‘Now look elsewhere!' People's Power Party candidate Samuel Lee resigns
SINGAPORE: Samuel Lee, who contested in the recent General Election at Ang Mo Kio GRC under the People's Power Party (PPP), announced in a May 27 (Tuesday) social media post that he has resigned from the PPP.
'On May 23, I, Samuel Lee, resigned from the People's Power Party, to pursue new opportunities while continuing my commitment to activism and advocating for a better Singapore. I am grateful for the lessons learned and wish PPP well in its future,' he said in a 20-second video. @samuel_leeyr
On May 23 (2025), I, Samuel Lee, resigned from the People's Power Party to pursue new opportunities, while continuing my commitment to activism and advocating for a better Singapore. I am grateful for the lessons learned and wish PPP well in its future. Thank you #SamuelLeePostGE2025
♬ 原声 – Samuel Lee (李育儒) – Samuel Lee (李育儒)
Mr Lee, 33, drew widespread attention on Nomination Day (April 23), when he sang the lyrics from 'I'm Just A Tiny Bird,' a Chinese song, during an interview.
'I look left, look right, look left, look right, for a career path. Is this a request considered too high?' he sang. @woodafook
Can't deny this guy will be a legend in times to come #lookleftlookright #legend #therealslimshady
♬ The Real Slim Shady – Instrumental – Eminem
The other reason why the former candidate received attention leading up to the May 3 polls is that he had been charged with two counts of reckless behaviour endangering the lives of others. This was for an incident in February 2022 in Toa Payoh, at a pedestrian crossing near Victory Family Centre's technical support centre.
While driving a Mercedes-Benz, Mr Lee collided into the gate of the centre after he had an argument with a rider on a Personal Mobility Device (PMD) .
Read related: Police investigating roadside jostling for right of way between Mercedes driver and PMD rider
He was given a six-week jail sentence in June 2024.
Goh Meng Seng, the secretary-general of the PPP, said that the party was aware of the incident. The party added that Mr Lee had been remorseful over what happened and had taken full responsibility for his actions, CNA reported on April 25.
'The Party believes strongly in rehabilitation and second chances,' the PPP said in a statement to the media over the matter.
According to the CNA report, Mr Lee had been part of PPP since late 2023 and had been a member of its Central Executive Committee, handling matters related to the press.
'Born in a humble family and raised with the values of hard work and resilience, Samuel knows firsthand the challenges faced by ordinary Singaporeans,' wrote the PPP about Mr Lee last month, adding, 'Samuel is 33 years old. His political awakening originated from a simple but powerful realisation that no amount of individual hard work can fix a system that isn't working for the people. Therefore, he is passionate about championing policies that put people first.'
On May 27, many commenters online brought back the lyrics Mr Lee sang last month as they commented on his resignation.
'Look right, look left and now look elsewhere!' wrote one Facebook user, who nevertheless gave the former candidate props 'for being brave enough to stand in elections!'
Another quipped that he would 'Continue [to] look left, look right, look for a better opportunity.'
One asked, 'Look left and right and now look where???' /TISG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Police Coast Guard steps up patrols around Sentosa after security barriers damaged
The Police Coast Guard has stepped up patrols around Sentosa, after a barge damaged a portion of floating security barriers on Jun 6 morning. The container barge was found grounded along the shore of Sentosa's Tanjong Beach. Authorities say no one was hurt and there is no risk of pollution. Associate Professor Goh Puay Guan from the Centre for Maritime Studies at the National University of Singapore discusses the incident. He talks about how the barge might have detached from the tug boat and if there were any lapses in protocol.
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
'Culturally sensitive' mediation: Can a new China-led international outfit earn global trust?
SINGAPORE: A new international mediation group spearheaded by China - with most of its founding members from Asia, Africa and the Caribbean - could serve as a 'softer' alternative to existing dispute resolution bodies like the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) that are perceived to be Western-led, analysts say. Signed into law on May 30 at a ceremony in Hong Kong presided over by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, the International Organisation for Mediation (IOMed) aims to 'resolve world issues through dialogue and understanding'. 'The establishment of the IOMed helps to move beyond the zero-sum mindset of 'you lose and I win',' said Wang, who also hailed it as an 'innovative step in international rule of law'. 'It will fill an institutional gap in international mediation and serve as an important public good in the field of the rule of law for better global governance,' he added. Analysts observe that the IOMed is being positioned as a model that is more acutely attuned to cultural sensitivities. 'What sets IOMed apart from institutions like the ICJ or PCA is its philosophical orientation,' said Kun Fan, an arbitrator and associate professor at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). 'While those global bodies centre on binding adjudication, IOMed will adopt a softer, consensus-based model grounded in mediation, compromise and cultural sensitivity,' she added. Enthusiasm and support from developing countries have also signalled Beijing's efforts to court the Global South, experts noted. Global bodies like the ICJ, PCA and International Criminal Court (ICC), 'lack objectivity and neutrality and cannot be trusted to deliver justice in global governance', said Joyce Chimbi, a journalist from Kenya, one of 33 countries which joined the IOMed. 'Africa has long been dissatisfied with the existing world order, especially with international dispute settlement instruments bred in the West, which are often blind to the cultural sensitivities of African states and their societies,' Chimbi told the Chinese state tabloid Global Times after Friday's signing ceremony. She also noted the significant role China played in brokering a reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran back in 2023 - a deal hailed as a major step towards peace and stability in the Middle East. 'When China brokered a reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023, it proved that mediation comes with many advantages, including cultural sensitivities and inclusion. It is also cost-effective, flexible, convenient, fast and easy to implement,' Chimbi said. Yet not everyone is convinced by China's growing role as a global mediator. In an era of tariffs, trade wars and heightened geopolitical tensions, analysts said the Chinese-led mediation body will need to earn global credibility and demonstrate impartiality in resolving conflicts. 'What would happen if its rulings differ from the ICJ and other global courts?' said political scientist Chong Ja Ian from the National University of Singapore (NUS). WHO'S IN? Thirty-three countries so far have signed up. Among them, long-term Beijing allies like Cambodia, Pakistan and Belarus - and Pacific nations like Vanuatu, where competition between the US and China has been escalating. Also joining them are multiple African countries including Algeria, Ethiopia, Kenya, Benin, Cameroon, Uganda, Sudan and Zimbabwe. 'The signatories definitely lean towards (being) more China-friendly, but they are also generally countries China wants to court,' noted China analyst Robert Rust from the US science advocacy nonprofit the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). 'Most are also countries in the Global South where China wants to position itself as a global leader.' Also on the list are Venezuela, Iran and Cuba, which Rust described as countries 'targeted or excluded by the US and its connected international bodies to varying degrees'. And for now, the usual China-friendly countries like Russia, as well as Central Asian states, have not signed up as members. 22:28 Min Fan from UNSW also noted that several countries are Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) member-states. 'These early signatories signal that the IOMed is an institution clearly positioned within the BRI ecosystem,' she said. "The aim is not simply to serve disputes but to offer more inclusive and culturally resonant institutional architecture that reflect BRI values and interests." 'NO LOSERS' IN MEDIATION The ICJ, which has its seat in The Hague, is the world's highest court - established after World War Two as a judicial organ of the UN to adjudicate disputes between countries and provide advisory opinions on issues arising under international law. The Chinese-led IOMed will also function on the basis of international law, according to officials, but with a focus on resolving global disputes through mediation. Its scope covers disputes between states, disputes between states and foreign nationals, as well as commercial disputes between private parties. 'Unlike the ICJ or the PCA, which adopt largely adversarial processes based on legal rights, the IOMed will use mediation,' said Lawrence Boo, a Singaporean professor and arbitrator, noting that there are 'no losers' in mediated settlements. While both arbitration and mediation involve neutral third parties, they differ in a crucial way. An arbitrator hears evidence and makes a binding decision. A mediator, by contrast, does not decide the outcome - instead they facilitate difficult conversations to help disputing parties find a mutually acceptable solution. 'Mediation creates space for win-win solutions that foster long-term relationships and preserve sovereignty - priorities that resonate not only with China's vision, but with many countries in the Global South that are seeking more balanced, inclusive dispute resolution mechanisms,' said Fan. 'In that sense, China's leadership in establishing IOMed is both a strategic effort to shape international legal norms and a response to broader demands for more cooperative and culturally sensitive governance frameworks.' IMPACT ON REGIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTRES The new mediation body, headquartered in Hong Kong, aims to cement the city's presence as a top centre to resolve disputes between countries, Chief Executive John Lee said. Work could begin as early as the end of this year, Hong Kong government officials said, revealing that the IOMed would later establish a secretariat and governing council. Signatory countries will be eligible to nominate their own nationals as mediators, said Hong Kong's Secretary for Justice Paul Lam. 'The acceptance and influence of the IOMed will depend much on how it will administer the organisation and more importantly, how professional are their mediators - they must get those in the field and not just political figures,' Boo said, adding that he was 'hopeful initial reservations and anti-China bias would give way to pragmatic acceptance'. Hong Kong is already an arbitration hub, tying with Singapore for second place, behind London, as the top choice for a seat of arbitration this year, according to the 2025 International Arbitration Survey conducted by Queen Mary University of London. While some view the China-led IOMed as a potential competitor to existing dispute resolution centres in the region, analysts say the initiative is more likely to complement rather than displace established players in the region. These include the Singapore International Mediation Centre (SIMC) and Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), both of which have earned reputations as leading institutions in Asia. 'We're witnessing the emergence of a more multipolar dispute resolution ecosystem,' said Fan, describing it as multiple tracks 'reflecting different legal traditions and institutional logics, which can be tailored to different users' needs'. Boo views IOMed's arrival as a positive step - particularly in raising global awareness of mediation as a viable and often underused method of resolving international disputes. 'There is now an international organisation willing to champion mediation as the more appropriate form of dispute resolution,' he said. Institutions like Singapore's SIMC and SIAC will 'continue to be relevant', Boo said, suggesting that IOMed might need the 'support of existing institutions to promote its cause'. In his view, increased global awareness of mediation could in fact raise caseloads for SIMC, rather than divert them. He added that arbitration and mediation are not mutually exclusive but 'different nodes of resolving disputes' which could 'grow in tandem without affecting the other'. But IOMed's primary focus would still be on state-to-state disputes as well as Investor-State Dispute Settlements (ISDS) - mechanisms in trade and investment agreements allowing for foreign investors to resolve disputes with foreign governments of countries they are investing in. This is distinctive from commercial caseloads that dominate Singapore's arbitration and mediation landscape, Boo said. 'IMPORTANT QUESTIONS' REMAIN While China has said that the IOMed would adhere to international law and the United Nations Charter, experts have raised questions about its impartiality and credibility. 'Like many major global powers, China often tries to ignore or go around international legal proceedings and rulings which are not in their favour,' said Chong from NUS, noting that Beijing's record of solving disputes tended to be 'primarily political rather than legal'. He recalled Beijing's dismissal of a 2016 landmark PCA decision in the Hague, which ruled in favour of the Philippines - concluding that China had no legal basis to claim historic rights to the bulk of the disputed South China Sea. 'China's new mediation body will ultimately serve as an alternative to the ICJ (by providing) a more suitable legal system which Beijing is comfortable with,' he said. However, major questions remain, Chong said. For instance, he questioned whether the IOMed would be able to rule against Beijing given that courts in both Hong Kong and mainland China have refused to do so in the past, and whether it could also re-litigate decisions made previously at the ICJ. 'Would this encourage other major powers to further ignore international law - if global rulings (elsewhere weren't in their favour)? Could these major powers start setting up their own courts that conform more with their own legal systems and comfort levels?' he asked. 'These are important questions that remain unresolved and ultimately, more questions remain than answers.'
Independent Singapore
5 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'Death by a thousand cuts': Bukit Batok forest faces imminent axe despite wildlife warnings and public outcry
SINGAPORE: A young forest tucked behind the HomeTeamNS Adventure Centre in Bukit Batok is set to be mostly cleared for housing development, despite warnings from environmentalists and a recently released Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) urging caution. The forest, which grew naturally on cleared land since the 1960s, has become a key habitat and corridor for endangered species, including the critically endangered straw-headed bulbul—one of the rarest songbirds in the world. Singapore is its last global stronghold, and the Bukit Batok plot is one of its few remaining footholds in the west. A patch too small? Only 0.48 hectares of the forest—less than 10 per cent of the existing vegetation—will be retained as a 'stepping stone' for wildlife movement between the western green spaces and the Central Nature Reserves. The rest of the 5.5-hectare forest will be cleared to make way for a 14.5-hectare housing estate at the junction of Bukit Batok Road and Bukit Batok West Avenue 5. The plot includes the current Bukit Batok Driving Centre and nearby scrubland. See also Why did HDB hire US based lawyers when it is in deficit? To compensate, the report proposes greening the new estate with native flora and creating a forest-like vertical structure to support flying fauna. For ground-based wildlife, NParks is exploring the possibility of dedicated crossings. But the measures haven't gone far enough for conservationists. 'This is a very small patch with decent butterfly diversity, which suggests it's well connected to surrounding forests,' said ecologist Dr Anuj Jain, who has studied the area. 'It's like death by a thousand cuts' Youth nature group, Singapore Youth Voices for Biodiversity (SYVB), called for more decisive action. Outreach head Jayden Kang raised concerns over the limited forest retention in Bukit Batok. He noted that developments like Tengah had already affected the western ecological network, and suggested that further clearing could worsen the impact. He likened the current pattern of fragmented development to 'death by a thousand cuts.' The ecological implications go beyond Bukit Batok. Experts warn that Singapore's wildlife relies on forest corridors to move, breed, and maintain genetic diversity. If these green links are severed, it could lead to population crashes among already fragile species. See also "Superman" spotted in Singapore! Reports about this development acknowledged that construction will likely cause 'noticeable stress' on flora and flying fauna, even with mitigation in place. Backlash on World Environment Day On June 5—World Environment Day—the Instagram account of Woodlands Botanical Gardens published a scathing response. 'It is incredibly disgusting how they try to cheat the people by saying they will retain a tiny bit of forest,' the post read. 'There is not enough buffer zone to minimise impact. Even when the EIA says it's not a good idea, you still go ahead. So what then is the use of an EIA?' The post also questioned the sincerity of the public consultation process, accusing agencies of offering feedback opportunities only to 'show face'—not to meaningfully engage. 'Stop trying to placate the people with cheap tactics,' the group added. 'Walk the talk you falsely showcase to the world.' In a pointed remark, the group proposed an alternative: demolish underutilised Good Class Bungalows (GCBs) instead of natural forests if the aim is truly to house more people. See also Singapore Catholic churches offer shelter to homeless people 'GCBs house four or five. HDBs house hundreds. If housing is a basic need, then prioritise it where it matters.' What happens next? While there is no official timeline yet, signs point to redevelopment beginning in the next decade. The Bukit Batok Driving Centre's lease has been extended till the end of 2028, and a new clubhouse replacing HomeTeamNS' facilities is expected by 2031. Public feedback on the EIA is open until June 15 at 6 p.m. on the HDB website. But many in the nature community are already sceptical of whether public sentiment will sway planning outcomes. For now, the future of the Bukit Batok forest—and the wildlife that calls it home—remains hanging in the balance. What is clear is that trust in the system has been shaken. And once the trees fall, there may be no going back.
