The Immigration Games? DHS weighs wild new reality show concept where migrants compete for US citizenship
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is reviewing a pitch for a reality television show in which migrants would compete for US citizenship through televised challenges. According to a Wall Street Journal report, while the proposal has sparked comparisons to dystopian fiction and prompted backlash on social media, DHS officials confirmed that the idea is undergoing a preliminary review.The concept, titled The American, was developed by Canadian-born writer and producer Rob Worsoff, who has worked on shows such as The Millionaire Matchmaker, Dating Naked, and Duck Dynasty. According to The Daily Mail, the proposal outlines a competitive format where 12 pre-vetted immigrants travel across the country, undertaking region-specific cultural challenges in a bid to fast-track their path to citizenship.The show begins on Ellis Island, with contestants arriving on a ship named 'The Citizen Ship.' Each participant would receive a baseball glove from a 'famous, naturalized American,' with names floated including Sofia Vergara, Ryan Reynolds, and Mila Kunis. None of them is formally attached to the project.From there, the contestants would board a train called 'The American' and compete in challenges such as collecting gold in San Francisco, rafting in Colorado, log-balancing in Wisconsin, rocket launching in Florida, clam-digging in Maine, assembling a Model T in Detroit, and delivering mail on horseback in Kansas.'We'll join in the laughter, tears, frustration, and joy — hearing their backstories — as we are reminded how amazing it is to be American,' the pitch states, as quoted by The Daily Mail.DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin confirmed to The Daily Beast that the department is reviewing the proposal but rejected claims that DHS Secretary Kristi Noem supports or is even aware of the pitch.She added that DHS receives hundreds of show pitches annually, ranging from border operation documentaries to white-collar crime programs. 'Each proposal undergoes a thorough vetting process prior to denial or approval. This pitch has not received approval or denial by staff,' she said.The show's finale reportedly involves the winner being sworn in as a US citizen on the steps of the Capitol by 'a top American politician or judge' as the US Air Force Thunderbirds fly overhead. Contestants who lose would receive 'iconically American' prizes such as a million American Airlines points, a $10,000 Starbucks gift card, or a lifetime supply of 76 gasoline—though no companies are currently linked to the idea.Secretary Noem's approach at DHS has been marked by an emphasis on publicity, including a $200 million ad campaign urging undocumented immigrants to return home. Her recent visit to a high-security prison in El Salvador, where she posed before inmates wearing a $50,000 Rolex, further drew media attention and criticism.Worsoff has argued in the pitch that the show could attract major sponsorship deals and broad commercial success. However, the project still requires financial backing and a distribution partner.As of now, there is no confirmation on whether the show will proceed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ex-Pentagon Official Calls Asim Munir ‘Osama in a Suit', Urges U.S. to Drop Pakistan as Major Ally
/ Aug 12, 2025, 12:48PM IST Former Pentagon official Michael Rubin has launched a scathing attack on Pakistan's army chief, General Asim Munir, labelling him 'Osama bin Laden in a suit' after a series of explosive anti-India remarks in the United States. Munir allegedly warned that if Pakistan collapsed, it would take 'half the world' with it, and threatened to destroy any Indian dam with ten missiles. Rubin condemned the comments as unacceptable on American soil, urging Washington to revoke Pakistan's major non-NATO ally status, impose a visa ban on Munir, and consider designating Pakistan a state sponsor of terrorism. He also warned that Pakistan's nuclear arsenal could fall into rogue hands, calling for the international community to manage the country's decline and even secure its nuclear weapons through military action if necessary. Watch
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
Brazil's Lula, China's Xi Discuss Role Of G20, BRICS In Defending Multilateralism
Brasilia: Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Chinese President Xi Jinping have discussed the role of the BRICS group of states and bilateral business over a phone call, according to Lula's office and Chinese state media said. "The leaders spoke for an hour on Monday, agreeing on the role of the G20 and BRICS in defending multilateralism," Brazil's presidency said in a statement. "Both presidents also highlighted their willingness to continue identifying new business opportunities between the two economies," the statement said. Lula said last week he would initiate a conversation about how to tackle Trump's tariffs with BRICS nations, after Trump dubbed the group "anti-American" and threatened them with additional tariffs. Xi called BRICS a key platform for building consensus in the Global South and said China is ready to work with Brazil to set an example of unity and self-reliance among major Global South nations, Chinese state media Xinhua reported. Agriculture trade features notably in China and Brazil's relations. China, the world's biggest soybean importer, gets most of the commodity from Brazil and recently, numerous Brazilian coffee companies found entry into the Chinese market after the industry was hit by steep US tariffs. China last week also showed Brazil support in resisting the "bullying behaviour" of imposing excessive tariffs, without naming the US. Xi described ties between the two countries as "at their best in history", and said both should work together to address global challenges and promote the political settlement of the Ukraine crisis, Xinhua said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
39 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's DC police takeover echoes historic racist urban crime narratives
Trump threatened to take over and beautify the nation's capital on the campaign trail and claimed the district was a nightmare of murder and crime AP Washington President Donald Trump has taken control of the District of Columbia's law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation's capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are in response to an urgent public safety crisis. Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the president promised a "historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse." His rhetoric echoed that used by conservative politicians going back decades who have denounced American cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressive politicians, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention. This is liberation day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back, Trump promised Monday. Trump's action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters But for many residents, the prospect of federal troops surging into the district's neighbourhoods represents an alarming violation of local agency. To some, it echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint historically or predominantly Black cities and neighbourhoods with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify aggressive police action. April Goggans, a longtime Washington resident and grassroots organiser, said she was not surprised by Trump's actions. Communities had been preparing for a potential federal crackdown in the district since the summer of 2020, when Trump deployed National Guard troops during racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd. We have to be vigilant, said Goggans, who has coordinated protests and local civil liberties educational campaigns for nearly a decade. She worries about what a surge in law enforcement could mean for residents' freedoms. Uncertainty about what's a safe environment raises alarms According to White House officials, National Guard troops will be deployed to protect federal assets in the district and facilitate a safe environment for law enforcement to make arrests. The administration believes the highly visible presence of law enforcement will deter violent crime. It is unclear how the administration defines providing a safe environment for law enforcement to conduct arrests, raising alarm bells for some local advocates. The president foreshadowed that if these heavy-handed tactics take root here, they will be rolled out to other majority-Black and Brown cities, like Chicago, Oakland and Baltimore, across the country, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's DC chapter. We've seen before how federal control of the DC National Guard and police can lead to abuse, intimidation and civil rights violations from military helicopters swooping over peaceful racial justice protesters in 2020 to the unchecked conduct of federal officers who remain shielded from full accountability, Hopkins said. A history of denigrating language Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by nonwhite populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence. Republicans have called for greater police crackdowns in cities since at least the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles. President Richard Nixon won the White House in 1968 after campaigning on a "law and order" agenda to appeal to white voters in northern cities alongside overtures to white Southerners as part of his Southern Strategy. Ronald Reagan similarly won both his presidential elections after campaigning heavily on law and order politics. Politicians ranging from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to former President Bill Clinton have cited the need to tamp down crime as a reason to seize power from cities like Washington for decades. District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump's takeover of the local police force unsettling but not without precedent. The mayor kept a mostly measured tone during a Monday news conference following Trump's announcement but decried the president's reasoning as a so-called emergency and said the district's residents know that access to our democracy is tenuous. Trump threatened to take over and beautify the nation's capital on the campaign trail and claimed the district was a nightmare of murder and crime. He also argued the city was horribly run and said his team intended to take it away from the mayor. The president repeated comments he'd previously made about some of the nation's largest cities during his news conference, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland, California, and his hometown of New York City. All are currently run by Black mayors. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities in a very bad, New York is a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen, he said. Civil rights advocates see the president's rhetoric as part of a broader political strategy. It's a playbook he's used in the past, said Maya Wiley, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. The president's rhetoric "paints a picture that crime is out of control, even when it is not true, then blames the policies of Democratic lawmakers that are reform- and public safety-minded, and then claims that you have to step in and violate people's rights or demand that reforms be reversed, Wiley said. Civil rights leaders denounce DC order as unjustified distraction Trump's actions in Washington and comments about other major American cities sent shock waves across the country, as other cities prepare to respond to potential federal action. Democratic Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said Trump's plan lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous in a statement and pointed to a 30-year-low crime rate in Baltimore as a reason the administration should consult local leaders rather than antagonize them. In Oakland, Mayor Barbara Lee called Trump's characterization of the city fearmongering. The administration already faced a major flashpoint between local control and federal power earlier in the summer, when Trump deployed National Guard troops to quell protests and support immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles despite opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
