Recuse Or Represent? Kitner's Ties Test Voter Trust In Dallas City Council D11 Runoff
As the Dallas City Council District 11 runoff election peaks, voters are scrutinizing the candidates' backgrounds and potential conflicts of interest.
Bill Roth, a commercial realtor, positions himself as a dedicated advocate for taxpayers for Texans, while his opponent, Jeff Kitner, faces a bigger set of questions regarding his dual roles and affiliations around the DFW area, as previously reported by The Dallas Express.
Many of those conflicts of interest are now raising local eyebrows.
Kitner serves as the Chief Operating Officer of the North Dallas Chamber of Commerce, a prominent lobbying organization representing a collection of 'business' interests, including developers and corporate contractors. If elected, Kitner has indicated plans to continue part-time employment with the Chamber, according to previous reports, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest if he wins the election.
Dallas City Code Chapter 12A mandates that officials disclose and recuse themselves from matters where conflicts exist, potentially limiting Kitner's participation in key council decisions affecting District 11 – The very district he wants to represent.
Some critics could argue that Kitner's ongoing ties to the Chamber could compromise his ability to impartially represent citizens in his area, especially when council votes intersect with Chamber members' interests.
Steve Nordseth, treasurer of the Save Pepper Square Neighborhood Association, previously told DX, 'It's like applying for a job to be a referee while staying on as a coach of one of the competing teams.'
In contrast, Roth emphasizes his commitment to serving District 11 without outside connections that might block his council responsibilities or cause any recusals. He is also currently campaigning for transparent governance and prioritizing the needs of local residents over external business interests.
Practically every important decision, from zoning and development to infrastructure projects and city contracts, affects the interests of Chamber members in Kitner's district. And each time Kitner would have to recuse himself from those discussions, District 11's voice would be absent, as Nordseth previously pointed out to DX.
The runoff election is scheduled for June 7. As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the debate over potential conflicts of interest remains a pivotal issue in the race.
'Serving as a Dallas City Councilmember can sometimes blur the lines between full-time and all the time,' said current councilmember Cara Mendelsohn in April.
Blur the lines, indeed.
As of the time of publication, Kitner's team has not responded to multiple requests for comment on his campaign or any conflict of interests connected to serving District 11.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Cyber Command signed into law: What this means for Texans
AUSTIN (KXAN) — On Monday, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 150, which creates a state-based cybersecurity department, into law. The Texas Cyber Command was passed during the 89th regular legislative session and is expected to help protect Texans against cyber threats. RELATED | Lawmakers file bills to create Texas Cyber Command 'Our state is under constant attack by cyber criminals, attacks that occur thousands of times every single second of every single day,' Abbott said. 'I'm signing a law that creates the Texas Cyber Command. Its ultimate mission is to prevent and protect against cyber breaches. Working together with the Texas Cyber Command, Texas will be on the path to be a national leader in cybersecurity.' According to the governor's office, the Texas Cyber Command will: Launch a cyber threat intelligence center to identify and repair weaknesses and to educate users on preventing cyber breaches Coordinate with governments on responses to cyberattacks Collaborate with local, state and federal partners to establish 'the gold standard for cybersecurity' RELATED | Is your data safe? Lawmakers say it's time for a Texas Cyber Command The department, which is headquartered in San Antonio, was funded through a $135 million investment, according to the governor's office. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - American energy is still being held hostage by Paris
The 2016 Paris Climate Accord is more than a bad deal — it is a globalist straitjacket that President Trump has rightly called a 'rip-off.' But even though Trump has pulled America out of it (twice), Paris still haunts our national security, our economy and the president's 'energy dominance' agenda. Despite Trump's unwavering commitment to withdrawing from this 'unfair, one-sided' pact and his condemnation of Biden's rejoining as a 'disaster,' powerful interests — big oil, big tech, manufacturers and industrial electricity users — are perpetuating the accord's influence. In Texas, these forces are fighting long-overdue grid reliability reforms that would force unreliable wind and solar generators to pay for the chaos they cause, costs that are dumped onto families and small businesses. This would effectively charge ratepayers to subsidize corporate virtue-signaling tied to climate commitments, leaving Texans to foot the bill for an agenda that undermines energy reliability. In 2021, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) issued a clear directive to the Public Utility Commission to 'allocate reliability costs to generation resources that cannot guarantee their own availability, such as wind or solar power.' This commonsense reform would force renewable energy providers to internalize their true costs. Yet the commission has so far ignored this directive, leaving Texas families and small businesses to bear what amounts to an electricity tax. In 2023, Texas ratepayers were saddled with a staggering $2.3 billion tab to cover the costs of wind and solar power's unreliability. Trump has been crystal clear about the Paris Accord's harm, stating in the first-term executive order, 'This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States.' His administration's withdrawal from the accord was a bold step toward energy dominance. Yet corporate America, bolstered by misguided policies, continues to undermine his vision. Former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act pours billions in subsidies and tax breaks into inefficient solar, wind and battery technologies, inflating electricity costs and distorting markets. Congress's latest proposal, the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, delays meaningful cuts to these subsidies. This protracted timeline will spark a frenzy of green tech deployments, further driving up electricity costs for Americans already grappling with what can only be described as an energy emergency. This is not the path to energy dominance; it is a capitulation to the 'climate cartel.' The costs of this agenda are not just financial — they are existential. Texas's energy grid, ERCOT, once a model of resilience, is increasingly strained due to the variability of wind and solar, which cannot deliver power when it is needed most. The 2021 winter storm in Texas and recent blackouts in Europe exposed the fragility of over-reliance on renewables, yet the same corporate interests that champion Paris are doubling down on these flawed technologies. The inconsistency is glaring. Big tech giants and industrial users demand grid reliability to power their production, data centers and factories, yet they fiercely oppose market reforms that would reward reliability and hold renewable energy accountable for its variability. Through power purchase agreements, these companies buy 'carbon-free' electricity to signal their Paris compliance, but buried in those deals are provisions that let renewable providers pass higher grid costs back to the buyer if and only if new rules or legislation force them to pay for their own unreliability. That is why lobbyists from Big Tech, Big Oil and 'woke' utilities have all descended on Austin to oppose reforms. They don't want their bill to come due. To break free from the Paris Climate scam and reclaim American energy independence, Texas and the federal government must act decisively. Texas has already led by example — in 2021, the state banned financial institutions that boycott fossil fuels from doing business with the state, striking a blow against the Environmental, Social and Governance or ESG movement, which I have called 'Wall Street's green coercion.' But the fight must go further. The Public Utility Commission of Texas should swiftly implement Gov. Abbott's directive to allocate reliability costs to renewable generators, ending the market distortions being fueled by corporate virtue signaling. Companies with Net Zero or Paris Accord commitments — just like those boycotting fossil fuels — should be barred from receiving public contracts, subsidies and tax breaks. These 'woke' corporations undermine Trump's America First energy agenda, and Congress is enabling them by stalling the repeal of the Inflation Reduction Act's green handouts. We need to reject the timid phasedown in the One, Big Beautiful Bill Act and instead dismantle the Inflation Reduction Act entirely. As I testified before the House Oversight Committee, this agenda diverts resources from reliable, affordable energy in service of globalist elites, threatening both our economic liberty and energy security. The grip that the Paris Accords hold on our energy system is a betrayal of Texas values and American priorities. We deserve an energy future that puts affordability and reliability first, not one manipulated by liberal executives and unelected climate bureaucrats. Trump started the fight. Paris or America? Pick one. Jason Isaac is the founder and CEO of the American Energy Institute. He previously served four terms in the Texas House of Representatives. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
BlackRock removed from Texas investment blacklist after rolling back woke policies: ‘We're seeing a course correction'
BlackRock has been removed from Texas's investment blacklist, a major reversal that follows the asset management giant's decision to scale back some of its controversial climate commitments. The move, announced Tuesday by Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar, ends a three-year ban that had prevented state pension and investment funds from doing business with the world's largest asset manager over its environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies. 3 BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is seen above on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in April 2025. REUTERS 'This marks a meaningful shift,' Hegar said. 'Texas has played a leadership role in standing up to financial institutions that try to push political agendas under the guise of environmental concern. We're seeing a course correction.' Texas funds hold an estimated $50 billion in assets. A BlackRock spokesperson told The Post: 'We appreciate the Comptroller's resolution of this matter.' 'More than $4 billion in Texas funds are invested with BlackRock,' the rep said. The Larry Fink-led company had $11.55 trillion in assets under management at the end of the fourth quarter in 2024. We are 'proud to help millions of Texans retire with dignity and, on behalf of clients, invests over $400 billion in corporations, local governments, energy infrastructure and other private assets throughout the state,' the spokesperson said 'These investments support the continued growth of the Texas economy.' BlackRock had drawn fire from Republican-led states like Texas for supporting climate-focused investment strategies and for its involvement in initiatives aimed at reducing global emissions. 3 Texas has taken action against companies that have adopted ESG (environmental, social and governance) investment strategies. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott is pictured. Jay Janner/American-Statesman / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images But over the past year, the New York City-based firm has distanced itself from some of those efforts. In January, it exited the Climate Action 100+ investor group. It also withdrew from the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative, a UN-backed coalition focused on reducing portfolio emissions. The rollback appears to have helped smooth tensions with officials in Texas, where fossil fuels remain a key pillar of the economy and political identity. The Texas comptroller's office had added BlackRock and other financial firms to its restricted list in 2022 after lawmakers passed legislation targeting perceived boycotts of the oil and gas industry. That law required the comptroller to identify firms that 'discriminate' against fossil fuel companies and to direct state funds to divest from them. Since then, the blacklist has become a flashpoint in the national debate over ESG investing. 3 BlackRock is the world's largest asset manager, overseeing $11.6 trillion in investments across global markets for governments, institutions and individuals. REUTERS While many conservatives have argued that large asset managers wield too much influence in promoting progressive agendas, others — including some within the financial industry — warned that the restrictions risked limiting returns and politicizing fiduciary decision-making. BlackRock has repeatedly pushed back on claims that it engages in coordinated efforts to undermine the fossil fuel sector. 'We never set out to penalize any company,' Hegar said Tuesday, 'but we made clear there would be consequences for putting politics ahead of financial performance.' Despite the thaw in relations, BlackRock remains the subject of a separate legal fight with a coalition of Republican attorneys general, including Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who allege the firm has violated antitrust laws through its ESG commitments. BlackRock has denied the charges, calling them baseless.
