2 more attacks on Jews heighten concerns about security in and around US synagogues
Now, they're sounding the alarm for more help after a dozen people were injured in Boulder while demonstrating for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza on Sunday. And just over a week earlier, two Israeli Embassy staffers were fatally shot outside a Jewish museum in Washington.
After that shooting, 43 Jewish organizations issued a joint statement requesting more support from the U.S. government for enhanced security measures. Specifically, they asked Congress to increase funding to the Nonprofit Security Grant Program to $1 billion.
'Every Jewish organization has been serious about security for years. We have to be,' said Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism. 'The grants are to harden the buildings, for things like cameras and glass, and some kind of blockage so they can't drive a truck into the building."
'These are the everyday realities of Jewish life in the 21st century in America. It's a sad reality, but it is an essential responsibility of leadership to make sure that people are first and foremost safe.'
Shira Hutt, executive vice president at The Jewish Federations of North America, said existing federal funds were inadequate, with only 43% of last year's applicants to the grant program receiving funding.
Citing the attack in Boulder, she said increased funding for local law enforcement is also crucial.
'Thankfully, the attack was stopped before even further damage could have been done,' she said. 'This is really now a full-blown crisis, and we need to make sure that we have all the support necessary."
One of the Jewish Federation's state-based affiliates, JEWISHcolorado, on Tuesday launched an emergency fund to raise $160,000 in support of the Boulder community. Its goals include enhancing safety and security measures for Jewish institutions and events.
Strengthening alliances and pushing for results
Leaders of Jewish Federation Los Angeles urged government, business and philanthropic groups to 'supercharge an alliance so we can build mutual understanding, dispel conspiracy theories, and provide rapid response when any group is under threat.'
'Jews here in Los Angeles are terrified but determined,' said the federation's president, Rabbi Noah Farkas. 'We do not need more community meetings, we need results and we are counting on our local government and our law enforcement partners to do more.'
The security costs at 63 Jewish day schools have risen on average 84% since the Israel-Hamas war began on Oct, 7, 2023, according to the Teach Coalition, the education advocacy arm of the Orthodox Union, an umbrella group for Orthodox Judaism.
The coalition is advocating for more state and federal security funding for Jewish schools and camps, as well as synagogues.
The attacks in Washington and Boulder only heighten the urgency, said its national director Sydney Altfield.
'Some people see this as an isolated instance, whether it is in Colorado, whether it's in D.C.,' she said. 'But we have to step up and realize that it could happen anywhere. … It is so important that our most vulnerable, our children, are secure to the highest extent.'
In Florida, Rabbi Jason Rosenberg of Congregation Beth Am said members of the Reform synagogue in the Tampa Bay area 'are feeling very nervous right now and having some additional security might make people a little bit more comfortable.'
He said that 'there's a definite sense that these attacks are not isolated events, that these attacks are, in part, the result of a lot of the antisemitic rhetoric that we've been hearing in society for years now.'
However, he said part of his message as a faith leader in such a climate has been to encourage resilience.
'We can't let this define us. … We can't stop doing what we do; we can't stop coming to synagogue; we can't stop having our activities,' he said. 'Our job is to add holiness to our lives and to the world, and we can't let this stop us from focusing on sacred work.'
Security concerns inside and outside
Jacobs, the Reform Judaism leader, said the latest attacks in Washington and Boulder signaled that new security strategies were needed.
'Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim were murdered outside of the event at the D.C. Jewish Museum,' he said.
'And that presented a whole additional sort of challenges for law enforcement and for each of our institutions doing security, which is: you can't just worry about who comes in; you actually have to worry about who's lurking outside, and so, that is part now of our protocols."
The attack in Boulder, he said, took place during a 'peaceful protest' where demonstrators were calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza.
'We have to worry about what happens inside our institutions. … We also have to be thinking and working with law enforcement about what happens outside.'
Jacobs recalled that when a Christian leader recently visited a Reform synagogue, he was 'stunned by the security protocols,' which included procedures that Jacobs likened to passengers passing through airport security.
'I said, 'Well, what do you do in your churches?' and he said, 'Well, we like to be welcoming.' And I said: 'We don't have that luxury. We want to make sure our people feel safe, otherwise people will stop coming.'"
___
Associated Press reporter Tiffany Stanley contributed to this report.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
7 minutes ago
- The Hill
Group opposed to partisan gerrymandering signals openness to Dem countermeasures
A nonpartisan watchdog group, which previously told The Hill it was against blue states doing mid-decade redistricting in response to a battle playing out in Texas, is now signaling some openness to the tactic. The watchdog group said in a statement on Tuesday that it would not 'endorse partisan gerrymandering even when its motive is to offset more extreme gerrymandering by a different party,' but it also added that 'a blanket condemnation in this moment would amount to a call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian efforts to undermine fair representation and people-powered democracy.' The group said it was establishing standards by which it could be assessing states' maps, including proportionality, public participation, racial equity and federal reform, among other aspects. 'We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy,' Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. 'But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation.' 'We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first,' she added. The announcement represents a shift for the group. Dan Vicuna, director of voting and fair representation at Common Cause, told The Hill last month of blue states engaging in redrawing their maps in the middle of the decade: 'This is dead wrong from a democracy perspective.' 'I think it's very problematic for Democrats from a political strategic perspective,' he added at the time. Common Cause noted Tuesday that they were still key supporters of independent redistricting commissions and reminded readers of their history in battling for fairer representation. 'We took Common Cause v. Rucho to the Supreme Court, which refused to curb partisan gerrymandering. We helped craft the Freedom to Vote Act to ban partisan gerrymandering, but Congress did not pass it,' the group said. 'We have championed independent redistricting commissions nationwide, yet neither party has embraced them fully. We are here because the courts, Congress, and political leaders failed to act.' 2024 Election Coverage Yet, Common Cause's signaling openness to allowing states to conduct mid-decade redistricting in response to Texas underscores how the larger redistricting battle has created fissures in democracy-focused and civil rights groups who have long opposed some of the same tactics Democrats are using to blunt Texas' potential gains with their proposed House map. Common Cause California was intimately involved in the creation of California's independent commission, though California Democrats are now trying to work around the commission to pass maps mid-decade. The watchdog's remarks strike a similar tone to Democrats who have argued that not responding to Texas Republicans' efforts to redraw their maps would be unilateral disarmament and that they need to fight fire with fire.


Atlantic
7 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Trump's Dreams for D.C. Could Soon Hit Reality
Washington, D.C., more than any other city in the country, presents President Donald Trump with the opportunity to meddle in the minutiae of municipal governance. Even in the capital, though, his powers are far from limitless. And the chasm between Trump's sweeping plan to 'clean up' D.C. and his actual authority over the city sets up a stark choice for the president: He can either settle for a significantly diminished version of the kind of change he desires or attempt to push the bounds of the law. On Monday, Trump announced that he would federalize the city's police department, deploy the National Guard, and dispatch hundreds of federal officers to patrol the nation's capital, pledging to address its 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam, and squalor.' Trump set a high bar for himself during a press conference in which he promised to, among other things, get rid of D.C.'s 'homeless encampments' and 'slums,' revoke the city's cash-bail system, end its so-called sanctuary-city policies, increase penalties for youth offenders, and even fill potholes with fresh asphalt. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs, and homeless people,' he said yesterday at the White House. 'And we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it.' But Trump is likely to find that even this seizure of broad emergency powers does not give him free rein to remake the city to his liking. The 1973 Home Rule Act, which allows a president to take over Washington's police force during an emergency, also sets a limit on how long this kind of federalization can last. Under that law, Trump has a maximum of 30 days to maintain control over the Metropolitan Police Department—hardly enough time to conduct a major revamping of policing tactics and enforcement priorities. (The 1973 law actually limits the White House's authority to 48 hours, allowing an extension to 30 days only after the president has notified Congress why such an accommodation is necessary.) Extending the federalization, which began yesterday, past a month would require an act of Congress. Democrats, whose votes Trump would likely need to pass such a law, have already blasted his actions as those of a would-be authoritarian. Charles Fain Lehman: Trump is right that D.C. has a serious crime problem Washington's attorney general, Brian Schwalb, has denounced Trump's moves as 'unprecedented, unnecessary and unlawful,' challenging the president's claim that D.C.'s crime levels constitute an emergency. 'There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia,' Schwalb wrote yesterday on X. 'We are considering all of our options and will do what is necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents.' Like many other cities, D.C. experienced a spike in crime during and immediately after the COVID-19 lockdowns but has since seen numbers drop. Homicides are down 12 percent so far this year compared with the same period last year, following a 31 percent decline in 2024, according to MPD. Violent crime is down 26 percent as of Monday, MPD reports, after a 35 percent drop last year. As a result, crime levels in Washington are at a 30-year low. Still, Trump has looked past the broader statistics to zero in on specific acts of violence—including a bloody assault on a federal staffer earlier this month that the president said led him to get more involved in local crime fighting. While the D.C. city council echoed Schwalb's criticism, calling Trump's actions 'a show of force without impact' in a statement, Mayor Muriel Bowser was less combative during a press conference yesterday afternoon. She said Trump's moves were 'unsettling and unprecedented' but 'not surprising,' given Trump's rhetoric in recent weeks. She said she would work with Trump's allies to review the city's crime laws and encourage the police force to collaborate with its federal partners to help end 'the so-called emergency.' Trump would need buy-in from Washington's police officers themselves to enforce the more aggressive form of policing he has requested. (Trump said yesterday that law enforcement should 'knock the hell out of' suspected criminals, lock up more juveniles, and otherwise 'do whatever the hell they want.') He received a nod from MPD's union, which has clashed with the city council over laws that aimed to reduce police misconduct and hold officers accountable for using excessive force. The union said yesterday that it welcomed the federalization and looked forward to working with the White House to tackle local crime. At the same time, the union asserted that any federal takeover should be temporary, and fissures have already emerged over staffing levels. The department said its force of about 3,200 officers, which has shrunk by about 600 over the past five years, is overstretched and needs more employees. Trump, who wants the department to make more arrests, disagrees, saying yesterday that the officers need only to have the right policies in place. 'I was told today, 'Sir, they want more police.' I heard a number—3,500 police,' Trump said. 'They said, 'We have 3,500. We need more.' You don't need more. That's so many. That's like an army.' As the commander in chief of D.C.'s National Guard, Trump faces fewer limitations in deploying the actual Army onto Washington's streets. Unlike state National Guard members, who report to a governor, the D.C. National Guard is under the purview of the White House. Even so, D.C.'s National Guard is relatively small. The Army said in a statement yesterday that it was mobilizing 800 soldiers, though only about 100 to 200 would be assisting local law enforcement at any given time. In practice, that means the troops will likely serve primarily as backup to D.C. police or other law-enforcement officials who might be arresting suspects or conducting direct law-enforcement activities, as California National Guard troops largely did after Trump sent 4,000 of them into Los Angeles earlier this summer. Trump's eagerness to deploy the guard members to a mostly quiet city sparked accusations of hypocrisy from Democrats, who questioned his delays in dispatching the guard during the deadly January 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Other federal agents from branches including the FBI, U.S. Park Police, and the Drug Enforcement Agency have begun emerging on city streets but are supposed to limit their activities to enforcing federal laws. Yesterday, Trump pledged to overhaul several local D.C. policies—cash bail, immigration enforcement, road construction. The Home Rule Act does not give him authority to do any of those things; instead, it offers broad powers to the locally elected D.C. city council and mayor to govern the city of 700,000. Once Trump realizes that he does not have the ability to enact his vision quickly, the president is likely to move on to other matters, Joseph Margulies, an attorney and government professor at Cornell University, predicted. 'It's equivalent to the bloviating about buying Greenland or seizing the Panama Canal or making Canada the 51st state, where he's going to lose interest in an hour and a half,' Margulies told me. 'And then, the National Guard will drift away, and the FBI will be reassigned to where they need to be, and the D.C. police will go back to doing what they do. It's just a pointless symbolic exercise.' Others see darker possibilities. Trump's ultimate goal might be to normalize the idea of federal forces storming into Democratic cities, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, an expert on authoritarianism, told me. 'It is no surprise that with the flimsiest of excuses—a supposed crime surge that is contradicted flatly by the actual statistics—they are moving to militarize the capital,' she said. 'Each laboratory of repression—first L.A., now this—is supposed to habituate people to accept this executive overreach and with the aesthetics of cities being subjugated by troops.' But unlike mass protests over racial justice or pro-immigrant activism in Los Angeles—incidents that tend to grab the national spotlight at least for a time—the issues of homelessness, youth crime, and municipal disorder are long-standing challenges that defy easy fixes. Trump has shown more interest in the flashier parts of managing the city's profile, appointing himself the chair of the Kennedy Center, creating the 'D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force' to tackle crime and urban grime, and overseeing a military parade near the White House. During his press conference yesterday, he took time to tout the recent 'upgrades' he has implemented at the White House itself, including renovated marble floors, an abundance of new gold trim, and plans for a massive ballroom. Citing his 'natural instinct' for 'fixing things up,' Trump suggested that he would do the same for the nation's capital, betraying no awareness that his power is far more limited outside the gates of the White House complex. 'Not only are we stopping the crime; we're going to clean up the trash and the graffiti and the grime and the dirt and the broken marble panels and all of the things they've done to hurt this city,' he said. 'And we're going to restore the city back to the gleaming capital that everybody wants it to be. It's going to be something very special.'


Politico
8 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump administration finds George Washington University failed to address campus antisemitism
'Every student has the right to equal educational opportunities without fear of harassment or abuse,' said Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon in a statement. 'No one is above the law, and universities that promulgate antisemitic discrimination will face legal consequences.' The university did not respond to a request for comment. GWU was one of 10 colleges the federal task force on combating antisemitism said it would visit due to antisemitic incidents on campus since October 2023. In a letter sent Tuesday to President Ellen Granberg, the DOJ said Jewish students and faculty were 'subjected to a hostile educational environment that was objectively offensive, severe, and pervasive.' Agency officials pointed to protests last year — including an encampment in the GWU's University Yard in the center of campus — that they said were disruptive and attempted to 'frighten' and 'intimidate' Jewish students. The notice also included examples of students being harassed while crossing campus or counterprotesting, as well as instances when university officials and police failed to intervene. 'To be clear, Jewish students were afraid to attend class, to be observed, or, worse, to be 'caught' and perhaps physically beaten on GWU's campus,' the letter said, adding that the university received at least eight complaints of antisemitic discrimination because of the protests.