logo
Defendant's mother testifies at murder trial

Defendant's mother testifies at murder trial

Yahoo09-05-2025

May 8—LIMA — Latoya McClellan, the mother of a Lima teenager on trial for murder, dominated the proceedings Thursday in her son's jury trial in Allen County Common Pleas Court.
McClellan was called to testify in the case of her son, Donya Perkins, but much of the significance of the woman's appearance took place outside the jurors' presence.
Perkins is charged with murder in the shooting death of Steve Smith, whose body was discovered in the early morning hours of July 16, 2023, in the 1000 block of Reese Avenue in Lima, near the home of McClellan and Perkins. McClellan and Smith were alleged to have been involved in a sexual relationship at the time.
McClellan was the state's first witness of the day, but prior to the start of testimony Thursday, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Josh Carp made a formal motion that the woman be declared a "court's witness." Carp said it had come to his attention that the defendant's mother "will testify differently" from statements she earlier had made to investigators and prosecutors.
Defense attorney Allison Hibbard, outside the presence of jurors, shared with Judge Jeffrey Reed information she had received that McClellan had threatened to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination if forced to testify, and that prosecutors had threatened her with a murder charge if she elected to do so.
Carp vehemently denied that allegation. He said that during a meeting Wednesday with the witness, "We (prosecutors) just asked her what her intentions were" upon taking the witness stand.
Hibbard also sparred with prosecutors over text messages that prosecutors planned to submit into evidence in which McClellan reportedly threatened to blow up Smith's house and to kill the Lima man. Prosecutors said, and Reed agreed, that rules of evidence would not allow the defense attorney to question McClellan about the alleged threats.
Hibbard explained, to no avail, that the purpose behind that line of questioning was "to develop an alternative defendant" in the case. The judge overruled her objection.
One event, several stories
McClellan was convicted of tampering with evidence in connection with Smith's death. She was sentenced in March 2024 to an 18-month prison term for hiding the firearm allegedly used by her son to shoot and kill Smith. She was recently released from prison and is now on parole.
Taking the witness stand Thursday morning, McClellan was questioned by prosecutors about statements she made to Lima Police Department Detective Steve Stechschulte on the morning after Smith's death. The woman admitted to jurors that some information she had given the detective about the night of the shooting were "probably not true" because she was nervous and scared. In other instances, she said she just outright lied.
McClellan told jurors that late on the evening of July 15, 2023, her son exited the family home at 403 E. Second St. with a gun in his pants after Smith knocked loudly on the front door of the residence. She said Smith was in the yard when Perkins exited the home "and then the gun went off." Asked by Carp if her son fired the gun, McClellan answered "yes."
The witness admitted upon cross-examination that her testimony in court did not match what she had said to Stechschulte because she had been "drinking and smoking marijuana" the prior evening.
Prosecutors wrapped up their case in chief with Stechschulte on the witness stand. Jurors watched two videotaped interviews between the detective and Perkins, including one which took place the morning after Smith's death. Perkins initially denied any knowledge in the events surrounding the shooting but changed his story after McClellan was briefly brought into the LPD interview room.
"Your mom told me everything. She just took me to where she said the gun was thrown. You just lied to me," the detective told Perkins on the video.
The defendant then gave his account of the incident, saying Smith was knocking on the door at the family home.
"He was trying to kick the door in, so I went outside. Me and him started fighting. He hit me and kept coming at me," Perkins said on the video.
Perkins said he pulled a pistol from his pants pocket and fired a random shot.
"I didn't even aim (the gun) at him," he said.
The jury is expected to receive the case and begin deliberations sometime Friday.
Featured Local Savings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why is a grand jury asking for e-cigarettes not to be sold at the Walker County Jail anymore?
Why is a grand jury asking for e-cigarettes not to be sold at the Walker County Jail anymore?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why is a grand jury asking for e-cigarettes not to be sold at the Walker County Jail anymore?

JASPER, Ala. (WIAT) — As a grand jury made the decision to indict Walker County Sheriff Nick Smith on charges of hiring uncertified personnel as deputies within his department, the group also took it on themselves to weigh in on an unrelated matter. While going through recommendations recently compiled by the grand jury, District Attorney Bill Adair read off one particular line regarding the Walker County Jail. 'Due to the number of recent arson charges attributed to e-cigarette misuse by inmates in the Walker County Jail, e-cigarettes pose a safety risk to the staff and inmates of the Walker County Jail,' Adair said during a press conference Tuesday morning. 'The grand jury recommends that e-cigarette sales to inmates at the Walker County Jail be discontinued and a safe alternative be substituted.' Chris Uptain, chief of the Jasper Fire & Rescue, said there have been at least two fires reported at the Walker County Jail within the last year that were caused by e-cigarettes. He didn't have a number for any fires reported last year. On November 17, 2021, Joe Brandon Thornton escaped from the Walker County Jail after he intentionally set a blanket on fire using a vape in his cell. He was caught two days later. Earlier this year on Jan. 21, another fire was reported at the jail. Using his personal Facebook profile, Smith said the fire was the result of a mattress that had caught on fire, although he didn't specify if it was caused by an e-cigarette. 'Many times, inmates will disassemble electrical components inside their cell to do this,' Smith wrote. 'Once the officer noticed the smoke they quickly evacuated the dorm and got all inmates to safety.' According to The Daily Mountain Eagle, the Walker County Commission was set to take up a motion to ban e-cigarettes at county facilities, but the issue was tabled in February after Smith brought up how e-cigarette sales from inmates alone generated an estimated $20,000 per month for the department. 'The store sales pay $120,000 per year for radios for us to communicate with, because the county did not go to the digital system when everyone was supposed to go to the digital radios many years ago,' Smith said. 'The Walker County Commission did not allocate funds for those purchases in our budget. In fact, the Walker County Commission has not purchased patrol cars for the sheriff's department since 2014. Those funds are paid through the jail store.' In the report, Smith was quoted as telling the commission that e-cigarettes had been sold at the jail for over a decade and that money generated from them went toward things like patrol cars, radios, bulletproof vests and more. The commission eventually passed a resolution banning e-cigarettes from being smoked inside all county buildings. However, the Walker County Jail was allowed to continue selling them, as long as inmates smoked outside. Elsewhere, e-cigarettes have presented unique problems in jail. In 2019, inmates at the Etowah County Jail used batteries and wires from e-cigarettes to burn a hole in a cell window. As a result, e-cigarettes were banned at the jail for 72 hours. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents
Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former GOP state Rep. Austin Smith, a Turning Point leader, indicted for forging election documents

Rep. Austin Smith, R-Surprise, on the floor of the Arizona House of Representatives on April 17, 2024. Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Former Republican state legislator Austin Smith has been indicted on 14 misdemeanor and felony counts for allegedly forging voter signatures on his petitions for reelection last year. Former member of the state legislature's far-right Arizona Freedom Caucus Smith dropped his reelection bid last spring after he was accused of personally forging more than 100 petition signatures to get on the 2024 Republican primary ballot. Around the same time, Smith resigned from his position as senior director at Turning Point Action, the political advocacy arm of Turning Point USA, a far-right organization based in Phoenix that aims to mobilize young conservatives. But according to Smith's Linkedin and X accounts, he was rehired in January as Turning Point Action's strategic director. Smith made his X account private, blocking his biographical information — including his job title — on the morning of June 10, after the news of his indictment was made public. A Maricopa County grand jury indicted Smith on June 2 on four felony counts, for presenting documents he knew were forged to the Arizona Secretary of State's Office, and 10 misdemeanor counts for personally forging the names of electors on his reelection petitions. The felonies each come with a 1-2 year prison sentence; the misdemeanors come with a six-month imprisonment. When the allegations of signature fraud became public in April 2024, Smith vehemently denied them, calling them 'ludicrous' and accusing Democrats of creating a 'coordinated attack' against him. However, 100 of the signatures on his petition to get on last year's Republican primary ballot, along with corresponding addresses, obviously look like they were all written by the same person. And some of the people whose names were on the petition told the court that they never signed it. Smith took no accountability for the allegedly fraudulent signatures and said that he dropped out of the race because didn't want to spend tens of thousands defending himself in the civil elections challenge — as well as a possible criminal case for forgery. Ironically, Smith was a member of the Arizona House of Representatives Municipal Oversight and Elections Committee, where he decried unproven election fraud in Maricopa County, and has even made jokes accusing county officials of mail-in ballot signature fraud on social media. 'Signature verification in Maricopa County is a joke,' Smith wrote on Twitter in May 2023. Smith was one of the many Arizona Republicans who falsely claimed without evidence that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from President Donald Trump. 'What happened on November 3rd, 2020 in Maricopa County continues to be a national disgrace and embarrassment,' Smith wrote on his website. 'Not only that, Austin believes it was criminal and will fight every day in the State Legislature to hold those responsible to account.' Multiple audits, including a highly partisan review orchestrated by Arizona Senate Republicans, found no discrepancies in the election. Fraud allegations made in court in the days and weeks following the 2020 election were all rejected because there was no evidence backing up the claims. Neither Turning Point USA Action nor Smith immediately responded to a request for comment. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony
He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

He called for election integrity, then was indicted for fraud. Oh, the irony

A former Arizona legislator who was one of the state's fiercest crusaders for so-called election integrity has been indicted on charges of election fraud. You cannot make this stuff up. Ex-Rep. Austin Smith, R-Wittmann, stands charged with 14 felonies and misdemeanors alleging he forged signatures on his nominating petitions to run for reelection last year. Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes announced the state grand jury indictment on June 10. Those who see a conspiracy behind every cactus will likely rush to Smith's defense, just as they rushed to defense of Arizona's fake electors. Just as they rushed to the defense of Arizonans and others who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to try to stop Congress from certifying the 2020 election. 'Patriots,' I believe they called the rioters. Now, they have a new cause célèbre. Smith was a rising star on the hard right, a member of the Arizona Freedom Caucus and a senior official in Turning Point Action, the political advocacy arm of Turning Point USA. But his political career went into freefall in April 2024 when a Democratic attorney filed a lawsuit challenging Smith's nominating petitions. The lawsuit claimed he forged 100 of the 826 signatures on petitions he circulated — signatures that 'bear a striking resemblance to Smith's' — and thus should be disqualified from running for office for the next five years, as state law requires. The lawsuit included sworn statements from two voters whose signatures appeared on Smith's petitions, saying they did not sign them. Lawsuits seeking to knock candidates off the ballot are common. What wasn't common was Smith's reaction. Rather than fighting the petition challenge, as is typical, Smith quickly dropped out of the race. Naturally, he played the Trump card, proclaiming himself the victim of a politically motivated plot by those who fear him. 'What I was (told) was this was a very intense effort to 'get me' and I needed to be prepared to spend tens of thousands of dollars to defend myself, not only against the civil elections matter, but most likely against some sort of criminal investigation that would be launched by those on the left who are unhappy with my politics,' he wrote in a lengthy statement laying out his victimhood. Smith never struck me as the type to stand down from a fight that he deems righteous. Surely, if those signatures were not forged, I thought at the time, he would stand his ground and explain why those signatures looked so remarkably like his own. Surely, if those signatures were not forged, I thought at the time, Charlie Kirk and his powerhouse Turning Point operation would defend one of his key leaders against the 'tyranny' of the justice system. Yet, there was Smith, high tailing it out of the race and leaving his post with Turning Point. Opinion: Gov. Hobbs finally goes on offense against lawmakers 'The recommendation I received most was that I bow out and live to fight another day,' he wrote at the time. 'I might be confident of victory, but all it would take is a judge believing any one person, and all would be lost.' All wasn't lost, though, as the suspected forger was allowed to continue on at the Legislature through the rest of last year, making laws for the rest of us to follow. Not so much as a single Republican raised an objection. Mayes, meanwhile, launched an investigation at the request of then-Maricopa County Supervisor Clint Hickman, a Republican. 'This is a man who has lied to the people of Legislative District 29 and the entire state about our election operations for at least three years,' Hickman said at the time. 'And now he is accused of lying about the signatures he personally collected to get on the ballot again. 'An investigation will reveal the truth, but this episode tells us something about those who have spread falsehoods with such ease since the 2020 Election. They can't comprehend that most Americans and Arizonans are honest people. They accuse others of dishonesty so easily because they have no qualms about lying to win a political race or a business deal.' On June 2, Smith was indicted for fraud, filing false instruments and 10 counts of signing someone else's name on his petitions to get on the ballot. That same day, Smith announced his appointment to the advisory board of the Arizona Young Republicans. Just think of the advice he can offer young generations of election deniers and conspiracy buffs. Expect to hear the heated cries of 'lawfare!' from the far right in five, four, three … Reach Roberts at Follow her on X (formerly Twitter) at @LaurieRobertsaz, on Threads at @LaurieRobertsaz and on BlueSky at @ Subscribe to today. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Austin Smith will call his indictment 'lawfare' in 3, 2 ... | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store