In Australia's housing war, political shift picks newbies over NIMBYs
The view of the Sydney Harbour Bridge next to a residential properties in Sydney, Australia, July 10, 2025. REUTERS/Hollie Adams
SYDNEY - Australia's affordable housing push has arrived in the wealthy Sydney suburb of Mosman, where new planning laws now challenge longstanding resistance to development in the leafy area known for mansions and sweeping harbour views.
State authorities in Sydney and Melbourne - Australia's two biggest cities - are stripping some planning powers from suburban councils, including ones like Mosman that have created national headlines over opposition to new housing from older, wealthier constituents.
The broad policy shift comes as political deference to NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) sentiment gives way to demands for more housing from younger voters whose electoral heft now rivals the traditionally powerful baby boomer bloc.
In Mosman, there are fears the reforms will ultimately alter the character of the suburb, which boasts natural beauty, high-end stores and a median house price of over A$5 million ($3.23 million).
"We're surrounded by water with harbour views so there are people who are going to have literally millions of dollars knocked off the value of their property because their view will be blocked," said Simon Menzies, an elected Mosman councillor of 20 years.
The new laws are designed to allow more housing at key transport and commercial hubs and give the New South Wales state government powers to override council objections to large developments.
Similar rules to fast-track three-storey apartment blocks have been introduced in Melbourne's state of Victoria.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Some ageing condos in Singapore struggle with failing infrastructure, inadequate sinking funds
Singapore PUB investigating wastewater discharge in Eunos: Pritam
Singapore Water gel guns among newer tools NParks uses to manage monkeys in estates
Life Feeling extra patriotic? Here are 7 other SG60 songs beyond official NDP theme Here We Are
Business DBS shares hit record-high after Q2 profit beats forecast on strong wealth fees, trading income
World Trump eyes 100% chips tariff, but 0% for US investors like Apple
World Trump's 100% semiconductor tariffs may hit chipmakers in Singapore, other SEA nations
Singapore SCDF officer who molested female subordinate gets 15 months' jail
Five kilometres from Mosman, a new metro line in the suburb of Crows Nest means the state government has given a 22-storey apartment building the green light, overriding years-long council opposition.
In Mosman, objections from neighbours to one such proposal are already pouring in, but the council said there is little they can do about it.
The government intervention tracks a broader international trend, particularly in high-demand markets like London and California where soaring costs have hampered home ownership for young people.
Sydney's house prices have surged more than 30% over the past five years, outpacing wage growth.
New South Wales Premier Chris Minns warns Sydney, the state's capital, risks becoming "a city with no grandchildren".
It is already the second-most unaffordable city globally after Hong Kong.
"Their narrative is get out of our way. We want to build as many homes as possible to enable young Sydney residents to buy their homes," said Kos Samaras, director at polling firm Redbridge.
"I think the political ballast that was there to protect the interests of homeowners is now gone."
THE CASE TO BUILD
Australia's sprawling cities are among the world's least densely populated and historically built to accommodate suburban aspirations of owning detached houses with large backyards, not apartment living.
That has shifted in recent decades, particularly as waves of immigrants and students settle in high-rises around public transport hubs.
The latest housing push is designed to fill in the "missing middle" - townhouses, terraces and low-rise residential flats, which typically meet opposition from councils.
Research from the Productivity Commission showed industry is only building half as many homes per hour, compared with 30 years ago, hampered in part by approval processes that can stretch more than a decade.
Federal Housing Minister Clare O'Neil said 40 years of state, local and federal government regulations have created an impenetrable "wall of bureaucracy" for anyone trying to build a house.
"I think we've reached a tipping point here where the majority of our population are actually in housing distress themselves or are deeply concerned about the people that they know, especially that younger generation," O'Neil told Reuters. After her party's landslide victory in the May federal election, O'Neil is pledging "bigger and bolder" policies. A productivity roundtable this month presents an opportunity to remove some of those requirements, she added.
The turnaround may have already started.
Building approvals of apartments surged almost 90% in the first half of the year, driven by a 33% jump in New South Wales. Construction jobs jumped 20% in the three months to May and construction starts of higher density homes rose over 20% in the first quarter.
Peter Tulip, chief economist at the Centre for Independent Studies, expects a substantial step-up in construction in New South Wales and Victoria from 2026 onwards.
However, supply will still struggle to meet demand, pushing prices higher. Indeed, national home prices have hit fresh records each month, fuelled by rate cuts and the expectations of more to come.
Justin Simon, chair of housing advocacy group Sydney YIMBY, said Mosman had great amenity and was exactly the sort of place where new housing was needed.
"There is no way an ordinary person, essential workers, cleaners, nurses or anyone else could ever afford to live in Mosman and that is because for decades they have stopped new homes being built and we need to turn that around," he said.
MONEY TALKS
Some Mosman property owners impacted by policy changes are joining forces to sell entire blocks to developers, capitalising on strong demand for higher-density housing in the harbourside suburb.
The first application under the new policy, for example, is a six-storey residential building near the main town centre, comprising 29 dwellings, most of which are the family-sized three-bedroom units Sydney lacks.
Objections cited issues such as traffic, road safety, parking and privacy concerns, public submissions to the council showed.
"These are mainly three-bedroom units, each with double beds, so the total number of eyes that will be looking into this area (my backyard) would be 110," said a neighbor of the development, who has lived in Mosman since 1999 and asked to remain anonymous.
"If they're all occupied, it's 110 eyes looking every time I hang my underwear outside."
While that local backlash could yet create wider pressure for the government, politicians for now are siding with what they see as demographic inevitability.
"Sydney, Wollongong, Newcastle - these cities aren't museums," said Paul Scully, New South Wales planning minister. "They need to grow and evolve and adapt and change in the same way our population changes." REUTERS
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
33 minutes ago
- Straits Times
University of California reviews US government's $1.2 billion UCLA settlement offer
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze US$584 million in federal funding. WASHINGTON –The University of California said on Aug 8 it was reviewing a US$1 billion (S$1.28 billion) settlement offer by US President Donald Trump's administration for UCLA after the government froze hundreds of millions of dollars in funding over pro-Palestinian protests. UCLA, which is part of the University of California system, said this week the government froze US$584 million in federal funding. Mr Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against US ally Israel's war in Gaza. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests, while some faculty groups have sued saying the cuts have chilled free speech. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA in 2024. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. 'The University of California just received a document from the Department of Justice and is reviewing it,' University of California President James Milliken said in a statement, adding the institution offered to have talks earlier this week with the government. Last week, UCLA agreed to pay over US$6 million to settle a lawsuit by some students and a professor who alleged antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. In July, the government settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over US$220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay US$50 million. Both institutions accepted certain government demands. Talks to settle with Harvard University are ongoing. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Asia 'Very nerdy' hobby of doujinshi self-publishing is a growing billion-dollar market in Japan Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The US$1 billion settlement offer for UCLA marks an unusually high amount. The White House had no immediate comment. Experts have raised concerns about the government's federal funding threats to universities, saying they amount to an assault on free speech and academic freedom. The government has also attempted to deport some international students, over which civil rights groups have raised due process concerns. Rights advocates note a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to the conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. REUTERS

Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump administration asks to dismiss Harvard suit over foreign students
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A Harvard spokesperson said that the government's motion on Aug 8 has has no impact on the school's ability to enrol international students. WASHINGTON – The Trump administration asked a federal judge to throw out Harvard University's lawsuit over a proposed ban on international students, saying the president has broad authority to issue rules restricting the entry of non-citizens into the country. The Justice Department said in a court filing in Boston on Aug 8 that Harvard doesn't have the legal right to challenge the restrictions. The dispute involves Harvard's certification with the Student Exchange and Visitor Programme – a requirement for any university to enrol international students. In June, President Donald Trump signed an executive action that prevents foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard, accusing the school of failing to implement discipline on campus and fostering a dramatic rise in crime. Mr Trump has made Harvard the main target of his effort to force universities to reshape higher education by cracking down on alleged antisemitism, removing perceived political bias among the faculty and eliminating diversity programs. Judge Allison Burroughs is expected to rule soon in another dispute over whether the government can terminate more than $2 billion in federal research funding for the school. Harvard sued the administration over the international students in May, arguing that the enrollment ban violates its due process rights and fails to follow federal regulations. Burroughs, who is overseeing multiple lawsuits between the school and the Trump administration, granted the university's request for a preliminary injunction blocking the policy, and then issued another order saying the government can't enforce Mr Trump's ban on its international students entering the US. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Opinion Beyond the hype: Will AI eat Singapore's lunch or provide it in the future? Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The Harvard lawsuit related to foreign students addresses both sections of the Trump policy. Compliance with the programme 'is an important requirement for hosting foreign student visa holders to ensure they are adequately monitored, disciplined, and reported on', the US said in the filing. 'Harvard was not complying with its obligations. This raised serious national security and public safety concerns, of which the President's determination is due the utmost deference.' A Harvard spokesperson said that the government's motion on Aug 8 has has no impact on the school's ability to enrol international students. 'The university will continue to defend its rights – and the rights of its students and scholars,' the spokesperson said. The Justice Department didn't immediately return a message seeking comment. The Trump administration has been trying for months to stop foreign students from enrolling at Harvard, one of several levers that could hurt the university's finances. In the last academic year, 27 per cent of Harvard students came from abroad. Ivy League settlements Harvard, the oldest and richest US college with an endowment of US$53 billion (S$68 billion), and the government have been negotiating toward a global settlement but have yet to come to a deal. Ivy League peers the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia and Brown have reached agreements in recent weeks. The White House views a payment of US$500 million by Harvard University as a floor in negotiations, and the cost of a deal could climb far higher if the school doesn't submit to government oversight provisions, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Justice Department lawyers said earlier this week that the US would no longer rely on a May 22 letter by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to justify the near-immediate ban on foreign students it sought, but plans to move forward through an administrative process to 'simplify this case and narrow the issues'. BLOOMBERG

Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
UK arrests 280 in crackdown on illegal delivery riders
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox LONDON - British authorities arrested almost one in five people they checked in a week-long crackdown on migrants working illegally as delivery riders last month, the government's interior ministry said on Saturday. Immigration enforcement officers stopped and questioned 1,780 individuals between July 20 and 27 and 280 people were arrested, the interior ministry said, adding asylum support was being reviewed for 53 of those detained. The operation was part of a push by the government to tackle illegal migration which also includes new legal requirements for companies to verify workers' immigration status. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing pressure to show voters he can counter illegal immigration with support rising for Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage's Reform UK party. "This government is making sure rules are respected and enforced," border security minister Angela Eagle said. As well as the arrests, civil penalty notices were issued to 51 businesses, including car washes and restaurants, which could face fines for employing illegal workers, the ministry said. Police seized 71 vehicles, including 58 e-bikes, and confiscated 8,000 pounds ($10,751.20) in cash and 460,000 pounds worth of illicit cigarettes. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says he will meet Putin on Aug 15 in Alaska Opinion This US-India spat is going from bad to worse Asia Chinese villagers hit by worst floods in generations say they had no warning Opinion Beyond the hype: Will AI eat Singapore's lunch or provide it in the future? Singapore 'This is home', for retired shop owner putting up 11th flag display in Toa Payoh to mark SG60 Singapore Nation building is every Singaporean's responsibility, not the work of one party alone: Pritam Business Are you set to retire comfortably in Singapore? Singapore Senior Gentlemen's Circus debuts to engage older men to stay active The interior ministry said immigration enforcement teams would receive a 5 million-pound funding boost for the work tackling illegal working. Last month, the government struck a new deal with food delivery firms, including Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat, to share information aimed at preventing illegal working. In the 12 months to July, Britain returned 35,052 people with no right to remain, up 13% on the previous 12 months. France this week agreed to accept some undocumented migrants who arrive in Britain by small boats with Britain accepting from France an equal number of legitimate asylum seekers with family ties in the country. REUTERS