Japan's Akazawa to Visit US to Press on Car Levy Cut Timing
Ryosei Akazawa's trip to Washington will be his first following the announcement of the trade agreement. The deal, reached after his eighth visit to the US capital since April, resulted in a pledge by the US to assess a 15% tariff on most imports of Japanese goods.
The deal allowed Japan to avoid a worst-case scenario of a 25% levy as threatened previously by President Donald Trump, but the universal levies will rise from the 10% rate imposed in recent months. The new rate is set to kick in on Aug. 7. Car tariffs are set to decline, but it remains unclear when that reduction will start.
'What we are asking for is very simple,' Akazawa told reporters before his departure. 'We'll continue to strongly urge the US to take steps to implement the agreement swiftly and steadily, including the reduction of tariffs on cars and car parts.'
With automobile tariffs currently at 27.5%, including a newly applied 25% this year and a previous 2.5% rate, the impact on Japan's economy is expected to be large. The sector accounts for the biggest component of exports to the US and serves as a pillar of employment and a trend setter for wage growth.
With assistance from Akemi Terukina.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump pulls the trigger, doubles India levy to 50%
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing an additional 25% tariff on all Indian goods entering the US, carrying out his threat made a day ago to penalise New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. Trump's additional 25% tariff followed after over a week of criticism focused on New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian energy. (REUTERS) The additional 25%, due to take effect on August 27, puts India at par with Brazil as the two countries whose exports will face the highest levy of 50% on their goods. The duties would put Indian exporters at a significant disadvantage compared to their rivals in Bangladesh, Indonesia and Vietnam – which face tariffs of between 19% and 20% tariffs. 'I have received additional information from various senior officials on the actions of the government of the Russian Federation with respect to the situation in Ukraine,' Trump wrote in the executive order. 'I determine that it is necessary and appropriate to impose an additional ad valorem duty on imports of articles of India, which is directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil.' India hit back, reiterating that the American actions are 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable'. 'India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests,' ministry of external affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, adding that it was 'extremely unfortunate' that the US had chosen to act against India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. He was alluding to continuing imports of Russian energy, especially LNG, by European Union (EU) member states that have paid Russia $105.6 billion for gas imports since the start of the invasion of Ukraine. Almost 87% of all EU imports of Russian LNG went to Spain, France or Belgium, people familiar with the matter said, asking not to be named. To be sure, the executive order continues exemptions provided earlier for sectors like pharmaceuticals and smartphones — though how long these exemptions remain is unclear. The order also exempts goods that are already in transit to America and which will clear US customs before September 17. 'The move places India among the most heavily taxed US trading partners, far above rivals such as China, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, and threatens most of India's $86.5 billion in annual exports to the US, from textiles to machinery,' according to analysis by the Global Trade Research Institute. 'The tariffs are expected to make Indian goods far costlier in the US, with potential to cut US-bound exports by 40–50%,' the GTRI analysis added. The executive order issued on Wednesday specifies that certain exemptions will continue. Among these are Section 232 national security exemptions that protect Indian pharmaceuticals — which account for about 40% of America's generic medicines — along with electronics, semiconductors and technology products that form the backbone of bilateral trade. Additional exemptions under Executive Order 14257's Annex II cover raw materials, certain metals and chemical formulations. Select product categories like apparels, vehicles and parts, furniture, organic chemicals and some food products like shrimp – which account for billions of dollars of exports -- will now face high tariffs entering the US market. Trump's additional 25% tariff followed after over a week of criticism focused on New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian energy. Washington has sought to increase economic pressure on Russia to negotiate an end to the Ukraine war by restricting Moscow's oil export revenues. India is Russia's second largest market for oil exports after China. In 2024, China purchased Russian oil worth $62.6 billion, followed by India's purchases to the tune of $52.7 billion. In the order, the US president also specified that he may – in the 21 days before the order takes effect – change the levy if 'if another country retaliates against the United States in response to this action, or if the government of the Russian Federation or a foreign country impacted by this order takes significant steps to address the national emergency and align sufficiently with the United States on national security, foreign policy, and economic matters.' In other words, Trump held out both a threat that he could ratchet up the levy or pare it back, depending on any retaliation or changes to Russia's stance in the war against Ukraine. Trump has set an August 8 deadline for Russia to agree to a Ukraine truce deal. 'There's a higher chance that India will find loopholes to concede the agri/soybean access the US has been asking for, than there is for India to halt oil purchases from Russia due to external pressure. Either way, it is unlikely that a decision will be taken on either front as long as Parliament is in session. Momentum on real solutions shouldn't be expected before August 20,' says Prerna Bountra, Deputy Director at the Ananta Aspen Centre, a New Delhi-based think tank. The rising tensions between India and the United States have also spiralled into a political controversy, with Opposition parties objecting to the government's handling of ties with America. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi called the move 'economic blackmail' by the US to bully India into an unfair trade deal, adding Prime Minister Narendra Modi should not let Indian interests be overridden. (With inputs from Rezaul H Laskar in New Delhi)
News18
28 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Says He Intends To Meet Putin, Zelensky As Early As Next Week, Following Witkoff Trip
New sanctions against Russia will still kick in the White House said, even as President Donald Trump praised a meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Vladimir Putin as 'highly productive' – and said he was open to meeting the Russian leader as early as next week. News18 Mobile App -
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
2028 Olympics bombshell: Donald Trump demands gender tests for all female competitors
Donald Trump suggests gender testing for female athletes at the Los Angeles Olympics. This follows controversy at the Paris Games involving boxers. Trump wants strict testing to ensure fairness. He cites concerns about athletes gaining unfair advantages. The proposal sparks debate about gender verification in sports. World Athletics already uses genetic testing. The IOC's policies face scrutiny. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Donald Trump want gender testing at the Olympics? What was the reason for the Imane Khelif scandal? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Will the rules for gender testing in World Athletics also apply to the Olympics? What will happen next for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics? FAQs US President Donald Trump is upending Olympic planning with a contentious new proposal. In a fiery press conference, he stated that all female athletes competing in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics should be subjected to, a move prompted by the controversy surrounding two female boxing champions from the 2024 Paris Games, who previously failed gender eligibility tests. He also announced a White House task force to oversee Olympic has made people more worried about fairness in women's sports and how governing bodies are dealing with issues of gender answered a reporter's direct question about transgender athletes in women's combat sports at a press event for the upcoming Los Angeles Olympics. He didn't beat around the bush when he said, "There will be a very strict way to test." And if the test results aren't right, they won't be able to compete in the Olympics, as per a report by the US president didn't say exactly how the testing would be done, but he was clear that he supports stricter eligibility rules for female two boxers, Algeria's Imane Khelif and Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, won gold medals at the Paris 2024 Olympics by dominating their weight classes, gender testing is once again being looked at there was a lot of talk when it came out that both had been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Championships in India for failing gender eligibility International Boxing Association (IBA), which was later stripped of Olympic governance by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), claimed the two athletes were ruled ineligible after confidential tests revealed they did not meet the "necessary eligibility criteria,' as per a report by the US IOC defended the policy at the time, saying that the athletes could compete in Paris based on their took advantage of the inconsistency. He stressed how important it is to keep American athletes safe and said that his administration would think about taking legal action against any male athletes who "masquerade as women" to gain an unfair advantage in a he left it up to the Department of Justice to decide what charges to bring, as per a report by the US Khelif and Lin Yu-ting made the news for their great performances at the Paris Games. But their history of failing previous eligibility tests has brought up the global debate about how to classify gender in elite sports IBA disqualified both athletes in 2023 because they were worried about biological advantages. Even though they could compete in the Paris Olympics under the IOC's rules, their past disqualifications made people worry about inconsistent policy enforcement. Critics say that the IOC's use of passports to determine gender doesn't do enough to make women's events fair, especially in combat testing is already common in sports other than boxing. World Athletics, the organization that runs track and field around the world, has announced new rules that will go into effect in September. These rules say that all female athletes who want to compete in big events like the World Championships must take a genetic test for the SRY gene, which tells you what biological sex you rule applies to famous athletes like Keely Hodgkinson and Georgia Hunter Bell from Britain, who are expected to follow it before the Tokyo World Championships start on September 13. The tests, which can be done with a cheek swab or a blood test, are not invasive and are meant to give a clear rules aren't in place for all Olympic events yet, but Trump's comments suggest that a similar system could be put in place for the LA 2028 Games, which he is in charge of. He even said he would lead a task force at the White House to oversee important parts of the Games, which could put him at the center of this heated rules about gender, eligibility, and fairness in women's sports are changing quickly as the Los Angeles Games get closer. There may be legal and moral problems with Trump's plan to make sex testing mandatory, but it has started a debate that is unlikely to go proposal follows a backlash from the Paris 2024 Games, where two female boxing gold medalists were previously disqualified due to gender eligibility isn't official yet. Trump has proposed "strong testing," but the specific procedures and legal approval are unclear.
