Former U.S. Official Michael Rubin Challenges Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir and Opposes Donald Trump's Stance on India
The controversy centres on Field Marshal Asim Munir's recent remarks threatening that if Pakistan 'goes down, it would take half the world down' with it. According to reports, the comments were made at a meeting in Tampa, Florida in the presence of some US military officials.
Donald trump India stance has formally condemned Pakistan army chief Munir's threat of a nuclear war. The Foreign Ministry said that nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade and it was unfortunate that such a statement was made from the soil of a friendly third country.
Rubin said a future US government may have to send special operations forces into Pakistan to protect its nuclear weapons. "We can't take the consequences of that as a given," he said. "We have to recognize the strategic level game being played here."
One of his key points was that Pakistan's nuclear threats could give a false sense of security to terrorist elements that they could 'go rogue' with nuclear weapons. He said Pakistan is a different challenge altogether than diplomatic spats.
"The US sees this largely in terms of grievance without seeing the ideological underpinnings," he added. "Asim Munir is the manifestation of a more institutionalized face of that."
Rubin also noted that Munir's remarks are 'raising in the minds of many' whether Pakistan can meet the requirements of being a state.
'The Field Marshal's rhetoric is reminiscent of what we've heard from the Islamic State,' he stated.
Rubin has previously advocated what he called 'managed decline' for Pakistan, which he suggested should include other countries recognizing Balochistan, a movement for an independent Balochistan within Pakistan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Rijiju Hits Out at Opposition Over Unruly Scenes, Paper Throwing in Lok Sabha
After Munir's Nuclear Threats, Pakistan Begs India To Release Water, Restore Indus Water Treaty Pakistan has gone from issuing nuclear threats to pleading with India for water. Days after its Army Chief Asim Munir warned of nuclear war and Bilawal Bhutto issued a war cry over rivers, Islamabad has urged New Delhi to resume the Indus Water Treaty—suspended by India after the Pahalgam terror attack. Pakistan's Foreign Office 'welcomed' a Court of Arbitration interpretation, claiming it supports Pakistan's rights over the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab. But India refuses to recognise the Court's proceedings, standing firm on punitive measures against Pakistan for its alleged terror support. Under the 1960 World Bank-brokered pact, each nation controls specific rivers, but the latest developments have escalated the water-war rhetoric. The contradiction between Pakistan's nuclear chest-thumping and water pleas exposes the deep strategic tensions shaping South Asia's future.#pakistan #india #induswatertreaty #asimmunir #bilawalbhutto #nuclearthreat #watercrisis #indus #geopolitics #breakingnews #trending #trendingnow #toi #bharat #toibharat #indianews 33.1K views | 6 hours ago
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No upper hand for US? Why Donald Trump has extended tariff truce with China for another 90 days
Experts believe Trump has not been able to effectively influence China with his trade war tactics. (AI image) US President Trump has extended the trade ceasefire with China by an additional 90 days, temporarily averting a potential economic confrontation between the world's largest economies. Trump said he has been "dealing very nicely with China" as Beijing said it was seeking positive outcomes. Through his Truth Social platform, Trump confirmed signing the executive order for the extension, maintaining that "all other elements of the Agreement will remain the same." Simultaneously, China's Ministry of Commerce announced their matching extension of the tariff suspension. The previous arrangement was due to lapse at 12:01 am Tuesday. Without this extension, the United States could have increased taxes on Chinese imports beyond the existing 30%, potentially triggering Beijing to elevate retaliatory duties on American exports to China. This extended pause provides additional time for both nations to resolve their differences, possibly setting the stage for a meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping later this year. American businesses engaged in Chinese trade have responded positively to this development. Also Read | 'China issue more complicated…': After tariff on India, will Donald Trump impose additional duties on China for Russia oil trade? What JD Vance said The US-China Business Council's president, Sean Stein, emphasised that the extension is "critical" for allowing both governments to negotiate a trade agreement. American businesses anticipate this will enhance their access to Chinese markets and provide the stability needed for medium and long-term planning. "Securing an agreement on fentanyl that leads to a reduction in US tariffs and a rollback of China's retaliatory measures is acutely needed to restart US agriculture and energy exports," Stein was quoted as saying by the Associated Press. What Trump's executive order on China said 'The United States continues to have discussions with the PRC (People's Republic of China) to address the lack of trade reciprocity in our economic relationship and our resulting national and economic security concerns,' said the executive order. 'Through these discussions, the PRC continues to take significant steps toward remedying non-reciprocal trade arrangements and addressing the concerns of the United States relating to economic and national security matters,' Trump's order said. 'Based on this additional information and recommendations from various senior officials, among other things, I have determined that it is necessary and appropriate to continue the suspension effectuated by Executive Order 14298 until 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on November 10, 2025,' the order added. Why Trump is extending the rope to China Beyond the language of the executive order passed by Trump, experts believe Trump has not been able to effectively influence China with his trade war tactics. Trump's unfinished agenda includes securing a trade agreement with China, following his significant disruption of global trade through the implementation of substantial tariffs on nearly all nations. Trading partners, including the European Union and Japan, have conceded to asymmetrical trade agreements with Trump, accepting unprecedented US tariff rates (such as 15% on Japanese and EU imports) to avoid more severe consequences. Also Read | 'US has gone rogue on trade...': Jefferies' Chris Wood calls Donald Trump's 50% tariff on India a 'xenophobic autarky'; slams 'beggar thy neighbour' policy The United States has transformed from a predominantly open economy to one characterised by protectionist measures under Trump's trade policies. According to the Budget Lab at Yale University, the average US tariff has increased substantially from approximately 2.5% at the year's beginning to 18.6%, marking the highest level since 1933. So why is Trump being somewhat lenient in his policies with China? Experts feel the answer lies in critical minerals. China has challenged the effectiveness of US trade policies that relied on tariffs as leverage for negotiations. Beijing wielded significant influence through its control over rare earth minerals and magnets, which are essential components in various industries from automotive to aerospace, according to the AP report. The US has agreed to reduce restrictions on exports of computer chip technology and ethane for petrochemical production, whilst China committed to improving US companies' access to rare earth materials. "The US has realised it does not have the upper hand,'' Claire Reade, senior counsel at Arnold & Porter and former assistant US trade representative for China affairs was quoted as saying in the AP report. In May, the US and China avoided an economic crisis by lowering substantial mutual tariffs, which had previously escalated to 145% against China and 125% against the US. Also Read | Donald Trump tariffs: How much will India's fuel bill rise if it stops Russian crude oil imports & where would it buy from? Explained The substantial tariff rates nearly halted commerce between China and the United States, triggering a concerning downturn in global stock markets. During discussions in Geneva in May, both nations agreed to reduce their rates, with the US lowering to 30% and China decreasing to 10%, whilst continuing negotiations. Since demonstrating their mutual capacity to inflict economic damage, both nations have maintained diplomatic dialogue. "By overestimating the ability of steep tariffs to induce economic concessions from China, the Trump administration has not only underscored the limits of unilateral US leverage, but also given Beijing grounds for believing that it can indefinitely enjoy the upper hand in subsequent talks with Washington by threatening to curtail rare earth exports,'' said Ali Wyne, a specialist in US-China relations at the International Crisis Group. "The administration's desire for a trade detente stems from the self-inflicted consequences of its earlier hubris." US-China trade deal: What's the road ahead? Experts feel that the prospects of a comprehensive agreement between Washington and Beijing addressing major US concerns remain uncertain. These concerns include China's inadequate intellectual property protection and their government's support policies, which US officials argue provide Chinese companies unfair competitive advantages globally and have led to a substantial US-China trade deficit of $262 billion in the previous year. Also Read | India-US trade deal: With Donald Trump's 50% tariffs looming, India reviews market access offers for US; three-pronged strategy to protect exporters Limited agreements appear more feasible, according to Reade, such as Chinese commitments to increase American soybean purchases and enhance controls on fentanyl-related chemical exports, whilst maintaining the supply of rare-earth magnets. However, Jeff Moon, who previously served as a US diplomat and trade official and currently heads China Moon Strategies consultancy, suggests that more complex issues will persist, noting that "the trade war will continue grinding ahead for years into the future.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'We are victims, not terrorists': Baloch leader reacts to US action against BLA; 'Pakistan sheltered Osama'
Mir Yar Baloch reacts to US designating BLA as 'foreign terrorist' organization. Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch reacted to the United States' decision to designate the Balochistan Liberation Army as a foreign terrorist organization and said Baloch people are not terrorists but victims of Pakistan-sponsored IS-Khurasan, "a deadly proxy nurtured by the ISI". The Baloch leader said Balochistan showed unwavering goodwill towards the United States historically, while Pakistan sheltered Osama Bin Laden . "The Baloch are not terrorists. They are a nation that has endured 78 long years of state terrorism, economic plunder, radioactive poisoning from Pakistan's nuclear tests, foreign invasion, and brutal occupation by the extremist and artificial state of Pakistan," Mir Yar Baloch said. "We are also victims of Pakistan-sponsored IS-Khurasan, a deadly proxy nurtured by the ISI, that has now issued a so-called fatwa calling for violence against peaceful Baloch political parties and their activists. This is yet another stark example of how Pakistan weaponises radical groups to crush legitimate political voices, suppress democratic aspirations, and destabilise the region," he said. "Throughout history, the Baloch have shown unwavering goodwill towards the United States. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Even during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Baloch people never raised arms against America or the Soviets. After 9/11, NATO supply lines passed through Balochistan, yet not a single attack was carried out by Baloch freedom fighters or civilians on American personnel or convoys," Baloch wrote on his X post. BLA, also known as the Majeed Brigade, was designated a "specially designated global terrorist" organization in 2019. But the new designation of a 'foreign terrorist' is more severe. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the move 'demonstrates the Trump Administration's commitment to countering terrorism'. 'Terrorist designations play a critical role in our fight against this scourge and are an effective way to curtail support for terrorist activities,' the statement said. Commenting on how Trump is now leaning towards Pakistan now, Mir Baloch said if the US recognizes Balochistan's independence, then the US would get a genuine ally. "In contrast, the Pakistani military and the ISI orchestrated anti-American rallies, chanting 'Death to America' while sheltering terrorists. For a decade, Osama bin Laden lived under the protection of Pakistan's military in Abbottabad. Pakistan's own leaders have admitted waging a fake jihad against the interests of the United States and the West, deceiving allies while breeding extremism," the Baloch leader said.
