The 12 days when an escaped eagle entranced the nation
Twelve days in 1965 saw the general public gripped by the exploits of a fugitive bird, a golden eagle that had escaped from London Zoo in Regent's Park.
The bird, in an inevitable shorthand created by the press, was given the sobriquet "Goldie", as he became headline news.
He had managed to swoop from his cage when the keeper who cleaned out the enclosure was a little lax in ensuring he'd closed the door properly.
Goldie spent his freedom soaring above the park, with brief forays into other parts of the capital.
Drivers caused traffic jams as they slowly circled the park, gazing at the sky; reporters attempted to capture the bird with a variety of novel methods, the Royal Navy was consulted, firefighters and the Civil Defence Service were roped in to help.
The early days of 1965 were bitterly cold, with a low of -7.4C recorded in London at the beginning of March. There was heavy snowfall, occasional blizzards and a biting easterly wind.
In terms of what was going on, Winston Churchill died, Harold Wilson survived a vote of no confidence as prime minister and the Beeching Report into the railways was published.
The Kray twins were arrested and both the Righteous Brothers and Cilla Black were in the top 10 with You've Lost That Lovin' Feelin'.
Malcolm X was assassinated and US President Lyndon B Johnson widened his country's involvement in the Vietnam War.
Crowds, many with a newfound (self-proclaimed) expertise in ornithology, braved the wintry weather to gather with picnics to observe, and, less wholesomely, to throw snowballs at the eagle.
Thousands wrote letters to suggest ways of capturing Goldie, including "get a gun that shoots a net" and "use archers to fire drugged meat into the air".
One woman, it was reported, turned up with a giant telescope "handed down from Trafalgar by some nautical ancestor".
And a BBC news reporter grasped the rare opportunity to try to woo him from the skies by whistling a magic pipe.
Experts were largely unbothered by Goldie's continued refusal to return to the zoo, knowing he would come down "once he gets hungry".
A zoo-keeper explained: "The crowds are too big. He's just under observation today. We are keeping vigil."
The hordes of people going to the park were more trouble.
One park-keeper was heard to grumble it was "like a great big bank holiday scene".
Couples with "baskets of bottled beer and blankets", children wildly misidentifying pigeons and press photographers resignedly legging it around the grass in an attempt to get their shot all added to the chaos.
The Times described a "fashionable Sunday excursion" where the "crowd streamed from every gate of the park, and with upturned faces and loud voices had intimate discussions about Goldie's mating habits, his digestion, and his ferocity".
The bird-keepers from the zoo said if they could stop Goldie eating for another two or three days they might have a reasonable chance of luring him down when the park was less congested.
And this philosophy of letting Goldie stay where he was until he was hungry seemed to be a good one - until he started to show hitherto unsuspected initiative.
The giant bird - he had a wing span of six feet - first set his sights on a Cairn terrier.
The dog's owner, it was reported, managed to scare Goldie away by vigorously waving copies of the Times and the Express at him - although why she had two daily papers with her was never addressed.
The fierceness of the defence obviously stayed with Goldie - he later saw a poodle and hastily flew away.
Not so lucky, though, were the Muscovy ducks that graced the pond of the US ambassador's residence in Regent's Park, Winfield House.
Goldie's duck meal, however, was disturbed by a helpful reporter, who thought he would throw his coat over the eagle in an attempt to delay him on the ground and facilitate his capture.
Goldie just soared off into the snow-laden wind, leaving behind half a duck - and a jacket soiled with a bird's displeasure.
The coat-thrower was not the only news reporter hoping to become part of the story.
For the BBC, John Timpson - best known for presenting the Today programme - turned up with an instrument he had, with astonishing foresight, picked up while covering the Queen's recent trip to Ethiopia.
He described his "Ethiopian bird pipe" as having two mouthpieces, one of which would produce a sound that would make a bird raise one leg, and the other mouthpiece the other leg.
Blowing on both sides, he explained, should cause the golden eagle to fall from the skies in a sort of daze.
So he gave it a go.
A fairly reedy warble emerged, which Goldie ignored.
The methods used by exasperated zoo-keepers included trying to dazzle the bird with a fire brigade searchlight before nabbing him when he was distracted.
However, as reported by the Mirror: "The ploy failed when Goldie's eagle-eye spotted the turn-table... He seems to be having the time of his life."
Efforts to capture him were further hindered by members of the public, "shouting and flapping their winter coats" to warn Goldie - whom they assumed wanted to stay on the loose - when they thought a tamer was getting too close.
After 12 days of freedom in the park, the deputy head keeper of birds of prey at the zoo, Joe McCorry, lured the eagle with a dead rabbit tied to a rope near one of Goldie's favourite haunts, the wildfowl sanctuary.
An hour and a half later, Goldie swooped down for his last picnic as a free bird.
The keeper quietly walked up and caught him with his bare hands, secured his legs and took him back to the zoo.
It was subsequently reported Goldie's adventure - and associated publicity - led to a surge in visitor numbers.
The Times estimated about 5,000 people flocked to Regent's Park to have a look at Goldie.
In Parliament, the Minister of Public Building and Works, Charles Pannell, said he was concerned "not with the damage done by Goldie, but the damage done in the park by the many onlookers".
Goldie was also brought up in the House of Commons - in relation to game licences, and also in a question about pesticides: "Does the Hon Gentleman realise that Goldie was safer in Regent's Park than he was in the Highlands of Scotland, because there were no pesticides in Regent's Park?"
The mentions are fairly humdrum in themselves - but worth noting because every time Goldie was mentioned, MPs would cheer, whoop and whistle, in that special way that is peculiar to MPs in the Commons.
Goldie would escape again, for five days in December 1965. Once again, he managed to nip out as the zoo-keeper left after cleaning his enclosure.
This time people were asked to stay away from Regent's Park.
Goldie's mate, Regina, had her own adventure when she was snatched the following February by student pranksters at Manchester University who sawed through a padlock to access the cage.
They had, it later transpired, thought they had taken Goldie.
Regina was found in a tea-chest punctured with airholes outside the student union before being taken back to London.
The jokers were described as "stupid, irresponsible clots".
Regina enjoyed a raw beef late-night snack and was back to share her travails with Goldie by breakfast time.
Goldie was eventually sent to a bird of prey centre in Newent, Gloucestershire, where he died in 1986.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3508696.stm
Endangered parrots Lily and Margot escape London Zoo
Exotic bird of prey continues to elude zookeepers
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Navy vet's daughter remains in ICE detention despite US citizenship claims
[Source] A Filipino woman has been detained at a Georgia immigration facility since March after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested her during a routine check-in, despite her family's assertion that she is a U.S. citizen. Catch up Alma Bowman, 58, was arrested by ICE on March 26 during a scheduled appointment at the Atlanta Field Office, where she reportedly came in a wheelchair accompanied by her children and legal representatives. ICE then moved her that day to Stewart Detention Center in Lumpkin, Georgia, run by private contractor CoreCivic, and began deportation proceedings to the Philippines. Bowman's father, Lawrence Bowman, served in the U.S. Navy and was stationed in the Philippines during the Vietnam War. She was born there in 1966 before her family relocated to the U.S. when she was 10. She has resided in Macon, Georgia, for almost five decades. Federal authorities reportedly revoked her permanent residency after a criminal conviction two decades ago for check fraud involving $1,200, which she repaid. Trending on NextShark: What her family is saying Bowman was previously detained by ICE for nearly three years from 2017 to 2020 — during the first Trump administration — and testified about unauthorized medical procedures at the now-shuttered Irwin County Detention Center. Now, her sons John and Chris describe severe family trauma. 'There have been a couple of times I come in her room, and it feels like I can't breathe,' John told Atlanta News First. She instructed them to sell her action figure collection if deported. 'I couldn't do it,' Chris added. 'It would feel like giving up on her.' Trending on NextShark: U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) calls the detention illegal. 'She's an American citizen,' he said. 'The fact that one of her parents was an American means that she is an American.' Meanwhile, family attorney Samantha Hamilton of the Asian Americans Advancing Justice argues ICE violated Policy 16001.2, which prohibits detaining potential U.S. citizens. This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Trending on NextShark: Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. ! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!


USA Today
9 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump's mass deportation scheme is an insult to all of us
Trump's mass deportation scheme is an insult to all of us | Opinion This is not the America immigrants who actually contribute to society, have the right documentation, show character and continue to play by the rules of the nation's immigration process deserve. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump administration detains Vietnamese who came as refugees after war After the Vietnam War ended 50 years ago, Republican and Democratic administrations shielded refugees from deportation. Donald Trump is changing that. As a nation, we shouldn't have to worry about a young man like Esro Garcia Mendez, the son of immigrants and a first-generation high school graduate in Florida's Palm Beach County. Mendez' character is evident. Instead of celebrating with friends after receiving his diploma, he rushed to HCA Palms West Hospital to be with his ailing father. Imagine a father's joy in sharing such a special moment. Esro kept a 4.0 grade-point average on the way to finishing high school, a goal he and his family shared as they clearly understood the importance of a high school degree. He doesn't want to stop there. He wants to enlist in the U.S. armed forces, another first that he believes will also make his family and community proud. Although his future seems bright, there's cause for concern. Trump's mass deportation scheme targets good people Specifically, there simply may be too many good folk like Mendez who will get needlessly ensnared in President Donald Trump's administration's mass deportation scheme that touts making numbers. Trump wants to deport 1 million immigrants a year, according to The Washington Post. According to NBC News, Trump officials have pushed the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency to pick up the pace by arresting 3,000 immigrants a day, an unpractical rate that will most likely include legal residents and U.S. citizens. Opinion: Manufacturing down, food expensive and ICE is deporting moms. Happy now, MAGA? Like those old Florida speed traps that coincidently popped up when some local official decides to make easy marks out of unsuspecting motorists, arrests, detainment and deportation seem more of a numbers game than sound public policy. Rule of law? Habeas corpus? How quaint. This White House is more ready to fend off pesky news coverage than to ensure anybody nabbed as a suspected illegal immigrant gets their day in court before deportation. This rush to meet numbers at the expense of decency, fair play, even legality, hurts ... us. How do you even prepare to talk about deportation? As a teenager taking the family car out on a Friday night, I can remember my dad telling me to obey local traffic laws and how to act if I were stupid enough to get pulled over by the police. There was no Black Lives Matter back then, cops weren't routinely shooting Black motorists at traffic stops, and the conversation didn't have a convenient "The Talk" label. Still, my parents did their job in trying to protect their wayward son. I did the same for mine, in far harsher times. Opinion: Dems can make all the demands they want on ICE arrests. They won't get answers. I can't imagine what the equivalent of The Talk is right now for anyone who can be considered a suspect for deportation. I mean, what steps can you take to prepare yourself when culture, dialect and skin color can make you a target, whether you're attending school, going to work or leaving church? What do you do when so-called rights don't apply? Keep your papers on you at all times? Don't make sudden moves in reaching for those papers? Know a good lawyer, the deportation equivalent of Benjamin Crump? Prepare your family in advance for self-deportation, if necessary? Could any of that have helped Maurilio Ambrocio, an evangelical pastor, father of five and landscaper living in the Tampa area? Outstanding member of the community. No criminal record. Arrested and detained. Or Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez, 20, in Tallahassee, charged with illegally entering Florida as an "unauthorized alien" despite having a U.S. birth certificate? Arrested and detained. It appears almost any "person of color" in the free state of Florida can get arrested, detained and possibly deported. How do we explain to anyone, much less rationalize to ourselves, how people are being snatched up only to "disappear" before being sent to El Salvador, South Sudan or God knows where else? This is not the America immigrants who actually contribute to society, have the right documentation, show character and continue to play by the rules of the nation's immigration process deserve. It's neither the type of country that befits its citizens who are quick to boast of freedom and liberty. We can't keep addressing a complex problem of immigration by simply trying to meet unrealistic deportation numbers. That should be an affront to us all. For the sake of Esro Garcia Mendez and so many like him, we must do better. Douglas C. Lyons is an editorial writer and columnist for The Palm Beach Post, where this column originally published. He can be reached at dclyons@


The Hill
5 days ago
- The Hill
Ukraine's war will be won by soldiers, not speeches
In the old days, you turned on the television to get the news. If the antenna was properly connected, a presenter would deliver what the editors wanted you to hear. Things have changed. Today, modern TVs let us switch quickly between bulletins, letting us cross-examine the news. Then there are mobile phones, tablets, laptops and dozens of social networks filled with statements from world leaders, analysts and bloggers. So, do we really understand the true background of political confrontations any better than we did during the Vietnam War or the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? Are the motives of presidents and prime ministers more transparent? How much can we trust the public words or social media posts of world leaders? They're often contradictory and inconsistent — politicians seem to forget what they said yesterday and rarely consider what they'll say tomorrow. At least, that's how it looks from Ukraine. Just days before Russia's full-scale invasion, Russian President Vladimir Putin denied any plans to attack. In October 2022, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky called negotiations with Russia 'impossible'; by this May, he was waiting in Turkey for peace talks with Putin that never happened. Donald Trump dismissed his campaign promise to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours as an 'exaggeration' and 'said in jest.' Such behavior from politicians has become the norm. The European Union and United Kingdom issued theatrical warnings of tougher sanctions against Russia but mostly focused their 17th package on targeting 200 vessels from Moscow's so-called 'shadow fleet.' I stopped reading official statements long ago — they lose meaning before reaching the media. But I had hoped personal talks might carry weight. That's why I awaited the Zelenskyy-Putin meeting in Istanbul and the Trump-Putin call. After a while, news broke that Trump had spoken with Putin. What did they talk about? Reuters reported: peace in Ukraine. Period. Trump called the tone 'excellent' and suggested the Pope as host. Putin muttered about a 'possible memorandum' and 'principles' of settlement. No dates, no names, no clauses — just fog. That's when I realized I wouldn't look to leaders' speeches to understand when this war will end. Before and after their talk, the front lines remained unchanged. Ukrainian defenders repel furious Russian attacks, losing lives but holding their spirit. Air raids continue. Russia recently launched its largest drone attack yet: 273 drones in one night. For some time, Kyiv was quiet — a small miracle in the middle of the war. Early in the morning, well-rested and unusually relaxed, I saw a lone soldier hauling backpacks. He looked like he'd been carrying war on his back. I offered to help him, and he accepted. As we loaded his things into the matte, gray-green pickup truck, I asked how things were, and he said simply, 'Bad. Bloody bad. But we'll win.' His certainty stood in stark contrast to the endless political speculation by pundits reacting to Trump, Putin, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz or U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Or, should I say, it stays. Analysts discuss in chorus, speculating endlessly — but can anyone see the full picture? Is there space for that soldier's quiet 'we'll win'? Putin's position hasn't changed: He demands Russia's right to Crimea and four Ukrainian regions, insisting Ukraine enshrine annexations constitutionally. No negotiation without that. Washington has no leverage. Zelensky, boxed in by Trump's biased arbitration, must accept capitulation — or not. But even if he wanted to, most Ukrainians would reject such a deal. The nation might let go of Crimea and Donbas, lost earlier, but yielding newly occupied regions is a red line. That's why Trump's negotiations are dead on arrival. Pressuring Zelensky is futile. Trump won't or can't pressure Putin. Trump's threat to cut military aid won't change Ukraine's course. The country won't surrender or collapse; it will bleed more, adding to the 'millions of people dead' Trump claims to mourn. A Ukrainian defeat would devastate Ukraine and deal a fatal blow to Trump's credibility. Speculation that Trump might convince Europe to abandon Zelensky is hollow. Europe, left to fend for itself, stands firm, preparing to turn Ukraine into a fortress — a 'steel hedgehog' that no enemy can digest, as Ursula von der Leyen once said. Neither Britain, France, Germany, nor any major power will step back. The war goes on. America's modest arms deliveries continue; Europe slowly scales up military support. The status quo is locked. Russia lacks the strength to break through; Ukraine can't afford to retreat. Trump cannot abandon either side, not after his loud declarations. This deadlock will hold unless one side gains overwhelming strength. Many analysts say time favors Russia: more manpower, weapons and economy. But Ukrainian soldiers see it differently: 'We'll win.' Why do I believe them, despite logic, exhaustion and despair? Because their conviction echoes the resolve of most Ukrainians, including me. We have no right to capitulate. Too many refuse to live ashamed of losing this war. It began as a fierce defense of our land against brutal aggression. It has become a test of endurance, demanding every last reserve of strength, costing hundreds of thousands of lives. It cannot end in disgrace, surrendered ground and raised hands. That's what Trump and Putin don't understand. They see Zelensky as a stubborn obstacle but don't see the millions behind him ready to fight until the enemy bleeds out. With or without Western support, this disgraceful ending will not happen in Ukraine. Kyiv didn't fall in two weeks in 2022 — not because Putin's tanks got 'stuck in the mud,' as Trump says, but because of Ukrainian strategy and heroism. Peace didn't come in 24 hours, didn't come from Istanbul negotiations and won't come from phone calls between Washington and Moscow. The war won't end because the White House calls it a 'bloodbath' or the Kremlin says 'Russia is for a peaceful settlement.' War's winners and losers are decided on the battlefield. More than three years in, what do we see? Russia, which Trump falsely called '20 times' the size of Ukraine, spends months taking yards of ground, littering the soil with corpses. Yes, numbers matter, but conviction matters more. There was unwavering conviction in that soldier's words. That's why I believe him and not politicians who imagine they hold all the cards. The battlefield is not a gaming table. The real winner will wear military camouflage, sweaty and bloody, with the yellow and blue emblem of Ukraine, existing as long as soldiers believe in victory. Sergey Maidukov is a Ukrainian author with a particular focus on cultural and political dynamics in post-Soviet space.