Espinoza or McAlister? Early voting open for Abilene City Council runoff election
Early voting for the Abilene City Council Place 5 runoff election kicked off Tuesday in Taylor County.
Newcomer Miguel Espinoza and incumbent Kyle McAlister are vying for the Place 5 seat. A candidate must garner 50% of the vote plus one vote to win.
During the May 3 election, three candidates split the vote in the race for Place 5.
McAlister received 49.78% of the vote, and Espinoza received 42.98%.
The third candidate Cynthia Alvidrez received 7.24% of the vote.
Eligible voters can put their vote in for Espinoza or McAlister at three polling locations during the early voting period, Tuesday-Friday this week and June 2-3.
Here is where you can vote early:
Taylor County Plaza, 400 Oak St. Open 8 a.m.-5 p.m. May 27-30 and 8 a.m.-5 p.m. June 2-3.
Mall of Abilene, 4310 Buffalo Gap Road. Open 10 a.m.-6 p.m. May 27-30 and 10 a.m.-6 p.m. June 2-3.
Abilene City Hall, 555 Walnut St. Open 8 a.m.-5 p.m. May 27-30 and 8 a.m.-5 p.m. June 2-3.
Election Day voting centers are open 7 a.m.-7 p.m. June 7.
Here are the Election Day polling locations:
Abilene City Hall, 555 Walnut St.
New Beginnings United Pentecostal, 5535 Buffalo Gap Road
Taylor County Plaza, 400 Oak St.
Westminster Presbyterian Church, 4515 South 14th St.
Espinoza is a born-and-raised Abilene native, a graduate of Abilene High School and Abilene Christian University and works as an accountant at a local Abilene firm.
As he grew professionally, Espinoza said he found a passion for nonprofit work.
He volunteered with All Kind Animal Initiative since its fruition serving on its board as treasurer and president.
He sits on the National Center for Children's Illustrated Literature Board and serves on several state committees related to his career in accounting.
Espinoza said his reason for running for City Council stems from his desire to pour back into the community that gave him so much.
"I love my community, and I want to set an example for, hopefully one day, my future children and grandchildren," he said.
Do not just exist in your community, Espinoza said. Use your gifts and personal blessings and give back.
McAlister, the Place 5 incumbent, has served on the City Council since 2013.
He said he is ready and able to serve again.
"The challenges that we have ahead of us are really some of the same challenges that we've always had," McAlister said.
City officials are tackling streets and water, solidifying infrastructure and continuing to develop job opportunities by bringing in companies and offering incentives to those companies, McAlister said.
"I want people to know that I'm working hard for them and that I am here to listen," McAlister said.
His job as a City Council member is to get results and work with the public, the other council members and city staff to work through problems together, he said.
Crash takes man's life
Memorial Day brings remembrances of those who served and those who gave all
This article originally appeared on Abilene Reporter-News: Early voting open for Abilene City Council runoff election
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Office of Open Records orders Cambria County to search again for 2024 election failure
CAMBRIA COUNTY, Pa. (WTAJ) — Cambria County officials have been ordered to conduct a new search for records related to a major voting system failure during the November 2024 election, following a successful appeal from State Rep. Frank Burns under Pennsylvania's Right-to-Know Law. The state Office of Open Records ruled that the county's original reason for denying Burns' records request, citing a noncriminal investigation, was not valid, requiring the county to either provide the documents or legally attest that they do not exist. Burns requested any documentation explaining the nature of the voting machine malfunction that led to ballots going unscanned and unaccounted for, as well as a tally of how many ballots were successfully or unsuccessfully scanned on Election Day. The Nov. 5, 2024, issue reportedly involved voting machines that had passed pre-election testing but failed when used, prompting concerns from voters and lawmakers alike. Burns has continued to push for transparency surrounding the incident, stating that the public still has no clear explanation for what went wrong or how many ballots were impacted. In response to an inquiry from WTAJ, Cambria County's solicitor, Ronald Repak, provided a statement acknowledging the OOR ruling and outlining the four key parts of the decision. According to the county, the OOR deemed one of Burns' requests moot after the county turned over the logic and accuracy testing records. The OOR also denied Burns' request for a finding of bad faith, instead stating, 'The County has been timely, attentive, and professional in both its responses to the Requester and to the OOR and has made serious attempts to provide the Requester with the information he is seeking.' The county confirmed the OOR did grant Burns' request for the number of ballots that failed to scan, which officials say occurred because the ballots did not include TIS (timing) marks required by the tabulation system. The county said this issue affected all ballots when polls opened. Additionally, the OOR granted Burns' request for documentation explaining the nature of the problem. The county reiterated it has repeatedly said the mistake was due to a clerical error by a county worker who uploaded ballots to the system without the necessary marks. Officials said there was no malicious intent. 'The County has no issue with completing another search to answer questions which the County has already gone to great lengths in answering,' Repak stated. The OOR has given the county 30 days to provide Burns with the relevant records or a sworn statement that they do not exist. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Supreme Court turns away RNC challenge to Pennsylvania ballot ruling
The Supreme Court on Friday turned away the Republican National Committee's (RNC) bid to block Pennsylvania voters' in-person, do-over option when they return a defective mail ballot. The announcement was intended for Monday morning, but the court mistakenly released it early due to what a court spokesperson called an 'apparent software malfunction.' The order leaves in place a 4-3 ruling from Pennsylvania's top court that voters can still cast a vote at their polling place on Election Day if their mail ballot was rejected for technical reasons, despite a state law saying such votes 'shall not be counted' if the mail ballot was timely received. The additional option impacts thousands of voters each election cycle. The legal battle gained attention just ahead of the 2024 election, when President Trump narrowly beat former Vice President Harris in the key swing state and went on to retake the White House. Just before the election, the Supreme Court declined the RNC's request to intervene on an emergency basis. Now returning to the high court on its normal docket, the RNC urged the Supreme Court to use its case as a vehicle to more broadly restrict state courts' power over elections. Two years ago, the high court declined to endorse the maximalist version of the so-called 'independent state legislature' theory, which would give state legislatures near-total control over setting federal election rules by preventing state courts from restraining their actions. However, the justices in that decision warned that courts may not 'arrogate to themselves the power vested in state legislatures.' The justices have yet to adopt a specific test to measure when a court crosses that constitutional line, and the RNC cast its petition as a prime opportunity to do so. 'Failure to correct the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's indefensible distortion of the General Assembly's laws would effectively do just that by sending a strong message that judicial review under the Elections and Electors Clauses is illusory. The result would directly contravene the Constitution,' the RNC's attorneys at Jones Day wrote in the petition. The justices' refusal to take up the case comes months after the justices turned away a petition arising from Montana asking them to take up similar issues. The Pennsylvania case arose after Faith Genser and Frank Matis attempted to vote in the state's 2024 Democratic primary. Initially, the duo planned to vote by mail. But they mistakenly returned 'naked' ballots, meaning they didn't include a required secrecy envelope. With their votes invalid, Genser and Matis went to their polling place on the day of the primary election to cast provisional ballots. They sued after the Butler County elections board refused to count those ballots. The RNC's petition was joined by the Republican Party of Pennsylvania and the Butler County Board of Elections.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will a ‘No Kings' anti-Trump protest take place next week in Tacoma?
Hundreds of protests are scheduled across the country on June 14 to coincide with a pricey military parade in Washington, D.C. The 'No Kings Day' protests will take place on President Donald Trump's birthday as he throws a military parade with an estimated cost of $25 million to $40 million, according to Politico. The protests against Trump are part of a national movement that has been gathering steam since his Jan. 20 inauguration. 'This is bigger than political disagreement,' notes a statement by organizers on their No Kings toolkit page. 'They've defied our courts, deported American citizens, disappeared people off the streets, and slashed our services — all while orchestrating a massive giveaway to their billionaire allies.' The June 14 military parade has been framed as a celebration of the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary of its founding. It is also Trump's 79th birthday. A festival at the National Mall will follow. Flights into Washington, D.C. will be halted during the event, according to multiple media reports. There have been other events and celebrations for the Army so far this year, but nothing is advertised beyond June 14. Reactions to the parade have been mixed, with some criticizing the optics, given the timing with Trump's birthday. 'Prior presidents have used military regalia to celebrate or mark other moments,' noted historian Joshua Zeitz, contributing editor at Politico Magazine in an interview with NPR. 'There are obviously military ceremonies that happen, for instance, at Arlington National Cemetery on Memorial Day. There's a military presence at inaugurations. But that's very different from what we're doing here. This is something that you would expect to see in countries like North Korea or the old Soviet Union or today's Russia.' The 'No Kings' event on June 14 is a direct response to the parade in D.C. Organized by organizations Indivisible, 50501 and Stand Up America, there are about 1,500 protest rallies planned across the United States. 'Join us to reject Trump's authoritarian vision and to show the wanna-be king what democracy looks like,' note Indivisible organizers on their website. There is no telling how many people will attend, but similar anti-Trump protests on April 19 under the 5051 banner drew 3 million people by Newsweek's estimate. Washington state has over six dozen No Kings protests scheduled for June 14. You can search locations in this interactive map. Here are the protest locations in Tacoma and Pierce County: ▪ Tacoma No Kings protest at People's Park at 900 M.L.K. Jr. Way ▪ Tacoma No Kings protest at The Defiant Goldfish at 5310 N. Pearl St. ▪ Gig Harbor No Kings Protest at Point Fosdick Drive and Olympic Drive
