Defense Department to spend $1 billion on ‘offensive' hacking: What that means—and the major risk involved
The funding comes from a provision tucked into President Donald Trump's massive 940-page One Big Beautiful Bill, which was recently passed and signed into law on July 4. The mega bill also increases overall defense spending from lasy year's fiscal 2024 levels of $873 billion, or 12.9% of the federal budget, per USAFacts a nonprofit initiative to make government data more understandable.
According to the report, the bill does not specify what the 'offensive cyber operations' are, or what software would qualify for funding; however, it does stipulate the funding will go to enhancing and improving the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), based in Hawaii, which is the responsible for defending and promting U.S. interests in the Pacific and Asia, including China.
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), senior cyber advisor Marcus Willet has described offensive cyber operations as those which 'most often entail influencing, misleading or otherwise cognitively affecting a competitor or adversary by, for example, planting false information. But they can also be used for disablement.'
Adding,'Offensive cyber operations are of increasing significance in international affairs and bring with them a range of strategic risks.'
Democrat Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who sits on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said that the funding comes as the same time the Trump administration has cut other defensive cybersecurity programs—including slashing the staff and budget for the the U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA—which Wyden said has 'left our country wide open to attack by foreign hackers,' according to the report.
'Vastly expanding U.S. government hacking is going to invite retaliation — not just against federal agencies, but also rural hospitals, local governments and private companies who don't stand a chance against nation-state hackers,' Wyden told TechCrunch.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walmart is cutting hundreds of store-support roles, Bloomberg News reports
(Reuters) -Walmart is cutting hundreds of store-support roles, in its latest move to simply its structure, Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday, citing a memo. The U.S. retail bellwether is eliminating the market coordinator job that supports some managers, the report said. These coordinators are considered to be corporate positions, assisting market managers, who are responsible for supervising roughly a dozen store managers each, it said. The company is also cutting some coach and coordinator roles at Walmart Academy, which trains store employees and managers, according to the report. Market coordinators and academy coaches will be guaranteed store-level coach roles in the local area, the report said. Walmart did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US tells automakers they face no fuel economy penalties for last three years
By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year under a law signed by President Donald Trump this month, U.S. regulators said. The tax and budget bill approved by Trump ends penalties for not meeting Corporate Average Fuel Economy rules under a 1975 energy law. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a letter to automakers seen by Reuters it is working on its reconsideration of fuel economy rules. The decision is one of a number made by Washington to make it easier for automakers to build gasoline-powered vehicles and to make electric vehicle sales more costly. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. Trump last month signed a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035. Last year, Tesla said it received $2.8 billion in global revenue from regulatory credits it earns from selling zero-emission EVs and sells to other automakers seeking to meet vehicle emissions targets. Republican Senator Bernie Moreno of Ohio said the costs automakers paid Tesla to be in compliance were "outrageous". Trump NHTSA Administrator nominee Jonathan Morrison said Wednesday at a Senate hearing "at the end of the day a consumer is going to pay for that." The law signed by Trump this month specifies that vehicle fines would be eliminated for any year that NHTSA had not finalized. Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign, criticized the decision. "The Trump administration is reaching back in time to give an obscene gift to pollution law violators GM and Stellantis at the expense of the American taxpayer,' Becker said. "The automakers lobbied hard for this 'get out of jail free' card. They get hundreds of millions in fines canceled." GM and Stellantis did not immediately comment. Senate Republicans estimated the law would save automakers $200 million. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers, thanked congressional leaders for addressing concerns about fuel economy rules saying "given current market conditions, the existing standards were challenging for many auto manufacturers to achieve." In 2023, under former President Joe Biden, NHTSA said its proposal to hike fuel economy standards through 2032 would cost the industry $14 billion in projected fines including $6.5 billion for GM, $3 billion for Stellantis and $1 billion for Ford Motor. The final rule adopted in 2024 eased requirements and said the auto industry would face no more than $1.83 billion in fines from 2027 through 2031. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Eagles Racing Clock After Sauce Gardner Sets Cornerback Contract Market
Eagles Racing Clock After Sauce Gardner Sets Cornerback Contract Market originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The cornerback market just exploded. The New York Jets signed Sauce Gardner to a four-year, $120.4 million extension with $85.653 million guaranteed, making him the highest-paid cornerback in NFL history. The deal surpasses Derek Stingley Jr.'s $30 million annual average and resets the entire market at the position. For the Philadelphia Eagles, fresh off their Super Bowl victory, this creates both opportunity and urgency. The Eagles struck gold with their first two picks last season — cornerbacks Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean, both Defensive Rookie of the Year finalists. DeJean didn't allow a single touchdown on 68 targets and delivered an iconic Super Bowl pick-six off Patrick Mahomes, while Mitchell locked down receivers all season. With both players on rookie contracts through 2027, the Eagles have a narrow window before facing extension decisions that could rival Gardner's massive deal. But here's where Howie Roseman's magic comes into play. Roseman has mastered the art of salary cap manipulation — converting base salaries into signing bonuses and using void years to spread commitments across future seasons. The results speak for themselves: Saquon Barkley's 2025 cap hit is just $6.66 million despite his deal averaging more than $20 million per year, while Zack Baun counts only $4.39 million against a $17 million annual deal. This aggressive restructuring works because the salary cap keeps rising — from $182.5 million in 2021 to $255.4 million in 2024. Roseman essentially takes interest-free loans against future cap increases, a strategy many conservative owners won't embrace but Jeffrey Lurie fully supports. The Eagles have already made strategic moves for flexibility, releasing veteran Darius Slay to save $4.3 million in 2025 and $17.8 million in 2026. Sitting on $30.8 million in cap space with their core consuming just 44% of the cap, Philadelphia still has room to maneuver. Gardner's deal creates fascinating dynamics for the Eagles. Outside corners command significantly more money than slot players — only two of the NFL's 20 highest-paid corners primarily play nickel. This benefits DeJean, who's being evaluated at outside corner during OTAs, potentially boosting his market value alongside his natural slot role. The Eagles have nearly $400 million in salary cap dollars pushed into void years across their roster, underscoring their all-in approach. While this creates future obligations, it maximizes their current championship window — a strategy validated by their recent Super Bowl triumph. The timing decision looms large. Extending Mitchell and DeJean before 2026 would secure them ahead of free agency but likely at current market rates. With Gardner resetting the market at $30 million per year, waiting could prove costly. However, if anyone can navigate these financial waters while keeping a championship roster together, it's Roseman. The question isn't whether the Eagles can afford to pay their star cornerbacks — it's whether they can afford not to. With the market now established at historic levels, Philadelphia's window to secure its young core at manageable rates is closing fast. But with Roseman's proven track record and Lurie's willingness to spend, Eagles fans have every reason to believe their defensive foundation will remain intact. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 16, 2025, where it first appeared.
