Tarrant and Dallas Counties. Under the new map, this seat would only be in Dallas County. Veasey lives in Tarrant County and while this would still be a Democratic seat, it would become a majority Latino district. "Obviously, that is a little problematic for me," Veasey told Jack. "I'm going to be looking at all options as far as which Congressional district I can run in, so I'm not taking anything off the table."
"I'm focused in on this fight. I'm trying to push back against this discrimination that the Republicans have put into this map this blatant discrimination. I'm worried about the neighborhood...And you know, while I get along well with my Republican colleagues that would represent parts of East Fort Worth. They're not going to want to represent the community. They're never going to be seen."
Republican Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne represents the 24th Congressional District in North Texas. She supports the newly drawn maps and states that Democrats are crying foul over the mid-term redistricting push. "For them to raise up their hands and get upset with the state of Texas for playing by their rules is dishonest, disingenuous and hypocritical," said Van Duyne. She acknowledged there would be minor changes to her district if the proposed maps are approved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Atlas Air Worldwide Expands Commitment to Workforce Development with University of Alaska Anchorage
Company Affirms Support of Efforts by President Trump and Secretary Duffy to Modernize U.S. Airspace Atlas Air Worldwide Expands Commitment to Workforce Development with University of Alaska Anchorage WHITE PLAINS, N.Y., Aug. 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. ('Atlas'), the leading global provider of outsourced aviation logistics solutions, today reaffirmed its partnership with the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA). Leaders from Atlas and UAA, along with faculty and students, were joined by United States Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy at Merrill Field in Anchorage. The Secretary is spearheading the Trump Administration's efforts to invest in the aviation workforce, modernize the air traffic control system, enhance safety, and address nationwide shortages of pilots, controllers, and mechanics. 'President Trump and I are on a mission to make our airspace the envy of the world. We will build a brand-new air traffic control system and address a chronic shortage of controllers and pilots,' said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy. 'President Trump's One Big, Beautiful Bill delivered over $100 million into the Don Young Alaska Aviation Safety Initiative to deploy state of the art technology and train the next generation of aviation talent. I applaud Atlas Air Worldwide for doing their part to contribute to this mission.' Aviation is essential to Alaska's economy, with Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) ranking among the world's top five busiest cargo hubs. The University of Alaska Anchorage is widely recognized for its top-tier aerospace program, which ensures students are equipped with the expertise needed to fill these critical roles. To further support Alaska's aviation workforce development, Atlas has also announced the renewal of its scholarship program, which helps students offset educational costs as they prepare for careers in aviation. 'We are proud to continue our partnership with the University of Alaska Anchorage by creating opportunities to advance aviation education,' said Michael Steen, Atlas Air Worldwide Chief Executive Officer. 'By investing in workforce development locally, we are advancing our commitment to aviation in Alaska, and to the resilience of the broader aerospace industry. We are fully dedicated to supporting the efforts led by President Trump and Secretary Duffy to make our airspace the global gold standard.' The new round of funding builds on Atlas-sponsored scholarships announced in 2024—four for maintenance technician students and three for aspiring pilots—and aims to develop a robust pipeline of talent for the sector. 'We are grateful to Atlas Air Worldwide for its continued investment in UAA and our students,' said Ray Weber, Dean of UAA's Community & Technical College. 'This generous donation is transformative, helping us build a more qualified workforce that is vital to Alaska's economic future and the broader industry. Thanks to Atlas, our students are gaining the training and credentials needed to pursue fulfilling careers, securing brighter prospects for the state's workforce and beyond.' Atlas Air Worldwide in Alaska Anchorage's proximity, within 9.5 hours by plane of 90% of the industrial world, positions it as a vital hub for global commerce, training and talent development, and it plays a key role in Atlas' operations. Annual Atlas departures at Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) have grown to more than 7,500 in 2024, supported by over 700 Anchorage based Pilots and ground staff. About Atlas Air Worldwide Atlas Air Worldwide is a leading global provider of outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services. It is the parent company of Atlas Air, Inc., Titan Aviation Holdings, Inc., and Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. Our companies operate the world's largest fleet of 747 freighter aircraft and provide customers the broadest array of Boeing 747, 777, and 767 aircraft for domestic, regional and international cargo and passenger operations. About The University of Alaska Anchorage The University of Alaska Anchorage is Alaska's largest university, educating nearly 12,000 students annually. UAA transforms lives through teaching, research, community engagement and creative expression in a diverse and inclusive environment. As the state's largest university, UAA is a driving force in Alaska's economy, producing over 1,600 graduates each year, with a large percentage entering the Alaska workforce. UAA has programs in professional piloting, aviation management, aviation maintenance technology and air traffic control. In 2022, UAA graduated 273 students to the aviation sector. Learn more at Contacts: Media: CorpCommunications@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at
Boston Globe
12 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
These are the voters who should scare Democrats most
In dozens of interviews, working-class swing voters said they had misgivings about the Trump presidency -- but many also said they were just as skeptical of the Democratic Party. Five years ago, Raymond Teachey voted, as usual, for the Democratic presidential nominee. But by last fall, Teachey, an aircraft mechanic from Bucks County, Pennsylvania, was rethinking his political allegiances. To him, the Democratic Party seemed increasingly focused on issues of identity at the expense of more tangible day-to-day concerns, such as public safety or the economy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'Some of them turned their back on their base,' Teachey, 54, said. Advertisement Working-class voters like Teachey, who supported Biden in 2020 but either backed Trump last year or, as Teachey did, skipped the 2024 presidential election, help explain why Democrats lost pivotal swing counties like Bucks and vividly illustrate how the traditional Democratic coalition has eroded in the Trump era. Now, Democrats hope to bring these voters back into the fold for the midterm elections in 2026, betting on a backlash to Trump and his party's far-reaching moves to slash the social safety net. Sarah Smarty, a home health aide and an author who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 but flipped to President Trump last year, in Mifflin County, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT But in interviews with nearly 30 predominantly working-class voters who supported Biden in 2020 before defecting or struggling deeply with their choices last year, many had a stinging message for the Democratic Party. Advertisement Just because we have misgivings about Trump, they say, it doesn't mean we like you. 'I think I'm done with the Democrats,' said Desmond Smith, 24, a deli worker from Smithdale, Mississippi, and a Black man who said he backed Biden in 2020 at the height of the racial justice protests. But last year, disillusioned by what he saw as the party's overemphasis on identity politics and concerned about illegal immigration, he voted for Trump. Asked how Democrats could win him back, he said, 'Fight for Americans instead of fighting for everybody else.' An in-depth postelection study from Pew Research Center suggests that about 5% of Biden's voters in 2020 switched to Trump in 2024, while roughly 15% of those voters stayed home last year. Trump retained more of his 2020 voters than Democrats did, a crucial factor in winning the election. Polling on the current attitudes of those Biden defectors is limited, but it is clear the Democratic brand, broadly, continues to struggle. A Wall Street Journal poll released in late July found that the party's image was at its lowest point in more than three decades, with just 33% of voters saying they held a favorable view of Democrats. 'They're doing nothing to move their own numbers because they don't have an economic message,' said John Anzalone, a veteran Democratic pollster who worked on that survey. 'They think that this is about Trump's numbers getting worse,' he added. 'They need to worry about their numbers.' Certainly, anger with Trump, an energized Democratic base and the headwinds a president's party typically confronts in midterm elections could help propel Democrats to victory next year. Advertisement Democrats have had some recruitment success (and luck), and they see growing openings to argue that Trump's domestic agenda helps the wealthy at the expense of the working class, a message they are already beginning to push in advertising. There is no top-of-the-ticket national Democrat to defend or avoid, while Republicans have virtually no room to distance themselves from Trump's least popular ideas. But interviews with the voters whom Democrats are most desperate to reclaim also suggest that the party's challenges could extend well beyond next year's races. Here are five takeaways from those conversations. Biden's disastrous reelection bid fueled a trust issue. It hasn't gone away. Bielski, 35, an executive chef at a private club, said he had typically voted for Democrats until last year's presidential election, when he backed Trump. Democratic leaders had insisted that the plainly frail Biden was vigorous enough to run, and they had encouraged skeptical voters to fall in line. Instantly after he dropped out, they urged Democrats to unite behind the candidacy of Kamala Harris, who was then the vice president. That did not sit right with Bielski, who said he was already distrustful of Democrats who had pushed pandemic-era lockdowns. Harris, he said, 'wasn't someone that I got to vote for in a primary.' 'It almost seemed wrong,' continued Bielski, who lives in Phoenix. 'It was kind of like, OK, the same people that were just running the country are now telling us that this is the person that we should vote for.' After Harris became the Democratic nominee, some voters interpreted her meandering answers in televised interviews as an unwillingness to be straight with them. By contrast, while Trump gave outlandish and rambling public remarks riddled with conspiracy theories and lies, some said they had gotten the general sense that he wanted to tackle the cost of living and curb illegal immigration. Advertisement 'It was difficult to understand what her point of view was,' said Bruce Gamble, 67, a retired substation maintainer for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Gamble said he voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump last year. Trump 'was able to communicate better to me,' he added, while Harris 'felt like she was talking over my head, so I didn't quite trust her.' Raymond Teachey, an aircraft mechanic in Bristol, Penn. HANNAH YOON/NYT Worried about paying the bills, they saw Democrats as too focused on cultural issues. Many in this multiracial group of voters said they thought Democrats had gone too far in promoting transgender rights or in emphasizing matters of racial identity. But often, they were more bothered by their perception that those discussions had come at the expense of addressing economic anxieties. 'It seemed like they were more concerned with DEI and LGBTQ issues and really just things that didn't pertain to me or concern me at all,' said Kendall Wood, 32, a truck driver from Henrico County, Virginia. He said he voted for Trump last year after backing Biden in 2020. 'They weren't concerned with, really, kitchen-table issues.' A poll from The New York Times and Ipsos conducted this year found that many Americans did not believe that the Democratic Party was focused on the economic issues that mattered most to them. 'Maybe talk about real-world problems,' said Maya Garcia, 23, a restaurant server from the San Fernando Valley in California. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and did not vote for president last year. Democrats talk 'a lot about us emotionally, but what are we going to do financially?' Advertisement She added, 'I understand that you want, you know, equal rights and things like that. But I feel like we need to talk more about the economics.' But in a warning sign for Republicans, a recent CNN poll found that a growing share of Americans -- 63% -- felt as if Trump had not paid enough attention to the country's most important problems. Marlon Flores, a technician at a car dealership in Houston. DESIREE RIOS/NYT 'America First' gained new resonance amid wars abroad. As wars raged in the Middle East and Ukraine, some working-class voters thought the Biden administration cared more about events abroad than about the problems in their communities. 'They were funding in other countries, while we do not have the money to fund ourselves,' said Smarty, 33, a home health aide and an author. She said she voted for Biden in 2020 and Trump in 2024, adding that she viewed Trump as a man of action. 'I would really like to see more jobs,' she said. 'I would like to see them take good care of people who are homeless in our area.' Bielski said that against the backdrop of overseas turmoil, Trump's 'America First' message resonated. But these days, he does not think Trump is living up to that mantra. 'We're getting into more stuff abroad and not really focusing on economics here,' he said. 'It doesn't seem like he's holding true to anything that he's promised.' Flores, 22, a technician at a car dealership, said the foreign policy emphasis -- and a sense that life was tough regardless of the party in power -- helped explain why he skipped last year's election as well as the 2020 presidential race. Advertisement 'No matter how many times have we gone red, or even blue, the blue-collar workers' have seen little progress, Flores said. President Trump at the White House on Aug. 11. Alex Brandon/Associated Press They worry about illegal immigration. But some think Trump's crackdowns are going too far. These voters often said they agreed with Trump on the need to stem the flow of illegal immigration and strengthen border security. But some worried about the administration's crackdown, which has resulted in sweeping raids, children being separated from their parents, the deportation of American citizens and a growing sense of fear in immigrant communities. Several people interviewed said they knew people who had been personally affected. Smarty, for instance, said her friend's husband, who had lived in the United States for 25 years, had suddenly been deported to Mexico. Her friend is 'going through some health problems, and they have kids, and that's really hard on their family,' Smarty said. 'I don't really feel that's exactly right.' They're not done with every Democrat. But they're tired of the old guard. Many of the voters interviewed said they remained open to supporting Democrats -- or at least the younger ones. 'Stop being friggin' old,' said Cinnamon Boffa, 57, from Langhorne, Pennsylvania. As she recalled, she supported Biden in 2020 but voted only downballot last year, lamenting that 'our choices suck.' Teachey thought there was still room for seasoned politicians, but in many cases, it was time to get 'the boomers out of there.' He is increasingly inclined to support Democrats next year to check unfettered Republican power. 'They're totally far right,' he said of the GOP. 'Honestly, I don't identify with any party.' This article originally appeared in
CBS News
12 minutes ago
- CBS News
Judge set to decide on Alligator Alcatraz, groups argue irreparable harm to Everglades
The third day of a federal court hearing over environmental groups' attempt to halt the Alligator Alcatraz detention center ended Tuesday without a ruling. The groups are suing the state of Florida and the U.S. government, alleging the facility could cause "irreparable harm" to the Florida Everglades. "What we heard in (federal) court today really confirms the need for the public to see what's going on out there, to see the environmental disaster that is unfolding," said Eve Samples, executive director of Friends for the Everglades, one of the organizations that filed the lawsuit against the state of Florida, Miami-Dade County and the U.S. government. The groups are trying to convince U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams that the facility is a threat to the wildlife and wetlands of the Everglades. "She's heard all of our witnesses. She heard the state's one witness, who admitted on the stand that they only looked at one site, and there are plenty of sites with runways and facilities and with wells in the ground that could have supported something like Alligator Alcatraz," said Curtis Osceola from the Miccosukee Tribe. Environmentalists sued the Trump and DeSantis administrations for what they consider dodging a federal law that requires environmental review before initiating any construction in the Everglades. Attorneys for the U.S. government left federal court without making any comments about the hearing. According to Samples, Judge Williams made an announcement that left many stunned in the courtroom. "We heard Judge Williams, for the first time, that Judge Williams was apparently extended an invitation by Attorney General James Uthmeier for a site visit. However, the attorneys for the defense did not agree to comply with that invitation," Samples said. The hearing continues Wednesday, with closing arguments from both the plaintiffs and the defense scheduled to start at 10:30 a.m. A decision about halting construction and operation at Alligator Alcatraz is expected before the end of the day.
