logo
Land Board rejects Pohakuloa EIS but lease negotiations to move ahead

Land Board rejects Pohakuloa EIS but lease negotiations to move ahead

Yahoo11-05-2025

The U.S. Army hit a speed bump in its effort to retain training land in Hawaii with the state Board of Land and Natural Resources voting to reject its final environmental impact statement on its proposal to keep a state-owned parcel at the Pohakuloa Training Area on Hawaii island.
The ruling is an embarrassing setback for the Army after years of working on the document and submitting several drafts since 2022. The many hours of public comment from hundreds of people who turned out to testify both in person and over a Zoom teleconference before the BLNR vote Friday evening overwhelmingly called on the board to reject the EIS and lambasted Army officials.
The public rebuke comes as Army leaders in Hawaii are preparing to host the Land Power in the Pacific Conference this week in Waikiki with a record 32 countries participating and 16 national chiefs of army expected to attend. But it's not the end of the service's efforts to retain training land in Hawaii after its leases expire in 2029.
'The issue today is whether we should accept the EIS or not accept the EIS, ' BLNR Chair Dawn Chang said during Friday's hearing. 'It is only with respect to PTA. It is not on whether what the Army is doing is good or bad, or if we provide them land retention or not. So I want to be really clear on what this is, I want to manage everyone's expectation, including my own and the board.'
The board ultimately concluded that the EIS, the culmination of years of work, contained significant data gaps on potential environmental and cultural impacts, ranging from effects on endangered species, surveys of traditional Native Hawaiian burial grounds, potential threats to groundwater and a litany of other issues raised both by community members and by staff at the Department of Land and Natural Resources who evaluated the document.
Notably, the Army's most recent biological survey was from 2013, and the service is currently working on a new one expected to be completed this year that takes into account sightings of two previously unaccounted for species at PTA—the yellow-faced bee and Blackburn's sphinx moth.
The EIS also didn't address concerns about the handling of funerary artifacts discovered in 2022 that the state and experts consider to be among the most significant archaeological finds in Hawaii's history.
Office of Hawaiian Affairs Board of Trustees Chair Kai Kahele released a statement Saturday in support of rejecting the EIS.
'This decision reflects a thorough review of the document's legal, environmental, and cultural deficiencies, many of which OHA and others identified in public testimony, ' he said. 'As the State and Hawai 'i's Congressional Delegation consider next steps, OHA remains steadfast in its commitment to ensuring that any future course of action honors the unique legal status of these lands and the trust obligations they carry. These lands are not ordinary—they are part of an unrelinquished legacy. OHA will continue to prioritize protecting the rights and interests of the Native Hawaiian people and preserving the integrity of the public land trust.'
Just minutes after the board voted Friday, the Army released its own statement saying, 'The Army is currently observing a 30-day waiting period, after which the Army will determine how much land it will seek to retain in its Record of Decision (ROD ). The method of retention, or real estate transaction (lease, fee simple ), would be negotiated with the State of Hawaii after the ROD is confirmed.'
DLNR put out a statement that said, 'An EIS is intended to support informed decision-making and does not, by itself, authorize any land use. No decision has been made on the Army's long-term lease request. A separate review and determination will be required should such a request be brought before the board in the future.'
Staunch opposition The Army has trained in the area since World War II and obtained the parcel at PTA and other land across the islands it uses for training for a mere $1 in 1964. Situated in between Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea, PTA is the U.S. military's largest contiguous live-fire training area in Hawaii and perhaps the entire Pacific.
The state parcel of 22, 750 acres sits between two federally owned pieces of land, collectively making up 132, 000 acres. Army officials call the leased land 'the connective tissue ' of PTA. Lately PTA has become central to the Army's new Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center, a series of training ranges in Hawaii and Alaska aimed at preparing soldiers for operations in the Pacific amid tensions with China.
But the state now considers its parcel at Pohakuloa to be a conservation district, and DLNR staff have concluded that military use of the land is 'not consistent ' with that designation.
With its rugged fields of lava rock and volcanic soil, Poha ­kuloa is classified as a sub-alpine tropical dryland forest—one of the world's rarest kinds of ecosystems—and is habitat for Hawaii's state bird, the nene, as well as the hoary bat and several species that exist nowhere else on the planet.
Public responses to the vote rejecting the EIS were swift. Maxx Phillips, Hawaii and Pacific Islands director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement that 'the board saw through the Army's hollow promises and recognized that you can't make informed decisions about protecting endangered species, sacred sites or clean water when you refuse to even do baseline surveys. This vote is a powerful affirmation that the future of these lands must be decided with integrity, not rubber-stamped based on incomplete and misleading information.'
A statement from Ashley Obrey, senior staff attorney at the Native Hawaiian Legal Corp., said the BLNR decision 'reflects well established Hawai 'i law that prioritizes the health of Hawai 'i lands and Native Hawaiian cultural practices over military convenience ' and that 'the state has a legal duty to honor the public trust and the rights of kanaka maoli. We commend the board members for standing firm and refusing to accept a document that would have paved the way for another generation of harm to these 'aina.'
Wayne Tanaka, director of Sierra Club of Hawai 'i, said, 'Pohakuloa has been bombed, burned and polluted for over six decades—and we now have a once-in-a-lifetime chance to finally say no more to such abuse of our 'aina. Today's rejection of the final environmental impact statement gives us a fighting chance to restore and protect this sacred place.'
According to a statement from Lt. Col. Tim Alvarado, the officer who oversees day-to-day operations at PTA, the Army in Hawaii 'understands and deeply respects the concerns expressed by community members, cultural practitioners, and environmental advocates regarding the Army's presence and activities at Pohakuloa Training Area. We recognize that past actions have caused harm and eroded trust, and we continue to seek a balance with consideration for the cultural and environmental significance of this land.'
History of litigation In 1989, the Sierra Club sued the Army on behalf of University of Hawaii at Hilo botanist Lani Stemmermann. She had visited an area of dryland forest in PTA in search of research sites to study native plants and found Army bulldozers leveling native naio and mamane trees for a new training range.
In 1993, an Army investigation found planners knowingly cut corners during the survey process, intentionally limited access to scientists and ignored recommendations by Army engineers that called for a comprehensive botanical study of the proposed site.
In 2019, the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled against the state in a lawsuit filed by the Native Hawaiian Legal Corp. on behalf of Hawaiian cultural practitioners Clarence 'Ku ' Ching and Mary Maxine Kahaulelio. The court found state officials had failed to ensure the military upheld its duties to clean up Pohakuloa and had harmed Hawaiian cultural interests, and that 'as trustee, the State must take an active role in preserving trust property and may not passively allow it to fall into ruin.'
The terms of the Army's lease state the military must 'make every reasonable effort to … remove or deactivate all live or blank ammunition upon completion of a training exercise, ' and disagreement over what 'reasonable effort ' means has been an ongoing sticking point.
The military only fires live munitions into PTA's 'impact area, ' which is on federally controlled land. Because it's considered an active range, the impact area is regarded as too dangerous for regular removal of ordnance. The board as well as several critics who testified noted the EIS did little to evaluate potential impacts of military action on lands surrounding the state parcel.
A small handful of people testified Friday in support of approving the EIS. Matthew Chalker, a Waikoloa Village resident and self-described wildfire safety advocate, said he believes the EIS was thorough and argued that firefighting facilities at PTA have been critical in protecting his community and training other firefighters across the state.
Riley Smith, who represents Hawaii island on the BLNR, opposed the motion to reject the EIS and argued the Army had acted in good faith to provide the best data it could.
BLNR at-large member Vernon Char, who abstained from the vote, said the public testimony 'was very one-sided. It was very well-planned and very emotional … many of the statements made today in opposition were very sincere. But some of it, I thought, was misdirected and maybe not really relevant to the issue of whether the EIS should be accepted as having positioned everything, subject to negotiation.'
Negotiations unsure The EIS was largely crafted during the administration of President Joe Biden. With the leases expiring in 2029, future efforts and actual negotiations going forward will be undertaken by President Donald Trump's Pentagon team, led by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Army Secretary Dan Driscoll promised U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, during his Senate confirmation hearing that he would work with her office and community groups in Hawaii on Army land leases and would listen to local concerns about the future of the land.
But while Hegseth has prioritized funding for U.S. forces in the Pacific, he has also vowed to drastically scale back or outright eliminate most of the military's environmental and cultural programs, charging that such programs are 'woke ' and have distracted the military from 'warfighting.'
When active training isn't taking place at PTA, only five uniformed soldiers are stationed there. The rest of the workforce of about 200 people is made up of Army civilians and contractors. Among them are scientists working to catalog and preserve native species living on the base, archaeologists and firefighters tasked with putting out blazes—whether they be natural or caused by military training.
Col. Rachel Sullivan, commander of U.S. Army Garrison Hawaii, said in a statement that 'the Army is committed to continuing its environmental and cultural stewardship in support of the U.S. Army Pacific training strategy while maintaining an enduring partnership with the Hawai 'i Island community.'
However, Hegseth has proposed cutting large portions of the Department of Defense's civilian workforce, especially any job that doesn't 'directly contribute to lethality, ' such as those working on environmental programs, and has proclaimed that the military is done with 'climate crap ' under his watch.
It's unclear what that will mean in Hawaii as the Trump administration continues to take shape.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Army to bring back names of 7 bases that once honored Confederate leaders
US Army to bring back names of 7 bases that once honored Confederate leaders

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Army to bring back names of 7 bases that once honored Confederate leaders

The US Army said Tuesday it will restore the names of seven Army bases that previously honored Confederate leaders. 'We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee,' President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday at Fort Bragg, which was briefly known as Fort Liberty until the administration changed it back earlier this year. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change.' The Army plans to give the bases new namesakes honoring 'heroic Soldiers who served in conflicts ranging from the Civil War to the Battle of Mogadishu,' according to a news release, as it rolls back the Biden-era name changes. Reverting the base names to the original Confederate namesakes would require congressional approval. The move comes after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a National Guard veteran and former longtime Fox News host, moved quickly to roll back name changes at other Army bases, such as Fort Bragg and Fort Benning. Hegseth also ordered the secretary of the Navy to rename the oiler ship USNS Harvey Milk, which had honored the gay rights activist and Navy veteran who was made to resign from the force because of his sexual orientation. Removing Confederate monikers from US military bases became a contentious political issue in the final months of Trump's first term. While Trump vetoed the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act that included a naming commission to study and recommend new titles for bases named after Confederate leaders, Congress voted to override his veto with overwhelming bipartisan support. The Department of Defense began implementing the naming commission's recommendations in 2023. Here are the names that are being brought back. According to the Army's Tuesday announcement, Fort Barfoot, a Virginia base previously named after Confederate General George Pickett, will be named in honor of 1st Lt. Vernon W. Pickett, a soldier who received the Distinguished Service Cross for his heroism during World War II. While pinned down by enemy machine gun fire, Pickett crawled forward and destroyed two enemy positions with grenades, the Army said. He escaped from a transport train after being captured, rejoined his unit and was later killed in action. Fort Cavazos in Texas will be renamed Fort Hood in honor of Distinguished Service Cross recipient Col. Robert B. Hood, who fought in World War I. In 2023, it was named after Gen. Richard Cavazos, who served in both the Korean War and Vietnam War. He was the first Hispanic four-star general in US history. Georgia's Fort Eisenhower will revert back to Fort Gordon, this time honoring Medal of Honor recipient Master Sgt. Gary I. Gordon, who during the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu, Somalia, defended wounded crew members at a helicopter crash site. The base, which was previously named after Confederate General John Gordon, was renamed Fort Eisenhower after General of the Army Dwight Eisenhower, who went on to serve as the nation's 34th president. A Virginia fort once named for Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee will carry the namesake of Pvt. Fitz Lee, who received the Medal of Honor for his service during the Spanish-American War. The fort was renamed Fort Gregg-Adams after Lt. Gen. Arthur Gregg and Lt. Col Charity Adams in 2023. Gregg helped desegregate the Army, including at Fort Lee, while Adams, in 1944, 'was selected to command the first unit of African-American women to serve overseas,' according to the congressional naming commission. Her service was chronicled in the 2024 film 'The Six Triple Eight.' Gen. James H. Polk, a Silver Star recipient and commanding officer of the 3rd Cavalry Group in operations across Europe during World War II, will become the new namesake for Louisiana's Fort Johnson, according to the release. The fort had been renamed in honor of Sgt. William Henry Johnson, a Black soldier who was considered one of the first heroes of World War I after he fought off about two dozen Germans alone, killing at least four. Fort Novosel will be redesignated as Fort Rucker, in honor of Capt. Edward W. Rucker, a Distinguished Service Cross recipient and aviator that flew behind enemy lines in World War I 'in a daring aerial battle over France, disrupting enemy movements and completing their mission against overwhelming odds,' according to the release. It was previously renamed after Chief Warrant Officer 4 Michael J. Novosel Sr., who served in World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War, where he flew 2,543 medical evacuation missions. The Army will bring back the Fort A.P. Hill name to Fort Walker, this time honoring Lt. Col. Edward Hill, 1st Sgt. Robert A. Pinn and Pvt. Bruce Anderson, three soldiers who fought for the Union during the Civil War. The Virginia fort previously was named in honor of Lt. Gen. Ambrose Powell (A.P.) Hill, a Confederate commander. It was renamed Fort Walker in 2023, after Dr. Mary Walker, the Army's first female surgeon who was ultimately awarded the Medal of Honor for her service during the Civil War. CNN's Samantha Waldenberg, Oren Liebermann, Devan Cole, Barbara Starr and Ellie Kaufman contributed to this report.

Mysterious Shipping Container Rocket Launcher Spotted At Trump's Visit To Fort Bragg
Mysterious Shipping Container Rocket Launcher Spotted At Trump's Visit To Fort Bragg

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mysterious Shipping Container Rocket Launcher Spotted At Trump's Visit To Fort Bragg

A containerized launcher designed to fire the same suite of artillery rockets and ballistic missiles as the M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) has appeared at the U.S. Army's Fort Bragg in North Carolina. The ability to launch ballistic missiles, in particular, from what is outwardly indistinguishable from any other shipping container, presents a flexible strike capability that is harder for opponents to spot. Ukraine's recent Operation Spiderweb covert drone attacks highlighted to a dizzying degree the value of even lower-end concealed fires capabilities. The launcher inside the container is visible off to the side in a video, seen below, from President Donald Trump's visit to Fort Bragg today, which was posted online by White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino. Trump was given demonstrations of various Army capabilities at the base's Holland Drop Zone, including the launch of artillery rockets. A separate launcher, the type of which is not immediately clear, was used to fire those rounds. President Trump arrives at the Holland Drop Zone—Fort Bragg… — Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) June 10, 2025 President Trump also observed paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division jump from a U.S. Air Force C-17 cargo plane and a mock special operations assault involving Green Berets and the elite 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment SOAR). A transporter erector launcher for the Soviet-designed Scud ballistic missile, or a full-scale mockup of one, is also notably present in the footage of the special operations demonstration. Bragg is the Army's main special operations hub, as well as home to the 82nd Airborne Division, among other units. The 82nd Airborne Division — Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) June 10, 2025 FORT BRAGG—@USArmy — Dan Scavino (@Scavino47) June 10, 2025 TWZ has not been able to quickly find additional information about the containerized launcher, but it is not entirely new. In August 2024, Military Times posted a video of it, seen below, across its social media accounts, but with no additional context. We have reached out to the Army for more details. What is clear is that the containerized launcher, the entire roof of which is designed to open to one side, can accommodate two of the same ammunition 'pods' used as the tracked M270 MRLS and wheeled M142 HIMARS launch vehicles. Pods are available that come loaded with six 227mm guided artillery rockets, a single Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missile, or two Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM). ATACMS and PrSM, the latter of which is beginning to enter Army service now to replace the former, are both short-range ballistic missiles. Current-generation 227mm artillery rockets in Army inventory can hit targets some 50 miles (around 80 kilometers) away, and a variant with a maximum range of just over 93 miles (150 kilometers) entered production last year. The longest range variant of the ATACMS short-range ballistic missile in Army service today can reach targets out to 186 miles (300 kilometers). The initial version of PrSM, also known as Increment 1, has a range of 310 miles (500 kilometers), but there are also plans to extend that out to 620 miles (1,000 kilometers) or more. It's worth noting that a PrSM with a range beyond 620 miles/1,000 kilometers would be categorized as at least a medium-range ballistic missile. The Army is also developing an anti-ship variant of PrSM with a new seeker and is eyeing further versions with 'enhanced lethality payloads' that could include miniature smart bombs and kamikaze drones. The Army is also currently exploring new pods loaded with smaller rockets that could expand the magazine depth of M270 and M142 launcher vehicles, but at the cost of a reduction in range. The service has been experimenting with new launcher vehicles that can fire this same family of munitions, including uncrewed types and a design offering significantly expanded ammunition capacity. Being able to launch this array of rockets and missiles already gives M270 and M142 immense flexibility. A containerized launcher would open up additional possibilities, including the ability to turn any truck that can carry a standard shipping container into a platform capable of firing long-range guided rockets and missiles. This, in turn, could help the Army more readily expand its available launch capacity as required. The containerized launchers could also be deployed in a fixed mode, offering forward operating bases the ability to hold targets at risk dozens, if not hundreds of miles away. This can include providing an on-call form of organic air/fire support for troops operating far from the forward base. The launcher inside the container cannot traverse laterally, but an array of them could be positioned in such a way to provide maximum coverage in all directions. Being a container-based design, whether deployed in a truck-mounted or fixed configuration, they would be readily relocatable from one location to another. The containerized launchers could also be loaded on rail cars and or employed from ships with sufficient open deck space. In any of these modes, the launcher would benefit from its unassuming outward appearance. This would present challenges for opponents when it comes to detection and targeting, since any container could potentially be loaded with rockets or ballistic missiles. As already mentioned, Ukraine just demonstrated the value of concealed launch capabilities in its unprecedented covert drone attacks on multiple Russian air bases. Other countries, including Russia, China, and Iran, have also been developing containerized launch systems for artillery rockets and/or missiles. In terms of naval use, specifically, it's also worth mentioning here that the U.S. Navy is already in the process of fielding a different containerized missile launcher, designed to fire Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles and SM-6 multi-purpose missiles, in shipboard and tractor-trailer configurations. The Navy launcher is based on the Mk 41 Vertical Launch System (VLS) found on various American and foreign warships, and is directly related to the Army's ground-based Typhon system that can also currently fire Tomahawks and SM-6s. How close the containerized launcher seen at Fort Bragg may or may not be to becoming an operational capability is unclear, but its potential value is not hard to see. Contact the author: joe@

Fort Novosel to be reverted to Fort Rucker with new namesake. Who is it?
Fort Novosel to be reverted to Fort Rucker with new namesake. Who is it?

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fort Novosel to be reverted to Fort Rucker with new namesake. Who is it?

FORT NOVOSEL, Ala (WDHN) — President Donald Trump announced on Tuesday that his administration would work to change the names of seven Army bases, including Fort Novosel, that previously bore the names of Confederate Army officers. 'For a little breaking news, we are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee,' Trump said while speaking at Fort Bragg. 'We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change.' The home of Army Aviation in Dale County is currently named after Chief Warrant Officer 4 Michael Novosel Sr., an aviator and Medal of Honor recipient with direct ties to Army Aviation and Enterprise who served in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Trump says he will reverse Fort Novosel name change The installation was previously named for General Edmund W. Rucker, a Confederate officer during the Civil War. Rucker served under Nathan Bedford Forrest, a slave trader and early leader of the Ku Klux Klan. While the Army installation will once again be named Fort Rucker, it will not be in honor of the same man. The U.S. Army announced that Fort Novosel will soon take the name of Captain Edward W. Rucker, a World War I aviator and Missouri native who received the Distinguished Service Cross after engaging in a firefight with German aircraft behind enemy lines. According to reports from the American Masonic Great War Project, Rucker, then a lieutenant, was credited with shooting down one enemy aircraft over France. Fort Novosel underwent its first name change in 2023, along with eight other Army bases. The movement to rename the installations under the Biden administration stemmed from concerns that U.S. military institutions should not be named for a Confederate leader who fought against the United States and was committed to slavery. Shortly after Trump's announcement Tuesday afternoon, the Army released a statement defending the decision. 'The Army will take all necessary actions to change the names of seven Army installations in honor of heroic Soldiers who served in conflicts ranging from the Civil War to the Battle of Mogadishu,' the statement provided to WDHN read. It is currently unknown when the process to change the name will begin, but the Army said the Secretary of the Army 'will take immediate action to implement these redesignations.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store