After HC contempt warning, CMC commissioner assures to enforce stay on vending zone work
1
2
3
4
5
6
Cuttack: After Orissa high court warned of contempt action, commissioner of Cuttack Municipal Corporation (CMC) on Friday assured to enforce the stay order on the construction of a vending zone along the boundary wall of the second campus of Madhusudan Law University (MLU) at Jobra here.
The vacation bench of Justices S K Sahoo and M S Sahoo observed, "We are of the view that on the face of records, it appears that the commissioner, CMC has flouted the order of this court dated May 20 as the construction of shop rooms that was initiated by the CMC was directed to be stopped. The commissioner is responsible for the acts of commission and omission that have happened after the orders were passed in his presence.
"
"Law is well settled that whenever there is a deliberate flouting of the order of the court, it amounts to contempt and it becomes the duty of the court to exercise its inherent power to set the wrong right as a party cannot be permitted to perpetuate the wrong by disobeying the order further," the bench warned.
"When the order was passed on May 20 in the presence of the CMC commissioner, it was nonetheless his bounden duty to see that no one should flout the same," the bench observed, adding, "It is unfortunate that no steps have been taken immediately by the authorities concerned to prevent such activities and as stated by the CMC commissioner 'hooligans' have dared to violate the orders of this court."
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Free P2,000 GCash eGift
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
CMC commissioner Anam Charan Patra, who was present in virtual mode, assured to enforce the court's stay order by taking necessary steps to protect the entire area immediately. He said barbed wire fencing with iron/concrete pillars will be installed to prevent vending/other activities there.
Taking it on record, the bench directed the CMC commissioner to file a detailed affidavit regarding the steps taken to carry out the court's May 20 order when the matter is taken up for hearing on June 30.
Three students — Aroop Kumar Deo, Sarvani Sahoo and Ambika Prasad Jena — filed a PIL seeking intervention against construction of the vending zone.
Though the PIL was scheduled for June 30, the vacation bench took it up on Friday after advocate Prasanna Kumar Nanda, representing the petitioners, made urgent mention alleging that vending zone construction was going on in violation of the court's May 20 stay order.
Later on special notice, Patra and DCP (Cuttack) Khilari Rishikesh Dnyandeo appeared through virtual mode.
Inspector in-charge of Malgodown police station, Suprasanna Kumar Mallick, also joined from the spot where the construction activities were allegedly going on in contravention of the interim order. Mallick showed live video footage of the construction that involved covering some portion of the vending zone cabins with galvanised iron roof.
Patra expressed helplessness and conceded that some hooligans have started construction in violation of the court's order. Expressing displeasure, the bench said that from such submission of CMC commissioner, it is apparent that the allegations made by the counsel for the petitioners are "prima facie correct".
DCP (Cuttack) also assured to ensure compliance of the court's interim order in letter and spirit and anyone who tries to violate it shall be appropriately dealt with in accordance with law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Communal post case: Influencer Sharmishtha Panoli gets bail by Calcutta HC; to furnish bail bond of Rs 10,000
Sharmishtha Panoli (File photo) NEW DELHI: The Calcutta high court on Thursday granted interim bail to social media influencer and law student Sharmishtha Panoli, nearly a week after her arrest for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through an Instagram video. Panoli was arrested on May 30. The high court directed Panoli to furnish a bond worth Rs 10,000. The 22-year-old, who was taken into custody by Kolkata Police from Gurugram last Friday, had been sent to judicial custody by a local court in Kolkata till June 13. However, her legal team moved the high court seeking relief, arguing that the case was a matter of free speech and that Panoli had already removed the controversial video and issued an apology. Her counsel, Md Samimuddin, said the court directed the state to ensure Panoli receives basic amenities while in custody, noting that such provisions were currently lacking. 'The High Court has also instructed the authorities not to register any fresh FIRs on the same cause of action,' he added. The arrest stemmed from a complaint filed by Wajahat Khan Qadri at the Garden Reach police station in Kolkata. He accused Panoli of sharing 'communal' content in a video discussing Bollywood's silence on 'Operation Sindoor'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like New Launch at Godrej Sector 12 | Luxurious 3 & 4 BHK Homes @₹2.91 Cr* Godrej Majesty Book Now Undo However, police have since registered an FIR against Qadri himself for allegedly posting inflammatory content online. He is now absconding, officers confirmed. Sharmishtha's arrest sparked backlash from legal circles. Manan Kumar Mishra, Chairman of the Bar Council of India, called it a 'grave miscarriage of justice' and accused the West Bengal government of selectively enforcing laws based on community identity.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NewJeans refuses to reach a mutual agreement with ADOR amid the contract dispute case; cites breaking of trust and mistreatment
The NewJeans and ADOR case has taken a completely new turn as the second court hearing was held. The contractual dispute between NewJeans and their management agency has been going on for months, with their second hearing for the case only held recently. In new reports, the K-pop group has refused to reach and negotiate any 'mutual agreements,' citing mistreatment. NewJeans refuses negotiations for mutual agreement In the second hearing half for the dispute case held on June 4, girl group NewJeans completely refused to reach a mutual settlement with their management agency. According to reports in Maeil Business Newspaper, the group was recommended by the 41st Civil Agreement Division of the Seoul Central District Court to reach a settlement with their former agency in order to put the overall case to rest. At the hearing, the girl group completely refused to reach any kind of settlement with the company. ADOR, on the other hand, has expressively made comments that they are willing and open for any kind of mutual settlement talks with the girl group. In a statement they shared that 'once the court's conclusion comes out, a settlement will be easier afterward." Unable to settle due to mistreatment The group cited that due to the trust that has been broken, they cannot settle for any mutual agreement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo They also shared that the decision is also influenced by the kind of mistreatment they had to undergo during their time with the management company. In a short statement, NewJeans stated that "trust has been completely broken. There's no turning back." They have also shared that their management did not protect the girls from favoritism and partiality, sharing that this went against their contract and that the company was in breach of it. NewJeans' legal representative also issued a statement after being asked by the court whether the girls would be willing to negotiate a settlement deal. In the statement, their legal representative replied with, "The defendants' mental conditions and such things do not seem to be in a situation where we can think of an agreement at this time." More about NewJeans' legal dispute The contractual dispute case has been going on since November last year. The group and their management agency went into a legal battle as the group announced the termination of their contract with the company during a press conference. Their management then later on filed a lawsuit against the group, citing that "just because you unilaterally claim that trust has been broken cannot be a reason for termination." The court later ruled in the company's favor, barring the girls from holding any solo and independent activities under their group name. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Was Jeffrey Epstein the reason behind Melinda French Gates' divorce from Bill Gates?
Did Jeffrey Epstein kill himself, or was it a cold-blooded murder? Finally, there's an answer to that long-looming question. After years of conspiracy theories and speculations over Epstein's death, the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) Deputy Director Dan Bongino revealed on Wednesday that there is nothing in the infamous American financier's file that might indicate that he died by any other way than suicide. While alive, Epstein ruined countless lives with his sexual abuse and sex-trafficking activities. The exact number of Epstein's victims remains uncertain, but estimates suggest that over 250 individuals were subjected to his abuse. However, those were not the only ones impacted by Epstein. Turns out, he had a massive contribution to the divorce of Melinda French Gates, who called it quits with Microsoft founder Bill Gates after 27 years of marriage. What happened? In May 2021, Melinda French Gates and Bill Gates announced their divorce after 27 years of marriage, sending shockwaves through the philanthropic and tech worlds. While the couple cited irreconcilable differences, Melinda has since revealed that Bill's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein played a significant role in the dissolution of their marriage. A deepening rift The relationship between the Gates and Epstein began in 2011, after Epstein had served a 13-month sentence for soliciting prostitution from a minor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tecno Pova Curve 5G - India's Slimmest 5,500mAh Curve TECNO Mobile Buy Now Undo Bill Gates met Epstein to discuss philanthropy, but Melinda was uncomfortable with the association. In 2013, she reportedly warned Bill about his meetings with Epstein, describing them as a "turning point" in their relationship. In a 2022 interview with CBS Mornings, Melinda stated, 'I did not like that he'd had meetings with Jeffrey Epstein. I made that clear to him.' She also recounted meeting Epstein once and finding him 'abhorrent' and 'evil personified,' an encounter that left her with nightmares. The final straw Reports suggest that Melinda began consulting divorce lawyers in October 2019, around the same time the New York Times reported on Bill's meetings with Epstein, including an overnight stay at Epstein's New York mansion. These revelations were reportedly a catalyst for Melinda's decision to end the marriage. The aftermath: While Epstein's role in the Gates divorce is a significant factor, it was not the sole reason. Melinda has indicated that there were multiple issues that contributed to the end of their marriage. However, Epstein's involvement undeniably played a pivotal role in their decision to part ways. The retrospection: After the divorce, Bill Gates has expressed regret time and again over his association with Epstein, acknowledging it as a 'substantial error in judgment.' In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, the Microsoft co-founder admitted that his decision to meet with the late convicted sex offender was 'foolish'. Gates explained that his initial interactions with Epstein were motivated by the hope of leveraging the financier's connections to support global health initiatives. However, he acknowledged the meetings were unwise and ineffective. "In retrospect,' Gates told WSJ, 'I was foolish to spend any time with him. And he, sort of, got time with various people by spending time with other people.' He added, "So yes, I think I was quite stupid. I thought it would help me with global health philanthropy. In fact, it failed to do that it was just a huge mistake." On the other hand, Melinda claimed the relationship had 'reached fever pitch' after the New York Times released a damning report on his connections to Epstein. She shared that the article about Epstein, whom she referred to as 'evil personified' in the interview, 'raised serious questions about Bill's conduct—questions that suggested he had betrayed not only our marriage but also our values." Following the divorce, Melinda has focused on her philanthropic efforts through Pivotal Ventures, an investment and charitable firm she founded. She has committed to advancing women's rights and participation in various sectors, including politics and business. Bongino updated Fox News on the investigation into the Epstein file, as conspiracies continue to float that he was murdered in prison, and said, "The evidence we have in our files clearly indicates that it was, in fact, a suicide. We do have video. It's not the greatest video in the world. I don't want to set expectations on fire." Bongino added, "However, the video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there. There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide." One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
