
Defendant's mother testifies at murder trial
May 8—LIMA — Latoya McClellan, the mother of a Lima teenager on trial for murder, dominated the proceedings Thursday in her son's jury trial in Allen County Common Pleas Court.
McClellan was called to testify in the case of her son, Donya Perkins, but much of the significance of the woman's appearance took place outside the jurors' presence.
Perkins is charged with murder in the shooting death of Steve Smith, whose body was discovered in the early morning hours of July 16, 2023, in the 1000 block of Reese Avenue in Lima, near the home of McClellan and Perkins. McClellan and Smith were alleged to have been involved in a sexual relationship at the time.
McClellan was the state's first witness of the day, but prior to the start of testimony Thursday, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Josh Carp made a formal motion that the woman be declared a "court's witness." Carp said it had come to his attention that the defendant's mother "will testify differently" from statements she earlier had made to investigators and prosecutors.
Defense attorney Allison Hibbard, outside the presence of jurors, shared with Judge Jeffrey Reed information she had received that McClellan had threatened to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination if forced to testify, and that prosecutors had threatened her with a murder charge if she elected to do so.
Carp vehemently denied that allegation. He said that during a meeting Wednesday with the witness, "We (prosecutors) just asked her what her intentions were" upon taking the witness stand.
Hibbard also sparred with prosecutors over text messages that prosecutors planned to submit into evidence in which McClellan reportedly threatened to blow up Smith's house and to kill the Lima man. Prosecutors said, and Reed agreed, that rules of evidence would not allow the defense attorney to question McClellan about the alleged threats.
Hibbard explained, to no avail, that the purpose behind that line of questioning was "to develop an alternative defendant" in the case. The judge overruled her objection.
One event, several stories
McClellan was convicted of tampering with evidence in connection with Smith's death. She was sentenced in March 2024 to an 18-month prison term for hiding the firearm allegedly used by her son to shoot and kill Smith. She was recently released from prison and is now on parole.
Taking the witness stand Thursday morning, McClellan was questioned by prosecutors about statements she made to Lima Police Department Detective Steve Stechschulte on the morning after Smith's death. The woman admitted to jurors that some information she had given the detective about the night of the shooting were "probably not true" because she was nervous and scared. In other instances, she said she just outright lied.
McClellan told jurors that late on the evening of July 15, 2023, her son exited the family home at 403 E. Second St. with a gun in his pants after Smith knocked loudly on the front door of the residence. She said Smith was in the yard when Perkins exited the home "and then the gun went off." Asked by Carp if her son fired the gun, McClellan answered "yes."
The witness admitted upon cross-examination that her testimony in court did not match what she had said to Stechschulte because she had been "drinking and smoking marijuana" the prior evening.
Prosecutors wrapped up their case in chief with Stechschulte on the witness stand. Jurors watched two videotaped interviews between the detective and Perkins, including one which took place the morning after Smith's death. Perkins initially denied any knowledge in the events surrounding the shooting but changed his story after McClellan was briefly brought into the LPD interview room.
"Your mom told me everything. She just took me to where she said the gun was thrown. You just lied to me," the detective told Perkins on the video.
The defendant then gave his account of the incident, saying Smith was knocking on the door at the family home.
"He was trying to kick the door in, so I went outside. Me and him started fighting. He hit me and kept coming at me," Perkins said on the video.
Perkins said he pulled a pistol from his pants pocket and fired a random shot.
"I didn't even aim (the gun) at him," he said.
The jury is expected to receive the case and begin deliberations sometime Friday.
Featured Local Savings

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Murder trial for 'El Diablo' begins with opening statements
Jun. 11—Antonio Riano does not deny he shot Benjamin Becarra outside a Hamilton bar 20 years ago. But his defense attorneys this week will try to prove he did it in self defense. The murder trial for Riano, also known as 'El Diablo,' began today with opening statements after jurors were chosen Tuesday in a Butler County Common Pleas courtroom. The prosecution said the 63-year-old Mexican national said he ruthlessly shot the 25-year-old Becarra in the face on Dec. 19, 2024, with a .38 Smith & Wesson. The defense said Riano was at a breaking point, claiming he and his family were terrorized by the man he shot. Assistant prosecutor Michael Hon led the proceedings Wednesday with his opening statement before a jury of 12 and two alternates. The facts show that the two men were at the Round House Bar on East Avenue and Long Street. Riano was inside when Becarra walked through a door off Long Street. An argument ensued, which had continued outside the bar. Hon said Riano fired a shot into the ground, and Becarra told a cousin to call 911. Then Riano walked away, but turned back, and they continued arguing. A bystander from the bar stood between the two men, but Hon said Riano pulled out his gun, stretched his arm over that bystander, and shot Becarra in the face. Defense attorney Kara Blackney said the shooting was in self-defense, and told the jury her client had "enough." She said Becarra and his friends terrorized him and his family — he had a wife and three children under 10 at the time — and allegedly attacked his younger brother. "Antonio wasn't going to the Round House Bar looking for a fight," Blackney said, adding his "El Diablo" nickname stems from volunteer work for his church as a teenager. "The fight found him." Blackney said the shooting happened mid-afternoon on Dec. 19, 2004, and Becarra said his blood-alcohol level was three times the legal limit and tested positive for cocaine. She was also told he was not permitted in that bar, as well as others, due to a fight the day prior. Hon told the jurors that the evidence presented and the witnesses called "may seem out of order to you," mostly in part due to navigating schedules and travel of witnesses, "it will all come together at the end." Butler County authorities worked the case for two decades with federal authorities to bring Riano back to Hamilton on the murder charge. According to Blackney, Riano fled Hamilton, going to New Jersey before heading to Mexico, where he had lived for the past 20 years, including working as a police officer in his hometown. Riano was indicted on the murder charge in February 2005. He was extradited back to the United States with the help of the U.S. Marshals Office and other authorities on Aug. 1.

Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Queens moped rider, 25, fatally struck by wrong-way hit-and-run driver
A 25-year-old man riding a moped was fatally struck by a wrong-way hit-and-run driver in Queens, police said Wednesday. Antonio Smith-Ortiz was riding his gas-powered 2015 Honda PCX 150 moped east on 149th Ave. in South Ozone Park when he was struck near 121st St. by a driver going the opposite direction about 10:05 pm. Tuesday, cops said. The driver, who was going against traffic in the eastbound lane, then struck an unoccupied parked 2015 Ford Transit 350 Courier van before speeding off. Medics rushed Smith-Ortiz to Jamaica Hospital but he could not be saved. He lives in Ozone Park, according to cops. The driver has not been caught and cops have not yet been able to develop a vehicle description.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge rules in favor of Texas woman after SWAT destroyed her house while pursuing a fugitive
Five years after police destroyed cancer survivor Vicki Baker's house while pursuing a fugitive, a federal judge has ruled that the Texas city she used to call home must pay her for the damage. "I've continued fighting this long, because if this can happen to me, it can happen to anyone," Baker told Fox News Digital in an emailed statement. "This case has always been about more than the money for me. I want to see real change." Baker's ordeal started in July 2020, when she moved to Montana and was in the process of selling her home in McKinney, Texas. 'This Is Personal': Marine Veteran Reacts To Judgment On Federal Loophole Police Used To Seize His Cash Wesley Little kidnapped a 15-year-old girl, fled from police and took refuge in Baker's home. Police surrounded the house and Little eventually released the teen but refused to surrender, according to court documents. A SWAT team tried to draw him out by launching a barrage of tear gas canisters at the house, shattering windows and punching holes in walls. Read On The Fox News App When police finally entered the house, they discovered that Little had killed himself. Baker's daughter's Chihuahua was inside during the onslaught and was left blind, deaf and sick from the tear gas and explosions. The dog eventually had to be put down, Baker said. A hazmat crew disposed of almost everything inside the house because it was saturated with a toxic film from the teargas, according to court documents. Damage to the home totaled at least $50,000, according to Baker and her attorneys at the nonprofit civil liberties law firm Institute for Justice. But her insurance company refused to cover the bulk of the damage because her policy — like most — excludes damage caused by the government. Justice Department Halts Dea's Random Searches Of Airport Travelers After Report Finds 'Serious Concerns' Baker tried to file a property damage claim with the city of McKinney, but officials refused to pay, citing qualified immunity, a doctrine often used to shield police and other government agencies from being sued for violating people's rights or destroying property during the course of their work. The Institute for Justice sued under the Fifth Amendment and the Texas Constitution, arguing that police may have been authorized to seize Baker's home in the interest of pursuing a dangerous fugitive, but that they should have to pay her just like they would if the government seized a home to build a road or other infrastructure. A prolonged legal saga followed, with one federal judge ruling in 2022 that Baker should be compensated and a jury awarding her nearly $60,000 in damages. The following year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed her Fifth Amendment win. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case last year, but Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch acknowledged the high court has yet to address whether the government can require individuals to bear the cost of police actions. Last week, a U.S. district court judge ruled again that Baker is entitled to $59,656.59 plus interest under the Texas Constitution. "This ruling makes it clear that the Texas Constitution's promise of just compensation applies when police destroy innocent people's property, and that this entire lawsuit could have been avoided if the city simply did the right thing in the first place," IJ attorney Jeffrey Redfern, who represented Baker, said in an emailed statement to Fox News Digital. The City of McKinney is "evaluating its options for appealing this ruling," a spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital. The city previously offered to pay the full amount of the damage to settle the case, but Baker's team says they refused to settle unless the city also changed its policies to protect all homeowners from similar actions in the future. Redfern said he still hopes the Supreme Court will hear a case similar to Baker's in the future so "we can ensure that the United States Constitution also protects innocent property owners in cases like this." "I want to make sure that cities around the country are doing the right thing and paying just compensation to people in similar situations," Baker article source: Judge rules in favor of Texas woman after SWAT destroyed her house while pursuing a fugitive