India and Russia launch joint naval drills
The Russian ships participating are the corvettes 'Rezkiy' and 'Hero of the Russian Federation Aldar Tsydenzhapov', as well as the medium sea tanker 'Pechenga' from the Pacific Fleet, Russia's Defense Ministry said.
The Indian vessels taking part in the drills are the destroyer 'Rana' and the corvette 'Kutar'. The exercises will also involve deck helicopters and aircraft from the Indian Navy, while a Russian Ka-27 helicopter will perform landings and takeoffs on the Rana. The INDRA exercises, first conducted in 2003, commenced this year on March 28 off the coast of Chennai, officials said.
Senior officer of the Russian ship detachment, Captain 1st Rank Aleksey Antsiferov, said the drills help assess whether the two countries are ready to accomplish joint maritime missions.
'Indra Navy is the format of the drills that allows for exchanging experience, sharpening the skills and practicing joint actions, establishing contacts and bolstering the strategic partnership between India and Russia for jointly countering military threats at sea,'
TASS quoted Antsiferov as saying.
He clarified that the exercises were not targeted at any specific country and were not a response to any shifts in the global military and political landscape.
🇮🇳🇷🇺India-Russia Naval Ties Set Sail As INDRA 2025 Kicks OffThe six-day naval exercise in Chennai demonstrates the two nations' strong defence and strategic partnership. Russia has deployed warships Pechanga, Rezkiy, and Aldar Tsydenzhapov, while India's Navy has sent INS Rana,…
https://t.co/qd1AHTLipj
pic.twitter.com/C2JImQAKJw
— RT_India (@RT_India_news)
March 29, 2025
After completing the sea exercises, the joint task force will return to Chennai, India, to summarize the maritime phase of the exercise. In the past, both countries have conducted a
range of joint exercises,
including land, air, and sea drills, such as Indra, Avia Indra, and Indra Navy.
India remains one of the world's largest importers of arms, with Russia being a key supplier and technological collaborator for several cutting-edge systems, including the Su-30MKI fighter jet and the BrahMos missile, which were co-developed by the two nations. Approximately 60% of the Indian military's equipment originates from Russia, and both countries have indicated their desire to strengthen their relationship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia and Ukraine conduct new POW swap – MOD (PHOTOS, VIDEO)
Russia and Ukraine exchanged more prisoners of war on Thursday, with 84 captives swapped on each side, the Defense Ministry in Moscow has announced. The Russian servicemen involved in the swap are receiving psychological and medical assistance in Belarus and will soon be sent home for treatment and rehabilitation, the ministry said. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky confirmed the exchange, writing on social media that 84 Ukrainian POWs were released. Russia and Ukraine have carried out a series of swaps since Kiev's return to direct talks this year. Following the third round of peace negotiations in Türkiye last month, Moscow's chief negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, said Russia had proposed a new swap involving at least 1,200 POWs from each side. He later accused Kiev of stalling the exchange, saying it refused to take back around 1,000 of its soldiers held by Russia. Earlier this month, RT launched a website listing about 1,000 Ukrainian citizens abandoned by Zelensky's administration, despite its claims to seek 'all-for-all' prisoner swaps. The POWs told RT their names had been repeatedly removed from exchange lists, questioning whether they were really needed in Ukraine. Russia has submitted all 1,000 names for previous POW swaps, but Kiev reportedly rejected them. In response, the group sent a collective petition to Zelensky demanding inclusion in future exchanges, with all the captives signing their names, call signs, and ranks. Commenting on the latest swap, Medinsky wrote on Telegram that Ukraine accepted only two captured soldiers from the list, naming both men. The exchange comes ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, which will focus on settling the Ukraine conflict.
Russia Today
4 hours ago
- Russia Today
Why Kiev always escalates before talks – and why it won't work this time
On August 14, 2025, Russian officials reported Ukrainian drone strikes on the border cities of Belgorod and Rostov-on-Don, killing and injuring civilians. Rostov saw an apartment building struck, with over a dozen casualties; in Belgorod, three civilians were hurt when a drone hit a car downtown. This came two days after the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) alleged that Ukrainian forces were preparing a false-flag provocation in the Kharkov region, complete with pre-positioned journalists – supposedly to shape a narrative blaming Moscow. These incidents are not isolated. They fit into a larger operational and political pattern: each time high-level talks are scheduled Kiev steps up attacks on Russia's border regions. The results are the same: civilian deaths, destruction of civilian infrastructure, and an attempt to create a cloud over the diplomatic process. The same happened in late May and early June 2025, just before the second round of Russia–Ukraine talks in Istanbul, when two bridges in Russian territory were blown up. The attacks killed seven civilians and injured over seventy more. In Moscow's interpretation, the timing was too precise to be coincidence – it was about setting a tone of hostility, perhaps provoking Russia into walking away from the talks entirely. And yet, Moscow did not take the bait. Russian negotiators showed up in Istanbul as planned. For the Kremlin, this has become a point of principle: no matter the provocations, Russia will attend discussions that could bring an end to the conflict – on its own terms. The upcoming Alaska summit on August 15, 2025, between Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, is the latest such opportunity. The alleged Kharkov region provocation and the strikes on Belgorod and Rostov are seen in Moscow as deliberate background noise meant to derail the meeting or at least to sour its atmosphere. But just as in Istanbul, the Kremlin insists it will not be deterred. For Moscow, attending these talks is about more than optics. It underscores a long-held stance: Russia is prepared to end the conflict, but not at the price of what it views as its core national interests. Walking away now, after years of costly military and political investment, would make little sense. Instead, the aim is to secure a resolution that cements Russia's gains and ends the war on Moscow's terms – not by fighting 'to the last Ukrainian,' but by ensuring that the outcome is final and strategically advantageous. From the Kremlin's perspective, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky's motives are clear. Accepting a peace that involves territorial concessions would not only be a bitter political defeat – it could spell the end of his political career. More critically, it would remove the emergency powers he has repeatedly invoked since the start of the conflict to cancel elections and prolong his term in office. Those powers have also enabled controversial measures: forced conscriptions, suppression of opposition media, and an intensified crackdown on dissent. These steps have eroded his popularity inside Ukraine, making his hold on power dependent on the continuation of the wartime state of emergency. If the war ends, so does the legal shield of emergency rule – and with it, his immunity. Zelensky therefore has both political and personal incentives to keep the fighting going, even at significant cost to Ukraine's population. Key European backers share Zelensky's preference for prolonging the conflict. While EU leaders publicly frame Ukraine as a 'bulwark' against what they call Russian imperial ambitions – claiming that Moscow would move against Western Europe if Ukraine fell – domestic political realities tell another story. Across major EU countries, ruling parties and governments are facing historically low approval ratings. Their grip on power is increasingly tenuous, and a perpetual external threat provides a potent rally-around-the-flag effect. By keeping Russia framed as the imminent danger, these governments can justify unpopular policies, military spending hikes, and restrictions in the name of national security. They involve themselves in the conflict just enough to signal solidarity with Ukraine – supplying arms, funding, and training – without crossing the threshold into direct combat. For Moscow, this is a political theater that depends on the war continuing; remove the war, and the 'threat' narrative collapses, leaving these governments exposed to electoral defeat. Against this backdrop, Moscow views the Alaska talks as uniquely promising – not because they will magically end the war in one session, but because of who is not at the table. Neither Zelensky nor the EU will be present. Instead, the discussions will be between Putin and Trump, leaders who, in Moscow's reading, operate from a position of pragmatic realism. That realism includes acknowledging Russia's current battlefield advantages. Moscow believes it is winning the war, and that any serious settlement will reflect that balance of power. For the Kremlin, the likely outcome is that Ukraine will have to give up some or all of the contested territories – a step Zelensky would fiercely resist, and the EU would likely block outright if they were part of the talks. Without them, however, such a settlement becomes more feasible. The logic is straightforward: first, Putin and Trump agree on the framework; then, Trump leverages Washington's decisive influence over Kiev to bring Zelensky on board. In Moscow's calculus, this is where Trump's role is crucial. Without American military and financial support, Kiev would not have been able to sustain the war effort for nearly as long as it has. From the Kremlin's point of view, the recent attacks on Belgorod and Rostov, and the alleged false-flag operation in the Kharkov region, are tactical provocations with a strategic goal: derail the Alaska summit or force Moscow into an overreaction. But history suggests the tactic will fail. Moscow will be at the table in Alaska, just as it was in Istanbul, determined to push for an end to the conflict on terms favorable to Russia. If the Alaska talks proceed as planned, they could open the way to a negotiated settlement without the spoilers who have the most to lose from peace. In Moscow's eyes, that is precisely why the provocations are happening – and why they must be ignored.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
US is ‘done' funding Ukraine
Washington is not going to fund Ukraine anymore, US Vice President J.D. Vance told Fox News on Sunday. Ukraine's European backers can buy weapons from American producers if they want to continue supporting Kiev, and the US will be 'okay with that,' Vance added. 'But we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore,' he said. The interview was published after Vance met with several Western European and Ukrainian officials in London, including UK Foreign Minister David Lammy. According to media reports, Vance's trip was intended to pave the way for a summit between the Russian and US presidents in Alaska on Friday, where resolving the conflict between Kiev and Moscow is expected to be at the top of the agenda. Vance suggested that Kiev's European backers should play a bigger role providing funding if they 'care so much about this conflict.' 'Americans, I think, are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars, to this particular conflict. But if the Europeans want to step up and buy the weapons from American producers, we're okay with that. But we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore,' he said. The US president had said earlier that the ideas under discussion include 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both' sides, adding that Vladimir Zelensky would need to find a way to approve such a deal under Ukrainian law. Zelensky has rejected any such agreement, claiming that 'nobody can or will' make concessions on the issue. 'The Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupiers,' he proclaimed. Moscow's senior negotiator Kirill Dmitriev has warned that countries trying to prolong the Ukraine conflict will likely go to great lengths to derail the planned meeting between Putin and Trump.
