Texas may cut ties with ABA, But at what cost to future lawyers?
That promise, anchored by American Bar Association (ABA) accreditation, now stands on shaky ground.
The Texas Supreme Court is reconsidering a rule that, since 1983, has required aspiring attorneys to graduate from an ABA-accredited law school in order to take the state's bar exam. What began as a procedural review has evolved into a high-stakes debate over legal standards, political ideology, and the portability of professional degrees in a fractured nation.
At the heart of the issue lies a fundamental question: Should one state's skepticism of a national institution be allowed to redraw the career trajectories of thousands of future lawyers?
A rule under siege
The review was initiated by the Texas Supreme Court in April, weeks after Florida launched a similar move questioning ABA authority. The Florida Supreme Court, made up entirely of Republican appointees, pointed to concerns over the ABA's now-paused diversity mandate and its 'active political engagement' as reasons to reconsider the group's role in legal education.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Get ₹2Cr life cover@ ₹700 p.m.
ICICI Pru Life Insurance Plan
Get Quote
Undo
Texas, where all elected judges are Republican, has signaled a similar wariness. The court has yet to announce any final decision or timeline, but its actions have already sparked a sense of unease across law schools statewide.
The ABA, the nation's oldest and most influential legal accreditor, has faced increasing pushback in recent years, particularly from conservative leadership. Once regarded as a politically neutral authority, it is now often seen by its critics as straying into ideological territory.
That shift has led the federal government to revoke the ABA's power to vet judicial nominees and has barred federal attorneys from participating in ABA events.
Yet for law students and legal educators, this fight isn't about partisanship; it's about practical consequences.
Texas deans push back
In a united front, the deans of eight of Texas' ten ABA-accredited law schools sent a letter to the state's highest court urging it to maintain the requirement.
They argue that the ABA's accreditation process, though rigorous, offers consistency, transparency, and, most importantly, national mobility.
According to the National Association for Law Placement, roughly 12% of Texas law graduates from the Class of 2023 took jobs in other states. Without ABA accreditation, these graduates could find themselves ineligible to practice outside Texas, effectively boxed into a single state's jurisdiction.
For many, this loss of flexibility would be devastating.
The deans also emphasized the value the ABA brings in terms of data collection, outcome reporting, and public accountability. Stripping away this layer of oversight, they argue, would not only isolate Texas law graduates but could also undermine public trust in the legal education system itself.
A fractured consensus among legal leaders
Interestingly, not all voices from within Texas's legal education system are aligned.
Robert Chesney, dean of the University of Texas School of Law, the state's highest-ranked law school, chose not to sign the joint letter. Instead, he submitted a separate comment encouraging the court to explore alternative pathways, such as recognizing multiple accrediting bodies or allowing case-by-case exemptions.
Chesney's tone was cautious but forward-looking, acknowledging the need for innovation and cost reform while still stressing the importance of preserving national mobility for graduates.
His nuanced stance suggests a willingness to evolve, but not at the expense of opportunity.
Another notable absence came from Texas A&M Law Dean Robert Ahdieh, who also refrained from joining the group letter. Ahdieh later commented that while competitive pressures might improve the ABA's performance, safeguarding the ability of Texas law graduates to practice across the country must remain 'critical.'
The political underpinnings
Though framed as a policy review, the roots of this debate run deeper, into the broader political climate of mistrust in long-standing institutions.
The ABA, once an uncontroversial gatekeeper, has increasingly become a lightning rod in the national culture wars. Its stances on judicial independence, diversity, and rule-of-law norms have made it a target of conservative administrations.
Texas' potential departure from the ABA requirement may be less about educational outcomes and more about reshaping the legal landscape to reflect shifting political ideologies.
In doing so, it risks turning legal education into a patchwork of regional standards, with Texas charting a course that isolates its students rather than empowering them.
What's at stake for students?
Beneath the institutional battles and political rhetoric, students remain the most vulnerable stakeholders. Today's first-year law student in Texas may not know whether their degree will carry the same weight in New York or California when they graduate.
Employers outside the state may hesitate to hire, uncertain of the new standards. Prospective students, wary of a narrower future, may opt for schools elsewhere.
In effect, a Texas law degree, once seen as a passport to practice anywhere, could become a local credential with limited reach. This erosion of trust in portability could diminish the appeal of Texas law schools and discourage top talent from applying.
A precedent in the making
The Texas Supreme Court has yet to decide whether it will uphold, revise, or eliminate the ABA accreditation requirement.
But as it deliberates, legal educators, students, and national observers are watching closely.
Because what Texas decides won't just shape its own legal education system, it could trigger a broader reckoning over who gets to define professional standards in America.
If Texas chooses to walk away from the ABA, it won't just be challenging an institution, it may be redrawing the boundaries of legal opportunity itself.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Aasu, teachers unions urge govt to cancel reappt of retd teachers in colleges
1 2 Guwahati: The All Assam Students' Union (Aasu) and leading teachers' unions on Sunday urged the state govt to cancel reappointment of retired teachers in model colleges or any other govt-run educational institutions. Last week, representatives of several student bodies had held demonstrations in front of the state directorate of higher education, protesting against the decision to reappoint retired teachers in model colleges this year. In a joint meeting, convened by Aasu, with the teachers' unions, both the unions urged the govt to reconsider its decision to appoint retired teachers, terming it as 'unjust' decisions. The meeting included representatives from the Gauhati University Teachers' Association, Assam College Teachers' Association, Assam High School Teachers' Association and Assam State Primary Teachers' Association, among other teachers' associations. "After detailed discussions, the special educational meeting strongly opposed the notification issued for the recruitment of teachers in govt model colleges established by the Assam govt. The decision to appoint retired teachers, thereby depriving thousands of educated unemployed youth and forcing newly appointed young individuals to work for three years with a salary of only Rs 50,000, amidst uncertainty, was opposed by the meeting," Aasu president Utpal Sarma and general secretary Samiran Phukan said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo "The meeting clearly said that the probation system is unnecessary and opposed the govt's attempt to extend this decision to provincialized colleges and schools," the note further read. The meeting rejected the idea of appointing retired teachers to 50% of the teaching positions, citing the need for experienced teachers as a 'pretext for depriving unemployed youth'. "The decision to allocate two out of three teaching positions to retired teachers is not justified," Aasu said. The meeting advocated for advancement of model colleges through a blend of experience and innovation. For this, they suggested that in model colleges, in addition to the positions of assistant professors in each department, at least one associate professor position should be created. In this way, experienced teachers will be appointed to these associate professor positions, they claimed. "If the govt considers it essential to utilise the experience of retired teachers, they can be appointed as guest lecturers rather than as associate or assistant professors. However, this should not lead to the elimination of associate or assistant professor positions," the unions said. "If the govt feels the need for experienced individuals in administrative roles for NAAC, IQAC, etc., it can create an educational officer position in model colleges," they further suggested. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
It's time to buy India, not sell, says Jefferies' Wood
Christopher Wood MUMBAI: Christopher Wood, a leading analyst on emerging markets at global broking major Jefferies, has suggested that India should not bow to US President Donald Trump's pressure tactics relating to higher tariffs. He advised Jefferies' clients to buy India, rather than sell, given the current global situation. Wood also indicated that the way Trump is going against some of the world's largest economies, it would push at least the Brics-the block of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa-towards de-dollarisation. De-dollarisation refers to a trade process, where rather than using the US dollar as the currency for trade between two countries, the partners trade in a non-dollar currency. In his widely read newsletter titled Greed & Fear, Wood said that Jefferies would not view the previously discussed 50% tariff on Indian imports to the US as a reason to sell Indian equities. "Rather, it is probably a reason to buy them since Greed & Fear's view is that it is only a matter of time before Trump backs off the stance, which is not in America's interest. "On this point, it is worth noting that the track record makes it clear that it pays to stand up to the Donald," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Put Bananas in the Garden and Just Watch Life Wise Hub Undo Wood said Jefferies has almost always been significantly bullish on India in Greed & Fear's various portfolios, most particularly, its Asia ex-Japan long-only portfolio. He mentioned that a recent report by Jefferies India highlighted that the country has just suffered its biggest period of under-performance over the past 12 months in a global emerging market context spread over the past 15 years. "This is not a great surprise tactically, since Korea has ripped higher on value-up while Taiwan has of late been celebrating the massive capex spending by hyperscalers (the leading global tech companies currently on a spending binge). For India the problem has been high valuations and, most importantly, massive equity supply. This is why we have of late been running only a marginal overweight in India in the Asia Pacific ex-Japan relative-return portfolio," Wood wrote in his newsletter. Still, Jefferies India made an interesting point in the report: following previous such periods of under-performance, the Indian market tended to bounce on a relative basis. "Or, in other words, that it is now too late to cut India with valuations now back near the 10-year average 63% PE (price-earnings) premium over emerging market peers," Wood said. The Jefferies strategist also said that one of the principal reasons Brics countries are coming together again is because an effective foreign policy conduct for a major world power requires a conceptual framework and "this is what is conspicuously lacking in the current US administration. The 47th US president certainly has no such framework and is also bereft of an adviser who has one." "This has become only too starkly evident in the past several days as Trump has succeeded in bringing China, Russia, India and Brazil together like never before. Indeed, Brics as a grouping has been regalvanised," he observed in the newsletter. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Audio abusing Jr NTR not mine, says TDP MLA Daggubati Venkateswara Prasad
Tirupati: Anantapur TDP legislator Daggubati Venkateswara Prasad has landed in controversy after alleged audio tapes surfaced in which he reportedly made derogatory remarks against prominent Tollywood actor Jr NTR . The audio, which went viral on various social media platforms on Sunday, sparked a strong backlash from the actor's fans. The tapes reportedly feature a conversation between Venkateswara Prasad and Anantapur TNSF president and NTR fans' association representative Gutha Dhananjay Naidu, allegedly recorded ahead of the release of the Hrithik Roshan–Jr NTR starrer War-2. In the conversation, the ruling party MLA purportedly makes offensive comments about Jr NTR and even threatens to halt the screening of War-2, which was scheduled for release on Aug 14 in theatres across Anantapur constituency. Following the leak, angry fans of Jr NTR staged protests at the MLA's office in Anantapur and tore down his posters and banners in several locations across the constituency. Despite the police arriving to control the situation, tensions remained high, with fans entering into heated altercations with law enforcement. Many fans, recalling their role in the MLA's victory during the 2024 general elections, questioned how he could make such remarks against Jr NTR and threaten the film's release. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo Demanding an unconditional apology, Jr NTR's fans strongly condemned the MLA's statements. Amid escalating outrage, the MLA released a video on Sunday in which he apologised to Jr NTR's fans. While maintaining that the voice in the viral tape was not his, Venkateswara Prasad said, "This is a big conspiracy against me. My political adversaries have been targeting me for the last few days, and this is yet another attempt to defame me." He added that he had lodged a formal complaint with the Anantapur Superintendent of Police and urged authorities to identify those behind the audio leak. "I myself am a fan of the Nara–Nandamuri families," he claimed in his video statement. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
